Audrey Hale manifesto a ‘blueprint on total destruction’ say pols, who claim FBI is stalling its release - Soft target terrorism is almost impossible to protect against.

Nashville shooter Audrey Hale’s manifesto is a “blueprint on total destruction” which the FBI are stalling releasing, according to local politicians, who describe its contents as “astronomically dangerous”.

Almost a month after Audrey Hale, who identified as transgender, killed six at the city’s Covenant elementary school before being shot by police authorities have yet to release a motive or any of the writings seized from her home, despite growing pressure.

Rep. Tim Burchett, (R-Tenn.) told The Post he knew the FBI was behind the delay, saying the news was “disappointing” and calling for documents to be released to grieving loved ones as well as members of Congress.

The manifesto “could maybe tell us a little bit about what’s going on inside of her head,” he added. “I think that would answer a lot of questions.”
Twenty journals, five laptops, a suicide note and various other notes written by Hale were seized from the house she shared with her parents as well as two memoirs, five Covenant School yearbooks and seven cellphones, according to a search warrant.

Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston confirmed to The Post the FBI has already ruled the manifesto would not be released in its entirety.
“What I was told is, her manifesto was a blueprint on total destruction, and it was so, so detailed at the level of what she had planned,” she said, when reached by phone.
“That document in the wrong person’s hands would be astronomically dangerous,” she added.

Johnston said “parts” of Hale’s writings would eventually come out, but added she feels “the vast, overwhelming majority of it,” presented too much of a danger to the public.
She added: “I personally don’t want to know the depths to which her psychosis reached … When I’m told by an MNPD high-ranking official that it keeps him up at night, I’m going to defer to that person in that agency that I don’t need to read that.”

The two agencies handling the investigation, Metro Nashville Police Department and the FBI, each deferred The Post to the other agency when contacted by The Post. Although MNPD is leading the investigation, spokesperson Don Aaron said material related to Hale is still “under analysis” by the FBI.

Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Director David Rausch described the writings he had seen during a meeting with the Tennessee Sheriffs’ Association, reportedly saying: “The documents that we have, and I have viewed those, you know, one is specifically a plan and the other is some journal-type rantings.”

Former police officer-turned author and adjunct professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice Joseph Giacalone said the public “has a right to know” what’s in the manifesto “even if it’s heavily redacted,” but believes authorities are worried about the effect releasing it could have.

“I think what the FBI is really concerned here with, and I think law enforcement, is that if there is something in there that is truly damaging for the transgender community, I think they are hesitant to do it because they are afraid of a violent backlash against that protected class of people.”

However, Giacalone also warned if authorities did release a heavily redacted version of the manifesto, “you run the risk of letting speculation run the day.”
Hale unleashed a hail of 152 bullets during her 14 minute killing spree killing nine-year-olds Evelyn Dieckhaus, Hallie Scruggs and William Kinney as well as school janitor Mike Hill, substitute teacher Cynthia Peak and headmistress Katherine Koonce, who reportedly ran toward the shooter to try to protect the school.
Rasmussen Reports surveyed 971 people in the aftermath and found that 68 percent believed Hale’s alleged manifesto should be released.

“it’s just too much of a risk that that could get into the wrong person’s hands.” -Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) said if the writings are not ultimately released, “then we need to investigate why.”

If released, a large part of the manifesto will be redacted for the specificity of the plans.

Rep. Walter Hudson (R-Minn.) has also pushed for their release. He recalled to The Post conversations with citizens who have expressed “increasing distrust with the FBI and with government agencies generally.”

“One of the greatest threats to democracy or, as I would say, threats to the Constitutional Republic, is the erosion of trust in institutions. The FBI is one of those institutions,” he said, adding he thinks public trust in the intelligence agency has wavered. He added: “If you’re going to wield power in a free country, then you have a responsibility to maintain the public’s trust in that power – and the FBI needs to figure out how to do that.”

