Why are women always liberal?

Even terfs are retarded, yeah. I don't have an explanation for any of it, really. I'm done with terf spaces specifically because they refuse to acknowledge the deadly BPD problem of women's spaces. Women's spaces that don't exclude BPD havers or BPD behavior will soon fail. So, terf spaces pretend that chronic fatigue is real and that racism is bad.

The women I know who don't buy into this crap are a mail order bride from the Phillipines, and a homeschooled fundamentalist baptist. Both of these women have gone to college and have the same "rights" as every other US woman. So I can only guess it's something gotten in western public schools.
I knew a woman who was against this crap, but she was a tomboy and pretty autistic. Only truly based woman I've ever known.
 
healthy subservience
Subservient behaviour is rarely healthy. No rational woman wants to be subservient. Plenty of us would much rather be at home raising kids and making jam than at work, but I will not be subservient. My husband and I have a partnership of equals. Is he better at some stuff than me? Absolutely. And vice Versa. We earn the same. We split the work at home. We have equal input into decisions of the children, money, etc.
I would not respect a man who wanted me to be the dominant partner and I wouldn’t respect a man who wanted to dominate me like that. It’s a male fantasy of having a dumb fucktoy so they can feel like the Big Yin. It doesn’t reflect reality
Reality is that marriage and kids and then ageing need you be partners. It’s a long time, and sometimes things get difficult in life. A weak and capability free wife is no help. You can compensate for each other’s weaknesses. Sometimes one of you may need to carry the other throigh illness, redundancy etc. the inherent imbalance in the idea of being totally docile and subservient goes against this.
I completely agree that American zoomer girls are madder than a box of frogs, but this subservient doormat wife stuff is rubbish. It’s a fetish.
Bring a housewife, homemaker etc is fine. It’s great and I wish I could do it, but it’s not the same as being subservient- that’s just porn
 
Subservient behaviour is rarely healthy. No rational woman wants to be subservient. Plenty of us would much rather be at home raising kids and making jam than at work, but I will not be subservient. My husband and I have a partnership of equals. Is he better at some stuff than me? Absolutely. And vice Versa. We earn the same. We split the work at home. We have equal input into decisions of the children, money, etc.
I would not respect a man who wanted me to be the dominant partner and I wouldn’t respect a man who wanted to dominate me like that. It’s a male fantasy of having a dumb fucktoy so they can feel like the Big Yin. It doesn’t reflect reality
Reality is that marriage and kids and then ageing need you be partners. It’s a long time, and sometimes things get difficult in life. A weak and capability free wife is no help. You can compensate for each other’s weaknesses. Sometimes one of you may need to carry the other throigh illness, redundancy etc. the inherent imbalance in the idea of being totally docile and subservient goes against this.
I completely agree that American zoomer girls are madder than a box of frogs, but this subservient doormat wife stuff is rubbish. It’s a fetish.
Bring a housewife, homemaker etc is fine. It’s great and I wish I could do it, but it’s not the same as being subservient- that’s just porn
I've come to see that marriage was intended as a fully symbiotic relationship. Like if the marriage was a company, the woman would be the Director - responsible for ensuring the company is functioning correctly and runs like clockwork. Ensuring that the company's tools and equipment are organized and in good working condition, Ensuring that daily tasks are are being completed properly and on time, And identifying and resolving problems and stresses the company is experiencing.

These are not meaningless tasks, and calling them trivial because they seem repetitive and simple does them a great disservice.
 
Oh noes, kids are going degenerate! *downloads porn*

It must be the evil wimmins, them and their liberal nonsense! *bangs a hooker*

The whole world has become degenerate and someone else is at fault but not the poor angelic totally conservative men! *grooms an underage schoolgirl*

It is a clown world, but you wankers are the punchline.
 
"Oh noes, kids are going degenerate!" *downloads porn*

"It must be the evil wimmins, them and their liberal nonsense!" *bangs a hooker*

"The whole world has become degenerate and someone else is at fault but not the poor angelic totally conservative men!" *grooms an underage schoolgirl*

It is a clown world, but you wankers are the punchline
 
Hi @Dylan 😁 have you cooled down yet, or are you ready to spill your manifesto?

Anyways, you wanted to know why so many women are liberal, well, there you go 👉

Either the majority of men are liberal themselves, or when they say they are conservative end up as disappointing degenerates. It peaks them. They've been peaking for years, and when that doesn't work, the bashing of conservative women when they try laying down rules you just give up.
 
Hi @Dylan 😁 have you cooled down yet, or are you ready to spill your manifesto?

Anyways, you wanted to know why so many women are liberal, well, there you go 👉

Either the majority of men are liberal themselves, or when they say they are conservative end up as disappointing degenerates. It peaks them. They've been peaking for years, and when that doesn't work, the bashing of conservative women when they try laying down rules you just give up.
what the fuck are you talking about, are you ESL or just off your meds
 
Same reason why there are a lot of liberal men. Lack of God in their lives.

