Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

Putin is the ultimate cuck when you think about it. What's stopping Russia from raining down 100s of missiles onto Kiev and taking out the Rada, SBU center or Zelensky himself? Literally nothing. We bombed Serbia to hell. We hanged Saddam after bombing Baghdad into the stone age while having Libyan rebels kill off Gaddafi for us. Russia must be the first military superpower to to waste cruise missiles on electric generators. Hollywood told me KGB colonels are these uber evil masterminds but the one in the Kremlin can't make up his mind if he's in a war or not.
"we"
cool story bro

In other news:
oy vey shoes.jpg
Oy vey jews and shoes

On the initiative of the Office of the President of Ukraine, on March 31 – the day of the liberation of Bucha – the "Ukraine. Crucifixion. Tribunal" international exhibition opened in New York, 100 meters from the United Nations. The exhibition is dedicated to the crimes of the Russian Federation in Ukraine and is presented on the eve of the UN's consideration of the creation of an International Tribunal that will punish Russia for crimes of aggression.​

>film yourself killing POWS, gouging their eyes out, and assorted other tortures, put it online to gloat
>"Russians are the real war criminals!"

something something cries as he hits you
 
Last edited:
If Putin is a cuck, then what does that make the US? Pic related:
View attachment 4962296
Reminder that Biden reaction to seeing 6 people (3 children) murdered by a trannie was giving the trannies a national tranny celebration day and no riots or even protest are going to come out of this.
US doesn't get the right to call anyone a cuck anymore, specially not Russia
 
Putin is the ultimate cuck when you think about it. What's stopping Russia from raining down 100s of missiles onto Kiev and taking out the Rada, SBU center or Zelensky himself? Literally nothing.
There's a point to keep the incompetents in charge of your enemies' leadership. Do not interrupt your enemies when they're making mistakes.
 
Typically the handlers escape unscathed or are just fucking murdered. The problem with this is the asset got captured, but the handler is probably just burning shit and is gone.

Contrary to popular belief, its really hard to make a bomb without training. Most people just blow themselves the fuck up. The assets are the most disposable. We abandoned a FUCKTON to the Taliban when we just fucking left. We also abandoned a lot of people the US Forces worked with and left them to the dogs for no fucking reason other than Biden not doing a staggered withdrawal because the commanders have their heads up their ass.

Blumpf was TOTALLY OWNED when those translators got captured and executed! Girl power! Trans rights! Refugees welcome!
 
Putin is the ultimate cuck when you think about it. What's stopping Russia from raining down 100s of missiles onto Kiev and taking out the Rada, SBU center or Zelensky himself? Literally nothing. We bombed Serbia to hell. We hanged Saddam after bombing Baghdad into the stone age while having Libyan rebels kill off Gaddafi for us. Russia must be the first military superpower to to waste cruise missiles on electric generators. Hollywood told me KGB colonels are these uber evil masterminds but the one in the Kremlin can't make up his mind if he's in a war or not.
Are you on crack cocaine?

Russia wants to rule this territory and add it to its borders. You don't bomb out a territory you want to add to your country. The reason Russia got BTFO'd was because they expected Crimea. They didn't expect Boris Johnson to go to Zelenskiy "G'DAY MATE YOU SHOULD JUST GO TO THE LAST HOLOL" because he was willing to sit down with the Russians and the Brits fucked it all up and turned it into a proxy war.

Russia basically expected a light operation and then walked right into a fucking buzzsaw. Which is what surprised everyone. But obviously Russia was not operating on a war footing. Also Russia does NOT want the entirety of Ukraine, especially not Western Ukraine where they hate Russians. They also don't want to start WWIII. They also don't want to rebuild every city they destroy.

Iraq and Libya were extremely massive foreign policy failures. Iraq is in a state of constant civil war to which we got nothing except trillions of dollars on, Libya caused the migrant crisis and is the last hold-out of ISIS. It also allowed for slavery in the region as well.
 
Also Russia does NOT want the entirety of Ukraine, especially not Western Ukraine where they hate Russians. They also don't want to start WWIII. They also don't want to rebuild every city they destroy.
Where did you get this understanding from? I figured that in this war, getting information on Russia's intentions is going to be hard because of the media bias against Russia to the point that using internet searches is futile.
 
Where did you get this understanding from? I figured that in this war, getting information on Russia's intentions is going to be hard because of the media bias against Russia to the point that using internet searches is futile.
You mean aside from the fact that they had repeatedly signaled that they would be willing to negotiate a truce providing they kept the territories they have claimed from the start?

I can't help but notice that the other thread is fixating more on debating the ideologies and moralitys of everyone involved using opinion and cojecture as evidence, while those thread is focused more on dissecting the details of battle tactics and equipment used as based as much undeniable hard facts as possible. Just recently this thread was discussing how much speed fighter jets lose when turning and exactly how much they can turn while losing the same amount of speed.

Considering which thread is supporting which side, I can take a guess as to which way the winds are likely to blow.
 