Archive: https://archive.ph/LAnnh#selection-1943.0-2163.448
Source: https://nypost.com/2023/04/20/audre...tion-say-pols-who-claim-fbi-stalling-release/
 
Metro Nashville Council Member Courtney Johnston confirmed to The Post the FBI has already ruled the manifesto would not be released in its entirety.
She added: “I personally don’t want to know the depths to which her psychosis reached … When I’m told by an MNPD high-ranking official that it keeps him up at night, I’m going to defer to that person in that agency that I don’t need to read that.”
COWARD.
If you can't see it, if you are too scared to look it in the eye, you do not deserve your position. You are a coward and bring shame to your station and your family.
 
No way. No way. No way in hell did the womanchild who had KH figurines in her window holding hands and drew cutesy shipping art of Winnie the Pooh characters write something that could be on par with/ or more dangerous than manifestos or previous killers, especially ones that had a higher body count and a bigger grievance against society. "Astronomical dangerous" yeah okay I'll believe it when I see it.
 
“Astronomically dangerous”, really? This autistic retard didn't come up with anything that anyone else with a brain couldn't figure out. Just buy a kilogram of fentanyl, get a job in supermarket and start putting it in random products. Or rent a bunch of apartments and start blowing up gas stoves.

The "blueprint of destruction" is not the difficult part, it's finding people who are retarded enough to actually carry it out. I guess the double concern here is a) some troons might be radicalized enough to do it (since they believe there's an ongoing genocide of their kind); and b) the backlash from normies once they realize this.
 
the backlash from normies once they realize this.
If anything I think homogay elements of USGOV is concerned about the backlash. They've tried to prop up troons as innocent little sex perverts angels, but whatever's in the manifesto might shatter that narrative completely.
 
What can possibly be in it that’s genuinely dangerous to the public? She was young, female, with no connections.
Or do they mean dangerous to a specific degenerate community? Or the state in some way?
Personally I believe the FBI investigators are aware of how unhinged troons are and are afraid that releasing it may inspire a wave of troon terrorist attacks. If that is the real reason then I think their fears are justified even if it is wrong to withold it.
 
Since I still think Audrey Hale was just an adult human female who jumped on the latest bandwagon to see if it would give her what she needed, her writings scaring the authorities is hilarious.
Are the FBI analyzing it so they can use it themselves in the future without getting accused of copying?

What I'm taking away from this is that a WOMAN wrote something super scary and the edgelord incels could never.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diana Moon Glampers
The modern world provides a startling number of means and oppurtunities for a lone individual to kill or permanently disable staggeringly large numbers of people in ways that don't involve kinetic energy.
It certainly does, and while I would never do such a thing I could think of half a dozen that would be possible fairly easily to anyone with a bit of imagination and technical knowledge.
But this is a dumb kid, a girl drawing stupid art. The chances of her having drawn up a mass casualty infrastructure attack are as close to nil as makes no difference. If she’d been capable of that she’d have done it not shot up a junior school. That’s the act of an angry, sick coward.
There cannot be anything on the manifesto that is genuinely ‘hey here are three steps to take the electricity grid/water down’ type dangerous.
So what they mean is it’s dangerous to someone’s agenda.
The feds are absolutely fucking desperate to preserve the narrative that right wing right supremacists are the biggest threat to the country
They are. Not to the public, but to the state. Trannies are no threat to the state. Antifa aren’t. BLM aren’t. The idea of the people who are actually capable of taking a government down getting a group consciousness? That’s a threat. It’s not a threat to law abiding Americans but it’s a threat to the power structures. That’s why they’re demonised. It’s why your men are emasculated, and the whole incel thing comes from. It’s what all the other groups listed above are set against. What’s more dangerous to the public is idiots like this girl, rioting, criminal sprees etc, but the state doesn’t care how many of us get shot. They only care about their own power
This plan the troon wrote is highly dangerous because the very best glowies with decades of experience in causing mayhem 6000 miles away were very helpful to the troon in writing it
Possibly. There must be something in there that’s making people sweat. It’s not ‘industrial society 2’ is it. So it’s an agenda thing, or a handler security thing.
 
