Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
It’s two things, they idolize Nick for being an attorney, and think attorneys are all powerful beings from the upper crust of society. They also think Nick is their friend so they behave like they are asking their lawyer friend for advice, secretly hoping he will take on their case pro-bono. Aspiring paralegal parasociopaths.
I dunno about Cynthia's legal threats against other Locals users but, as to the people mad at the Farms, I think the chances of Nick being the attorney of record in a fight against KF are practically nill. He'd take a even bigger hit to his cred, and would ultimately be seen as little better than somebody like Keffals. Null also seems to be trying really hard to stay mostly neutral in this, and if Nick were to send him paperwork that would be the death knell for what remains of that relationship.

Nick is caught between a rock and a hard spot here. On the one hand, he knows that what's happening here is basically what KF has always done. To wit, the archiving capability of this site paid huge dividends during Weebwars (until Ty fucked everything up). Everything was kosher when it was KV being monitored and mocked. It's only when it became about him and his that we become "bottom feeders." What changed? Only the target. Not the methodology or standards as to what the site finds funny.

On the other hand, he also knows that if he advises his new friends to tone down their degeneracy, so they're no longer the target of so much ridicule, it would be spoiling what he calls "the fun." This is the crowd he likes and wants to hang with now. Them toning it down would run contrary to what he's looking for.

I think the whole going into "secret" Discord servers is tacit recognition on his part that he can't really do much other than trying to make it somewhat harder, but never impossible, for us to point and laugh at his gaggle of retards.

So, in the end, if one or more of these idiots decides they're gonna "take down the Farms," they're gonna get mocked ruthlessly, and he's probably just gonna stand there with a dopey look on his face and let it happen. What else can he really do?
 
The reveal of the secret super fan discord, thanks to @Himedall All-seeing Waifu, basically sums up Nick at this point.

Nick has his own discord, where he could make whatever rules he wanted to, he just had to have a backbone and tell people off when they broke the rules. Even better, only people that paid Nick $5 a month were allowed into his discord server. All he had to do was say "I don't like this" and tell people to fuck off.

Then came locals and a bevy of drugged depressed women, and suddenly Nick drops all pretense of hanging out in his own discord and shills his locals instead. He states specifically that this new place is "Free speech" the only thing stopping you is the platform's TOS. As usual, Nick didn't stand up to anyone who broke those rules (see plethora of coom posting and fed posting).

Throughout all of this, Nick is creating parasocial communities and charging people money to join, just to drop it at a moment's notice as soon as any resistance to his behavior pops up. And even as he sells his Locals community as a way to chat with him 24/7, he doesn't hang out in there anymore, but rather goes into private discords where the only barrier to entry seems to be a thot that sends (or receives Nick nudes) or a noseguarding simp. These are probably the people who suggest he start a GSG.

I know I shouldn't feel bad for his paypigs (especially since I got swindled following his YouTube ban), but I can't help but feel a little sympathy for them as they attempt to grab their idol's attention by participating in his chat while he ignores them for some internet dick-sucking.

To just add a bit more context, this server really is not a 'superman exclusive discord server set up by Nick' for his top simps. It was setup by CGoody for Xino (Modern Feminism marches on... propped up by men) who wanted to make a safe space in light of Panoptes going live.

Nick and Lady R did join the server, but seem not to have posted really that much. Do not expect much quantity of content from Nose or Kayla from this source.

I have seen and heard many references to Nick telling people to DM him and that he does so with '700 people' or that he will give people his phone number via e-mail so '[they] can text about it'.

I do not have a full handle on what Nick and Kayla's inner social circle really looks like quite yet, but I am toying with the idea of building a mind map á la Roert Goveia to try to track it.

My gut impression is that Nick has created some informal core group that he communicates privately with across multiple DM platforms (LOCALS, Twitter, Discord, and Instagram), e-mail, and texting. It is clear that CGoody, Arttheclown, EgalitarianBtch, Spectre, Sdsmosher, Mandy_K, Basedfrommars, Sally78, Carimachet, and Spectre have some kind of increased access, but members of this group are at odds with each other. There is no no clear stratification or grouping apparent to determine a pecking order that has emerged quite yet.
 
To just add a bit more context, this server really is not a 'superman exclusive discord server set up by Nick' for his top simps. It was setup by CGoody for Xino (Modern Feminism marches on... propped up by men) who wanted to make a safe space in light of Panoptes going live.

