US BREAKING: Tucker Carlson leaves Fox News as they 'agree to part ways' - Fox News Media and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways.

Source

NEW YORK — April 24, 2023 — FOX News Media and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways. We thank him for his service to the network as a host and prior to that as a contributor.

Mr. Carlson’s last program was Friday April 21st. Fox News Tonight will air live at 8 PM/ET starting this evening as an interim show helmed by rotating FOX News personalities until a new host is named.

FOX News Media operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Digital, FOX News Audio, FOX News Books, the direct-to-consumer streaming services FOX Nation and FOX News International and the free ad-supported television service FOX Weather. Currently the number one network in all of cable, FNC has also been the most watched television news channel for more than 21 consecutive years, while FBN ranks among the top business channels on cable. Owned by Fox Corporation, FOX News Media reaches nearly 200 million people each month.
 
This is interesting. I don't particularly like Carlson much, but he's been right on a lot of things, imo, and wrong about many others. I went from like page 15 to just posting, because the slapfighting was too much to deal with reading the entire thread. I may go back and read it all later.

Tucker has fuck you money. His best bet in the short term is to grow the daily caller. I don't always agree with the guy, but he's intelligent and reactionary enough that he needs to be heard.
 
Totally Spies was a show to push the "girls in tights" fetish to kids.
and I loved it also Alex is best girl. Fucking fight me.

It was a show to push several fetishes to kids, and it's one of those situations where I get to blame Canada for what it unleashed onto American children.

Agreed otherwise.
 
Last edited:
WhereDidTuckerGo.png
 
I'm sure he'll either find some independent work or some other smaller network will pick him up. Tucker still brings in big time views, he's a big name. The problem will be will his audience follow him? FOX is still primarily watched by boomers who are terrified of the big thinkin machine that's collecting dust in their dining room. So if he goes all online how much traffic will he still draw in? Is it better to try his luck independently on youtube or would someone like The Daily Wire want to pick him up? I don't see him as a guy who would just retire at this point. Whether you agree with him or not I think he does genuinely believe in what he's fighting. He wouldn't just give up unless he had to.
He'll either work for The Blaze (doubt it) or becoming a columnist for Heritage (more likely)
 
Rate me late as fuck, but I'm interested to see what he does now. Never watched him much, but I always got the impression he was holding back just a tad because msm shenanigans. I want to see if he'll reveal how much of a grifter he is by keeping the same narrative as an independent, or go balls to the wall and name them.

Recite the TND pasta you fucking pussy, do it.
 
He is the co-founder and editor-in-chef of the Daily Caller, he could become totally invisible for a while. I prefer Tucker as a writer and I also hopes he goes back to the bow tie.
That'd be an interesting move. I imagine being such a gigantic success has probably bolstered his ego. I don't think most people would be able to go back to a less visible profession after bathing in the limelight like he has.
 
I've always liked Tuck's takes, though it's less of takes and more of slow burns of truth. I'm not even American and he's very entertaining especially him reading the TND copypasta. I think hs's a really swell guy but now that he's gone, there really is nothing left to go on American TV. The west is cucked right now.

Good luck to the Tuck and Fuck the news. Always take any nation's news with complete salt, be it a westerner or a shithole.
 
Can he hire back Blake Neff for his next gig now that he's not beholden to Fox?
 
Tucker is literally the only reason many people even watch Fox News. I know (boomers) who only turn it on for his show and just listen to local news for literally everything else. It makes me wonder who will try to grab him.

It was a show to push several fetishes to kids, and it's one of those situations where I get to blame Canada for what it unleashed onto American children.

Agreed otherwise.
I regret to inform you that Totally Spies is a French production. The Dub is just Canadian
 
Tucker, on the other hand, could start up a Youtube channel at his remote studio and make pretty close to FOX News money overnight. It'll probably be better for his brand to not be associated with FOX News.
How long do you reckon Tucker would last on YouTube? My guess is not very.

I wouldn't be surprised if Rumble starts talking to Tucker's people. Whilst they might not be able to offer as much money as Fox did, the editorial freedom and creative control could be mighty tempting for Tucker. He'd also attract new viewers to the Rumble platform, particularly those who are Fox News watchers that may not be aware that Rumble exists.
 
Regardless, it's funny how quick the right-leaning are to drop their loudest voices. Couldn't be NBC dropping Rachel Maddow or CNN dropping Anderson Cooper.

FOX is not the right. Just like MSNBC is not the left. They are part of the soap opera to convince you there is a true left and right. Why do you think the Republicans developed #NeverTrump? Anyone that comes along and threatens the soap opera is eventually purged. Tucker probably just had enough clout for his long years working for the soap opera, they were willing to give him slack. Until the heads of the Democrat party said "Hey! He's playing outside of the rules of the soap opera! Get rid of him!'
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pee Cola
This is interesting. I don't particularly like Carlson much, but he's been right on a lot of things, imo, and wrong about many others. I went from like page 15 to just posting, because the slapfighting was too much to deal with reading the entire thread. I may go back and read it all later.

