Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[Gondolindrim]

Neither side is 100% right about this (men do appear to have had worse outcomes when receiving blood from a female donor, but perhaps only because of a protein left behind after pregnancy), and both sides will claim moral victory.

But the way the first tweeter denies scientific findings that could potentially save lives, merely because they have the potential to strengthen the other side's arguments, is pants-shittingly retarded. If anyone deserves to be injected with the pregnancy blood, it's him.

View attachment 4917112
Link, Archive

Did that cunt seriously just pull the "Well it's never happened where I work so it's not a thing" defense?

 

[Prince Vegeta]

Second this, just make sure to start at the beginning if reading an arc otherwise it might not make complete sense.

To be fair, my friend started at Men at Arms and Hogswatch and was fine. I think Pratchett's talents also lie in making each book standalone fun, but making it extra enjoyable (and feel like a larger whole) to read and reread with the arc in mind.

 

[monstrous bubo]

Let’s throw our support behind JK’s efforts




link
archive

 

[Gorillion others]

Let’s throw our support behind JK’s efforts


View attachment 4932984

link
archive

Wait...I thought Stalin was the good guy to these morons.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Anyone else listened to ep 7 of the witch trials podcast? It opens up by veering wildly between unquestioning acceptance of a bunch of myths about witch trials and nuanced analysis of the others. The core of the argument is that education, literacy, and a strong sense of justice are no protection against turning into a colossal cunt. Deliberately contrasting the pillorying of Rowling by christians to her later mistreatment by the eternal troon.

Wait...I thought Stalin was the good guy to these morons.

No, a lot of them reframe stalin as a nationalist and a fascist when it's convenient. Unquestioning support of stalin and his violent methods is how you can tell someone is a tankie (or a more general shill for Russian expansionism).

 

[AirdropShitposts]

View attachment 4910269
Link

I like how they used "the nerve" wrong.

View attachment 4915929

These two replies are amusing, aside from accusing Rowling (Labour supporter who condemned Corbyn's association with people who used anti-Semitic rhetoric) of being a conservative and anti-Semite, because it would relatively trivial to find people on "the right side of history" who do these things all the time, perhaps even daily.

 

[Jacknife]

When it comes to people's opinions on trans people and calling people by their preferred pronouns or not, I don't think that really matters. But when it comes to bodily autonomy, that's where things are more important. I have seen some 'gender critical' feminists openly state they want to ban access to hormones and cosmetic surgery for people. Not just for children, but for adults. I don't think Rowling wants to, but quite a lot of her supporters do. At that point, I really don't think it's your right to dictate what an adult does with themselves. It comes off as concern trolling. You probably wouldn't want to ban people mountain climbing or paragliding, despite how dangerous it is and how many people get killed doing it. It's on an adult to take a risk if they want to.

You do realize that hormones aka steroids have been banned the whole time right?
This is really not about "dictating what an adult does with themselves" but about not giving genderspecials privileges.

 

[Newman's Lovechild]

The "healthcare" in question
View attachment 4895590

I've seen this before, somewhere...

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Another thing I found in the books:
In book 6 a secondary villain does something in secret and he poses his two lackeys to guard the room in which he's doing his thing. To make them blend in better and to avoid attracting attention to that spot he tells them drink a shape-shifting potion that turns them into girls.
When heroes discover this they laugh at the lackeys and reminisce how miserable they were that year.

 

[Dambusters' Dog II]

I honestly think this is pretty cultural. Britain actually used to be slightly more homophobic than even the U.S. They had ''Section 28''.

Archie Bunker said "England is a fag country". He was counter-arguing against the legalisation of homosexuality, which at the time was legal in England, but only in two US states (Ilinois and Connecticut, so therefore not in New York, where All in the Family was set). Buggery had been legalised in 1967 as a result of the 1954 Wolfenden report, a government report that was set up because people like Sir John Gielgud and Lord Montagu of Beaulieu had got caught doing gay stuff, which embarrassed the upper class. As you can see, 1967 is two years before 1969, so this change in the law had nothing whatsoever to do with a fracas in a Greenwich Village gay bar.

The motivation for Section 28 was a topic that has recently come back into prominence, homosexual propaganda books aimed at children. The version that actually passed was also used to push back against far-left local councils in general, but the issue that got it going was the books. I had previously just gone along with Ian McKellen and assumed Section 28 was just promoting homophobia, but after investigating some of these books and seeing what people have produced since, I think we were too hasty in removing Section 28 completely.

 

[Dr. Butt]

I wanted to present this with no further comments, but between the authoritative stance, the bizarre close-ups, the emotional blackmail, and general stench of narcissism, this guy might as well call himself TransHitler;

( Archive )

I've posted about him before, search for 'Adam Soucie' or 'TransCinderella' in the site's searchbar.

Very late, but this man's gotten fucking FAT! Good lord he looks like a a completely different person than in his older, bleach-blonde videos. Is he still married to the old lady who's so happy to have such young cock every night that she overlooks his troonsanity?

 

[Random Internet Person]

The article itself:

Warner Bros. Nears Deal for Harry Potter Online TV Series

Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. is close to a deal for a new online TV series based on Harry Potter, the best-selling young adult books, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.

www.bloomberg.com

Warner Bros. Nears Deal for Harry Potter TV Series on HBO - Bloomberg

archived 3 Apr 2023 23:49:59 UTC

archive.is

 

[Gorillion others]

View attachment 4972724

View attachment 4972728


The article itself:

Warner Bros. Nears Deal for Harry Potter Online TV Series

Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. is close to a deal for a new online TV series based on Harry Potter, the best-selling young adult books, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.

www.bloomberg.com

Warner Bros. Nears Deal for Harry Potter TV Series on HBO - Bloomberg

archived 3 Apr 2023 23:49:59 UTC

archive.is

Let me guess. They're going to add in an "original character". Three guess as to what it'll be.

