Defendant: Ethan Oliver Ralph - Ethan Ralph's Documented Legal Troubles & Other Court Docs

[.iota.]

What's gotten into Ralph hollering so hard about the court cases? He does that shit when he's scared.

he has a hearing next week (on the 19th) with the family court regarding all of the nonsense that he and the whorse filed regarding faith, her fiancé, and her parents. i doubt that he even remembers what he wrote.

 

[NicoFountaine]

he has another hearing next week with the family court regarding all of the nonsense that he and the whorse filed regarding faith, her fiancé, and her parents. i doubt that he even remembers what he wrote.

I am praying, and asking all gods of all cultures from all epochs that Ralph presents one text message with Amanda's phone number badly edited out (Like the time he pretended Andy Warski's texted him to offer herself sexually to him) and use that as Evidence in court.

that would be hysterical and this guy is just dumb enough to actually do something like that.

 

[Fannyscum]

Now that image uploads are working again, let's have a look at the recent legal proceedings from the court of twitter. First, Ralph showing that the preparation for his defence doesn't go further than the summary from his google search results:


Tweet | Archive


Vickers responds:



Ralph feels he has a laydown misere, so reveals his legal strategy:

Tweet | Archive

Vickers responds with some 5D chess of his own:


Not legal related but this caused Ralph to resort to some Pantsu posting to try and avoid another RO violation:

Tweet | Archive
Which of course Vickers can't let go unanswered:


Back to the courtroom, Ralph declares Vickers' strategy leguhhly inadmissable:

Tweet | Archive

But Vickers hasn't played his trap card yet:




More violations of the RO... There's pages of this shit on his timeline, I can't be bothered to clip it all:



Ralph has won more court cases that Rekeita has spilled on new shoes, AWLAWGS:

Tweet | Archive

Tweet | Archive

 

[Some dude]

I am praying, and asking all gods of all cultures from all epochs that Ralph presents one text message with Amanda's phone number badly edited out (Like the time he pretended Andy Warski's texted him to offer herself sexually to him) and use that as Evidence in court.

that would be hysterical and this guy is just dumb enough to actually do something like that.

You'd have to have a phone plan to have a phone number.

 

[Fornicario]

The Ralphalawyer should know that the Fifth is the worst possible answer you can give in family court. There's no jury. The judge is it until appeal, and family court is allowed to either compel your testimony or lock you up. The Ralphamale will not have the chops to appeal a contempt charge and it just might get the judge to tell Ralph it's done. No more visits, no more custody issues, no more California court chaos.

 

[ddlloo]

The Ralphalawyer should know that the Fifth is the worst possible answer you can give in family court. There's no jury. The judge is it until appeal, and family court is allowed to either compel your testimony or lock you up. The Ralphamale will not have the chops to appeal a contempt charge and it just might get the judge to tell Ralph it's done. No more visits, no more custody issues, no more California court chaos.

Ralph is too much of a coward to plead the fifth. Only a real man could tell the judge to fuck off and refuse to answer any questions.

 

[Some dude]

We're probably months away from the Sovereign Citizen arc.

 

[Telemeter]

We're probably months away from the Sovereign Citizen arc.

Months away? We are months into it.

 

[Cad an Hell]

From todays stream. lol



> i need someone served in bevada country california

 

[.iota.]

what the ever-loving hell is this?!

his pickled and pill-addled porcine brain can't keep up with his court dates. the trial for the thirty-four alleged violations of the dvro, including the theft and distribution of faith's diary, isn't until monday, april 24th.

however, unless something has changed, his next court appearance is on wednesday, the 19th. it's a request for order hearing regarding visitation, initiated by the ragepig himself, in which he claims that:

It has come to my attention that she [faith] is grooming my son to have Iziah Valle be his step-father.

he continues by alleging that:

[ ... ] pedophilic and unconsensual acts were co-signed and encouraged by the older Vickers.

he concludes that:

I honestly do not think that Mr. Valle should be allowed near my son. But, at the very least, his interactions should be supervised. I request an order to that effect.

the request is poorly-written and replete with errors, such as the following:

- listing himself as the petitioner and as the defendant
- misspelling faith's legal name
- referring to events that allegedly took place prior to the visitation order
- misrepresenting faith and iziah's age difference
- referencing violations of california law while failing to cite any such laws
- submitting a declaration by the whorse as evidence of faith's sexual history
- failing to submit any credible evidence of any of his allegations
- addressing the judge directly in his filing
- requesting a change to an order that does not pertain to the individuals listed in the order itself

Spoiler: the request for order

also, just as a friendly reminder ... the same family court judge who will be ruling on this request will also be conducting the trial for his many, many dvro violations the following week.

