- Joined
- Oct 3, 2022
No doubt. They have a Kardashian and Rihanna on the front page, and the Met gala. The top photographers are not shooting Dildo that's for sure.
Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.
- Thread starter Swerf'n'Terf
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2021
He looks miserable in every photo. Dead eyes. The random flying hair looks silly, especially when using ugly massive wigs. The style and poses are also ridiculous.
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2022
not sure why he insists on hanging on to this ultra ugly sixties hair...its so dated and unattractive, especially on him. his whole look kind of sucks, i wonder if hes gonna bust out some swing dresses and victory rolls to go for the cliche rockabilly look, any time soon
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2021
He likes looking like a cartoonish 1950s housewife, but I agree it's doing him no favors. Hed be better off shaving his head and wearing good quality wigs that look real. He has pretty bad receding hairline already in his mid 20s.not sure why he insists on hanging on to this ultra ugly sixties hair...its so dated and unattractive, especially on him. his whole look kind of sucks, i wonder if hes gonna bust out some swing dresses and victory rolls to go for the cliche rockabilly look, any time soon
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2022
the fact that hes in his twenties is mindblowing..he looks my age almost! idk if its the whole look hes going for, the ton of makeup, but its not helping him at all..there is no way some straight guy will have anything to do with him. he needs to give it up, take his newfound riches, and go back to being the semi cute faggot that he once was.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2014
I’m guessing the photographer realised that that Mouth-of-Sauron grin he does isn’t exactly flattering. I pity anyone assigned to try to make him look convincingly feminine.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2021
Lol, that is true I forgot he has a creepy large mouth. Also when he smiles his wrinkles show more.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2022
What if I told you that it wasn't a wig. Extensions in the back maybe, but that uncanny hairline is au naturel!
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2021
- Joined
- May 2, 2022
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2023
Barbie's hair is celebrity hair. If you can't understand that, you'll never even make the D List.
Flaming Carrot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2019
I think if they had done an ad with Caitlyn Jenner and thrown in some jokes no one would have cared. If they'd had an ad with a random gay actor or celebrity like Ian McKellen or Tim Gunn it probably wouldn't have caused any controversy. They just gave a few custom beer cans to someone in Instagram, and they managed to send their sales into a tailspin. It's weird that this was the one tranny thing normies flipped out over and not Lia Thomas or the girl in Virginia getting raped in the bathroom, but it is hilarious.
You know what, I changed my mind. I'm team Dylan now. Nothing is worth bringing nu metal back.
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2022
Normies in Virginia, specifically educated suburban Dem voters (including a substantial number of minorities), did flip out and put a Republican governor in office. That's actually comparable backlash to the Bud Light thing now that I think about it.
The Lia Thomas thing was never going to blow up this big because the people directly affected (college girls) are the least likely to object to globohomo.
Mariposa2.0 LTE
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2022
"But you have to be careful because I'm a singer". I seriously doubt "Normalize The Buldge" will knock Mariah Carey's, "My All" off its throne.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
They picked the absolute worst possible audience for it. A literal terrorist bombing their breweries couldn't have caused more harm to the brand.
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2018
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
Doesn’t look like this has been posted yet, so…
Another day, another instance of AB/Bud Light’s rudderless detachment leading them to trip over their own dicks yet again. Apparently, they disabled comments on the most recent upload to the brand’s YouTube page. Now, I can understand not wanting the comments section to be bombarded with smug gloating and anti-troon sentiment, but it’s amazing that they couldn’t see how the step they took only inflames their current problems. It’s the Streisand Effect in action- the act itself of not allowing comments only draws more negative attention. And at that point, the conversation becomes entirely about AB/Bud Light being spineless pansies afraid of simple ribbing and anti-troon wrongthink. It projects an image of fear and no-strength, and that doesn’t exactly inspire the consumer. They’d be better off treating it like they would a schoolyard bully- just take your abuse without reacting/“giving the bully what he wants,” and eventually he’ll get bored and move on. I’m this case, disabling comments is tantamount to crying in the bully’s face, thereby encouraging him. Keep feeding the trolls, idiots.
There are countless normie comments on news articles saying things along the lines of “[x tactic] won’t work. Only a sincere apology from Bud Light will fix this.” People who honestly believe that are unable to understand, that what would pass as a *sufficient* apology by their standards, is simply not doable for the company.
A sufficient apology (interpreted as such by their customer base) would have to include a mea culpa for the bilge they promoted. And there’s no way to do that without alluding that troons are bad for business/in general. We know that they’re too afraid to say anything that could be construed as remotely negative to Troon Inc. and its enablers. That means they obviously can’t apologize for using Dylan, because it comes off as “sorry we used a troon to try and sell our product,” which is essentially saying “TROONS BAD.” Hell, they can’t even address it with their famous brand of humor. A self-deprecating set of tweets cracking jokes about themselves with troon-centric punchlines might help somewhat, but it would still be too spicy for them. At this point, unless they start posting shit like “girls don’t have penises, mmkay?” they’re just wasting their time, money, and the consumer’s patience.
