Plagued Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    3,848
Having sex is pretty much the only verifiable and generally respected proof of manhood. In our post industrial secular culture, there are no rites that transition a boy to a man in the eyes of the community.

Having sex is the one way of showing you have in fact reached a milestone of success and respect. No other milestone has the same luster.

As a man that is. To not have sex as a man is to be an outcast, the ur-loser, the forever child that never grew up, it demonstrates that no one respects you, if you can’t get a woman to sleep with you, even once then well your kinda worth nothing.

Some men handle this better than others, some evade the expectation by trooning out or being homosexual, but incels internalize this expectation. So they treat it very seriously.
 
Having sex is pretty much the only verifiable and generally respected proof of manhood. In our post industrial secular culture, there are no rites that transition a boy to a man in the eyes of the community.

Having sex is the one way of showing you have in fact reached a milestone of success and respect. No other milestone has the same luster.

As a man that is. To not have sex as a man is to be an outcast, the ur-loser, the forever child that never grew up, it demonstrates that no one respects you, if you can’t get a woman to sleep with you, even once then well your kinda worth nothing.

Some men handle this better than others, some evade the expectation by trooning out or being homosexual, but incels internalize this expectation. So they treat it very seriously.
HAHAHAHAHA

Wow what a fuckin loser, clearly never had sex
1682633977542.png
Here's a REAL man.
1682634078388.png
 
"A new chapter in life"
why are they acting like having sex with a woman will somehow solve all your social problems you've had before in life
if you are unattractive, anti social, bitter, lazy, have no ambition and you blame being an incel on chads and stacys and shit
all of a sudden having sex won't fix your previous ingrained problems.
It's like when wings and boogie got the weight loss surgery, they still had all the same problems that led to them being fat in the first place
then wouldn't you know it, they beat the surgery and gained all the weight back
i dont think this mod will go back to being an incel mod, but his prospects dont seem very high either way.

edit: another example thats directly related is chris chan. he finally had sex with a prostitute, meaning he's no longer an incel. did anything about his life change at all after that, not really.
ethan ralph got married and had kids. didnt change at all
This incel civil war thing will be interesting to watch, and just in time for the Month of Retribution! Elliot Rodger rolls in his grave.

Honestly I think that it's a ruse to destroy the incel "community" and/or the guy just paid a prostitute to have sex with him.

Honestly if I was still a virgin at 30 or whatever I'd probably just pay a hooker because obviously it's not going to get any better. Chris for all his autism probably realized this fact and just went ahead and done it.

Ethan is probably an exception to the rule, I'd say internet infamy can help your chances even if you have to settle for a horse face girl.

I wonder how many of these guys have denied opportunities for dates or sex because the girl was non-white or a geek/nerd girl or whatever? Or had kids from a previous relationship?
 
i would never date a single mother neither tbh
I never have, but once you're in your thirties there's not a whole lot else left. I kinda wonder if most of these guys at least mellow out at a certain age? Or just end up meeting someone who will put up with their shit?

And yeah I completely understand that, yeah it sucks that little Jimmy doesn't have a dad but you don't want to get involved with baby daddy drama. I wouldn't count a "baby daddy" as a father figure though.

My take on it is that I wouldn't want to make it my problem.
 
How the hell does the Incels.is forum manage to never had any DDOS attacks, hosting controversies or any mass calls for removal unlike the Farms' there? I've been using the Farms for ages (although my account is relatively new I've been a casual lurker for some time before) and I never saw anything here that is as spicy as what they got.

Most users literally talk about how the age of consent should be abolished and even bait shit like mass shootings or whatever, 'going E.R.'?

I dunno if the above are 'serious' or just trying to be edgy, but still it's pretty strange... Do they have any small hat backers or what? I guess TECHNICALLY they never posted any 'illegal content' as in CP (yet) and I guess there hasn't been any shooters who had verifiable proof that they had connections to the forum, but still.

Where were all the troons and leftist e-celebs around the time of #DropKiwifarms for that site? I've never seen any leftist e-celeb call for Incels.is to be taken down, but a lot have called for the Farms'. inb4 troons are basically aligned with incels in practical terms
 
Last edited:
How the hell does the Incels.is forum manage to never had any DDOS attacks, hosting controversies or any mass calls for removal unlike the Farms' there? I've been using the Farms for ages (although my account is relatively new I've been a casual lurker for some time before) and I never saw anything here that is as spicy as what they got.

Most users literally talk about how the age of consent should be abolished and even bait shit like mass shootings or whatever, 'going E.R.'?