Nick and Lady R did join the server, but seem not to have posted really that much. Do not expect much quantity of content from Nose or Kayla from this source.
Thank you for the correction. I had completely misunderstood the original idea for the "secret Discord".
 
Thank you for the correction. I had completely misunderstood the original idea for the "secret Discord".

No problem. To be fair, the more I dig into it, the more asinine the structure of it becomes. Where you expect 'Social Media Expert' Nicholas Robert Rekieta Esq. to make a common sense decision, he often does the opposite... It is boggling.

I also have the benefit and singular joy of sifting through most of the archives to glean the highlights I post here. (Yay?) That is a lot of context that colours (and hopefully informs) my perception and deductions. I have at least 2 more potential angles to leverage more information and laughs, but slow and steady wins the race... We are still months out from seeing anything from those larger endeavours.

Panoptes took 2 weeks of work, #TheRekietaFiles about 4 weeks, Discord a month and a half, and the next will probably be about 6 months of planning and preparation, all told. My last project will be well over a year.

Advice to the LOCALS crew: in this game, question everything and everyone you think you know.
 
Someone needs to do a black light check on this poor kid’s suit jacket.
I really don't know what to say about it. I guess my thoughts on the matter can be summarized by a quote from noted wordsmith E.O. Ralph:



Looks like Nick can't be bothered to stream tonight. It's not like anything newsworthy law wise went down today.
I think it's a decent bet that Nick was seething about the developments in his thread yesterday evening.

Also, counter-ops against the Farms, that occur on the Farms, usually end pretty badly for the people that try it. This guy is in for a rough ride if that's his dream.
I don't know. It's possible to completely derail a thread with Discord ops. Just look at a random thread on the Ralph subforum every other week. The difference is this was amateurish and that was obvious even before today. As for today.... LMFAO.
:story:
 
See post below if you’re asking what meds Kayla takes.

Ahhhh interesting. It's funny because the whole crew like drex, mindset, branca, nick are always talking about how women over 26 are undesirable and have no value in the dating market and are all on SSRIs and other psych meds/crazy pills and otherwise ripping on all women.
 
No problem. To be fair, the more I dig into it, the more asinine the structure of it becomes. Where you expect 'Social Media Expert' Nicholas Robert Rekieta Esq. to make a common sense decision, he often does the opposite... It is boggling.
You really shouldn't make light of people's disabilities like that, Oppositional Defiant Disorder is a true and honest mental condition just like Gender Dysphoria.
 
My gut impression is that Nick has created some informal core group that he communicates privately with across multiple DM platforms (LOCALS, Twitter, Discord, and Instagram), e-mail, and texting. It is clear that CGoody, Arttheclown, EgalitarianBtch, Spectre, Sdsmosher, Mandy_K, Basedfrommars, Sally78, Carimachet, and Spectre have some kind of increased access, but members of this group are at odds with each other. There is no no clear stratification or grouping apparent to determine a pecking order that has emerged quite yet.
Well, if you're correct about Spectre being in that group, I think "at odds" might be an understatement. That's a potential shitshow in the making. We've already discussed CGoody at some length, but Spectre has also gone in on EgalitarianBtch and Sally on his Twitter.

1681921481343.png

1681921272238.png

1681921970662.png


On the face of it, it might seem odd that he would be caught dead hanging in with the very degenerates he claims to despise (he hasn't been seen in the Locals chat, AFAIK), but as the Nose Defense Force continues to contract in size, I think a certain amount of consolidation is inevitable. It's either that, or he'll have to admit Nick prefers to run with a much different crowd these days, and abandon ship like most people with a brain started doing back in November. One thing I have noticed about all the Gator-types is that their personal values tend to become highly malleable over time, so it wouldn't exactly shock me if he starts dialing it back if he feels he needs to in order to remain in the Rekieta inner-circle.
 
Here is a Xanax dependant female freaking out because they cannot get it in their new state. There are ways to deal with this... Go to a doctor. Go to a clinic. Go to the A&E.

Damn, this is both hilarious and tragic at the same time.
Best practice when it comes to prescribing benzos is not to do it for longer than a week or two at most. Once you get past that period, the drug stops having the effect that it was being prescribed for, and will tend to cause the symptoms you were getting it prescribed for -- with dependency on top. And as many people have already pointed out here, I'd take a heroin dependency or a cocaine dependency over a benzo addiction any day of the week. Benzos are so much more difficult to quit than all the others. This woman needs to be referred to somebody who is expert in detoxing people from benzos ASAP.

