Mar-27-2023 - Chris is out of custody

Who posted bail?


  • Total voters
    2,617
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
?? What else are we supposed to say then if christard isn't posting new content mr know it all
It’s just people are speculating like mad about what’s going to happen based on little no actual information and instead dubious stuff from weens and other speculation nonsense. I miss when a story like this would be the front page of the farms but now with how insane the modern world is it’s buried beneath an article from some twat trolling furries and a Ftm Troon shooting up a school, sad times.
 
Don't they accept volunteers?
I highly recommend institutionalizing yourself in the Virginia mental health system for the keks.
?? What else are we supposed to say then if christard isn't posting new content mr know it all
Chris isn't smart and by no means a criminal mastermind on the lam. Just wait. He's been in jail a year and a half. You can wait a couple weeks maximum for Chris to inevitably do something stupid.
 
It’s just people are speculating like mad about what’s going to happen based on little no actual information and instead dubious stuff from weens and other speculation nonsense.
I prefer to think of them as lying bastards but to each their own.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: UncommonParlence
It’s just people are speculating like mad about what’s going to happen based on little no actual information and instead dubious stuff from weens and other speculation nonsense.
Well, my mother's sister's 6th cousin's uncle's friend's son knows this guy named Billy, who has a buddy named Eric, who is related to a guy living in Guatemala named José, whose niece knows this nice old lady, her friend's sister told me that she knows where Chris Chan is right now. Unfortunately I can't tell you because Joe Biden's 12th cousin 4 times removed told me to keep it a secret.
 
It’s just people are speculating like mad about what’s going to happen based on little no actual information and instead dubious stuff from weens and other speculation nonsense. I miss when a story like this would be the front page of the farms but now with how insane the modern world is it’s buried beneath an article from some twat trolling furries and a Ftm Troon shooting up a school, sad times.
More than likely, he's been tard wrangled and placed in a group home. I payed a Georgia Bloodhound 10,000 dollars to wait on the Chanlder porch. No sign of Chris.


I hope these are Chris's wranglers, and he has a bedroom next to theirs. As he falls asleep, he has a dream about he and his father cutting massive logs.
Screenshot_20230402_170513_Chrome~2.jpg
 
Last edited:
It’s just people are speculating like mad about what’s going to happen based on little no actual information and instead dubious stuff from weens and other speculation nonsense.
Yeah most of this discussion is now just stuff that can be answered if anyone bothered to read the FAQ or any amount of this thread. The only justifiable reason this thread isn't locked is it's on topic.
 
Has any one called the group home or half way house and confirmed chris' presence ?
HEY DO YOU HAVE CHRIS CHAN

realistically though chris will pop up eventually. he cant be outright banned from using the internet but because his case is still pending he was probably told by heilberg to stay off social media to ensure that he doesn't end up incriminating himself which he would do within a matter of hours if he is allowed to openly communicate with anyone.

also its important to understand how prison likely impacted Chris. as you can see he entered prison full of delusions that everything would be fine and he would be back home raping barb within a matter of days. as months passed he started getting annoyed and frustrated but still held delusions that he would be able to return home eventually. what you see at the end is a soulless husk who was told that all his toys were gone, his house was gone, Barb is gone and that he will be stuck in a padded room with a bunch of slow in the minds like him. there is no more anger and frustration in that face, just depression, fear and uncertainty. if we do see Chris again down the line we will all probably wish we didn't.

1680475810707.png
1680475821849.png
1680475866879.png
 
It’s just people are speculating like mad about what’s going to happen based on little no actual information and instead dubious stuff from weens and other speculation nonsense. I miss when a story like this would be the front page of the farms but now with how insane the modern world is it’s buried beneath an article from some twat trolling furries and a Ftm Troon shooting up a school, sad times.
ohh , mb didnt see this before . but yea i kinda agree with you , thats just how it is sadly . chris was also at his peak years ago and now hes just awkwardly trying to do something he physically cant and get people to like him from what i see
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobJones997
can anyone even be truly banned from using the internet? sure, maybe a group home or something can prevent a resident from using a computer, but i dont think a (relitively) free man can be downright banned from accessing the world wide web, especially with how easy it is to do privately
 
@Tracksuit PHd Alerted me to this development. Honestly, I think (also read pray) that Chris has learned in his time during lockup to STFU when it comes to the internet. Realistically, I don't anticipate him from fucking his shit up by broadcasting his information because of some sort of light bulb going off stating that "Maybe I should keep my mouth shut." I'm an optimist. Time will tell.
 
can anyone even be truly banned from using the internet? sure, maybe a group home or something can prevent a resident from using a computer, but i dont think a (relitively) free man can be downright banned from accessing the world wide web, especially with how easy it is to do privately
Edit : No you can't be legally banned from using it at least not in America. It actually used to be possible however, in 2017 the Supreme Court ruled that it's unconstitutional and violates freedom of speech even in cases where the offender was a pedophile and used the internet to commit the crime. However all of this is a moot point anyways, since Chris's crime did not involve the internet. The group home however can restrict his internet usage if they choose to.
 
Last edited:
Edit : No you can't be legally banned from using it at least not in America. It actually used to be possible however, in 2017 the Supreme Court ruled that it's unconstitutional and violates freedom of speech even in cases where the offender was a pedophile and used the internet to commit the crime. However all of this is a moot point anyways, since Chris's crime did not involve the internet. The group home however can restrict his internet usage if they choose to.
Packingham v. North Carolina. Generally, a blanket ban on all Internet use is presumptively unconstitutional, although a less draconian ban (such as staying away from sites that cater to children specifically) could probably pass muster.
I thought he is charged with fucking his mother so why would they ban him from using the internet? Of course he fucks up his life being on the internet, but legally, how is fucking your mother relevant?
It isn't, which is why that probably didn't happen, although he may have agreed to conditions of release containing such a ban.

His crime had nothing whatsoever to do with the Internet, other than that he incidentally used the Internet perhaps to purchase his rape manual and talked about his crime on the Internet. Neither of those would really justify a ban.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back