They’ll never issue that apology. AB is a megacorp with a neghole that was pozzed by globohomo and ESG a long time ago. They’d sooner let the entire company die than take their mouths off of the heckin’ valid female penises they’re sloppily deep-throating.
Also:
They still don’t get it. It’s not the fact that it was “one can sent to an influencer” (in a soulless corporate attempt to expand market share) that people are pissed off about. The lesser availability of the can and the company’s intentions are not the issue here…it’s the appearance that they were promoting troonism. Yes, the mere use of Dylan propagates this image. People are sick of troonism being shoved down their throats. And by using Dylan in any capacity, the optics make it appear as though they’re endorsing and promoting the degenerate troon lifestyle. THAT’S what is pissing people off. It’s the troon, stupid. And they’re petrified to admit that, so they never will.
People are also alluding that Harvard Heinerscheid’s snooty poo-poo’ing of the brand image and humor (and by extension, customers) as “fratty” and “out of touch” holds a lot of weight in the backlash. It surely didn’t help things. But it’s clear that’s only an aggravating factor, not the primary source of outrage.
Another day, another instance of AB/Bud Light’s rudderless detachment leading them to trip over their own dicks yet again. Apparently, they disabled comments on the most recent upload to the brand’s YouTube page. Now, I can understand not wanting the comments section to be bombarded with smug gloating and anti-troon sentiment, but it’s amazing that they couldn’t see how the step they took only inflames their current problems. It’s the Streisand Effect in action- the act itself of not allowing comments only draws more negative attention. And at that point, the conversation becomes entirely about AB/Bud Light being spineless pansies afraid of simple ribbing and anti-troon wrongthink. It projects an image of fear and no-strength, and that doesn’t exactly inspire the consumer. They’d be better off treating it like they would a schoolyard bully- just take your abuse without reacting/“giving the bully what he wants,” and eventually he’ll get bored and move on. I’m this case, disabling comments is tantamount to crying in the bully’s face, thereby encouraging him. Keep feeding the trolls, idiots.
There are countless normie comments on news articles saying things along the lines of “[x tactic] won’t work. Only a sincere apology from Bud Light will fix this.” People who honestly believe that are unable to understand, that what would pass as a *sufficient* apology by their standards, is simply not doable for the company.
A sufficient apology (interpreted as such by their customer base) would have to include a mea culpa for the bilge they promoted. And there’s no way to do that without alluding that troons are bad for business/in general. We know that they’re too afraid to say anything that could be construed as remotely negative to Troon Inc. and its enablers. That means they obviously can’t apologize for using Dylan, because it comes off as “sorry we used a troon to try and sell our product,” which is essentially saying “TROONS BAD.” Hell, they can’t even address it with their famous brand of humor. A self-deprecating set of tweets cracking jokes about themselves with troon-centric punchlines might help somewhat, but it would still be too spicy for them. At this point, unless they start posting shit like “girls don’t have penises, mmkay?” they’re just wasting their time, money, and the consumer’s patience.
They’ll never issue that apology. AB is a megacorp with a neghole that was pozzed by globohomo and ESG a long time ago. They’d sooner let the entire company die than take their mouths off of the heckin’ valid female penises they’re sloppily deep-throating.
Also:
They still don’t get it. It’s not the fact that it was “one can sent to an influencer” (in a soulless corporate attempt to expand market share) that people are pissed off about. The lesser availability of the can and the company’s intentions are not the issue here…it’s the appearance that they were promoting troonism. Yes, the mere use of Dylan propagates this image. People are sick of troonism being shoved down their throats. And by using Dylan in any capacity, the optics make it appear as though they’re endorsing and promoting the degenerate troon lifestyle. THAT’S what is pissing people off. It’s the troon, stupid. And they’re petrified to admit that, so they never will.
People are also alluding that Harvard Heinerscheid’s snooty poo-poo’ing of the brand image and humor (and by extension, customers) as “fratty” and “out of touch” holds a lot of weight in the backlash. It surely didn’t help things. But it’s clear that’s only an aggravating factor, not the primary source of outrage.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
How long before Disney begin adding the troon ideology to their shitty movies?
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
They could try dressing Rupaul as a trucker, and make him go "wasssuuppppp".
No, you're right, they're fucked. Budweiser admitted they hate their customers and want to replace them with trannies and faggots who barely drink beer. They've Ratnerized themselves.
I hope Dylan has a long, high profile career peaking normies and wrecking woke businesses.
Tryphine
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2023
The post with his custom can is tagged #budlightpartner. He also did another ad for them on Instagram with the same hashtag. The can was unambiguously part of their advertising. They're cowards. If they want the troon money, they should deal with the consequences of that.