Yeah, according to Hollywood, waging total war totally doesn't mean destroying your enemy's infrastructure and ability to maintain lines of communication, production, and basic ability to support the troops in the field. Total war means giant blue lasers that the good guys have to stop before a digital clock counts down to zero. I AR SMART MILITARY GENIUS, I WATCH MARVEL MOVIES!
Just to reinforce that: Hollywood's version of nuclear war is The Day After where everyone shakes the dust out of their hair and promises to rebuild 'Murica

The British version is  Threads where everyone who didn't die wishes they had.

Anyone who thinks you can win a total war against a nuclear power should be made to watch Threads on repeat until they stop being retarded.
 
Where did you get this understanding from? I figured that in this war, getting information on Russia's intentions is going to be hard because of the media bias against Russia to the point that using internet searches is futile.
Because Russia went in specifically to get a land bridge to Crimea and for the Russian speaking region that's been shelled and basically on the verge of a civil war? I mean, that's their basic objectives. Its why it was called a special military operation and why they blitzed in.

Its not rocket science, if they wanted all of Ukraine they wouldn't have been pushed back and Zelinsky wouldn't negotiate.
 
Just to reinforce that: Hollywood's version of nuclear war is The Day After where everyone shakes the dust out of their hair and promises to rebuild 'Murica
I think you very clearly haven't seen The Day After.

Yeah, everyone who survives the utterly fucking horrific nuclear attack sequence dusts themselves off and proceeds to try to put things back together again in good ol' American fashion...only to die very slow, painful, agonizing deaths as their bodies completely break down and they succumb to radiation poisoning.
 
Because Russia went in specifically to get a land bridge to Crimea and for the Russian speaking region that's been shelled and basically on the verge of a civil war? I mean, that's their basic objectives. Its why it was called a special military operation and why they blitzed in.

Its not rocket science, if they wanted all of Ukraine they wouldn't have been pushed back and Zelinsky wouldn't negotiate.
People also seem to forget the preceding 8 years and Russia constantly pushing Ukraine to abide by the Minsc agreement and grant the Donbass administrative autonomy (not even independence). This was never an invasion to conquer all of Ukraine and anyone who thinks it was needs to have their head examined.
 
Where did you get this understanding from? I figured that in this war, getting information on Russia's intentions is going to be hard because of the media bias against Russia to the point that using internet searches is futile.
Western Ukraine is full of Jews and Polish and was austrian for the longest time. It would also weaken Russias position. a giant border that cant be defended and cant be used to start offensives.

Because Russia went in specifically to get a land bridge to Crimea and for the Russian speaking region that's been shelled and basically on the verge of a civil war? I mean, that's their basic objectives. Its why it was called a special military operation and why they blitzed in.
What they want to do with southern ukraine is a bit unclear. there are plenty of russians there, the ports are importent and the land itself is pretty good for farming and has possible oil below.
 
You certainly haven't seen Threads.
Yes, but if you'd seen The Day After you'd know the summary you just gave was complete and utter...whats the word you people like to use? Bollocks.

I mean, let's take a look at how you described it again:
Just to reinforce that: Hollywood's version of nuclear war is The Day After where everyone shakes the dust out of their hair and promises to rebuild 'Murica
noneofthisiscorrect.JPG

(Edit: the fact you've been updooted by scrawny handjob should be a clue that you're being retarded)
Edit: the fact that you still seem to think that The Day After is some kind of uplifting can-do American movie about surviving and rebuilding after World War III shows that you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
 
Last edited:
Yes, but if you'd seen The Day After you'd know the summary you just gave was complete and utter...whats the word you people like to use? Bollocks.

I mean, let's take a look at how you described it again:

View attachment 4963430


Edit: the fact that you still seem to think that The Day After is some kind of uplifting can-do American movie about surviving and rebuilding after World War III shows that you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
And that's s why you shouldn't power-level about being a literal retard who is constantly in therapy because all I'm going to do is laugh at you.

Go eat your crayons.
 
Threads is an old movie which explains why I've never heard of it, but it's free on Tubi...

Come to think about it, there really isn't a lot of media that delves into what the world would look like immediately after a nuclear war. A lot of the ones that do exist have stepped further on in the timeline where people somehow evolve telepathy or become ogres and such. Would explain why brinkmanship isn't as terrifying to some people anymore
 
And that's s why you shouldn't power-level about being a literal retard who is constantly in therapy because all I'm going to do is laugh at you.

Go eat your crayons.
LMFAO rekt harder than a the Ukranian economy.

Why are we back to 'RUSSIA WANTED TO TAKE THE WHOLE OF UKRAINE!'? From the very start of the conflict they made their objectives pretty clear and it's only Ukr/and the MSM that went dribbling on about the rest
 
I've seen Threads. It's quite disturbing and gave me nightmares. For a while, I was fascinated with media that delved into a nuclear apocalypse.

Since we're on the topic, When The Blows? I feel as if it too covers the futility that is nuclear war. I recommend it and it's comic BTW.

Regarding Ukraine, just to keep the thread on track, the news here are simping hard for Sanna Marin because she "defied Putin"

I guess Ukraine is getting butt fucked by a razor if she's considered exciting news

Jesus...
 
Back