Oh, I wanted to throw in thoughts since everyone pillories me for supporting Vance up until recently in the associated chat and I'm trying to decide how I feel on it.
Sam, Jet, and Fishtank itself seem to skid wildly back and forth on whether sabotage and underhanded tactics are rewarded. Sam has stated at times both that contestants
should consider sabotage, and also punished those who managed to get away with sabotage without being caught by other contestants. Most challenges are rife with opportunities for sabotage and everyone contestant has at least suggested if not actually done a sabotage at some point. Sam and Jet constantly hand Letty weapons to encourage her to sabotage, also.
Watching Vance and Josie just refuse to dick each other down, therefore, was fucking ridiculous. It seems like it comes from Vance thinking that because he is in his "alliance" with Josie he won't fuck with her the way he has always been open to fucking with Letty, but when you are trying to get into the final fucking two, what difference do alliances make?
Like he had two options, especially as he was coming up on the end of his stamina -
lose, or beat Josie. How is beating Josie immoral? What on Earth were alliances for if not to help you win?!
I wanted him to win, for the purely elemental reason that I cannot hear Josie when she is talking outside of B1, and I didn't want the final days of the show to be Jon and Chris shouting over a mumbler.
Instead of simply securing his spot, in a flurry of hypocrisy Vance is going to refuse to play to win on a challenge against his strongest opponent because he would "feel bad" and instead psychologically torture Letty into leaving. Ugh. I want nobody to win.
Real Sylvia? Maybe? Probably not?