- Joined
- Aug 13, 2018
Mar-27-2023 - Chris is out of custody
- Thread starter themarchivist2
- Start date
- Status
Second-Hand Boat Supplies
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2021
I bring this point up frequently, but it’s very relevant here. That ruling would only count for punishments for a crime. They would have much more leeway to set conditions that are technically conditions for deferral from punishment. “Either you choose to follow these, in a sense, ‘optional’ conditions or you receive the constitutionally allowed punishment for your crime”
Manu Chao90
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2023
It's amazing to me that the guy is out and we have not a fucking idea where he is at all.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
But Chris is the real victim, surely?
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2022
It shouldn't be surprising since Chris is likely in a mental hospital or group home, etc... There's no way to see him or get information that an autistic motherfucker is somewhere because of HIPAA.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
Trust me when you've followed Chris for as long as I have you get used to dry spells like this.
Manu Chao90
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2023
Trolls managed to find a fucking flag from a simple picture but cannot find a retarded rapist ? Then again i get your point , but i find it a little weak
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Involuntary commitment is after an adjudication of incompetence. Chris was there for a determination of whether he was incompetent or not.
And again, they could have fucked this up, but @Pointless Sperg went into this in excruciating detail over and over again, and he wasn't convicted, nor was he found incompetent to stand trial, or he wouldn't have even been able to agree to the deferred adjudication.
So as much as I hate to give credence to anything from Praetor, he probably does have a chunk of change, either for his entire period behind bars, or for the period when he was sent to WSH (when he might have had the tugboat suspended but I believe probably not).
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Perhaps he's in a therapeutic community bring reamed out by his fellow offenders. Could be he'll have to follow rules, do chores, and sit in group for up to 6hours a day. Look up safe p or the elan school. Many of the court mandated communities last from 6 months to a year followed by 6 month in a halfway house.
If this is indeed the case he will NOT have internet access until he is in the halfway house portion. Safe p is operated by TDC(Texas department of correction) some on the same land as the penitentiary. If you fuck up they flip you over the fence directly into prison.
Not to say that Chris is in Texas just that Virginia indubitably has similar programs.
These therapeutic communities are hates by inmates and are often called "snitch programs" because you are forced to write reports on other inmates to advance. Smart people will be like "hey, I'll write you up for a small infraction and you write me up and we'll both get out eventually". Chris is the type to write up whoever and end up in the infirmary.
Lol. He could stand some face yelling and punishment inflicted by other criminals. That boy ain't right.
If this is indeed the case he will NOT have internet access until he is in the halfway house portion. Safe p is operated by TDC(Texas department of correction) some on the same land as the penitentiary. If you fuck up they flip you over the fence directly into prison.
Not to say that Chris is in Texas just that Virginia indubitably has similar programs.
These therapeutic communities are hates by inmates and are often called "snitch programs" because you are forced to write reports on other inmates to advance. Smart people will be like "hey, I'll write you up for a small infraction and you write me up and we'll both get out eventually". Chris is the type to write up whoever and end up in the infirmary.
Lol. He could stand some face yelling and punishment inflicted by other criminals. That boy ain't right.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
The story of Chris's life is him repeatedly weasling his way out of the consequences of his own stupidity. That doesn't stop people from trying to change that however like Mary Lee Walsh.
Ken_Penders69
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 1, 2021
assuming chris is sent to an adult group home (not a half way house) is chris even allowed to have toys/video games/a computer? I dont see why he WOULDN'T, then again i only know a little about group homes and dunno if there are restrictions? I'm certain chris (even without the tugboat nest eggs) will find a way to get money without working to feed his addiction to legos toys and video games.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
So depending on the home you may have a roommate. There are no restrictions to what they have ususally I have two clients who are gamers one has an XBOX in theirs another has a moderate gaming pc. They will have rules though you won't be able to have a complete mess in there and your roomate is not guaranteed to be a good person. Theft is common in some group homes/boarding homes.
