The retarded idea of having two threads on the Ukraine war, and how it's the future of the internet.

Thing, I know a guy who was Ukrainian.
I do not like either or. One bad candy left a sour stain in my memory.
 
300,000 mobilized in Russia is meaningless, Russia is running out of missiles but somehow attack with 100 cruise missiles every few weeks, Russians have no drones despite the fact the lancet is an extremely effective and affordable drone, etc
And where you see such comments on Kiwi?

And besides I really do think having opposing points of view presented is a good thing, people religiously following one line of thought because they're willfully blind to contrary evidence is retarded and leads to bad places.
Separation isn't because both sides have different views. Separation is because one of them used to make shit everywhere and deny reality ('BAKHMUT IS ENCIRCLED FROM SIX MONTHS, SANCTIONS AREN'T WORKING, GLOBOHOMONAZIJEWS INVENTED THIS WAR').
I've always maintained that it's not Twitter in general that destroyed political discourse in the West, but the block button in particular, because it creates these echo chambers.
The point is - it is impossible to win a internetz war with a retarded idiot. Only option is to take a retarded idiot from the thread and thrown him into basket.

You cannot dispute about effinency of a drug with a idiot beliving in chinka tradmedicine.

You cannot dispute about space missions with a idiot beliving that Earth is flat.

You cannot dispute about pandemic with someone who isn't able to read statistics and do math.

there's no way Russia, who's army was like 10X the size of Ukraines doesn't just surge the border and kill them all in a week or two.
In the eve of war armies was at best on equal numbers on frontline.
My point, in its entirety was that this war is entirely astroturfed, because even with a declining population of Russia in the last 30 years, they still outnumber and outgun Ukraine, a country who's greatest hit list includes Chernobyl and about 50% of who's population probably considers themselves to be Russian anyway.
And this is also a problem: you didn't do any research and still you are commenting about this war.

Reasons why I'm not present on many threads is that I will not write a single word without making reaserch. I'm not commenting any other divided hread because I don't have enough knowledge to do so.

I highly suggest to do that - don't wrote a single word without research - to everyone.
 
The Ukraine Russia war is an exception of really splitting the user base here, both for justification of each side actions, and because each side has its own military headed propaganda wing, having any real understanding of the situation is impossible, since every source is insanely biased. Honestly I doubt there will be any other topic this divisive.
 
and because each side has its own military headed propaganda wing, having any real understanding of the situation is impossible, since every source is insanely biased.
This still isn't the case. Just go to both threads, read for example about DU ammo plot.

One of threads is thunbering about how DU will give everyone cancer, how r means that one side is going to fall and how it is waste of money (yes, in one thread they will give you multiple contradictionary statements). Guess which one.
 
This only works on places like 4chan or Kiwifarms which at least nominally try and have free speech. But they won't let you segregate into two echo chambers. If I go to any other website and try and start a "here's why Russia was justified in intervening in Ukraine's civil war" then I'll just get banned for "far-right conspiracy theories" and "posting Russian propaganda." If you look at any "token conservative" threads on these websites you'll find they're mostly glorified RINOs and libertarians who might get as hardcore as Sean Hannity every now and then.
 
This still isn't the case. Just go to both threads, read for example about DU ammo plot.

One of threads is thunbering about how DU will give everyone cancer, how r means that one side is going to fall and how it is waste of money (yes, in one thread they will give you multiple contradictionary statements). Guess which one.
Nigga you sound clinically retarded.

People like you are why there are 2 threads, because you seem physically incapable of not sperging for your "side" to everyone.
 
If I go to any other website and try and start a "here's why Russia was justified in intervening in Ukraine's civil war" then I'll just get banned for "far-right conspiracy theories" and "posting Russian propaganda."
And - where is the problem? If I will post why Save the
Loli should be lincolned due to his ass cancer and child abusing behaviour I will be using the freedoh da speach or I will just posting shit?

People like you are why there are 2 threads, because you seem physically incapable of not sperging for your "side" to everyone.
I cannot help that I have free rent rooms in minds of countless subhumans.
 
The one thing slavs hate more than anything in the world is a country bordering theirs that is also populated by slavs. As long as slavs are on this website it will continue to degrade in quality. The only solution is to ban all slavs from this website.
 
The one thing slavs hate more than anything in the world is a country bordering theirs that is also populated by slavs.
Most of Slavs also hate own country. Or country where they immigrate. Or any country.

We need a separate fat acceptance thread so men can discuss hogs without the threat of being banned for offending the delicate sensibilities of jershs harem.
If I every make a site about pregnuddles I swear to God I will demand execution for everyone complaining of it or posting normal nuddles.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Feline Supremacist
This is more like on how each thread is going.

Pro-russian thread: 'guys, as guy#1 says ruzzia is winnung, so they will uss T-55 as a decoy, because they wainnung, and they winnung because guy#1 say this. And T-14 will arrive to frontline, just wait another two weeks bro'. Also shitty memes. Mostly this is shitpost thread with pro-russian bias.

'Pro-ukrainian': more like using facts and sperging about sources than shitposting. It seems to be pro-ukrainian mostly because without making some extreme and mulitlayered shitposting it is ipossible to support an agressor. Or beat that Russia can at the end of a day win war with NATO.

