Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

[Big moth tiddies]

It's now 15 days since he's produced any new Tik Tok content, the longest hiatus since his cosmetic surgery.

I'm relatively new to Dylan so I ask the sages of this thread, how rare is it for him to take breaks like that? I know he teased a lot during his FFS arc, but IIRC he still posted some content here and there.

Dylan is so disturbing not even faggots like him. Like its not just that they chose to Adopt-a-Troon, they chose the most uncanny valley one in the lot.

It's a retarded catch-22 where you have to wonder if it's better they didn't choose a (relatively) likable troon, or that they legitimately thought he would be a hit.

He is/was charmingly annoying.

He also seemed to genuinely care about people.

Richard Simmons had this thing about him where it didn't feel like he was selling you something. He felt authentic in a way that nearly everyone in the workout business failed to. Even now, when I look at people like Billy Blanks or something, I don't get the feeling he actually cares. It just feels like a paycheck to him. Annoying or not, when it comes to Richard Simmons, you really do get the feeling that if he were there in person, he would be cheering you on.

 

[ScooterL]

I wonder why Budlite fucking up would cause that.

Damage control, I guess. The more he talks in public, the more people seem to be repulsed by him.

I won't be surprised anyone out side of make up brands consider his ass radioactive at this point, too.

They're trying to sell to women, though, and women seem to be the most offended by Dylan. To make money from advertisers, he'll need to find brands that exclusively aim at trannies and faggots.

I'm relatively new to Dylan so I ask the sages of this thread, how rare is it for him to take breaks like that?

I don't recall a gap in videos this long before, except for the period of almost three weeks right after surgery

 

[Kermit the Impaler]

"We have taken any decision making authority about influencer engagement away from anyone lower than senior director.

I wonder what happened to the person who made that decision. I assume they were fired but I want to know what was going through their head from the moment this blew up until now.


Rainbow Washing Women Out of Existence (Archive )
The first part of this article talks about how Nike treats pregnant athletes badly. However, the second part has an interview with 'Zoey' a "London-based marketing veteran who has experience and knowledge of media acquisitions and how celebrity is created" about how exactly Dylan was created.

She says it was by Creative Artists Agency (CAA) because they have been buying ad agencies so they can create the actors and the ads.Tiktokers are great for one off media campaigns because they are cheap (compared to actual stars). "Talent agencies can provide cheap but well known talent for one off campaigns that even if unpopular, get the product trending." The rest of interview is very interesting and goes into more detail than the quote below.

Zoey explains what she calls Mulvaney’s “straight shot to fame” noting how he has been promoted by CAA, “They recently bought up a few ad agencies such as Droga5, a very successful ad agency that has really pushed woke advertising for brands like Under Armour and The New York Times.” Zoey historicises how Droga5 was eventually acquired by William Morris giving other examples of acquisitions in mergers stating, “I’m suggesting this as a very good example of how different types of media companies, brands and talent agencies are merging. The end result: a made-up character such as Dylan is created. He is the whole package and everyone profits.”

Through her knowledge of talent agencies, Zoey explains how Mulvaney was catapulted into social media celebrity:

I happened to notice Dylan was with CAA when he first got traction. That piqued my interest given he was just some low rent influencer a few months ago. To get signed by CAA is major. This is not the privilege of many much more talented, bona fide actors or influencers. When I first noticed Dylan, I looked into his agent, Stephanie Paciullo at CAA. I thought it was odd that someone with quite a high profile roster would have Dylan Mulvaney as her client. I then looked into her wider remit which is to merge brands, talent, influencers and specific products. As mentioned before, brands do not always want to spend millions with A-listers, but they need a famous face for their campaign. Dylan is perfect—cheap, big TikTok following, shameless.

Hypothesising that Paciullo likely created Mulvaney from a data-driven brief, Zoey speculates, “Her remit covers creative talent and digital advertising. With that context, I am in no doubt Dylan was created in a boardroom. If you look at Paciullo’s clients, you can see why the media is so complicit. The roster touches every area of media and there are a lot of folks like Paciullo at CAA.” Indeed, CAA employs various agents whose client list moves around identity politics [the] category for “Women’s Empowerment” includes other men aside from Mulvaney, such as Janet Mock and Laverne Cox.

 

[LikeAStone 2.0]

Tanking your company stock and losing your job to own conservatives.

