Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

While I'm definitely in the Pat is behind the swattings camp, I think it's weird that the first we hear about Pat's plan to sue the MPD is from torswats. For someone who has to constantly tweet about the swattings you think he would mentioned his plans to sue the department for enabling his cyber atalkers at some point.
He has been oinking about taking legal action on his facebook.

We can only go so far. FBI will seize his phone and social media and start trawling through.
Patrick has been deleting tweets, so they may get twitter to reinstate them.
They'll look at any crypto transactions from his bank accounts.
get cell records to see if he has been accessing telegram servers
They will have the necessary missing pieces to know whether he did it or not
NOTE: patrick has publicly denied ever having crypto or tg - so should be easy to prove.

Between October and present he has also upgraded his camera system from the old ADT to a NEST.
Purely to better capture the SWATTs footage for oinking/lawsuits
 
I think we all agree that:
Fatrick is not a murderer because he barely manages to keep his day-to-day life together and he wouldn't be able to plan and execute something as difficult and complicated as murdering someone and getting away with it.
Fatrick is not a pedophile because he's morbidly obese and:

sauce
With his obesity he probably made himself asexual: no testosterone, no libido, possible erectile dysfunction.
I've been saving this for awhile since the phone incident.
 
This is just speculation, and almost certainly late, but it occured to me that one reason Patrick was so eager to recover his phone data is because he used it to do the SWATing. He had his crypto and Telegram stuff on there, and needed it back to pay Torswats (or at least "No, Child" him.)

I would give Patrick enough sausage material for a year in return for a look at those financial records.
 
While I'm definitely in the Pat is behind the swattings camp, I think it's weird that the first we hear about Pat's plan to sue the MPD is from torswats. For someone who has to constantly tweet about the swattings you think he would mentioned his plans to sue the department for enabling his cyber atalkers at some point.
He was tweeting about them to build a public record of them all. His diseased livestock brain hates the cops so much he was sure they'd do something he could sue them for if they came out often enough and was waiting for "and after they'd been to my door 74 times before, they finally shot my cat/wife/is there still a lizard?" for a big lawsuit. He wouldn't have put that plan into writing unless drunk and livid, so I'm surprised he didn't now that I think of it.

I'm making all of this up of course, but it's plausible because oh my God, that is definitely him in the vandalism video. The obvious tell is that he can't keep the flashlight out of his mouth. Failed father, failed writer, failed cyber slip-and-fall guy.
 
fatrick still hasn't suffered the consequences for associating with SFWA so i'm of the very pessimistic opinion that he gets away from this purely on DSP-tier retard luck.
To be fair if they hadn't given him $100k he wouldn't be $50k+ in the hole
 
is there still a lizard?"
i completely forgot he even had a lizard. since we havent seen him post about it, i assume the 1.2 gpa was too retarded to take care of it and it died of neglect. that or the fat ass whipped up a special batch of pepperoni and ate it.
 
There is no way in hell Pat would pay for a swat on MTG to frame @AltisticRight of all people, and there is no way in hell that Pat would call in other random swats on other locations. Either Torswats is lying about these new details, or he's lying about the entire thing.

EDIT: Or, the person saying these new details isn't actually Torswats, and the OnA user posting these screenshots is either falling for an op or participating in an op.

Also, a reminder to everyone that the MTG call was already leaked, coming from a Ralph sperg named Lizard:
Axel stream with a caller called Lizard who admits to being the guy who tried to blame @AltisticRight for that SWATing. I downloaded it but it's 430mb too big to upload and I'm phonefagging. Got a copy though.

Time stamps
First cop call
32:54 / 3:35:22
Second cop call
41:09 / 3:35:22
Lizard in VC playing a high quality recording of framing @AltisticRight
1:28:47 / 3:35:22

EDIT - TIME STAMP FOR FULL CALL 2 hours 11 minutes - 2 hours 18 minutes thanks @My Name is Mud
 
Last edited:
The silence from the Milwaukee police blotter is deafening. From multiple calls a day to zero, just like that?

Innnnneresting.

A52CC2EB-42FC-4757-BF8A-048057452217.jpeg
 
i completely forgot he even had a lizard. since we havent seen him post about it, i assume the 1.2 gpa was too retarded to take care of it and it died of neglect. that or the fat ass whipped up a special batch of pepperoni and ate it.
he killed nibbler, most likely by being a retard who didnt clean the substrate enough in a terrestrial lizard's enclosure. Just judging by how filthy the rest of his hovel is. I think he got a new one though. I remember him crying to the police about people making fun of his dead lizard too.
 
If he was he would be a non-offending one. Because he wouldn't be able to catch up to any children due to his morbid obesity.
Could he catch up to fried chicken-fed fat children?

the great pest arrival when owena went down made pat posting a chore instead of a joy
Pretty sure the pests feel the same way about kiwi refugees *sigh* Can’t we all just get along?
 
in my mind the other reason I don't think this was a kf/ona user framing pat is because of how unpredictable all the elements are. vice just happened to publish a story on this guy a day before torswats decides that the best revenge is to dump a client's info? specifically this client? how would you orchestrate that? ona has orchestrated things when we were able to control more of the elements (josiah tapes, canyon boykin, seth simons, nadolski's text deletion defense) but this is supposedly a real SWATer, not some dumbass twitter user

if it turns out it's actually pat i think i need to start going to church because god's sense of humor is unparalleled
 
he killed nibbler, most likely by being a retard who didnt clean the substrate enough in a terrestrial lizard's enclosure.
RIP in peace Nibbler, lizards are cool and that little nibba deserved better than 1.2 gpa pat. honestly, people like pat should be legally barred from having pets.
 
