Soviets excavated many holocaust mass graves with photographic evidence which you will always be skeptical of, because who says they were Jews?
Using figures provided to me by a denier, I showed
here that destroying 6 million bodies (which no historian believes happened) would consume .5% of a single years worth of gasoline production. Since the bodies were destroyed over a period of years this would mean the Germans were devoting a relatively miniscule portion of their resources (they also used coal and timber which were much more abundant than oil) to covering up one of the most egregious crimes in human history.
You're out of your element here, stick to moon resettlement fan fic.
Indeed, who says who they are at all ?
Im not sure if you realize this but we've exchanged probably hundreds of messages over the past year. Most of this was debating your self-proclaimed 'strongest evidence against the mainstream story', namely that German steps taken to preserve the lives of Jewish forced laborers was evidence that there was no generalized killing program.
You're boring to talk to because you so often link back to some Codoh thread or article instead of making the case yourself. If you don't have an original thought, you should at least paraphrase so I can know what your exact arguments are.
Nevertheless, if you want to continue with me, you can address the following questions in your own words.
Do you agree with leading revisionists Mattogno/Graf/Kues that millions of Jews were resettled in occupied USSR, the majority of which were unfit for work?
In the past you stated there was some evidence of resettlement, so in this case can you describe (with witness or documentary evidence) what happened to some of the Jews during their resettlement in German occupied USSR?
If there is no direct documentary or witness evidence of resettlement in German occupied USSR, how does this jibe with the very high level of documentary and witness evidence for a much smaller amount of Jews being resettled in Romanian occupied USSR, or the Nazis resettling the 100k Poles of Zamosc?
1/ Yes indeed german preservation of Jewish lives was a central point of the argument and it remains irrefutable. A generalised killing programme is a deeply silly idea.
2/ I present a number of arguments myself and present numerous argument examples from codoh. I try to avoid passing off something someone else said as my own. There is no particular need to present an original thought from me as this subject is very old and has been well worked on. You seem to find disputing revisionist points on codoh troublesome, and avoid questions I have for you. But perhaps we can get into more interesting stuff.
3/
a. Please explain why I should answer these resettlement questions when this has already been covered to your and everyone's satisfaction on this thread?
b. Rapechu showed people being moved to Stutthof just as you asked for. Which you accept already.
c. The general argument goes that Jews were shipped east to ghettos that became increasingly radicalised and therefore were increasingly broken up before soviet forces came through in any case therefore Germany instead kept its Jews for the war effort. This makes sense from a number of different angles. You already implicitly accept this.
d. You refuse to defend the alleged killing methods of pesticide and engine fumes, you accept the large typhus death tolls. You accept the german efforts to save Jews.
e. You have made some argument that Germany could disappear alot of bodies easily but make no reference to revisionists work here dealing with specifics to places such as Auschwitz? Are you aware of that work?
Like most authoritarian governments the Soviets lied to their citizens in public statements and in the state media. They also suppressed information and used coded language when describing crimes they committed in documents. But this is different than "manufacturing false evidence". For what exactly? What examples do you have?
What do you mean, for what? You already know this.
The Jeager report seems a good example.
Bodies burn like bodies. The denier I was talking to in the other thread looked at cremation figures and extrapolated 15 million gallons would be necessary to burn 6 million 100 pound bodies.
what does "where all the resources necessary" mean? yeah you can probably win this argument if you stop speaking comprehensible English. If you mean where all the resources necessary 'came from' , this would be German stockpiles. As I showed in the post they were producing 10 million gallons per day. Destroying 3 million bodies would take less than a days worth. Even if fuel consumption was 5x greater than the denier quoted me, it would be doable for the Nazis and that's also assuming gasoline was the only combustant used.
You give up, your artistic talent is going to waste. I was gonna mock you on how you always disappear very quickly after I start challenging you, but honestly this is a good move. Don't waste your time on this stuff.
Yes, as bodies they are mostly water in composition. The disposal allegations are fraudulent in a number of ways. There is no trace of mass murder in the AR camps or any other. The nazis had no motive, the alleged means are silly. The impression I get given that we've covered this without much pushback from you is that this is all generally accepted by you?
However, I would most interested to hear from you about this killing process but sticking to one camp such as Belzec. Do you have your own explanation of how the alleged killing took place or would you rely on whatever witnesses have said?
) and recently I stumbled across a janny on plebbit.