So, that's the sad part. The hilarious part is that the poor old xanny mom thinks that her $5 a month buys her on-demand consultations with a lawyer, whenever she feels like she needs it. But I can answer her questions for her:

a.) No, you can't sue your doctor or your pharmacy. When a practice suspects somebody is growing dependent on the drugs you're prescribing, stopping prescribing for them is the first thing most doctors will do. To sue a doctor for clinical negligence, the thing they did to you has to be way out of line with what constitutes current practice. It'd be far easier to make that argument for prescribing the benzos than it would be for stopping prescribing them.

b.) Who moves to a different state but continues to have their old doctor in their old state carry on prescribing for them? I'll tell you who does this: DRUG ADDICTS. Regular patients just get a new doctor and have them continue with their medication.

c.) The game is up for this woman. She has but two choices now: find a pill mill who'll continue prescribing to her despite knowing she's a dope fiend. This is a terrible route to go down. Pill mills never last for very long. You're always worried that the one you use will close -- because they do get shut down all the time. The alternative is to get treatment for her benzo dependence. But given how anxious she is at the moment, this idea will just make her even more anxious -- that's one of the major symptoms of withdrawal. And while an alcohol withdrawal will last a week or two, a heroin withdrawal perhaps a month or so (depending on how long you've been using) benzo withdrawals can last for years.

I know there's one doctor who has expertise in treating drug dependence who thinks benzos have a useful role to play in treating some drug dependent patients. I'm pretty sure that she's the only person in the world that believes this. Every other doctor in the world believes that the only appropriate treatment for women like this is detoxification and abstinence.
 
I know that in the US they day you can sue a ham sandwich, but what is in the water that makes everyone think that they have a Righteous Cause that will prevail if only a judge/jury will see it!?

I'll stick to being a nobody and avoiding the legal process.

I've said this here before but I'll say it again. I'm married to a lawyer. Unlike a lot of lawyers (and certainly unlike her husband) my wife is scrupulously ethical. If you showed up at her office wanting to sue somebody, she'd attempt to do everything in her power to talk you out of it. She was convinced that for most people, for most sums of money that weren't life ruining, the process was so life and soul destroying that most of the time you were better off walking away.

There were numerous occasions when we got fucked over ourselves -- generally by crappy tradesmen of one sort or another. We'd have a great case, one that would obviously win when it eventually got to court. She ALWAYS refused to sue. She just didn't think the money was worth the stress.

She came to hate the practice of law. She started off doing civil lit them moved into family. About fifteen years before she retired, she retrained as a mediator, because she felt much more comfortable helping people divide up their assets and arrange their child care agreements outside of the court system with the horrendous costs that people incurred -- at a time in their life when they'd often struggle to be able to afford it. (When she started her practice, the legal aid system covered divorce but at some point that stopped -- and rightly so, to my mind.)

If a couple can put the rancour to one side for a moment while they get this stuff sorted out, they can save themselves a fortune. And if you've got kids, you really need to be able to do that at some point for the sake of your children. The sooner you can do it the better.

But some people are just so angry and so fixated on their need to be right and their partners need to be wrong, that they do what Rekieta is doing with Monty, and let the costs spiral regardless. Instinctively, I'm much more like Nick than I am my wife. I'm also stubborn and obsessed with the need to be seen to be right. But over the years, she's persuaded me that my instinctive approach is a stupid one. And she's absolutely correct. Who but a complete moron would spend $75k defending their right to call a complete stranger a paedophile on the internet?
 
The LinkedIn profile checks out with her being a mechanic:

The LinkedIn profile was created only after doubts were expressed as to the true nature of her job. The (highly unprofessional) photo on the LinkedIn is her former YouTube pfp.

Unusual that there is no employment history or educational background listed. Place of work is listed as the generic “Ford Motor Company” in Arlington, Texas but there isn’t anywhere there that doesn’t go by the specific name of the shop or dealership.

Someone in this thread speculated upon how Mandy had such a blemish free body when she was a slight framed woman allegedly doing a labor intensive job. (This may have been before Cynthia disclosed that Mandy admitted to posting pics that were over ten yrs old) Subsequently, after admitting on Locals to reading the thread, Mandy posted a photo of a bruise on her hip, claiming the bruise had happened at work.

Around the time just before or during the Rittenhouse trial Mandy said in Nick’s YT chat that she was a waitress at Hooters.
 