 

[Phony Chicken]

From todays stream. lol

View attachment 5045553

> i need someone served in bevada country california

Looks like he was jerking off to Lily Kate too.

Edit-Nevermind. Forgot he's too high on Xanax to be able to jerk off.

 

[Wine em Dine em 69 em]

@.iota. The judge will need a handy glossary of ralphamale terms such as ‘co-signed’ ‘disavowed’ ‘aylogs’ ‘loose pussy isn’t defamatory if it’s true’ and other bangers.

 

[bile demon]

- listing himself as the petitioner and as the defendant

A fairly high IQ tactic worthy of a truly seasoned courtroom operator. No matter who loses, the Ralphamale wins.

 

[AnOminous]

There's no jury. The judge is it until appeal, and family court is allowed to either compel your testimony or lock you up.

You can invoke the Fifth because they can't actually compel you to confess to a crime, but they can rule against you for it. You can't just do a blanket assertion of the Fifth to avoid testifying about anything at all or turning over discovery materials (even if those are incriminating).

So he could end up in jail if he doesn't pony up any testimony in the DVRO case/violation case, but it wouldn't be directly for asserting the Fifth (unless it was fraudulent), but for failing to rebut the proven case of the other side.

So the family court could conclude either Vickers made out their case and Ralph failed, find him guilty, and lock him up (at least for quasi-civil proceedings like contempt or violating the DVRO) or something less drastic like fining him or limiting his visitation even more (like he ever bothers to visit "his" son who is a total stranger to him).

 

[Fornicario]

You can invoke the Fifth because they can't actually compel you to confess to a crime, but they can rule against you for it. You can't just do a blanket assertion of the Fifth to avoid testifying about anything at all or turning over discovery materials (even if those are incriminating).

So he could end up in jail if he doesn't pony up any testimony in the DVRO case/violation case, but it wouldn't be directly for asserting the Fifth (unless it was fraudulent), but for failing to rebut the proven case of the other side.

So the family court could conclude either Vickers made out their case and Ralph failed, find him guilty, and lock him up (at least for quasi-civil proceedings like contempt or violating the DVRO) or something less drastic like fining him or limiting his visitation even more (like he ever bothers to visit "his" son who is a total stranger to him).

Now I'm confused. In my state, family court is not criminal court, so pleading the Fifth unless you are currently under criminal investigation is verboten. As I was told (I'm proud to say I've never experienced it firsthand) if you plead the Fifth without a crime under investigation, you can be compelled to answer. I may be wrong, or it may be state by state.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Now I'm confused. In my state, family court is not criminal court, so pleading the Fifth unless you are currently under criminal investigation is verboten. As I was told (I'm proud to say I've never experienced it firsthand) if you plead the Fifth without a crime under investigation, you can be compelled to answer. I may be wrong, or it may be state by state.

Doesn't matter if there's an active investigation, you can plead the 5th whenever if you feel that testifying would be self incriminating.

Good example would actually be the Bill Cosby case. It started with Cosby pleading the 5th in regard to a civil case against him but there was no pending criminal case against him. The DA was able to compel him to testify by saying that he wouldn't use anything Cosby said as evidence in any potential criminal case. Of course evidence was used in a criminal case later but Cosby got out because of his 5th amendment right was violated by the DA's office lying.

 

[Fornicario]

Doesn't matter if there's an active investigation, you can plead the 5th whenever if you feel that testifying would be self incriminating.

