Ukrainian Defensive War against the Russian Invasion - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

I think the Japs are the only ones who have put new destroyers in the water.
You also have Britain, Australia, South Korea, India, China and arguably France/Spain/Italy (they all have ships they class as Frigates but which are more inline with Destroyers). In fact out of the handful of navies that actually operate DDGs, literally the only ones who haven't put out a new one since the end of the USSR are Russia and Taiwan, who operate ex USN ones.
 
You also have Britain, Australia, South Korea, India, China and arguably France/Spain/Italy (they all have ships they class as Frigates but which are more inline with Destroyers). In fact out of the handful of navies that actually operate DDGs, literally the only ones who haven't put out a new one since the end of the USSR are Russia and Taiwan, who operate ex USN ones.
Actually, in a gigantic Fuck You to the American MIC, the US Navy gave the Italians the contract for their next generation Frigates.


It was gigantic "shot across the bow" as it were. The Admirals were tired of the White Elephants being churned out by the US Corporations. Giving the Frigate contract to the Wops of all people was seppuku level dishonor for them. We'll probably get a next generation destroyer and cruiser design at some point here in the coming decade. Most likely from a properly chastised US company.
 
Destroyers have been built since the Cold War. And the reason nobody builds anything bigger is because we don't have to. The stuff available now is good enough to wreck any near-peer opponent. Russia quite simply can't build anything that big.
Ehhh... not exactly. The size of an Arleigh Burke or a British type 45 are the size of WW2 Light Cruisers. The next British Destroyer the Type 83 was originally presented to their lawmakers as a Cruiser. They balked at it so the Royal Navy scratched out Cruiser and Pencilled in Destroyer and resubmitted it. It passed no problem.

Every Navy is labeling everything as Destroyers because legislatures are conditioned to think Destroyers are cheaper good value for money ships. The Japanese  navy Naval Self Defense Force calls the Izumo class Destroyers. And they're fucking carriers.

actual Destroyers they now call Frigates.
 
You also have Britain, Australia, South Korea, India, China and arguably France/Spain/Italy (they all have ships they class as Frigates but which are more inline with Destroyers). In fact out of the handful of navies that actually operate DDGs, literally the only ones who haven't put out a new one since the end of the USSR are Russia and Taiwan, who operate ex USN ones.

Ok, the UK came out with the Type 45 - so I don't think Aussies & SKs get to count since X I believe they just bought Type 45s. China is also just making a licensed copy from Russian designs so I don't know if they get to count, and I believe that's the same for India.

And the Frogs also made like 3 ships, and the Germans too. Though the euros love calling their ships frigates.

So ok, a fair number of countries get to dab on Russia.

Though I do enjoy the destroyer rankings: 2, 4, 6... and then goddamn 70.

Ehhh... not exactly. The size of an Arleigh Burke or a British type 45 are the size of WW2 Light Cruisers. The next British Destroyer the Type 83 was originally presented to their lawmakers as a Cruiser. They balked at it so the Royal Navy scratched out Cruiser and Pencilled in Destroyer and resubmitted it. It passed no problem.

Every Navy is labeling everything as Destroyers because legislatures are conditioned to think Destroyers are cheaper good value for money ships. The Japanese  navy Naval Self Defense Force calls the Izumo class Destroyers. And they're fucking carriers.

actual Destroyers they now call Frigates.

The "Class creep" is real. There is no longer any accepted designation for corvette/frigate/destroyer/cruiser.

Part of this is the designations crept out of colliquial terms and only in the Washington Treaty were ship designations grouped and limited by weight.

A "Cruiser" was originally meant an steam-powered ship of extended range i.e. it could 'cruise' instead of being a coastal defense boat. This turned into "armored cruiser" - which had orginally just a belt of armor at the water line - which developed into what we call the pre-dreadnoughts.

The accepted roles are that Destroyers are multi-role anti-submarine vessels with the ability to engage in ship-to-ship combat. Cruisers are primarily ship-to-ship combatants. Frigates are small destroyers and no one has really decided what separated a Destroyer from a Frigate anymore other than size; the previous separation was that frigates didn't have torpedo launchers.

Destroyer is shorted "torpedo boat destroyer", originally meant to be small fast boats you'd used to counter massed torpedo boat attacks, the Destroyer in one of the great ironies were quickly armed with torpedoes.
 
Ehhh... not exactly. The size of an Arleigh Burke or a British type 45 are the size of WW2 Light Cruisers. The next British Destroyer the Type 83 was originally presented to their lawmakers as a Cruiser. They balked at it so the Royal Navy scratched out Cruiser and Pencilled in Destroyer and resubmitted it. It passed no problem.
I had to look this up. They're phasing out the Type 45s after less than 30 years in service? The Sheffield class managed over 40 years. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised; they were a clusterfuck from the very beginning. Imagine having an air defence destroyer that had to spend its first two operational years in service without its primary armament.