Who but a complete moron would spend $75k defending their right to call a complete stranger a paedophile on the internet?
Nick has on occasion offered the explanation that he is doing this for the benefit of everyone. That he is protecting the internet itself by doing this. That after the court determines that the case should be done under Colorado law, that the court will issue Nick an anti-SLAPP judgement through which Monty will owe Nick all of Nick's legal expenses. Nick assumes that Monty cannot pay Nick's legal expenses and therefore he can use an unpaid civil judgement by Monty to control Monty's behavior until the end of time. Somehow the civil judgement will forevermore prevent Monty from filing a lawsuit against anyone over any issue.
Yes. That makes no sense and is the logic of a moron. But that is what Nick has said.
 
Well, if you're correct about Spectre being in that group, I think "at odds" might be an understatement. That's a potential shitshow in the making. We've already discussed CGoody at some length, but Spectre has also gone in on EgalitarianBtch and Sally on his Twitter.

View attachment 5069664
View attachment 5069658
View attachment 5069695

On the face of it, it might seem odd that he would be caught dead hanging in with the very degenerates he claims to despise (he hasn't been seen in the Locals chat, AFAIK), but as the Nose Defense Force continues to contract in size, I think a certain amount of consolidation is inevitable. It's either that, or he'll have to admit Nick prefers to run with a much different crowd these days, and abandon ship like most people with a brain started doing back in November. One thing I have noticed about all the Gator-types is that their personal values tend to become highly malleable over time, so it wouldn't exactly shock me if he starts dialing it back if he feels he needs to in order to remain in the Rekieta inner-circle.

Nick has always been good at keeping his friend groups separate while still maintaining good relations with them. Even if they hate each other, he managed for a long time to stay out of the drama and picking sides. If anything, it was (or appeared that it was) others who chose to alienate him.

Nick seems adept at playing the part he Ned's to in order to get along with internet friends. After all, he admitted ge had been 'pretending' for about 20 years by being someone he is not, no?

Damn, this is both hilarious and tragic at the same time.

I just do not understand the need to scream about it on the internet. Ai am not a GP or specialist, but there are more healthy ways of addressing it.

I scrolled through the chat later on, and the story is some combination of: 'The pharmacist told the doctor I had picked up all my prescription refills ON April 8th' vis-a-vis 'I would have picked them all up BY the 8th', making it sound like she picked up all the pills on one day, not that here refills were expired.

The alternate story is that the GP prescribed 1X pill a day and she has been using 3 or so, so she ran out more quickly of her refills. She claims the direction on the bottle says take UP TO 3x a day.

She is also petrified of being labeled a drug addict. Also petrified of withdrawal. Benzos have years-long withdrawal symptoms if used for more than a few weeks, so why were they in use so long?

Going through prescription at a rate of 3X for a year seems sketchy, and the parsing of words of the first sounds shaky as well.

The LinkedIn profile was created only after doubts were expressed as to the true nature of her job. The (highly unprofessional) photo on the LinkedIn is her former YouTube pfp.

Unusual that there is no employment history or educational background listed. Place of work is listed as the generic “Ford Motor Company” in Arlington, Texas but there isn’t anywhere there that doesn’t go by the specific name of the shop or dealership.

Someone in this thread speculated upon how Mandy had such a blemish free body when she was a slight framed woman allegedly doing a labor intensive job. (This may have been before Cynthia disclosed that Mandy admitted to posting pics that were over ten yrs old) Subsequently, after admitting on Locals to reading the thread, Mandy posted a photo of a bruise on her hip, claiming the bruise had happened at work.

Around the time just before or during the Rittenhouse trial Mandy said in Nick’s YT chat that she was a waitress at Hooters.

Mandy has always been an enigma, but an uninteresting one to me. She could be catfishing, but in and of herself, not that interesting. Her doxx would be tangential to laughing at whatever sap she conned, but she does not seem to be taking advantage of anyone.
 
