Debate user @secret watcher on the ethics of using post reactions without posting himself

sneed.png

Godspeed secret watcher
 
Why is it more important to protect the feelings of the tards who are too stupid to not take bait? Why not just ban disagreements? After all someone might sperg out if another user disagrees with them.
Because I don't want to have to sift through replies crying about this week's sperg when trying to read about the thread topic. Watcher may nig-rate but he doesn't post so he's harmless. Snailshart & similar retards were cancer & deserved their spot in the oven.
 
I always smile when I notice somebody doing that to me because it means their jimmies have been unsalvagably ruffled. I don't know why people get so upset about it.
Absolutely. Imagine getting assblasted over a user named Kermit Jizz. Like imagine unironically thinking the words "Fuck that nigger KERMIT JIZZ he makes me so mad" and then not killing yourself in shame.

Why is it more important to protect the feelings of the tards who are too stupid to not take bait? Why not just ban disagreements? After all someone might sperg out if another user disagrees with them.
It's not about protecting retards feelings, it's about taking out the common denominator. Why ban dozens of spergs when you can just ban the one stirring the pot?

Or ban both, either works for me.
 
Treat stickers as redditors should (but don't) treat reddit karma: They don't fucking matter!
That’s how I see it tbh. Not everyone will agree with my posts and that’s just fine tbh. I actually enjoy stickers because I usually just read the threads instead of actively posting and it’s a way to leave a sign to someone that people still agree/disagree or w/e without the pressure of having to craft a forum post.
I have the same mentality here that I carried when I was using 4chan, where I lurk until I have something valuable to add and if everyone thinks it’s retarded, just try again.
 
Last edited:
I do find it funny when people sperg about negrates, even I've done it before and realized how gay I looked afterwards. I do, however, find it very strange that somebody would just read threads, not participate at all or give any take, and just react to posts. Seems like Reddit behavior and NPC behavior. Someone who is too afraid to share their opinions and yet decides to be on his high horse and decide which takes are good and which are bad. Tbh seems like schizo behavior. Either way, if you negrate me I will kill you in real life, not in Minecraft.
 
More than being pissed about a sticker, imagine being so angry about it that you actually pay attention to the user who neg rated you. Who has that much autism to spare?

Also, I still want a laugh sticker. Funny kiwis deserve to be laughed at.
 
I don't mind secret watcher, but I do think it's a little unfair he's allowed to do his gimmick while other harmless gimmick posters, like that guy that just replied to everything with a Bible verse he felt was relevant, gets told to stop.

Agreed. Either harmless gimmicks are tolerated, or they aren't. Picking and choosing is fucking gay.
 
Last edited:
Yes it does, and yes there are. I don't know the mappings myself (obviously some things can be assumed, score go down for top hat and autismo ratings, score go up for medal/green checkmark), but the whole system isn't documented somewhere besides the bowels of Null's Xenforo config.
@CatParty's greatest idea, back when he was still online, was that we shuffle the score values on a monthly basis to out the people obsessing over it when suddenly they're sprinkling the deviant rating everywhere to give good karma.

I wish @CatParty would come back. They are greatly missed in the Kiwi Kot Kommunity.
 
Last edited:
Back