What if somebody is paying torswats in both publicity and $ to leak these details?
The real torswats, the real swatter, but fake details on the client.

He has already waved away several details like "oh I don't get into my customer's business" (on the ona user's interview) to "Yes I know this motive, he told me."
If you're being paid to commit a crime you're not interested in why they want it done. You're not going to agree or disagree with its justification, you're just taking the job. Same thing applies here, why does he want to know the reasons behind the swatting?

The details are just too perfect.. and nobody else has ever stiffed this guy? On his first stiff he drops their name?
It doesn't make sense at all for the swatter to offer to do 10 calls (based on rates) without payment until completion... they would be individual transactions. Otherwise it's like you're giving 5 away for free.

I think this guy was given the opportunity for massive publicity by accepting this large campaign against a famous lolcow, calling them out, and spreading his rates/info. The ona interview was granted on contingency that the interviewer post the rates and new telegram info for torswats on the ona forums.. all this torswats guy cares about is the publicity this is generating, and the future sales that will get him.

Whether he continues, or this is just a quick final cash grab after the vice article and other publicity made the situation too hot is yet to be seen... but this torswats guy isn't giving all this information and confirming all these things out of the goodness of his heart, nor is it profitable for him to go on this crusade if it was anyone but a popular lolcow.
 
What if somebody is paying torswats in both publicity and $ to leak these details?
The real torswats, the real swatter, but fake details on the client.

He has already waved away several details like "oh I don't get into my customer's business" (on the ona user's interview) to "Yes I know this motive, he told me."
If you're being paid to commit a crime you're not interested in why they want it done. You're not going to agree or disagree with its justification, you're just taking the job. Same thing applies here, why does he want to know the reasons behind the swatting?
That's actually not always true. A real criminal "mastermind" would always try to extract as much information out of their "client" to squeeze as much out them as they can if and when they need to. Maybe I've watched too many Sopranos clips and true crime episodes but the biggest risk is almost always put upon the person who seeks out the services of these nefarious fucks. That's why crime doesn't pay or whatever.
 
Torswats is no mastermind. Torswats is human criminal scum who puts peoples' lives in jeopardy for chump change ($50 is chump change in this context.) He would most certainly take a C-note, or less, to throw Patso under the bus, or tell any number of lies. I would believe nothing he said without corroboration. Who would pay him to burn the pig? The same person paying him to swat the pig?

I'll believe that Patso is the swatter when the I see the FBI perp walking him on the nightly news. "Today the FBI arrested a Milwaukee man in connection with a string of swattings..." There is no doubt that the Jackboots will be 'interviewing' Patso, especially since the bomb threats have been mentioned. Preferably they chat him up after his Wednesday debtor's exam. So he is in the best mood possible. Tell them sweet little lies. They love it when people lie to them. We know Patso loves to lie.

This is very convoluted. It vaguely reminds me of the Umberto Eco novel, "Foucault's Pendulum." It's a fun read, but a bit frustrating too. Sort of like this thread.
 
That's actually not always true. A real criminal "mastermind" would always try to extract as much information out of their "client" to squeeze as much out them as they can if and when they need to. Maybe I've watched too many Sopranos clips and true crime episodes but the biggest risk is almost always put upon the person who seeks out the services of these nefarious fucks. That's why crime doesn't pay or whatever.

Exactly this. If I were a filthy SWATer-by-hire like this guy claims to be, I'd want to get as much info out of the client as possible. This way, if I get caught, I can fuck them over too. This creates a sort of Mutally Assured Destruction scenario. If you fuck-a me, I fuck-a you. Therefore, hopefully, you no fuck-a me.

So since this thread is already filled to the brim with basically useless speculation: why not add my own?

I can see both sides here. On the one hand, why the fuck would you choose to "out" Patrick S. Tomlinson as your client if he wasn't actually your client? This guy does not matter to the world whatsoever. Outside of here and that eccentric gentleman Owen A. Forrems, no one knows who the fuck this guy is. Surely if this person wasn't hired by Fatrick to SWAT himself, he'd choose someone more notable to "out" and put pressure on them.

However, it's just as likely that it's a Pat troll that hired this guy while posing as Pat. I mean, it makes sense, especially when people were already betting that Patrick was SWATing himself. It throws a fun chaotic wrench into the works. "LMAO, this guy will eventually out Pat, especially if I promise payment and then don't deliver! Haha, this is fun and I love dick!" It's gay ops at a high level (of gayness).

Fact is, making statements to the affirmative or negative is a bad call when we're playing with half a deck. It is, quite literally, a he-said, he-said scenario. Until we see some fucking receipts (which should be somewhere) we essentially know nothing.
 
Back