Most homes won't let them just sit alone in their room all day though they tend to force them to socialize and boarding homes tend to have theraputic groups and activities that run they are "required" to attend.
Should mention btw there are group homes which ususally you have your own bedroom and a common kitchen and living room with maybe 5 or so clients. And there are boarding homes where you usually have a roomate and its a larger faciliy where some may have single rooms for more money and they tend to have 10 to 20 clients and are usually a bit more strictly run. They ususally havea larger common area and larger dining room. Boarding homes are more likely to have 24/7 nurse/psych staff then a group home who may have on-call staff medical staff, but not ones that stay there.
It's been stated by both Pointless Sperg and I in that thread that SSDI benefits wouldn't have stopped because Chris was never convicted. Don't know why people keep claiming it was, assume it was, or even question it at this point. There's only three main reasons why the SSA stops SSDI benefits: long term incarceration after a guilty conviction or not guilty by reason of insanity, the persons health got better and they're capable of working, or they managed to get a job and work more than a few hours a week. The SSA refers to this as a "substantial gainful activity." The SSA determines what that amount is as it can change, but there's also a few other exceptions to that. I won't go into the full details, but it's easy enough to get all that information at the SSA website.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
Think one of the issues is that I've been using the word suspended benefits when really what I mean is withdrawal of benefits. I'm not trying to say they are going to kick him off SSA, just that he is going to be deemed over resource limits so he won't recieve actual money from them.
Also, suspension is not really what will stop his payments. You can have your payments stopped and still be on benefits due to living arrangments or what they assume is your income. Him being in custody and thus having both his shelter and food subsidized (their wording) would mean he would get a restricted amount of money, but the lack of conviction would mean he is still "recieving" benefits.
The way it works is that they take what you should recieve and subtract what they believe you are gaining via somoene else for shelter or food.
On top of it all once you are $2,000 in the bank your benefits are stopped (As in you won't recieve funds into your account) due to their resource limit of what is allowed in your bank. So even if he received benefits once they deposited to that amount they would be withdrawn and after a long enough time possibly suspended.
SSA Info on Resource Limits
Also, suspension is not really what will stop his payments. You can have your payments stopped and still be on benefits due to living arrangments or what they assume is your income. Him being in custody and thus having both his shelter and food subsidized (their wording) would mean he would get a restricted amount of money, but the lack of conviction would mean he is still "recieving" benefits.
The way it works is that they take what you should recieve and subtract what they believe you are gaining via somoene else for shelter or food.
On top of it all once you are $2,000 in the bank your benefits are stopped (As in you won't recieve funds into your account) due to their resource limit of what is allowed in your bank. So even if he received benefits once they deposited to that amount they would be withdrawn and after a long enough time possibly suspended.
SSA Info on Resource Limits
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Or even get it spoonfed to you like you're a retard at the thread @Pointless Sperg started specifically so we didn't have to go over this same bullshit OVER AND OVER AND OVER again.
This explains nearly everything over and over and over again. If you read this thread, stupidity will evaporate! Learn to read!
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2022
The limit doesn't apply to retroactive benefits. For example, it's common for a lump SSI/SSDI sum when a person first gets accepted after waiting for some time.
Whatever, even if Chris is gifted a lot of money, he'd just burn it on toys.
Jacknife
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
Is there a possibility that he has some untreatable cancer and got released into a hospital for recovery or maybe even a hospice for it?
Slython
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
Out of curiosity how would the Feds know how much is in your bank if you're receiving benefits? That sounds... very illegal wouldn't you need the IRS to audit you?
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
They can pull the balanace in your bank account at any time to make sure your not over resource limit. Pretty much if you get benefits your allowing them to know what happens in any bank acount in your name/social security number. They also do financial reviews ever so often that require a recipient to give bank statements, utlitity bills, rent info, etc.
Had them wait 6 years to do a review on a client once they decided they were overpaid the entire 6 years and demanded thousands of dollars back so they just garnished a portion of their SSI until they had it.
- Status