Tucker has fuck you money. His best bet in the short term is to grow the daily caller. I don't always agree with the guy, but he's intelligent and reactionary enough that he needs to be heard.
It's bigger than Tucker. It's a clear sign that one of the only places in mainstream media that would buck up against the narratives the establishment wants to brainwash everyone into believing is falling back in line to becoming a neocon Democrat Lite mouth piece again. The implications are kind of fucking awful honestly.
 
Good riddance.
It was a show to push several fetishes to kids, and it's one of those situations where I get to blame Canada for what it unleashed onto American children.

Agreed otherwise.
Yeah, when you go into the show with the mindset that 'this episode is going to involve some kind of sexual fetish', the fact it happens so damn often is far more than mere coincidence.

I mean, shit, I think Clover gets turned into a furry twice?
 
Breaking development - Rupert himself fired Tucker.

View attachment 5083346
Tweet
Archive

Linked article/Archive
this might be breaking news if you literally know nothing about rupert murdoch.

from Maury Povich's book: Current Affair: A Life on the Edge, pg 244

I knew the party was over when I met with Barry Diller at his Fox office and he congratulated me on the new talk show and wished for many years of A Current Affair. He gave me some good advice about the talk show: "Don't let the salesmen run the thing." Then he said, "there's a friend of yours here." In walked Rupert, who was charming and smiling and congratulated me, as well. Rupert and Diller started talking about the show-what time it would run, how it would play.
"not Nighttime," I said.
"Well, you should consider night time," said Rupert as if the whole thing had not been settled.

Moving forward he spoke to Paramount because he knew some people, made the deal and went that direction. after announcing to Fox his desire to exit they had to decide how to replace Povich. from the next page:
Brennan, [one of Murdoch's Aussie boys] however, thought that we could use my exit to the advantage of the show. He suggested that we hold a year-long nationwide talent search for my replacement. Naturally, I would be the one to go out and conduct the search. One more upside-down gag to confront the critics.
I thought it was a brilliant idea and would take the sting out of the departure: A clear display of no-hard-feelings, mate. I would also get a lot of media play and make the show look good, as well as make the corporate side of Fox look human and endowed with something that so few corporate systems had: a sense of humor.
But the word from Rupert was a cold rejection. He did not want to call attention to my departure-he didn't even want to call attention to my presence-and he certainly did not want to create another media star out of my replacement. The man still wanted to maintain his idea of proper employee/master relations. And so I would leave with the usual public relations statement of insincere regret. It would be handled as just another formal expression of corporate babble: bad-news-disguised-as-good-news.

rupert's modus operandi was: you do what you want, and i have last say. if tucker really did say no to him he was fired on the spot. at the end of the day for rupert it's ego and money. he will find a way to replace the money (again tucker likely doesn't do the bulk of his own writing for the show) and there will always be another schmuck along to read the TelePrompter. were people really watching fox and not understanding the kind of person rupert murdoch is? they really do appeal to the lowest common denominator if so.

on top of this look at the career Carlson had before Fox. I checked to see what his writing credentials could be and I'm genuinely surprised. he has not 1 but 3 books, in addition to writing articles, columns, and opinions for organizations such as the Arkansas-Democrat Gazette, The Wall Street Journal, The Daily Beast, The New York Times, Reader's Digest, and an article that won accolades for the Esquire in which he followed Al Sharpton and other civil rights activists on a trip to Liberia. In terms of television he worked for CNN, PBS, MSNBC, and getting eliminated first from a season of Dancing with the Stars. You can never tell with these people what their politics are off camera but the boondocks highlights my opinions quite succinctly.

i do change my previous statements and think if he decides to go it solo he will do okay. he has the writing experience to go somewhere, be it writing or setting up a smaller show. however, i don't think it will necessarily be as biting as the stuff fox was coming up with. he will also find more difficulty with legal trouble as Fox would offer more protection for some of the stuff you say. he's not gonna have that anymore.
 
Is it possible this is just media companies tightening their belts? There are massive layoffs going on in various industries, and this would make more sense of the coincidental don lemon firing.

Not that its a smart move, but perhaps fox executives reason that the station existed before tucker and that they will persist after him, but with less expensive anchors.
 
Because despite their ignorance, they are in control of a lot of the infrastructure of the country. Even some relatively rich people, who are too busy jetting around and doing business deals, don't really know whats going on under the surface.
Brave of you to assume normies have anything more than a facsimile of power which is evident by them continuing to vote for the Uniparty. The only time these dipshit can make a change is when it involves cheap, pissbeer from a company whose stock prices dropped like a rock during the lockdowns and has remained largely stagnant since.

And let's be real: we already know what 95% of normies think about any given topic. It's Coke Cola or Pepsi. It's Intel or AMD. It's Dodge or Ford. Fuck, most of them are too stupid to realize that most of what they buy is owned by a handful of conglomerates.
 
Last edited:
Back