Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[Autphag]

It's largely satirical intending to draw attention to the double standards involved in White guilt and White genocide in academia. None of it is illegal. Assuming I even wrote it.

What is your excuse for harassing Clare Chesterton and publishing that she is a "practising paedophile", causing significant distress and harm?

Is there any proof he used those words exactly?
Even if he did, it fails a crucial legal test of libel: it must have been knowingly wrong. Oliver might have been making inferrences on the basis of nothing better than value judgements. Time expediency and all that, you know?

 

[Mikemikev]

Is there any proof he used those words exactly?
Even if he did, it fails a crucial legal test of libel: it must have been knowingly wrong. Oliver might have been making inferrences on the basis of nothing better than value judgements. Time expediency and all that, you know?

Aka "making shit up" moron.

 

[Autphag]

Aka "making shit up" moron.

There's a distinct difference, actually.
Making up shit is what you do, forming contradictions to reality on the spot, usually knowingly, like in your case denying that you'd made any confession or negation as to your Korean language abilities when you did.

Making value judgements is what people like Oliver and I do, inferrences which can be made from the gaps of two discrete (that is, isolated but openly available) facts by deducing their intermediate implication. You're utterly bereft of any deduction abilities so we needn't worry about you doing that.

 

[Mikemikev]

There's a distinct difference, actually.
Making up shit is what you do, forming contradictions to reality on the spot, usually knowingly, like in your case denying that you'd made any confession or negation as to your Korean language abilities when you did.

Making value judgements is what people like Oliver and I do, inferrences which can be made from the gaps of two discrete (that is, isolated but openly available) facts by deducing their intermediate implication. You're utterly bereft of any deduction abilities so we needn't worry about you doing that.

You are actually insane.

 

[Autphag]

You are actually insane.

Legally? Barely. Medically? No, neither autism nor personality disorder are mental illnesses. One's a neurological condition and the other's a social manifestation from a shitty childhood.

But that's neither here nor there, because it doesn't change that I've rightfully distinguished your lack of rigour from the extent others have been capable.

 

[Mikemikev]

Legally? Barely. Medically? No, neither autism nor personality disorder are mental illnesses. One's a neurological condition and the other's a social manifestation from a shitty childhood.

But that's neither here nor there, because it doesn't change that I've rightfully distinguished your lack of rigour from the extent others have been capable.

No, you just harped on a small mistake where I forgot that I mentioned my Korean ability in the context of you people lying previously that I had claimed to be fluent, expanding that minor error ridiculously, while you were simply making up shit the whole time, and putting this in a ridiculously pretentious and unnecessary word salad, to make it look like something other than childish tit for tat.

 

[Pikimon]

I ship @Mikemikev and @Autphag

 

[Oliver D Smith]

Note Mikemikev now trying to distance himself from his posts, and claiming they are satire. Like I said he's a phony. "Ella" also confirmed Mikemikev mentioned nothing to her about his racial views in real life, and she is shocked to discover what he has been posting online. In other words, Mikemikev as a white supremacist is an internet persona. He mentions nothing about it in the real world. It's a keyboard fantasy world for him.

 

[Mikemikev]

Note Mikemikev now trying to distance himself from his posts, and claiming they are satire. Like I said he's a phony. "Ella" also confirmed Mikemikev mentioned nothing to her about his racial views in real life, and she is shocked to discover what he has been posting online. In other words, Mikemikev as a white supremacist is an internet persona. He mentions nothing about it in the real world. It's a keyboard fantasy world for him.

Why would I mention that to a casual business acquaintance fuckwit? Do you introduce yourself in shops as "online antifa activist and lying sexual smear artist, traitor to the European people"? Neither of us discussed politics. My posts really are satire, I have no interest in genociding other races. It's to highlight the double standard. Pretty tough for you to argue your way out of paedophile slanders though.

 

[Oliver D Smith]

And lol @ "assuming I wrote it". Except you did. There's no "assumption" involved. You're such a disgusting liar Mikemikev you're now trying to disassociate yourself from your accounts because I just pointed out they break hate speech laws and malicious communications act.

Your account "Captain JT Verity MBA"
http://www.politicalforum.com/race-relations/452662-admit-we-need-peaceful-segregation-5.html

The account you wrote this on, is the same name you used at Wikipedia which is blocked under "Mikemikev":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useraptain_JT_Verity_MBA

Furthermore, the admin at politicalforum banned Captain JT Verity MBA as a Mikemikev sockpuppet.

Why are you suddenly ashamed of what you've been typing on forums?

 

[Mikemikev]

Why are you suddenly ashamed of what you've been typing on forums?

I'm simply not confirming or denying anything since I prefer to focus on the issue of your sexual slanders against a young woman.

 

[YI 457]

My posts really are satire, I have no interest in genociding other races. It's to highlight the double standard. Pretty tough for you to argue your way out of paedophile slanders though.

Hey guys! I was pretending to be a fucking retard all along!

 

[chimpburgers]

I'm simply not confirming or denying anything since I prefer to focus on the issue of your sexual slanders against a young woman.

Your performance art really sucks though, even if it is really "satire." I've seen that excuse tried many times before by other cows just like you.

 

[Mikemikev]

Hey guys! I was pretending to be a fucking exceptional individual all along!

A rhetorical gedankenexperiment into justification of genocide isn't a crime. You can lie otherwise if it makes you feel better. What are you so bitter about?

 

[YI 457]

I am a pretentious cuck

 

[Mikemikev]

Your performance art really sucks though, even if it is really "satire." I've seen that excuse tried many times before by other cows just like you.

But you're a biased source. You're a troll and insincere. Many love my work. The shit you come out with is of no value.

 

[BILLY MAYS]

Many love my work.

[citation needed]

 

[TheAmazingAxolotl]

But you're a biased source. You're a troll and insincere. Many love my work. The shit you come out with is of no value.

This isn't the first time I've seen someone with a verified tag say these exact words, and more often than not, they're lost in their own world rife with an autism that extends far beyond the veil of all human understanding.

 

[Mikemikev]

This isn't the first time I've seen someone with a verified tag say these exact words, and more often than not, they're lost in their own world rife with an autism that extends far beyond the veil of all human understanding.

But you're coming out with this based on nothing. You literally don't know what you are talking about. Your position is "I know nothing about you so you could be imagining what you say about yourself". Personally I couldn't behave with that kind of insincerity and above all pointlessness. It's just mindless. I'm actually quite curious about the sociopathic characters on this board.

Anyone who says "Many love my work" is "lost in a veil of autism"?

I think somebody is in a detached mentality here.

 

[TheAmazingAxolotl]

But you're coming out with this based on nothing. You literally don't know what you are talking about. Your position is "I know nothing about you so you could be imagining what you say about yourself".

Incorrect, sir. I come out with this based on the assumption that you are a sudsy, less-alcoholic version of my good friend and former gay lover Marijan Siklic, about whom I should tell you racked up a higher score than yours when he discovered his thread. This assumption gives me an idea of what I might dictate unto you in this veritable battle of wits that would surely have us both banned from Wikipedia, though I've the decency to stop at three bans. So, answer me this, mate, is your tactic when arguing with good folk on the internet always to resort to petty you-know-nothings in a vain attempt to defeat your opponent? Bully for you if it is, but my good man, if I have no idea what I'm going to do, then by all intents and purposes, you've no idea what I'm going to do. Strange, isn't it? Also, you should really consider not using the word "literally" in an improper place like that; it could metaphorically be the literal bane of your hyperbolic accusations.