Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Still no motion for sanctions from Rekieta's side, so it looks like this will be in a holding pattern until the motion hearing on the 10th. If the judge addressed the residency shitshow at all in the February 28th hearing, it doesn't seem like what happened has leaked out from either side yet. I'm not aware of any developments anyway.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Associate Rick, Kosher Salt, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 1 other person
Balldo's Gate said:
Still no motion for sanctions from Rekieta's side, so it looks like this will be in a holding pattern until the motion hearing on the 10th. If the judge addressed the residency shitshow at all in the February 28th hearing, it doesn't seem like what happened has leaked out from either side yet. I'm not aware of any developments anyway.
Click to expand...
From the second Rekieta started whining about how easy this was to beat I knew it would turn into a tarbaby of retardation. Firstly because he is an incompetent lawyer who can't understand or read situations let alone legal cases properly and secondly because he in theory was in the position of power meaning every moment the enemy isn't wiped out and defeated is technically a victory for that opponent - dragging it out, making it cost money, giving Rekieta plenty chances to embarrass himself. Good content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moths, Swole McPole, feral cat #6385 and 2 others
Twitter Is Cancer said:
From the second Rekieta started whining about how easy this was to beat I knew it would turn into a tarbaby of retardation. Firstly because he is an incompetent lawyer who can't understand or read situations let alone legal cases
Click to expand...
I don’t know what’s funnier: That he hired someone as prominent as Randazza for this or the fact Randazza will happily (consensually) rape him on fees. MR really is a master troll in so many ways.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Fat Gay Riker, 6thRanger, Hraf and 5 others
John Andrews Stan said:
I don’t know what’s funnier: That he hired someone as prominent as Randazza for this or the fact Randazza will happily (consensually) rape him on fees. MR really is a master troll in so many ways.
Click to expand...
And to think that once upon a time he saw kiwi farms as some solid lawbros.
www.youtube.com

#kiwifarms #rekietalaw #neverforget

How it started: https://m.twitch.tv/clip/SpeedyWanderingBeaverPipeHypeHow it’s going: https://youtu.be/kmfZ-Oeb8FA
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
 
  • Feels
Reactions: AnOminous
Twitter Is Cancer said:
And to think that once upon a time he saw kiwi farms as some solid lawbros.
www.youtube.com

#kiwifarms #rekietalaw #neverforget

How it started: https://m.twitch.tv/clip/SpeedyWanderingBeaverPipeHypeHow it’s going: https://youtu.be/kmfZ-Oeb8FA
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
Click to expand...
He’s just mad most of us aren’t retarded enough to buy his expert persona or cheerlead everything he does. Many such cases!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown, Himedall All-seeing Waifu, TherapyMan and 4 others
Screenshot_20230403_184526.jpg


Nick is softly crying somewhere in a corner.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Bush did USS Maine, Marvin, repentance and 11 others
There’s been new fillings from Nick’s 75,000$ legal team.

654D2923-1BEE-455C-98F4-75A8D310FC71.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • Informative
Reactions: some racist username, TurboNAS, 6thRanger and 11 others
Also Not a Fake Name said:
There’s been new fillings from Nick’s 75,000$ legal team.
Click to expand...

My impression is that its a bloated filing around a rather straightforward and standard argument. The argument being that Monty is a public figure and Nick didn't act with malice. Its stuffed full of side-issues and things that don't matter much, but that is the core argument.

I think that all the stuff about SLAPP and colorado law actually weakens the core argument. They would have been better off in the first attempt at dismissal to make an argument around Minnesota law. There is yet more stuff about Monty but it doesn't add anything to what they have said and produced in the earlier filings. Less is usually more in these things. It doesn't really take much to show what Monty is and what Monty does.

There is also alot of boilerplate first amendment stuff in there. But it doesn't seem to have had much effort put into it or crafted much to the particular circumstances of this case. I was expecting a far better and more complete argument as to how calling someone a pedo is not necessarily defamation.

The weakest parts of the argument are the claims that Nick uncontrovertably had no malice in the statement and that he was addressing a matter of public concern. I think the process would have to go further to make a determination on malice. Claiming that Nick directly calling him a pedo was Nick discussing issues isn't a strong argument either.

The document is also just too busy. It would have been better to stepwise proceed with first getting an acceptance of colorado anti-SLAPP rather than doing a combined motion that tries to argue both for Colorado Law and for a summary judgement based on Monty being a public figure.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Sneed S. McSneedensen, 6thRanger, Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back