- Joined
- Nov 16, 2022
EXPLAIN YOURSELF @secret watcher
Debate user @secret watcher on the ethics of using post reactions without posting himself
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
Dagoth AMOGUS
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2023
It's okay to just browse the website. That's what I do. This is actually my first post here, hello. But I don't see why secret watcher has to say anything. I am pretty sure his stickers are his statement. Interpret them however you want. A badge of honor, a mark of shame, but don't get all bent out over it.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2023
It's more like a calling card, the watching is done by the time he leaves one.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
TLDR: The mods should be naming the users involved so we can shame them into laughing and having fun, or they need to be bullied until they leave.
Secret Watcher is the ideal Kiwifarmer. He doesn't shit up the forum by posting inane content that is conveyed just as well by a sticker. He doesn't cowtip or interact with the lolcows that congregate on his userpage beyond a sticker, while said stickers draw funny autists worth mocking into a singular place, making easy lols accessible by all.
In fact, Secret watcher does the community a great service by outing the retards who take themselves seriously on an internet forum whose stated goal is to provoke laughter.
@Null I am at a loss at what 'ethics' need to be debated. Is there any reason we are not naming and shaming the users making reports on Secret Watcher? They deserve it. Regardless of whether these reports were made in good faith, the users that made them are antithetical to everything this forum represents. Selective exclusivity is important for any community. Look at any of the myriad we have in community watch that died when they accepted trannies as jannies. If trannies are the deathblow to any normal community, then the kind of self-serious people who cannot accept even the mildest form of criticism without trying to get another user banned will be the death of this one.
The kind of Alogs that report Secret Watcher are the exact kind of Alogs which are cowtipping, fedposting, and gayopping, because dontcha know, the internet is srs bizness.
In conclusion, the users shitting up your report box are cancer, and the cure is light, bleach, and community-based shaming.
Secret Watcher is the ideal Kiwifarmer. He doesn't shit up the forum by posting inane content that is conveyed just as well by a sticker. He doesn't cowtip or interact with the lolcows that congregate on his userpage beyond a sticker, while said stickers draw funny autists worth mocking into a singular place, making easy lols accessible by all.
In fact, Secret watcher does the community a great service by outing the retards who take themselves seriously on an internet forum whose stated goal is to provoke laughter.
@Null I am at a loss at what 'ethics' need to be debated. Is there any reason we are not naming and shaming the users making reports on Secret Watcher? They deserve it. Regardless of whether these reports were made in good faith, the users that made them are antithetical to everything this forum represents. Selective exclusivity is important for any community. Look at any of the myriad we have in community watch that died when they accepted trannies as jannies. If trannies are the deathblow to any normal community, then the kind of self-serious people who cannot accept even the mildest form of criticism without trying to get another user banned will be the death of this one.
The kind of Alogs that report Secret Watcher are the exact kind of Alogs which are cowtipping, fedposting, and gayopping, because dontcha know, the internet is srs bizness.
In conclusion, the users shitting up your report box are cancer, and the cure is light, bleach, and community-based shaming.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
because you need to lurk moar
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022
Agreed
lol no
The ideal forum user is one that creates content and archives tirelessly, not speds and spergs.
I can give you one example, @Tard Whisperer has been almost singlehandedly maintaining the Nicole Fuentes detox area of the site filled with content.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
"Debate X on the ethics of Y" is a meme format that lets everyone know Kiwis are being stupid faggots and embarrassing themselves in the thread.
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2020
Debate user Dynastia on the ethics of kiwis being stupid faggots on the Internet.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
Debate the ethics of explaining debating ethics to spergs
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
secret watcher gives me nice reacts so i feel special 
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
Secret watchers antics have created this thread and the content within for us to laugh at. I would argue them pushing a button on a few posts has generated ten times the content and conversation you have with the paragraphs you’ve wasted.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022
Untrue.
People that got mad at him and repeatedly abused the report system, pissing off jannies and also Jersh, are the ones responsible for the thread.
Abusing stickers is just one schizo way of misusing the forums; there are far more numerous schizos that abuse the report system, constantly plaguing jannies with their petty, unimportant, irrelevant conflicts with other users they dislike, which eventually leads to Jersh getting mad and having to waste time on it.
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
Secret watcher is the metaphorical pickle man, watching Chris from across the street. The people reporting are Chris.
I think we should make a poll: is using the reaction stickers to react “misusing”the site?
One person in this thread sounds like an utter loser and it isn’t Secret Watcher. He hasn’t said anything.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
This one knows his sins. I have shamed my family and will now commit sudoku. Now where is my pencil?
Good idea. I'll provide a visual aid. One moment.
I dislike your comment. As such, I have given you a mean sticker, thereby misusing the forums and entering into a petty, irrelevant conflict with you, a user I am coming to dislike.
Would you like to complete the circle and plague the janies with a report about my naughty behavior?
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022
Definitely not. The dislike is not (yet) mutual, no idea why I would hate on you we barely interacted.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
Don't you guys realize that Internet points are the only marker by which a modern man can estimate his worth? Family? Gay. Friends? Gay. Work? Gay. Hobbies? Gay. Intellect? Gay except when leveraged to gain more updoots.
Stickers? Stickers = Success.
Stickers? Stickers = Success.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
I made this GIF:
Use it wisely, Kiwis.
Use it wisely, Kiwis.
MunsterCheeseJr
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2022
Big deal. So some rando or a few randos give you a negative rating on a post. It happens. People disagree. And some people just like to troll with the ratings system. Or maybe your offended someone and they are butt hurt by what you said. Don't get butt hurt yourself over a little disagreement.
If you get a whole bunch of solely negative reactions, then maybe your autistic self fucked up. Time to pay attention. Or maybe the primary audience of a specific thread isn't like the rest of the website.
Or maybe, just maybe your dark sense of humor was so black and disgusting you won the internet.
It isn't as if you can win anything tangible with your internet points.
If you get a whole bunch of solely negative reactions, then maybe your autistic self fucked up. Time to pay attention. Or maybe the primary audience of a specific thread isn't like the rest of the website.
Or maybe, just maybe your dark sense of humor was so black and disgusting you won the internet.
It isn't as if you can win anything tangible with your internet points.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
It is literally not a misuse at all wtf. His one post was to ask in tts why he couldn't rate posts anymore, which was a setting change so brand new accounts could not be made to do proxy sticker wars (no really it happened constantly). I configured his account to bypass the requirements because he had been around so long.
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022