Fucking ugly ship, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghostse
So, regarding russia now sharing a very very very large border with NATO right next to all its most crucial shit, lets see how it is covered by russian state media....
View attachment 4936792

Cant see it? Even with the red line round it? Allow me to zoom in at the literal bottom of the page....
View attachment 4936800

Seems that the narrative is still being thrown together behind the scenes, or they are straight up going to ignore this

Also before you ask....no. No mention of bakhmut again.
Because it basically shoots their own "Oh we had to invade Ukraine to stop NATO expansion onto our borders!" propaganda argument in the foot.
So now, NATO has even more borders with Russia (and close to those western populous parts, too), exponentially more civilians have died in muh dawnbazz in the last 12 months than have in all of the previous 8 years combined, Ukraine has not been "demilitarized" in the least bit.

All according to plan, of course...
Destroyers have been built since the Cold War. And the reason nobody builds anything bigger is because we don't have to. The stuff available now is good enough to wreck any near-peer opponent. Russia quite simply can't build anything that big.
The only thing that gets an advantage from being bigger is aircraft carriers, everything else is slowly trending smaller.
 
I had to look this up. They're phasing out the Type 45s after less than 30 years in service? The Sheffield class managed over 40 years. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised; they were a clusterfuck from the very beginning. Imagine having an air defence destroyer that had to spend its first two operational years in service without its primary armament.

Fucking ugly ship, too.
When the Type 45's were first commissioned, there was a store on each ship, that could only be accessed by Babcock contractors.

The story goes that some ex RN officer at Babcock had a difficult time with some still serving officer, so just to spite him and the Navy, got the MOD to agree to something that no Captain in the history of the Royal Navy would ever have agreed to. Of course all the RN captain jockying for position didn't want to rock the boat so accepted it quitely.

All that was in the store was a laptop that allowed access to some systems on ship, however a Babcock employee would have to be flown out and would make a big deal of unlocking the store room etc etc.

Eventually they got rid of it, because it was just too humiliatingly for the RN to stand for. However it kind of demonstrates the complete breakdown between the Navy and contractors such as BAE and Babcock. The Type 45 has massive issues, and BAE blame the Navy for all of them, they're all down to faults inherent in the design and the design is to RN specs.

The Sheffields were really only platforms for the Sea Dart, and the ship was designed by a non lunatic that allowed for easy access to conduct maintenance.
As CIWS becomes better, that may start to change but given the lack of ship-on-ship combat naval countermeasure progress has lagged.
I think CIWS has already hit an evolutionary dead end. The future of Anti Ship missiles are going to be a hi-lo mixture of supersonic active seeking missile, cheap stealthy IR homing, and ballistic missiles. Gun bases systems are obsolete, and are really just there for moral purposes, Missiles are never going to be responsive enough.

I don't think the crew of the Moskova were incompetant and I don't think the ship was even in that bad a state (the report Lazerpig gushed over in his video originated within the ship itself and just shows they were actually capable of doing inspections), it's just trying to be on the lookout for small ASM's 24/7 isn't practicable.
 
You know its fucking bad when Turkey approves a spur of the moment NATO applicant after the nightmare they went through to get in, You know those folks on the other side know they are next being so close to Russia and China, but the Z people will tell you its NATO that is the aggressor in the region.
 
Actually, in a gigantic Fuck You to the American MIC, the US Navy gave the Italians the contract for their next generation Frigates.


It was gigantic "shot across the bow" as it were. The Admirals were tired of the White Elephants being churned out by the US Corporations. Giving the Frigate contract to the Wops of all people was seppuku level dishonor for them. We'll probably get a next generation destroyer and cruiser design at some point here in the coming decade. Most likely from a properly chastised US company.
Well even if our new frigates are made out of pasta they will at least be in properly salted water.

Also this gave me chuckle.

 
There has been some controversy in Kharkiv because the leader of a LGBT group went on live stream and seethed in anger that a street in Kharkiv will be named after Hero of Ukraine Georgiy Tarasenko. Tarasenko was a Nationalist leader of a youth group that would fight LGBT people in the street. This backfired against the LGBT leader because people voted 96% to name the street after Tarasenko.

Even the former commander of Azov Maxim Zhorin responded to this on his telegram.
The head of the so-called Kharkiv Pride and LGBT activist Anna Sharygina opposed the renaming of Plekhanivska Street in honor of the fallen commander of the Frykor unit, Georgiy Tarasenko, who was posthumously named Hero of Ukraine. In her opinion (which no one asked, by the way), Zhora's contribution to the country's defense is not as important as his stance against LGBT movements.