 

[Punished Neco]

Something has been nagging at me for awhile...
Listen, I know it's an advert and nobody is expecting you to start beer chugging but if you're going to try to make it look like you're enjoying a cold beer whilst talking to the camera maybe at least drink some of it.

What's that? A 330ml can, Mulvaney drank from the can twice, there's probably 228ml left in that can, and that's 2ml lost from evaporation.

It generally isn't a good look when your brand representative won't even drink the product they're supposed to be endorsing.

 

[I Hate Anime Avatars]

I'm relatively new to Dylan so I ask the sages of this thread, how rare is it for him to take breaks like that? I know he teased a lot during his FFS arc, but IIRC he still posted some content here and there.

It's a retarded catch-22 where you have to wonder if it's better they didn't choose a (relatively) likable troon, or that they legitimately thought he would be a hit.

That's a question a lot of us have been asking for a while, how does a troon so over-the-top ghoulish get so much official promotion. It really does almost feel like some kind of joke to see how far they can push people but maybe that's the point, my tinfoil hat theory is that it's just a bunch of obnoxious troons and TRAs getting off on rubbing this shit in peoples faces as much as possible. "We've won, we're here to stay, we're comming for your children and as much as you hate us you want us, you need us and there is nothing you can do about it". This is exactly the sort of things most troons want to say (and some do) so I really don't think it that far fetched that that's a big reason for a lot of troon shit getting pushed so hard now. It's not like it's difficult to get these sorts of positions if you are a tranny, companies will hire anyone to improve their ESG score.

I don't really follow Mulvaney because he just isn't funny to me, at least troons like Keffals, Kevin Gibes etc. are so repulsive and such horrible people you just never know what your going to get with them and it's fun to hate them. Mulvaney is a one trick pony that just makes me MATI, maybe if he has a downward spiral arc I'll tune in but I honest to god just cannot tolerate him.

Richard Simmons had this thing about him where it didn't feel like he was selling you something. He felt authentic in a way that nearly everyone in the workout business failed to. Even now, when I look at people like Billy Blanks or something, I don't get the feeling he actually cares. It just feels like a paycheck to him. Annoying or not, when it comes to Richard Simmons, you really do get the feeling that if he were there in person, he would be cheering you on.

I unironically own several Richard Simmons workout DVDs, I always thought there was something so infectious about his enthusiasm even for someone as blackhearted as me.

 

[Bookwork]

BUD LIGHT'S MARKETING LEADERSHIP UNDERGOES SHAKEUP AFTER DYLAN MULVANEY CONTROVERSY
Alissa Heinerscheid, who has led the brand since June, takes leave of absence and is replaced by Budweiser global marketing VP Todd Allen
Ad Age (archived)


Bud Light marketing VP takes leave of absence in wake of Dylan Mulvaney backlash: report
Trouble began for Bud Light following its brand partnership with TikTok trans activist Dylan Mulvaney
Fox Business (archived)

 

[Goofy Logic]

The main mistake of the Bud group was the smug animosity they reacted with when they recieved criticism of the sponsorship. How did these marketing people look at the Gillette ad fiasco and not think "I probably should not insult my core market group."

Attempting to reimage the brand is fine, but trying to do so while giving your core audience the feeling you absolutely hate them for whatever reason is not the way to do it!

 

[AnOminous]

In 20 years he going to look like a gay Richard Simmons.

Wait, there's a heterosexual Richard Simmons?

I didn't even realise he had a theatre background, it's not obvious from his content (although I guess he does read a bit "theatre gay").

He set off my gaydar a tiny little bit, mainly by his impeccable enunciation and immaculate grooming that is rare in a heterosexual man, but I really didn't know until at some point he just casually mentioned his husband, which wasn't terribly surprising but until then I hadn't even really thought about it because his content is the main reason you're watching.

And yes, the comparison of Max to Dylan is incredibly insulting to Max (even though he very well may support that troon but I don't care).

She says it was by Creative Artists Agency (CAA) because they have been buying ad agencies so they can create the actors and the ads.Tiktokers are great for one off media campaigns because they are cheap (compared to actual stars).

Oh, that explains it. CAA is one of the vilest media entities that most people have never heard of. Look up Michael Ovitz for instance. He is burning in Hell right now. Even though he's still alive.

 

[Balr0g]

Is Dylan Mulvaney really that powerful to censor content he doesn't like, such as criticism from YouTube ranters?