Yes, women are a bit more "emotional" leading them to want to be more empathetic and nurturing towards people, but they can do those things without necessarily agreeing with or supporting liberal politics. Especially if they're following scripture. God asks us to love others while also not following the paths of sinners. Those aren't mutually exclusive.

Where I live, I know some very young women who don't agree at all with the LGBT and can see the harm it's doing.
Funny enough I'm an atheist and not a leftards, funny how that works. Besides most political parties and stuff like that are cultish morons, so, eh.

Besides, most conservative women, at least in the US, tend to be religious fanatics often of a very peculiarly American brand of "Christianity." The kind that DNCommies seem to think that all religious people ascribe to.
>Libertarians are about freedom of choice
>Women choose not to sleep with libertarians

:\
 
Even the 'based' ones tend to have some shitlib opinions, especially about gays
Why are all the supposed right wing male groups filled with closeted homos then? Like I've seen /pol/ threads where the males there talk about how based Hadrian was for loving boipussy. The Fuentes stuff is like what I would expect out of right wing male zoomers since they drape themselves in homoeroticism despite the "based opinions." Complete cognitive dissonance.
 
Funny enough I'm an atheist and not a leftards, funny how that works. Besides most political parties and stuff like that are cultish morons, so, eh.

Besides, most conservative women, at least in the US, tend to be religious fanatics often of a very peculiarly American brand of "Christianity." The kind that DNCommies seem to think that all religious people ascribe to.

>Libertarians are about freedom of choice
>Women choose not to sleep with libertarians

:\
Well, atheism has existed far longer than modern leftism, so it isn't that strange. And yeah, a lot of Christians go overboard (to put it lightly) and disregard a lot of what Jesus teaches us, unfortunately. But we're all sinful by nature, so it's to be expected.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: frozen_runner
Well, atheism has existed far longer than modern leftism, so it isn't that strange. And yeah, a lot of Christians go overboard (to put it lightly) and disregard a lot of what Jesus teaches us, unfortunately. But we're all sinful by nature, so it's to be expected.
Well how do I say this, I mean, I honestly don't know or care about the existence of a supreme being, I think in Buddhism it's not an important question either. At least the followers of Christ for the most part don't actively encourage you to chop off your kid's genitals or whatever they're preaching now. I have met the kinds of people who think that America is a "Christian Nation" like some modern day medieval monarchy but they're not too common. Besides, what brand would be "official?" Are we going to screw over the Quakers and Baptists to favor the Presbyterians or Catholics? People don't realize there's many denominations and it gets very complicated.
 
Women are agreeable, not liberal. They agree with the dominant social order by default. Someone else brought it up, but women voted hitler into power and women created the temperance movement.

They side with whatever they believe will provide them with less social confontation. Which makes sense from a biological standpoint as men are both physically stronger and the ones who provide literally everything to women, food, shelter, electricity, water, etc.

Its why propaganda is so effective/stronger on women and why its less effective on men. (In general).

Men tend to have more paranoid conspiracy schizos and be more distrusting (there's a reason 99% of conspiracy theorists are men) and women tend to have more drones that agree with whatever is put in front of them.

Convince women that letting trannies into their locker rooms is hip and cool and normal and they'll uncondnitionally support it.

If conservatism stops being a counterculture most women will become conservative.
 
They side with whatever they believe will provide them with less social confontation. Which makes sense from a biological standpoint as men are both physically stronger and the ones who provide literally everything to women, food, shelter, electricity, water, etc.

Its why propaganda is so effective/stronger on women and why its less effective on men. (In general).

Men tend to have more paranoid conspiracy schizos and be more distrusting (there's a reason 99% of conspiracy theorists are men) and women tend to have more drones that agree with whatever is put in front of them.

It's what they found in thousands of Psychological personality tests they did repeatedly. Differences were minor across countries and culture.

Women typically score higher in Neuroticism, which means they react to external stimuli more easily. Probably because in the past, they had to be aware of threats and danger more readily, and be aware of their social standing in the group. Second was Agreeableness/Compassion. Which marketing firms in the 90's researched made them ideal targets of campaigns using emotional appeals.

Men they found have a tendency towards Disagreeableness/Rationality. And a tendency towards Assertiveness. Because the Men obviously can't break down if everything goes to shit.

I sometimes wonder if Men are largely considered useless by the media and corporations as a target group. Because Women are simply the better vector for propaganda, and also the biggest spender and biggest consumer. And now that we have social media. Theres no real threat of violence. More a threat of developing popular consensus and then shadowbanning. Which could be considered a Feminine tactic.
 
Last edited:
Women tend to lean towards being the baseline of society. While men are made in nature to be more varied in their outlook and basically work as a vector for nature to experiment with genetics, women by nature are more generic and act in accordance with group wishes more than anything else. It just so happens that today, society endorses liberal ideology and feminist outlooks, which causes women to default to those outlooks.
 
Back