When feminist parenting feels pointless

FEMINIST CONSCIENCE QUESTION

When feminist parenting feels pointless​

The boys scuffle while the girls play nuclear family. Does education without gender stereotypes achieve anything at all?
Beate Hausbichler May 18, 2023, 10:00

First the children just let themselves wear anything, as long as it doesn't scratch or pinch. And then suddenly it's only allowed to be a dress for the daughters, and under no circumstances a pair of trousers, especially not in blue. And for sons only pants and dark colors - that's clear anyway. And this despite the fact that moms and dads have made an effort to convey to their children: All colors are there for everyone, dolls and diggers as well, of course. But all this is obviously of no use - the boys fight, while the girls play nuclear family. Users also say that it often seems to them that it "has" to be like that after a certain age.

Educator and author Susanne Mierau knows such stories from many parents. "According to neurobiologist Lise Eliot, there are indeed small differences between boys and girls in terms of cognitive abilities, school performance, motivation, emotions and relationship styles," but these are small compared to the influence of society. "At the age of four or five, many children begin to assign themselves more strongly to one gender," Mierau says. It's the age when children define their selves more: "What is my position in society? Who am I? And how do I transport that to the outside world?" All of that plays a big role for children at this age or in the transition between kindergarten and school, he says. "Paw Patrol" or princess. "The feeling of wanting to belong is an inner human drive," Mierau says. Studies even show that social exclusion can actually cause physical pain in people. Belonging to a group is therefore enormously important for children, he says. They also express this through "Paw Patrol" shirts or princess dresses. Gender stereotypes are often exaggerated by children of preschool age; according to Mierau, this is also related to how they are often portrayed in society.

There are also still too many stereotypical play activities, even in kindergarten. That's why it's important, she says, for children to be offered a variety of play activities and also to be involved in a wide range of areas in everyday life. "Boys can be involved in different care work in the family and girls in repairs," Mierau says.

A limiting perspective for children on their self-expression or potential interests is only one problem. Simply sitting back, saying, "Boys will just scuffle," is the other. Boys won't learn to deal with strong feelings like anger that way from the start, Mierau says. With girls, he says, there's more of a tendency to go the opposite way and teach them to suppress anger. Says Mierau, "It's very important to show boys that they can express themselves in other ways than fighting with each other and saying that's just normal for boys." The author understands that parents often feel at a loss in the face of strongly counter-gendered consumer products, such as martial figures for boys and unicorns for girls. That's why it's so important to get together to change the structures. At parents' evenings, they can exchange ideas and possibly discuss gender-sensitive materials for school or kindergarten. (Beate Hausbichler, 18.5.2023)

Source (DerStandard.at)
 
That's the thing that drives male mentality. No one is going to rescue you. Nobody is going to support you, and hell, you'll probably be the one doing the supporting.

That's what's fueled those red pill guys, in a nutshell, and is the gist of the book written by that one woman who went undercover as a dude for a year. There are a lot of advantages to being a man, but it comes at the cost of having basically zero support in life. Not only is the support basically non-existent, but as a man you are scorned for seeking it. The whole homo scare has forced men to shun close friendships with other men, just look at any of the scores of articles talking about how Frodo and Sam are totes gay for each other when they were written as normal friends by the standards of Tolkien's time. All of the social support networks for men have been steadily cut away over the years, and then people wonder why suddenly they're all fucked up and killing themselves at record rates.
 
When I was a kid, I usually made stories with my toys. Sometimes it was Digimon families, other times it was dinosaurs and dragons going on adventures into the unknown. Sometimes it was crossover fan fiction with Pokemon, Yu-Gi-Oh, and Digimon. I have no idea what this says about "gender expression". I just enjoyed making stories.
 
When I was a kid, I usually made stories with my toys. Sometimes it was Digimon families, other times it was dinosaurs and dragons going on adventures into the unknown. Sometimes it was crossover fan fiction with Pokemon, Yu-Gi-Oh, and Digimon. I have no idea what this says about "gender expression". I just enjoyed making stories.
I think that's a quintessential child and more broadly human thing, regardless of gender. Stories are the oldest way our species has of organizing and communicating our thoughts, so it's no surprise that children are primed to be deeply interested in them.
 
Feminists won't be happy till humans are neither male or female but a third sex all together. The abject hate of healthy feminine behavior, be it at any age by the supposed woman's movement has got to be one of the greatest tragedies of our time.
 
We have known this for decades but every few years they try again and are shocked it fails.

Stereotypes exist for a reason. Some girls might play with cars and machines and some boys might get into playing family and dolls but on average some 95% of them do as is he natural and expected. It's nature, simple as.

Remind me of one other attempt at this where the feminist just straight up mixed up the toys and had boys with girls toys and girls with boys toys. It ended up with the boys using Barbies and Suzies to pretty much remake Charlie's Angels and the girls making car families with truck dad truck mom and car kids, down to taking their wheels off to put the cars to sleep "without shoes".
Its funny they note "some differences exist but um society is more important, why well trust us1"

You can only parent this way by forcing boys to wear dresses or demanding girls take an interest in dinosaurs or trains. Its the entire theory of social constructivism played out as an experiment-norms, behaviors and disparities aren't "real" they are produced by and maintained by power imbalances in societies and benefit the privileged.

When you see articles like this, remember the entire foundation of these people's beliefs is a lie. Not just feminism or anti racism or w/e but the whole thing-its based on a cope about the nature of reality and human dispositions.
 
Didn't she have a mental breakdown over that?

Yeah, she did. It was an okay read of a book, and a little positive, but her mindset going in about what men fundamentally are was so cartoonish, and she didn't really seem to lose that fundamental caricature by the end, just that she appreciated what she didn't appreciate. I suppose guys would walk away from doing the same thing as a woman. We are fundamentally so utterly different in some subtle ways, we can't really recognize the reality of the opposite sex, but she sure tried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syikeblade
And then suddenly it's only allowed to be a dress for the daughters, and under no circumstances a pair of trousers, especially not in blue. And for sons only pants and dark colors - that's clear anyway. And this despite the fact that moms and dads have made an effort to convey to their children: All colors are there for everyone, dolls and diggers as well, of course.
Allowed by whom?

and is the gist of the book written by that one woman who went undercover as a dude for a year.
Didn't she have a mental breakdown over that?
1. She was crazy before.
2. It was a retarded experiment and I wish people stop bringing it up. The reason a woman pretending to be a man has no support isn't because men have no or less support (if they do), it's because she's invented a completely new person who doesn't have friends by definition and prevented herself from acquiring any by being a fucking liar. This is not a crossdressing-specific problem, it affects (for example) spies who start families with other spies or unsuspecting members of the public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frozen_runner
i had a teacher in the 2000s that would talk about much she hoped her son was gay but he just liked breasts too much. she was also the leader of the GSA club at school. being supportive of homos just didn't give her enough dopamine so she moved on to laying the need to be woke on her son. she moved to california soon after i had her for a class. a proto wokester
Not that that matters because even gay men love boobs.
 
Back