Anheuser Busch might have threatend to pull their advertising from Youtube and despite Google money behind them they bend the knee for extra cash. Or someone at Youtube is portecting this clown in a dress

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

I'm relatively new to Dylan so I ask the sages of this thread, how rare is it for him to take breaks like that? I know he teased a lot during his FFS arc, but IIRC he still posted some content here and there.

Well his whole schtick was putting videos up every day to show off his "days of girlhood." I don't know how that changed after reaching a year, but it's definitely odd for someone who came to notoriety off daily content to be so absent. Maybe attracting the ire of conservative pundits like James O'Keefe, who personally confronted him (though personally I think the way O'Keefe went about it was stupid), made him realize the consequences of peddling this gender poison weren't going to be restricted to the Internet.

Or maybe he's getting his dick inverted and is in recovery right now. I wouldn't be surprised if in two weeks there's a new video about how he now has a real "barbie pocket" or whatever disgusting AGP euphemism he uses to refer to his new amhole.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

The main mistake of the Bud group was the smug animosity they reacted with when they recieved criticism of the sponsorship. How did these marketing people look at the Gillette ad fiasco and not think "I probably should not insult my core market group."

Attempting to reimage the brand is fine, but trying to do so while giving your core audience the feeling you absolutely hate them for whatever reason is not the way to do it!

And now, having walked it back, they’ve alienated the people they were trying to appeal to with the Dylan campaign. I feel like this whole thing will become a case study in marketing flops.

 

[Roland TB-303]

@Kermit the Impaler. I can’t quote you but that article is so soulless and void of any humanity that it reminds me of this.

 

[Big moth tiddies]

Or someone at Youtube is protecting this clown in a dress

As we learned in the case of Kef-fails and Johnathan Yaniv, only one person in the right place is necessary for obscene shit to just railroad on through.

How did these marketing people look at the Gillette ad fiasco and not think "I probably should not insult my core market group."

And now, having walked it back, they’ve alienated the people they were trying to appeal to with the Dylan campaign. I feel like this whole thing will become a case study in marketing flops.

This is two problems (probably more to be honest) happening at once.
One, fucking retard goes to college and gets pozzed. They bring their disease to the company they work for, then fuck it in the ass pozzing it as well.

Two, the heavily pozzed retard shows a graph with a line going down that says "Old people dying equals less money!" and then shows another with a line going up that says "Young people buy product, money go up!"
to a group of uninterested, misinformed, doddering retards who don't care and they just nod their heads. In the case of bud lite, if the people in charge are to be believed, all of this happened without their knowledge which I HIGHLY doubt.

Either way, this plus the promise of Blackrock goodboy points is enough to make this happen again and again, and this won't land in any case study because then they would have to admit pandering to trannies was wrong. Unless for some reason they come to the obvious conclusion that trannies really are the fucking menace they are. Then maybe this gets slotted in with evidence of how crazy stupid politics got and how the government as well as retards ruined millions of people's lives.

 

[Some Dumb Faggot]

A big part of this flopping so hard is ESG being on its deathbed. Blackrock posted a loss in profits of 19% this year and their stock has nosedived from its height in 2021.

With the intrest-rate hikes and bank failures the days of easy money printing and cocky investors are over and are probably never going to be back. All this pozzed bullshit is hated and unprofitable it was only pushed because of Blackrock purchasing company stock with money they got from the Feds.

The Troons made a huge mistake because they have fallen for the propaganda and don't realize every single other group hates them. So the Troons have now gone around acting like obnoxious clowns pissing on everyone under the sun off and now wanna act surprised when people get angry and tell them to fuck off.

People on this forum need to realize too that there is more backlash to this shit than is being shown in the media. Theres videos that dont get pushed in algorithm of Troons creeping on women and getting told off by a man.

You never see these freaks try their shit at a hardware store or a Golds gym because the men there would cave their skulls in. Instead they go to places where there are only women and children because both are unable to tell these faggots to fuck off.

 

[jellygender]

Wait, there's a heterosexual Richard Simmons?

It was a bit of an intellectual exercise to attempt to answer this question, but here's a response: Mike Levy, the 80s/90s infomercial host of Amazing Discoveries. The OG straight RichSim.

Richard Simmons had this thing about him where it didn't feel like he was selling you something. He felt authentic in a way that nearly everyone in the workout business failed to.