All this lgbt schizophrenia is starting to get a little fucked up. They are trying to get in with their agenda - laws on same-sex marriage, disrespect for the memory of the soldiers - while all sane people in the country are engaged in the war. All this is unacceptable and will have a corresponding reaction.

All these LGBT groups and people needed to do was shut up and help the war effort. However, they are incapable of not being the center of attention and are now going to have bigger worries then the Russians coming after them.
 
Well even if our new frigates are made out of pasta they will at least be in properly salted water.

Also this gave me chuckle.
TBQH, I am absolutely thrilled our most modern warships are going to be built by a company that usually builds cruise ships. Cruise ships are incredibly zero sum. Its a high cost purchase that has to go fucking right every time to make a profit. If the ship fucks up even ONCE you are fucking done. Game over, bankrupt, goodbye. I am 99.9% certain Fincantieri will deliver frigates as tight as walnuts wearing corsets, and so seaworthy a Marine Private will never get seasick on them. Not the least because national pride is literally riding on the Constellation Class. If they pay off, Italian maritime shipbuilding will become HUGE. Frigates are THE naval platform for even a low tier national navy.
 
There are two Orthodox Churches in Ukraine. Both named Ukrainian Orthodox Church to make it confusing for normies. The largest in run by the Ukrainians and the small one is run by the Russians. In a new poll only about 4% of Orthodox Ukrainians follow the Russian Church.(Most switched churches when the war started. Even priests switched sides.)

However, because the Ukrainian government was full of Russophiles nothing was done about the Russian Church and they were allowed to lease out church buildings from the State. The Kyiv Pechersk Lavra is the most significant because it was built in the 11th century and is the foundation of the Orthodox faith going all the way back to the Rus. It has allowed the Russian Church to LARP as the TRUE and HONEST Orthodox faith.

Now the Ukrainian government has not renewed the Russian lease to the buildings and has asked them to return all the Orthodox artifacts and leave. The Russian priests are now seething and acting like squatters saying they will not leave.

Also the Ukrainian SBU have done raids of Russian Churches and have found Pro-Russian propaganda and child pornography. They even found a Russian priest sleeping with a choir boy when they raided a Church at night.
In order for a church to be truly independent it has to have the okay from every other independent Orthodox Church America has been trying to get the last two people to agree to it for about 45 years now.
The only two countries Constantinople and Greece which are the same two countries who refuse to give America an independent Orthodox Church
If you don't have that you are not in communion with the rest of the Orthodox world
Suffice it to say gaining your independence from your mother church is extremely complicated and can sometimes take hundreds of years
.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk about how the Orthodox church is organized

I do not appreciate the head of the Russian Church or the the Ukrainian government using my religion to play s***** geopolitical games.
 
The only two countries Constantinople and Greece which are the same two countries who refuse to give America an independent Orthodox Church
That explains why there is a Bulgarian, Ukrainian, Greek, Serbian and Russian orthodox church within 30 minutes of where I live. Fun story. Each one fly's their respective countries flags. So yeah. Outside observer looking in, it seems to me the Orthodox Church is not really separable from the countries they represent. Which probably hurts their evangelical obligation to bring the unbeliever into the church. If American converts to the Russian Orthodox Church are any indication, the USA may need to deal with them too at some point.

So its really not surprising Ukraine is cracking down on the Russian Orthodox Church. Since there is no difference between the Moscow Patriarchate and the Russian Federation.
 
If A Z person comes into our thread please do not report them. Their thread is basically a one way street where as this thread has some meaningful debates going on.

They were really upset about Finland becoming a NATO state.
23v12313v21.PNG
231v23132113v2.PNG

Our thread is better than that.
 
Last edited:
Imagine being a Ukrainian soldier and finding out Americans and Western Europeans think about buying and wearing Ukraine-stamped underwear that somehow stick it to Putin. Does this mean a Chinese invasion of Taiwan will have loads of merchandise? Is Amazon plotting to profit off of future wars with crappy merchandise as we speak?
Imagine them plastering the Taiwanese flag all over random cheap plastic made in China- oh, that might be tricky actually.
If A Z person comes into our thread please do not report them. Their thread is basically a one way street where as this thread has some meaningful debates going on.
That depends whether we're getting meaningful debate, or "COPE KHOKHOL NATO TRANNY SHILL 30 AFU DIVISIONS ENCIRCLED IN ARTEMIVSK" etc etc
 
That depends whether we're getting meaningful debate, or "COPE KHOKHOL NATO TRANNY SHILL 30 AFU DIVISIONS ENCIRCLED IN ARTEMIVSK" etc etc
That is the best kind of Z guy they are brainwashed insane person we can laugh at. Some can make compelling arguments but those are generally dependent on how honest the Russians are being. When I think absolute truth tellers of the world I think Russia and China ect...
 
Back