Which side is more childlish - well, check who is trying to weaponize like-reactions
I'm of the impression that the two threads complement each other very well, in that they form one whole internet person. Regardless of which one's correct, the Russia thread is coping, the Ukie thread is seething.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whoopsie Daisy
I don't see what the problem is. It works for me. It means I don't have to see page after page of retarded cope posts by retarded delusional vatniggers. If you want to see that shit you can always go post in the vatnigger delusion thread as I call it. When I had my pre hack first account I used to post in the vatnigger delusion thread because I didn't know about the other one. I was looking for the Russia Ukraine war thread and I found one. All I would do is post the truth and the vatniggers would get all butthurt and start breathing hard and pounding on their keyboards. I would get downvoted and shit. That kind of reddit faggot shit doesn't matter to me. But it was kind of funny and sad at the same time to log on and see nothing but notifications telling me some vatnigger retards voted all my posts as dumb or whatever.

If you want to go fuck with them you can. Just go make a post saying Russia is losing. They will start REEEEEEing and spamming vatnigger cope posts at you. I guess if you want to screw with the pro Ukrainian side you can. I don't know how you could though since everything seems to be working out in Ukraine's favor.
 
I don't see what the problem is. It works for me. It means I don't have to see page after page of retarded cope posts by retarded delusional vatniggers. If you want to see that shit you can always go post in the vatnigger delusion thread as I call it. When I had my pre hack first account I used to post in the vatnigger delusion thread because I didn't know about the other one. I was looking for the Russia Ukraine war thread and I found one. All I would do is post the truth and the vatniggers would get all butthurt and start breathing hard and pounding on their keyboards. I would get downvoted and shit. That kind of reddit faggot shit doesn't matter to me. But it was kind of funny and sad at the same time to log on and see nothing but notifications telling me some vatnigger retards voted all my posts as dumb or whatever.

If you want to go fuck with them you can. Just go make a post saying Russia is losing. They will start REEEEEEing and spamming vatnigger cope posts at you. I guess if you want to screw with the pro Ukrainian side you can. I don't know how you could though since everything seems to be working out in Ukraine's favor.
"I'm not coping, they're the ones who are coping!!!!" he says, coming to yet another thread to announce to everyone just not not upset he is.
 
If you're left leaning, you wanted lockdown, vaxes and mandates. The right wanted freedom, individual choice and no vaccines.
There were plenty of lefties in the COVID thread who opposed all that shit. Me, for instance.
 
The problem was the posting culture of the two sides were wildly different too. One side was very quick to bug the Mods to censor and the other was not.

I suspect I know the answer to this, but I'm curious to hear why you think one side was more censorious than the other.
 
I suspect I know the answer to this, but I'm curious to hear why you think one side was more censorious than the other.
I mean its obvious. Ukraines supporters tended to come from the west and skewed towards the libertarian/anarchist side of the political equation. Russia posters (and their supporters) tend to swing hard to the Nationalist or Authoritarian side of the political equation. It was a common through line of the discussion, Ukraine posters tended to catch bans quite a bit. When I pointed this out I was told if I had issues with others posters I should report them too. So I just mass reported three pages of Vatnik sperging and got two of them banned.

The original threads were a silly place. Keeping the two sides at arms lengths has helped things alot.
 
I mean to a large extent this sort of split has already happened. Most places online are hugboxes for one "side" or another. Even different spaces in the same site, like on Facebook where Trump boomers will mostly interact with other Trump boomers and such. Kiwifarms being sort of a holdover from the "old Internet" is just catching up to Current Year in this sense.

It makes perfect sense to me because when you look at spaces where opposing sides actually do interact with each other, it's always a substance free shit show. Twitter is the best example of this. What happens on Twitter? High minded reasoned debate and argument? No, all that happens is "dunking." It's a perpetual attempt to insult the other side for likes and clicks and clout. And you can sort of see something similar with a thread being split on Kiwifarms because of too much retarded sperging. No one is getting any closer to truth in these spaces, it's just a big pissing contest.

My view is this is due to human psychology on persuasion/persuadibility. People are generally open to persuasion when faced with information or viewpoints that are completely novel to them, something they've never heard of before, or never really thought about very much. That is when they come into an issue without any pre-existing bias or emotional attachments. I think this is one reason why there was that big wave of atheist content and a whole "atheism movement" and shit about 15 years ago.

A large amount of people raised in Christian families/communities had never encountered an atheist perspective before and barely even knew such a thing existed. The leaders and authority figures in their communities hadn't either, so if they tried to argue against atheism, they genuinely didn't know what to do and made fools of themselves. It was totally novel to them so they didn't know how to handle it. Older people who are already set in their ways would not change their view but many young people who did not yet have set worldviews and identities were thus swayed into atheism.

However that "atheist movement" died down and you basically never hear about or see that kind of content anymore, whenever Christianity vs atheism comes up today it's always in the context of broader culture wars between woke vs conservative and the like. This is because the issue reaches a saturation point where everyone has been exposed to it and made up their mind. The novelty wears off, and once people make up their mind about a political topic, they are not open to persuasion any longer, they become dug in and fixed in that spot. They might change their mind but it won't be because someone owned them in a debate with facts and logic. Attempts to persuade people quickly become pointless under this condition and probably just harden them further by creating us vs them adversarial mindset.

I think this dynamic carries over to politics on the Internet as a whole. As time goes on the positions get crystallized and debate becomes increasingly pointless as every possible argument has already been done a million times over. With that said I have been able to have some exchanges and discussions that didn't feel totally shallow and pointless, but it is always in the context of a very small space that only a tiny handful of people have access to or are paying attention to, typically 10 or less. Like a private chat room or a thread on a site somewhere that basically no one is reading except me and a couple other spergs.

The bigger a space becomes and the more eyes are on it, the less possibility there is for any real truth-seeking as social clout chasing and retard sperging takes over and drowns out anything else. This is pretty predictable as most people suck at/have no interest in truth seeking and are only able to participate in politics via a tribal identity lens, so any place that lets in any significant number of people to participate will necessarily become a tribal shouting match.
 
Back