Good example would actually be the Bill Cosby case. It started with Cosby pleading the 5th in regard to a civil case against him but there was no pending criminal case against him. The DA was able to compel him to testify by saying that he wouldn't use anything Cosby said as evidence in any potential criminal case. Of course evidence was used in a criminal case later but Cosby got out because of his 5th amendment right was violated by the DA's office lying.

That particular piece of misconduct will always bother me because Pennsylvania has plenty of examples of making a shitty plea deal and it used to end with the state honoring the deal, but firing the prosecutor who made it.

 

[Vulkan]

We're probably months away from the Sovereign Citizen arc.

Your honna I’ll have you know I am not an individual I am a pig and therefore not subject to your so called laws

 

[AnOminous]

Now I'm confused. In my state, family court is not criminal court, so pleading the Fifth unless you are currently under criminal investigation is verboten. As I was told (I'm proud to say I've never experienced it firsthand) if you plead the Fifth without a crime under investigation, you can be compelled to answer. I may be wrong, or it may be state by state.

Well, Fifth Amendment is federal. You can generally be compelled to testify with a grant of immunity but you can take the Fifth in any proceeding where you are being ordered to confess to a crime.

The Difference Between Asserting the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in a Criminal Investigation Versus in a Civil Case

In criminal cases, you are allowed to “plead the Fifth” and stay completely silent and it cannot be used against you. This is one of the ways that criminal cases are very different from civil cases. In civil cases, such as divorce cases or protective orders, you can still assert your Fifth Amendment privilege, if necessary, but the judge or the jury is allowed to assume that “pleading the Fifth” means something bad for you. This is called an adverse inference.

The 5th Amendment and Family Law

The United States Constitution protects every person from having “to be a witness against himself.” This is known as the privilege against self-incrimination, or “pleading the 5th.”

www.bundylawoffice.com

This is about Oklahoma specifically but the Constitution is nationwide. This means you can invoke the privilege, but the court can assume you're doing it because your answer actually would incriminate you. A jury can also find against you in a civil case if you invoke the Fifth in it, unlike in a criminal case.

California also has a specific rule:

What to Learn About Your Fifth Amendment Rights in California Divorce and Family Law?

CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE CODE

PARTICULAR PRIVILEGES

Privilege Against Self-Incrimination

Evidence Code Section 940

To the extent that such privilege exists under the Constitution of the United States or the State of California, a person has a privilege to refuse to disclose any matter that may tend to incriminate him.

https://www.thurmanarnold.com/resou...ence-code-section-940-california-privilege-a/

This is from a California family law firm.

I assume that in California as well, the court can draw an adverse inference from your refusal to testify under the privilege, or compel you to testify if the answer couldn't possibly incriminate you. Generally, they don't even for ridiculous claims of this sort, but just rule against you.

Also violating a DVRO has quasi-criminal consequences like jail time, and contempt does as well, so the consequences aren't nothing.

You can also be compelled to testify about a crime you were already acquitted for because you're not in jeopardy.

ETA: another I just remembered. If you do actually give testimony on a subject, you can't then just pick and choose what to answer. You've opened the door to it and the other side gets to develop its opposing case too.

 

[SargonF00t]

You can invoke the Fifth because they can't actually compel you to confess to a crime, but they can rule against you for it. You can't just do a blanket assertion of the Fifth to avoid testifying about anything at all or turning over discovery materials (even if those are incriminating).

So he could end up in jail if he doesn't pony up any testimony in the DVRO case/violation case, but it wouldn't be directly for asserting the Fifth (unless it was fraudulent), but for failing to rebut the proven case of the other side.

So the family court could conclude either Vickers made out their case and Ralph failed, find him guilty, and lock him up (at least for quasi-civil proceedings like contempt or violating the DVRO) or something less drastic like fining him or limiting his visitation even more (like he ever bothers to visit "his" son who is a total stranger to him).

Whilst I doubt that Ralph will get locked up for any period of time, if he were to get locked up for a month, that would likely cause Pantsu real problems with paying the rent. Ralph is such a fuckwit loser, I suspect he must be close to living week to week in terms of relying on Super Chats to pay his bills and would run out of money if jailed for 30 days.