I dunno if the above are 'serious' or just trying to be edgy, but still it's pretty strange... Do they have any small hat backers or what? I guess TECHNICALLY they never posted any 'illegal content' as in CP (yet) and I guess there hasn't been any shooters who had verifiable proof that they had connections to the forum, but still.

Where were all the troons and leftist e-celebs around the time of #DropKiwifarms for that site? I've never seen any leftist e-celeb call for Incels.is to be taken down, but a lot have called for the Farms'. inb4 troons are basically aligned with incels in practical terms
DDOS attacks don't happen because you said something bad, they happen because criminals are pissed off at you.

While incels.is is more repulsive to the general public, kiwifarms.net is more enraging to terminally online narcissistic psychopaths.
I didn’t say it was valid or rational or right. It’s just the unwritten social expectation.
Expected by who? Incels, PUAs, dumb teenagers? If a manchild fucks an ugly chick, he's still a manchild in society's eyes. Conversely, turning down said ugly chick would not hurt one's social standing. Having sex is not a mark of respect nor proof of being a functioning adult.
 
How the hell does the Incels.is forum manage to never had any DDOS attacks, hosting controversies or any mass calls for removal unlike the Farms' there?
DDOS attacks don't happen because you said something bad, they happen because criminals are pissed off at you.
What @Blatant hypocrite said. But also, for as much as the faggots on sites like Reddit and Twitter and elsewhere like to paint the Farms as some boogeyman, for the most part people here just document and laugh at faggotry. Literally, that's all. It's not just some wagon-circling rhetoric that we break out when emulator developers and/or trannies pretend to minecraft themselves and blame Kiwi Farms in their suicide notes. It's the actual truth. And it pisses them right the hell off.

Where were all the troons and leftist e-celebs around the time of #DropKiwifarms for that site?
Speaking of Keffals and #DropKiwifarms, remember how quiet they all got when people started bringing up doxbin? It really makes you think.
 
young man can go on the clearnet and finally be told "your eyes are not lying to you, the old formula doesn't work, the rules have changed, modern women do not think or act the same as your grandma and your Boomer parents/relatives/adult friends are in denial about all of this."
The rules haven't changed that much. If anything they've put the game of getting laid on easy mode. The problem is you're failing to adapt to the lastest patch in the game.
No 10% of the guys aren't getting 90% of the women. You need to unplug from incels.is, /r9k/ /pol/ and the manosphere/Pui faggots on youtube. Those guys are nothing but Alex Jones tier bullshit but they're just ranting about the dating pool (and making a nice penny off add revenue) You're their paypigs.
The guys over at incels.is?
Do you go to Best Buy and ask the guy at the register about why your car is stalling out?
No you don't because he's not going to know the first thing about your problem, where it started, where it's going and especially not how to fix it.
Listening to those mouth breathing failures is the same thing.
Listening to guys about women who don't know anything about women.

I'd fall into that adult friend category. I'm not wanting to brag here but since you mentioned 20 somethings I'm just going to state that I've managed to bag myself 4 in the last 6 months using everything BUT tinder. I've got 2 more on the burners right now.
Do you know how I've managed this?
First you go outside. You go do social things. You actually TALK to women (the cold approach still works)
You get to know said women.
You go out on dates with them. Out for drinks. Go hiking. What ever you can come up with.
Yeah yeah I know I'm a simp. I've spent my wagecuck bucks on a woman.

If I can do this. If my friends can do this. If the teenagers I know can do this.
You can do this.
It isn't hard. Just don't be a cookie cutter zoomer faggot. Grow some fucking balls and get out there.
I'm willing to bet that the problem is 100% you.
 
The rules haven't changed that much. If anything they've put the game of getting laid on easy mode. The problem is you're failing to adapt to the lastest patch in the game.
yeah exactly.
back then, to get laid women were a lot more conservative and modest due to greater religion and tradition.
so you usually had to wait a while before they put out and marry them before they ever did in some cases.
 
yeah exactly.
back then, to get laid women were a lot more conservative and modest due to greater religion and tradition.
so you usually had to wait a while before they put out and marry them before they ever did in some cases.
An important thing to consider about "back then" though - is that women basically used to HAVE to be married to make it through adult life. Women in the US weren't even allowed to have their own bank accounts until 1974(!) so the concept of women being able to be entirely independent is still fairly new, and I think a lot of incels don't really realize this. They're told by their loser boomer dads that they're guaranteed to find someone because every woman was more or less forced to marry the local Joe Shmoe just to get by as recently as 45 years ago, with zero effort on Mr. Shmoe's part. Now that women have more of a choice, and don't have to marry the very first idiot that comes along, you actually have to be a likeable person too. This is where the incels ultimately fail.
 