What the manifesto will look like:
Security-Redacted-Documents-Alamy-2JRWYD9.jpg
 
That this is absolute, utter bullshit is so obvious it should fool no one. This subhuman transgender vermin is not some sort of super villain evil genius. She was an autist who was not functioning that well, and could barely cut it in some bullshit art, graphic design, receiving an actual participation award as the extent of any distinction she earned.
My concern though is that there are enough people utterly deluded and hypnotized by the programming and social engineering that there will not be a critical mass of people to call tis out and get this published. Nor will there even be a third party verification process where public officials who are skeptical of this take a lot and confirm what they are claiming.
 
Last edited:
They are. Not to the public, but to the state. Trannies are no threat to the state. Antifa aren’t. BLM aren’t.
Disagree. If you live in a gated community and rich person land away from the slums or inner city but you gotta leave sometime to do basic shit. So, that puts you in danger. Poor ass niggas show up in court houses and sports arenas and use the same road traffic. Trannies working in IT handle your personal information. That cheap Mexican labor used by contractors in responsible for your mansion and escape room.

All you need is one black security guard, troon, commie or Reddit poly cuck upset and inflamed about “revolutionary idea” to decide to take one for the team and cap your old Lilly white ass as a political statement. Or sell your personal info. Or get drunk and drive their shitty car into your Tesla.

Some politicians and rich people might think they are safe from ruining society, but it’s quite the reverse. For ultimate safety and security, they should be improving everything for everyone, not trying to play this IDpol war shit 24/7 thinking it won’t affect them.

Think it’s more just glowies fucking up a job and not wanting to look bad, lol.
 
All you need is one black security guard, troon, commie or Reddit poly cuck upset and inflamed about “revolutionary idea” to decide to take one for the team and cap your old Lilly white ass as a political statement. Or sell your personal info. Or get drunk and drive their shitty car into your Tesla.
And if justice for crime is not applied equally, that's anarcho-tyrrany.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Personally I believe the FBI investigators are aware of how unhinged troons are and are afraid that releasing it may inspire a wave of troon terrorist attacks. If that is the real reason then I think their fears are justified even if it is wrong to withold it.
There is no way they don't have the data on how insane these people are, and by insane I mean actual medical insanity, real mental illnesses that can make them -literally- explode at any moment. I think that's more a reason for the government protecting them than because they believe in their actual rights. "Yes, Sir, we need to let these people call themselves whatever they want otherwise they will either shoot a Church or commit mass suicide and this isn't speculation." If you think about it, there is nothing the government can do when so many mentally ill people have no way to get their insanity contained or controlled. It's like troon jihad.

The troon's manifesto is just a confirmation of that. I don't think it's as "astronomically catastrophic" as they claim it is, though. It doesn't have any blueprints for how to bomb a building nor is a guide on how to destroy society. It's either this girl saying how she realised troonery has fucked up her life and she just wanted to end it or simply it's the same rhetoric our politics say about transgenderism. Both are "catastrophic" only for them.
 
There is no way they don't have the data on how insane these people are, and by insane I mean actual medical insanity, real mental illnesses that can make them -literally- explode at any moment. I think that's more a reason for the government protecting them than because they believe in their actual rights. "Yes, Sir, we need to let these people call themselves whatever they want otherwise they will either shoot a Church or commit mass suicide and this isn't speculation." If you think about it, there is nothing the government can do when so many mentally ill people have no way to get their insanity contained or controlled. It's like troon jihad.
I heard it put that they're normalizing pathology and pathologizing normalcy. I think it's a move to make gender ideology as legitimate as religion, then say well we also don't have sanity data on the religious, and they're also likely to shoot stuff up at any time. Regulations targeting a tranny support nonprofit, a nonprofit which is "normal" under the new standard, will be used against religious nonprofits, which actually are normal, but under the old standard.
 
"Please understand, this particular document is too Jokerfied for public consumption."

Better have movie recommendations like Dorner's
 
Last edited:
Back