- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
He at least meant well.Admittedly, Lupin wasn't the most advisable role model either
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He at least meant well.Admittedly, Lupin wasn't the most advisable role model either
I do hope you are writing this under the supposition that the account is somehow more than one person (I am not convinced of this). I would hate for you to use they incorrectly, ie in the third person singular.Do you think they chose the name Remus to reflect the fact that their output would be one long Reeeeeee?!
Rubin Reeeeeeeeeeeemus!!!
Not when he became a deadbeat dad. He meant well to Harry, sure, not to his son. Maybe to his wife? I honestly barely recall the seventh bookHe at least meant well.
He didn't have the time to become a deadbeat dad, he and Tonks died soon after their son was born.Not when he became a deadbeat dad. He meant well to Harry, sure, not to his son. Maybe to his wife? I honestly barely recall the seventh book
That's sorta incorrectHe didn't have the time to become a deadbeat dad, he and Tonks died soon after their son was born.
Unironically Harry Potter has some life lessons if you are willing to look for them.Love how my thread has morphed into wholesome autistic debate about Harry Potter.
Nah, it was that even a close friend could backstab you out of cowardice.Not sure about Book 3, maybe the fact that prisons need to be more secure?
Funny that applies to Daniel Radcliffe himself. Fucking coward.Nah, it was that even a close friend could backstab you out of cowardice.
He offered Harry to join them on the horctux hunt early in the book because having a family was too much for him but Harry told him to stop being a faggot and go back to his wife and child. Lupin apparently listened to him and did as he was told.That's sorta incorrect
Lupin already had plans on abandoning his kid shortly after he impregnated Tonks
View attachment 5066235
View attachment 5066236Harry Potter's Sixth Year 1996-1997 Timeline – Harry Potter Lexicon
1996-1997 – The year of war, of learning about Voldemort’s past, and the death of Dumbledorewww.hp-lexicon.org
![]()
Lupin visits Grimmauld Place, asks to join Harry's quest – Harry Potter Lexicon
Lupin, worried that his expected child with Tonks will be a werewolf and feeling guilty for starting a family despite his outcast status, comes to Number Twelve, Grimmauld Place and tries to convince Harry to let him join in on the quest. Harry gets angry at Lupin for abandoning his family to go...www.hp-lexicon.org
That said, yes, Lupin and Tonks did die a month after the kid was born. Plenty of time for Lupin to be a deadbeat (though we are unsure if he changed his mind)
View attachment 5066260
View attachment 5066261
Harry Potter's Seventh Year 1997-1998 Timeline – Harry Potter Lexicon
1997-1998 – The year of hunting Horcruxes, the Battle of Hogwarts, and the final defeat of Voldemortwww.hp-lexicon.org
How about: feds are incompetent fags and put innocent people in prison while individuals such as Lucius Malfoy walk free because they have the right connections??Not sure about Book 3, maybe the fact that prisons need to be more secure?
Not so fast, Ms. Farrow, we want to hear your hot takes. If you take part in the conversation it's no longer off-topic.My work here is done.![]()
And the saddest part is that he'll probably blame it on Caroline Farrow for it...But it's probably from him mass tagging people.
How about: feds are incompetent fags and put innocent people in prison while individuals such as Lucius Malfoy walk free because they have the right connections??
There is a speculation thread about it:I was just coming on to say, that Reeeee-much was suspended for targeted harassment.
I believe he was released because he claimed that he was under Imperius curse which leads me to believe that there was evidence against him but - in Muggle terms - he claimed temporary insanity.Should being a former death-eater be a criminal offence? If he didn’t actually murder people or there was no proof of crimes, difficult to know what to do. Should thinking the wrong thoughts be illegal?
I believe there was something akin to Nuremberg and that's where Belatrix was sentenced. In Goblet of Fire Voldemort mocks those of his followers who lied about their alignment and motives to avoid prison.Maybe the ministry should have placed restrictions on his ability to conduct magic or maybe there should have been a Nuremberg.
Can you comment on any possible legal attempts to expose his identity? If you can't blink twice really fast.