They're told by their loser boomer dads that
no wonder they are retarded.
if a young man today has a boomer dad, that dad was like 50 when they were born very likely to be autistic as fuck.
most incels lean on the younger side i imagine, so late millenias early zoomers. their parents would likely be gen xers and older millenials. meaning women were allowed to have bank account already when there parents got laid.
and i dont mean recently, for as long as 20 years.
 
no wonder they are retarded.
if a young man today has a boomer dad, that dad was like 50 when they were born very likely to be autistic as fuck.
most incels lean on the younger side i imagine, so late millenias early zoomers. their parents would likely be gen xers and older millenials. meaning women were allowed to have bank account already when there parents got laid.
and i dont mean recently, for as long as 20 years.
My point still stands imo. Those gen-x parents had boomer parents, and everyone knows gen-x is almost entirely losers lol
 
I'm going to powerlevel a bit here and just state that this is coming from my observations as a millennial.
yeah exactly.
back then, to get laid women were a lot more conservative and modest due to greater religion and tradition.
so you usually had to wait a while before they put out and marry them before they ever did in some cases.
That whole thing took a swift nose dive with the coming of the late 70s/early 80s. I distinctly remember damn near almost all of my male Gen X older cousins had zero problems finding girls and getting laid. I was pretty much the tagalong little kid to them.
An important thing to consider about "back then" though - is that women basically used to HAVE to be married to make it through adult life. Women in the US weren't even allowed to have their own bank accounts until 1974(!) so the concept of women being able to be entirely independent is still fairly new, and I think a lot of incels don't really realize this. They're told by their loser boomer dads that they're guaranteed to find someone because every woman was more or less forced to marry the local Joe Shmoe just to get by as recently as 45 years ago, with zero effort on Mr. Shmoe's part. Now that women have more of a choice, and don't have to marry the very first idiot that comes along, you actually have to be a likeable person too. This is where the incels ultimately fail.
Watching incels roll around in their crab buckets screeching is one of my morbid curiosities/pleasures.
I'd say that a majority of them are more than aware of these facts. Or they're at least aware of some "Golden Era" just before their time that any fuckwit could snatch up a woman and she more or less stuck around (only) because of shared assets and equity if the marriage was dogshit. But still those men had to at least put on a decent front beforehand. Back then there really wasn't a whole lot stopping an angry dad+ his brothers or friends rolling up on some punk late teenager and telling them to not come sniffing around their daughters anymore.
My point still stands imo. Those gen-x parents had boomer parents, and everyone knows gen-x is almost entirely losers lol
Yeah there are a lot of Johnny Lawrence tier Gen X-ers. But then again most of them had these kickass boomer union jobs (that went the way of the dinosaur) that they were told they were going to get into. So therefor they didn't need any sort of higher education. Just get in there son, look him in the eye and make sure your handshake is firm.
Some lucked out and got into that and established before the SHTF with that but I'd say a majority didn't.
Then with the tech boom going from analogue to digital well.................
On the upside they still got cheap housing and cars. So they had that going for them. Also credit scores weren't nearly as important to them getting established.

The whole boomer parent era though was entirely hands off as far as parenting went. Hell in my particular age range a lot of our boomer parents were pretty much both absent from the households because they were out chasing that magical 401k.
If you look into a lot of 90s films you'll notice a trend where it's some teenager and the parents are out working elsewhere for days/weeks at a time. That was a real thing for a lot of us. Myself included as well as the guys in my friend circle. I mean it wasn't anything at all having a girl come over and spend the night or a few days with you. Or vice versa.

This mythical monogamy thing with boomers-gen x and y is complete horse shit. As a matter of fact it was loads easier to have an affair because you could just find some woman/man on the other side of the city or over into the next city. Social media wasn't a thing so it removed that layer of getting caught. There's an lot of people nowadays doing 23&me. Then finding out that dad's "business trips" meant he was off somewhere else with a whole other family that no one knew about. Had this one happen to a former GF of mine back in the early 2010s. And yes boomer parents.
 
I saw talk of NPNW on /pol/ this evening. I think I'd seen the phrase No Pussy No Work pop up on the site once or twice this year, but I never really absorbed it. Till today.

The No Pussy No Work (NPNW) """Movement""" now has a website (archive). Strictly speaking, it's more manosphere/MGTOW than incel, but as we all know these are not hugely important distinctions. If you read the site, they do basically admit they're incels on strike.

They have a news section.
News.png

and an expanding list of unapproved jobs.Badjobs.png

NPNW is sometimes extended to encompass more qualities.