This is pretty much it: authenticity. People loved Richard bc he seemed sympathetic – even with all the theatrics (sequin shorts included). Simmons and Mulvaney are lightyears apart to older people – one seems ridiculously fake and one seems sadly sweet. But maybe that's not so for the younger gen. Maybe Mulvaney is sympathetic/authentic, despite his theatrics, in the same way those older of us found Richard Simmons authentic despite his theatrics. I'm trying to tease apart the difference between the two. Maybe someone gen-x or older can ID this distinction. Why is Dylan so off-putting compared to goofy Richard? Is it all about the gender proclamation?

 

[MalachiteMask]

It was a bit of an intellectual exercise to attempt to answer this question, but here's a response: Mike Levy, the 80s/90s infomercial host of Amazing Discoveries. The OG straight RichSim.

This is pretty much it: authenticity. People loved Richard bc he seemed sympathetic – even with all the theatrics (sequin shorts included). Simmons and Mulvaney are lightyears apart to older people – one seems ridiculously fake and one seems sadly sweet. But maybe that's not so for the younger gen. Maybe Mulvaney is sympathetic/authentic, despite his theatrics, in the same way those older of us found Richard Simmons authentic despite his theatrics. I'm trying to tease apart the difference between the two. Maybe someone gen-x or older can ID this distinction. Why is Dylan so off-putting compared to goofy Richard? Is it all about the gender proclamation?

Sperging Speculating here - Simmons is spectacularly gay, by modern standards fairly cringe, and never apologize for either fact. He seemed (to my somewhat uninformed eye) sincere about helping people. Like, he's gay, he's wearing sequined hot pants and he's very enthusiastic about helping people make better choices.

Dylan is an unspeakably self-absorbed faggot who enacts some of the most low-brow, knuckle-dragging misogynist stereotypes I've ever seen. He's spectacularly gay, immune to shame, and completely disinterested in anything other than the worship of Dylan Mulvaney, Real Girl. He did a costumed, choreographed video in a robotic skirt, to reveal his own plastic-surgeried face.

Richard Simmons wants to help you get healthier. To Dylan, you're an NPC who exists to affirm his narcissism.

 

[Baked Al-Aqsa]

Well his whole schtick was putting videos up every day to show off his "days of girlhood." I don't know how that changed after reaching a year, but it's definitely odd for someone who came to notoriety off daily content to be so absent. Maybe attracting the ire of conservative pundits like James O'Keefe, who personally confronted him (though personally I think the way O'Keefe went about it was stupid), made him realize the consequences of peddling this gender poison weren't going to be restricted to the Internet.

Or maybe he's getting his dick inverted and is in recovery right now. I wouldn't be surprised if in two weeks there's a new video about how he now has a real "barbie pocket" or whatever disgusting AGP euphemism he uses to refer to his new amhole.

Or maybe... just maybe...

 

[goodgrief]

It's really disgusting how they're able to even sell this artificially created "female" personality packaged in a creepy man. And the average handmaiden has been so warped by the messaging beaten into her, that she sees nothing wrong with an adult male acting like he does.
Handmaidens unironically say shit like this. This whole trope of a childhood being "taken" from these males or them having to "grow up" first is disgusting.


Like it's normal he starts dressing in women's clothes and his first idea is to act like a messed up, cartoonish version of a little girl, and that's okay. It's normal that this is the instinct. I didn't link the source cause there's nothing interesting in it, but this comment stood out because of how fucking dumb this person is. I don't know what has to happen to you in life to come to the conclusion that men who dress like women need to be allowed time before they reach adulthood.

 

[My cravat doesn't flutter]

Sperging Speculating here - Simmons is spectacularly gay, by modern standards fairly cringe, and never apologize for either fact. He seemed (to my somewhat uninformed eye) sincere about helping people. Like, he's gay, he's wearing sequined hot pants and he's very enthusiastic about helping people make better choices.

Dylan is an unspeakably self-absorbed faggot who enacts some of the most low-brow, knuckle-dragging misogynist stereotypes I've ever seen. He's spectacularly gay, immune to shame, and completely disinterested in anything other than the worship of Dylan Mulvaney, Real Girl. He did a costumed, choreographed video in a robotic skirt, to reveal his own plastic-surgeried face.

Richard Simmons wants to help you get healthier. To Dylan, you're an NPC who exists to affirm his narcissism.

Richard Simmons is also an iconic figure whose name has endured the test of time. No one will know who Dyldo Mulvaney is in 5 years. It's been decades since his peak and people still know the name Richard Simmons, even if they don't know what specifically he did. And really, which of these people looks more approachable/less threatening?