This guy just wants to be a farmer. This comment is telling, he’s all about Kiwi Farms, this site is the bar with which he’s begun to judge all others, whether he’s aware of it or not. What he doesn’t get is that right now, he doesn’t need permission to join the forum, (or any forum with open registration,) and more importantly, that KF isn’t a monolith. His obsession with The Nose is blocking his view. This thread is 1 of over 100,000. It’s fairly popular, sometimes even outright hopping with activity, but far from a pinnacle of what makes KF what it is. One day, if he’s lucky, he’ll realize that he’s fantasizing about this site because we have fun. That little discord server doesn’t look too fun, so if he ever figures it out, he might realize his big dream. If you’re fantasizing about posting threads, lmao, then make an account and do it.
Oppositional Defiant Disorder is a true and honest mental condition just like Gender Dysphoria.
ODD is a Dx only given to children. Seen a trend of adults using this term, and it’s actually funny, and frightening, if you’re in the know. Nowadays the field of psychiatry is super pozzed, and victim mentality worship is everywhere, which compounds the unrealistic views on diagnosis often seen. Originally, (before the great pozzening & self Dx labeling era) the whole reason ODD was created as a diagnosis was because Dr’s understood better the power a Dx holds, and thought it was too cruel to mark a child for life with a Dx as severe as Antisocial Personality Disorder, in fact you aren’t allowed to give that label to anyone under 18. Enter ODD. (Don’t want to highjack this thread into psych hour, so I’m cutting this short.) Point is, ODD doesn’t exist in adults, ASPD does. (Important to note that a child can be helped to overcome a mild or moderate case of ODD. It’s not a death sentence that you’ll have ASPD as an adult.) However, those with a history of ODD have a greater than 90% chance of being diagnosed with another mental illness in their lifetime. They are at high risk of social and emotional problems as adults, including suicide, mood disorders like anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder, and high rates of substance use disorders. Last point, if ole Balldo has ODD, in reality, it’s ASPD.
 
LOCALS Charlie seems to enjoy throwing hands... He is going to court for A&B charges and he is already on probation:

As some point we're gonna have to ponder whether the Mexican savior of the white race (Fuentes) now has a high pedigree of audience than this Nick.

As more time goes on, I'm seeing less names I remember from when I was a fan of Nick's work, and more druggies, drug dealers, petty criminals, wine-moms, fedposters, crazy cat bitches, etc.

These floor sweepings are positively Ralph-tier. The absolute state of the "Racketeers" in 2023. Very sad.

1681927213911.png

Truth.

Nick has always been good at keeping his friend groups separate while still maintaining good relations with them. Even if they hate each other, he managed for a long time to stay out of the drama and picking sides. If anything, it was (or appeared that it was) others who chose to alienate him.
Fair point. I suppose he could keep the "inner-circle" compartmentalized into pie slices.

But if they cross-paths.... hooo boy! Get ready for fireworks as Nick just stands there watching his remaining loyalists tear each other apart.
 
Saw it. Still didn't mention the GriftSendGo. Noseguarding must be all or nothing. Sad! Many such cases.
i want you hysterical cunts to fucking die

can you even imagine how unfun this faggot shit you're pulling makes talking about internet drama?

I do not read this thread. I do not follow this thread. I do not store shit about Rekieta to long term memory. If you want to cry that I remember Chantal's entire life story, it's because she's funnier. Part of why she's funny is that when I read her thread I see funny stuff. When I read the Rekieta thread, I see petulant man-children throwing a fucking fit that their favorite e-daddy didn't talk about mention the right things while talking about their old favorite e-daddy.

Fucking tumor.
 
I just do not understand the need to scream about it on the internet. Ai am not a GP or specialist, but there are more healthy ways of addressing it.

I scrolled through the chat later on, and the story is some combination of: 'The pharmacist told the doctor I had picked up all my prescription refills ON April 8th' vis-a-vis 'I would have picked them all up BY the 8th', making it sound like she picked up all the pills on one day, not that here refills were expired

At the risk of power levelling here, I used to work in addictions research -- a lot of it would be ethnographic stuff, so I had a lot of contact with people who were benzo dependent. This woman is so typical of the benzo dependent people I dealt with. A heroin addict loses their source of supply, they're kind of used to it and tend not to have much of a problem getting a new connection.

But benzo dependent people were invariably dependent on prescribed drugs. When their doctor realized that they had a patient with a problem, they would inevitably make the decision to cut off their source of supply -- and the combination of panic and anxiety that this woman is displaying is absolutely typical. They get really frantic -- it's almost as if somebody's told them that the world is about to end, and so they'll run around like headless chickens, squawking at anybody who will listen about how critical it is that they get their prescription sorted out.

Best practice guidelines suggest that benzos shouldn't be prescribed for longer than 2-4 weeks. Here's a good summary of the issues involved for GP's in prescribing benzos.
 
Back