"NPNWNPNTNPNVNPNP includes the full 4 pillars of the NPNW philosophy and it stands for No Pussy No Work No Pussy No Taxes No Pussy No Vaccine No Pussy No Peace."

They also have a Patreon (with 0 apparent paypiggies). The tone of the whole site is humorous, the sort of thing you'd expect a 4channer to make. Which raises the question of whether it is all just a joke. Surely someone on strike shouldn't be trying to have their site make money, right? Or maybe it is a genuine lack of self awareness.

The FAQ (archive) has some great content.
Why are millions of men pussy insecure?
Simply put because of no pussy but this does not mean that there is an actual pussy scarcity on this world. There is enough pussy in circulation to prevent the lonelineless and sexlessness of all men. The problem is that modern women nowadays deny pussy to nearly 90% of men. Those men face sexual exclusion and discrimination which is in fact a systemic sexual exclusion and discrimination. The misandristic feministic oppressive tyrannical regimes all over the world support this sexual injustice with oppressive policies that have accelerated this artificial pussy scarcity to astronomical levels. Basically there is a (wo)manmade artificial pussy scarcity backed up by evil wealthy people in power. It is as if millions of people in Brazil, Russia and Canada died by terminal dehydration despite having huge resources of freshwater in their countries. Such an absurd phenomenon would be totally unacceptable and inexcusable and surely many people would ask how something absurd like that could ever happen.

What caused the artificial pussy scarcity?

This is a complex issue and many different factors have contributed to this result. Just to name a few of the factors:

1)The fact that the sex market is completely unregulated. It is totally absurd that no policies regulate the sex market. Who is allowed to have sex and who isn't?and how much sex is each sexhaver allowed to have? No politicians in any country ever proposed any policies to regulate such things in order to prevent sexual injustice. In the far future our era will be seen as the wild west era of the sex market.

2)Women's corrupted biology and hivemind. Women are attracted to a very small minority of men. Several studies confirm that women consider less than 10% of men in their prime age(15-35yo) attractive. Women also desire men much taller than them, which is problematic because a very small minority of the male population is over 6 feet so most men are simply not good enough for women just because of their genes they can't control. Lastly women are attracted to men with evil and primitive traits such as psychopathy and narcissism. Those men are mostly murderers, thieves, drug dealers, gang members and all kinds of criminals and they get rewarded with pussy by women. In other words women collectively increase crime by breeding with men who pass those primitive traits on the next generation.

3)The female primitive brain supports polygyny. Females prefer to belong to the harem of a top tier man than be the exclusive gf/wife of an average man. In other words women prefer to be sidebitches than the main bitch. Of course those top tier men know their worth and use this opportunity to have as much fun as possible. They pump and dump hundreds of women but eventually they can only marry one of them which leads to another absurd phenomenon. Women complain ''where are all the good men'' because a top tier man didn't marry them despite having lots of sex with them so now those bitter women have to settle for an average man.
Also noteworthy is that studies have shown that in cultures that permit men to take multiple wives, the intra-sexual competition that occurs causes greater levels of crime, violence, poverty and gender inequality than in societies that institutionalize and practice monogamous marriage. In other words women collectively increase crime and destroy human civilization with their polygynistic fetish.

4)The urbanisation of the population. Today, 55% of the world's population lives in urban areas, a proportion that is expected to increase to 68% by 2050. Living in cities made it a lot easier for women to have more options than ever before. That means women have nowadays much better chances to meet strangers and specifically the strange rare tall and attractive man they desire. This wasn't possible in the past because people in small communities had few options so the average woman had to pick an average man they knew already. The other negative aspect of urbanisation is the fact that most people in cities are strangers and have no idea who their neighbor is. In the past this wasn't possible. If a woman were a whore in a small community everyone would know it and they would rightfully discriminate her and slutshame her but that isn't the case anymore. Most women living in cities are riding the CC but face no judgement for their slutty crimes because no one even notices it.

5)The invention of the internet and dating websites/apps. Those inventions made it extremely easy for women to find the top male of their area without even knowing him. Ordering a pizza nowadays is harder than ordering a free dick to come to the place of any woman no matter how attractive or not the woman is. The other negative aspect of those inventions is the fact that they have inflated the ego of each woman to astronomical levels. Every woman nowadays has the princess complex because thousands of lonely thirsty men worship each woman and beg for a little pussy. This absurd phenomenon led to the very common delusion most women have nowadays that they deserve a tall top tier 10/10 multimillionaire man.

6)The smartphone. This satanic invention gave the opportunity to women to chat anytime anywhere with strangers. After a few messages on the go they can arrange meetings with strangers and ride the CC. Women can also use their smartphone to check anytime anywhere how many likes and donations the SIMPS have given them which means constant dopamine overdose and constant princess complex 24/7.