 

[ASeabear8952]

View attachment 4972724

View attachment 4972728


The article itself:

Warner Bros. Nears Deal for Harry Potter Online TV Series

Warner Bros. Discovery Inc. is close to a deal for a new online TV series based on Harry Potter, the best-selling young adult books, according to two people with knowledge of the matter.

www.bloomberg.com

Warner Bros. Nears Deal for Harry Potter TV Series on HBO - Bloomberg

archived 3 Apr 2023 23:49:59 UTC

archive.is

As unnecessary as this is, it’s fun to see WB double down on their troon repellent after Hogwarts Legacy.

 

[Chandelier]

Neither side is 100% right about this (men do appear to have had worse outcomes when receiving blood from a female donor, but perhaps only because of a protein left behind after pregnancy), and both sides will claim moral victory.

But the way the first tweeter denies scientific findings that could potentially save lives, merely because they have the potential to strengthen the other side's arguments, is pants-shittingly retarded. If anyone deserves to be injected with the pregnancy blood, it's him.

View attachment 4917112
Link, Archive

Spanky there barely gets 50 likes on his tweets, even with 100k tweets to his name. Every time JKR is brought up, the algorithm boosts them.

Predictably, he's dead fucking wrong, and even working at a blood bank like the Red fucking Cross says no.

The reason why you should refrain from donating plasma during pregnancy is two-fold. Dr. Adams explains that there are proteins in the body called Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) which are markers attached to most of the body's cells. HLAs help the body recognize which cells belong to your body and which do not. Your baby gets half the HLA from the egg and half from the sperm.1


"The pregnant mom then makes antibodies to the HLA from the dad because they do not recognize those proteins," says Adams. "If a pregnant mom gives plasma with those HLA antibodies, the recipient of the transfusion may have a transfusion reaction called TRALI (transfusion-related acute lung injury). This is one of the more serious transfusion reactions that can lead to death."


After the American Red Cross discovered that the majority of TRALI cases were associated with female-donated plasma between 2003 and 2005, they began distributing plasma from only male donors in 2006. By 2008, they found there was a substantial decrease in reported TRALI cases since the implementation of that guidance.

From here.

What they will say instead is that no, it doesn't really say that. However, what they are referring to are red blood cells, not blood plasma, which carries TRALI. Katy Montgomerie, a frequent mention on the Tranny Sideshows thread, also pulled this stunt.

It's obvious the main tweeter didn't actually read the research JKR was talking about, and just spewed off his ignorance because all he is is someone who sticks a needle in someone's vein - if that. I don't think he's a nurse. Hematologists will tell you these differences.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

There's really no depths of evil to which Rowling will not sink:

 

[Nijigasaki]

There's really no depths of evil to which Rowling will not sink:
View attachment 4975009

She wants to keep the IP to spite trans people? Holy shit, not everything is about trannies. Maybe she wants to keep the IP that she created at a tough time in her life, the one that lifted herself and her daughter out of poverty and brought her success and admiration? God forbid that she be attached to her accomplishments.

 

[Der weiße Teufel]

There's really no depths of evil to which Rowling will not sink:
View attachment 4975009

Hahaha they are so mad she was smart enough to keep control over her creation. If only she sold it so they could still consooooom Harry Potter! But no, she will keep it to spite all the trans people who now HAVE to give her money. Insidious.

 

[David Glowie]

She wants to keep the IP to spite trans people? Holy shit, not everything is about trannies. Maybe she wants to keep the IP that she created at a tough time in her life, the one that lifted herself and her daughter out of poverty and brought her success and admiration? God forbid that she be attached to her accomplishments.

Or maybe she wants to keep it because after those run-ins with Disney, she knows that studios can do anything with IPs they control, and she doesn't want that happening to her work. Anyone who doesn't like it is more than welcome to write their own wizard franchise.

 

[Dafuqisdis?]

When it comes to people's opinions on trans people and calling people by their preferred pronouns or not, I don't think that really matters. But when it comes to bodily autonomy, that's where things are more important. I have seen some 'gender critical' feminists openly state they want to ban access to hormones and cosmetic surgery for people. Not just for children, but for adults. I don't think Rowling wants to, but quite a lot of her supporters do. At that point, I really don't think it's your right to dictate what an adult does with themselves. It comes off as concern trolling. You probably wouldn't want to ban people mountain climbing or paragliding, despite how dangerous it is and how many people get killed doing it. It's on an adult to take a risk if they want to.

There's also some huge hypocrisy on the subject of abortion, when it comes to all these 'gender critical' feminists opinions about biological reality. Feminist groups here in the UK have repeatedly made attempts to stifle anti abortion speech and protests, and have even made false claims of violence and harassment at anti abortion protests that were proven to be entirely false. My friend's aunt was threatened with being fired when she shared a negative opinion about abortion in her workplace, because it might have made people 'uncomfortable'. Even using words like kill or mutilation to describe destroying a fetus has been labelled as insensitive at best, hateful and bigoted at worst. You can't claim to support biological facts on the subject of sex, but then 5 minutes later you're telling people to censor factual statements about natal development and abortion just because it might hurt someone's feelings.

Tell us more about the deeply conservative reasons to not defend JK Rowling, sir tranny.