The retarded idea of having two threads on the Ukraine war, and how it's the future of the internet.

Imagine being so asshurt by there being multiple threads about The Great Satan's new Foreverwar that the solution you propose is to make yet another one.
Great going, OP.

In any case, fuck the slavshits. I literally do not care what they do, as they are basically the subsaharan Africans of Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cold Root Beer
So I just mass reported three pages of Vatnik sperging and got two of them banned.

As I was reading your post I was surprised since it was the exact opposite of what I would have expected, and then you dropped this nugget and now I realize why your post sounds off.

Anyway, back to the topic of the thread. This balkanization of the Internet isn't the future, it's how it's been for awhile and it will only increase since most people would rather rub two brain cells together and just have their programmed thoughts be confirmed correct so they can get back on Steam & Pornhub.

Critical thinking isn't fun for most people, so this isn't going to change.
 
Last edited:
the Ukie thread is seething.
Where?
No one is getting any closer to truth in these spaces, it's just a big pissing contest.
The truth - trademarked, cerfitied, only and divine truth.

Man, we have on Kiwi Farms only few people reading stuff, not having direct knowledge what is exatcly happening. Neither in banking, healthcare or warfare - best we can due to have a MD, former sergent in some army, small individual investor or so. Event if we can download full info about what is going in certain current thing (lets say full info of ongoing bank transactions) we probably not have anyone onboard who will be able to make fast and correct interpetation of what shit was just dropped.

In controversial threads we didn't have dilema between 'having a debate which will lead to one and true truth' vs 'echochambers' but we have to choose 'having a untrolled shitstorm' vs 'having isolated groups who exchenge second-hand info of various quality'. Yes, it is funny to poke from time to time kumbaya or other tranny, but I preffer to have option to exchenge rumours and info with other rather that have designated shitting thread (unless we have both: I can go to dump shit of vatniggers in massdebates and read what someone have spotted on media).

All that bullshit how socialmediatization will bring to internetz any real value - civic journalism, fast circulation of informations or so - is just pure cope.
Critical thinking isn't fun for most people, so this isn't going to change.
Find yourself on this picture:

868.png
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Feline Supremacist
To be fair, arguing politics on the internet is fundamentally retarded.

I remember in the 2000s people arguing in threads for hundreds and hundreds of posts over shit like Dubya, the Iraq war, 9/11 being an inside job etc, nobody ever really got anywhere or changed any minds, flash forward to today and now it's just Trump, Ukraine etc.

And when the great a'Wokening started going down around a decade ago no matter how carefully you tried to argue, no one would listen, people went full retard anyway if they wanted to and nothing would stop them, in the end none of it mattered, you took one fucking look at someone like Zoe Quinn and in an instant your gut decreed how you felt about it.

There's no logic to it, it's all emotion and personal bias based on your personal experiences in life, no matter how much we might try to cloak it in logic, it boils down to what do you personally find more unpleasant, a fat broad with blue hair or a fat neckbeard? Booya, American politics in a nutshell.

The internet never makes anyone happier than when it's just used for fun, politics online is always going to just boil down to echo chambers, you can bemoan the loss of when people from across the aisles would engage, but in the end it was pointless and didn't change anything anyway, an impasse was eventually reached and everyone just divorced from one another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
To be honest I don't think people ever did, but before the internet they just had to. The pool of people you could make friends with and get to know was restricted to your geographical area. Your friends had to be chosen from your work/schoolmates, your neighbours, even if you went to a hobby group based around a common interest, the guy next to you at the sports event, concert or D&D club could be from any background and have any political views, so if you wanted friends you had to grow up and learn to understand them. Now you can sort your friends so that they're all exactly like you in every way and delete anyone from your life who you might have to make an effort to get along with.

We're a tribal species. We are genetically programmed to sort people into "us" and "them", and to hate "them" and excuse even the worst behaviour from "us". We're now seeing the consequences of making that so much easier.
But at the same time, you weren't exposed to the crystallized version of each end point of an argument. You weren't one search away from a rationalization that helps you stay in your beliefs comfort zone.

And of course you had radio/tv manufactoring your opinion, which meant it deviated a lot less than the free for all internet
Find yourself on this picture

I'm the one in the middle.

Polish_20230326_012357326.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back