7)The legalisation of premarital sex which gave women the right to ride the CC with the top 10% of men. If premarital sex was illegal, women would not ride the CC but instead they would pick at young age an average looking trustworthy man to marry and start a family with.

8)The legalisation of child murder also known as ''abortion'' which made it even easier for women to ride the CC without having any fears about the consequences of their actions. If abortion was illegal, women would be more careful and wouldn't ride the CC because top tier men who pump and dump lots of women simply can't raise a family with lots of women at the same time so it would be risky for women to give pussy to such men who would possibly leave them anytime for other women, especially in the case of pregnancy since top tier men obviously want to have as much pussy as possible and don't care much about relationships and family.

9)The normalisation of prostitution. Most women nowadays are e-prostitutes posting their half naked bodies to instagram, twitter, twitch etc in exchange of likes and worshipping comments from thirsty simps. Some women even demand money for it and make in fact very good money from it, much more that actual and useful professions such as doctors and engineers. The mass media, friends and even parents of those women encourage this behavior. Many women prefer to be e-prostitutes than have an actual relationship with a single man. Getting attention from thousands of male strangers is preferable cause a single man can't satisfy the average woman's burned out from dopamine brain anymore.

10)The hoeflation is the artificially inflated value of low value women. The result is that overweight women, women with tattoos, high mileage sluts, single mothers etc have extremely high demands from men but most men are not willing to fullfill such demands for low value women, therefore many men remain alone by their own choice.

Anyway, it's basically exactly what you'd expect, but enjoy poking around.

Edit: added more content
 
Last edited:
How the hell does the Incels.is forum manage to never had any DDOS attacks, hosting controversies or any mass calls for removal unlike the Farms' there? I've been using the Farms for ages (although my account is relatively new I've been a casual lurker for some time before) and I never saw anything here that is as spicy as what they got.

Most users literally talk about how the age of consent should be abolished and even bait shit like mass shootings or whatever, 'going E.R.'?

I dunno if the above are 'serious' or just trying to be edgy, but still it's pretty strange... Do they have any small hat backers or what? I guess TECHNICALLY they never posted any 'illegal content' as in CP (yet) and I guess there hasn't been any shooters who had verifiable proof that they had connections to the forum, but still.

Where were all the troons and leftist e-celebs around the time of #DropKiwifarms for that site? I've never seen any leftist e-celeb call for Incels.is to be taken down, but a lot have called for the Farms'. inb4 troons are basically aligned with incels in practical terms
Because kiwifarms basically hold dossiers on everyone so that puts them automatically up the ladder for deletion. People don't like their dirty laundry on the internet.

See keffals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABE LINN COHN
How the hell does the Incels.is forum manage to never had any DDOS attacks, hosting controversies or any mass calls for removal unlike the Farms' there?
In addition to what others have said, incel forums rarely make a habit of cataloguing and archiving individuals engaged in lolcow behaviour. Also unlike most of what we point out people for (grooming, sending medicine w/o a license, charity fraud) it's not ILLEGAL to be an unpaid Chad-chasing prostitute.

Hell in some places you have to use a VPN and Tor to call someone a slut lest you be arrested for that Tweet.

The closest equivalent to any in the redpill/incel/etc. community is /r/whereareallthegoodmen and its sister site. Even that's a stretch; they don't dox people half as hard.

An important thing to consider about "back then" though - is that women basically used to HAVE to be married to make it through adult life.
And for good reason. Survival. If a woman has absolutely ZERO incentive to find a man during her child-bearing years, reproduce, and raise said child(ren) together...she generally won't unless she has a firm religious upbringing. And I think we can all agree the gas tank on that truck is empty.

So without those incentive(s) the average woman will use up her natural attractiveness and fertility at 30-35. At that point she might have a couple benefits bastards and maybe be together with some last-minute Larry. Also fairly likely she's a childless cat lady.

This means your tax-paying native population will eventually shrink to the point you start importing anyone you can out of desperation (most of the Western world) or you just plain start dying out (Japan)

I saw talk of NPNW on /pol/ this evening. I think I'd seen the phrase No Pussy No Work pop up on the site once or twice this year, but I never really absorbed it. Till today.

If you read the site, they do basically admit they're incels on strike.

Intriguing. I admire their spirit, but a movement to boycott all forms of paid pornography would be a better idea than some arbitrarily picked jobs.

So would one to create a viable cyberwife. The feminazis freaked the fuck out about Gatebox and "sexbots" - imagine a viable combination of the two.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Gunter x Gunter
Back