Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
I checked out of this thread a few hundred pages back when the balldo and Locals lewds started becoming a thing. I did kinda like Nick before that but lost a lot of respect for him.

I know I'll get told to read the thread, but has there been any form of realisation on his part on how cringe he's being? Guessing not.
 
Leaving this here. Also, why is LR always magically in the bathroom?

When did Megan Fox start showing her entire boobs on a livestream? "Conservative" YouTubers get more insufferable every time they appear on camera.
I know I'll get told to read the thread, but has there been any form of realisation on his part on how cringe he's being? Guessing not.
The only moment of clarity that he's had so far was when he decided to go back to Law stuff after clearly saying he hated it back in December. Many have theorized that it was Rumble pushing that.

Other than that, Nick won't realize anything because to do that would require him to agree with the people in this thread, which he's called "bottom of the kiwi barrel" many times.
 
I know I'll get told to read the thread, but has there been any form of realisation on his part on how cringe he's being? Guessing not.
Not really, there have been hints at realization and there had been a couple of attempts to get his streams back to what people liked but then he would seethe during that because he hates talking about anything non coomer now and he hates his thread so he can't stop referencing it for more bitching, especially when drunk.
 
What's most mystifying to me is why Nick thought this was a good idea, since anyone with half a brain should be able to look at the setup and ask "so uh...the punchline?". Perhaps alcohol played a role.
"HA HA HA joke's on you! I was only IRONICALLY ramming a dildo up my ass and putting my testicles into a weird little cuck cage to TRICK you into thinking I'm gay!"
 
When did Megan Fox start showing her entire boobs on a livestream? "Conservative" YouTubers get more insufferable every time they appear on camera.
I thought she was a mother and Trad enough to avoid such noncery. Her boomer take on women going to meet men at Home Depot or bookshops gave me false hope... Also her talk about submitting to her husband and not doing things he asks her not to do, buoyed me...

Alas and alack, she is only truly medium smart.

I personally do not find it useful to wonder if Nick 'corrupted' her or not, because she is a grown woman with children who should know better.

I still hope she keeps helping children and families in abusive situations and sticking it to the academic elites who try to brainwash them...
 
He described people coming up and flirting with him and his wife separately at bars in general and then tells a story about when they were at a bar at closing time
I just don't see that even happening in Nick's case. His wife might get attention in a bar. But Nick? Not very likely and even less likely that women are going to be coming up to hit on him. He is this weirdo skinny short old faggoty guy with nothing at all to recommend him to anyone - woman or gay man.
Its the same kind of thing as that story he told about a "lesbian couple" coming up to flirt with him & wife at Gay90s or him being felt up by (I think) two women in an elevator in Las Vegas.
I would also agree that if that situation actually happened and he pointed to the wife in the bar, the interpretation on the other side would be that he was looking for a threesome. Nick may or may not be clueless enough not to know that.

I didn't watch his whole thing last night, but the impression I got from the part I watched is that he was promoting public flirting between married people and others as a great thing for marriage. That it was a healthy thing and he went back to his old line about being thirsty being all positive for people's self esteem in marriage. I think he said at one point that the lack of doing that made people get fat.

He also invoked the Sermon on the Mount last night as part of pushing his argument. The way I interpreted what he said was that the Sermon on the Mount was really about us being in the situation of judging ourselves and determining for ourselves when we have done wrong. That it was ok to lust openly after other women even in public and even to your partner while married. He left the final line that actually cheating might be wrong if you did it. But nothing else was. Push them right up to the line of cheating and then if they do cheat, its their fault.

I'm sure that these arguments are the type of thing he used on his wife to either get her to swing or encourage her in that direction if she is not there quiet yet. Its the kind of argument that could get a very dumb women to start visiting swinger bars and resorts. "Its all just flirting" "Its good for our marriage" "Jesus wants you to do it".

Pathetic.
 
He also invoked the Sermon on the Mount last night as part of pushing his argument. The way I interpreted what he said was that the Sermon on the Mount was really about us being in the situation of judging ourselves and determining for ourselves when we have done wrong. That it was ok to lust openly after other women even in public and even to your partner while married. He left the final line that actually cheating might be wrong if you did it. But nothing else was. Push them right up to the line of cheating and then if they do cheat, its their fault.
It still reads like a bad smutty manga plot. Another point to ponder is that this some sort of religiously adapted sex fetish between the both of them. You know, the same sex party shite they were trying to court their Locals people to participate in.

With Drex as a major NPC in their lives it would make sense that a communal exchange of sexual prowess and fantasies would be appealing. It would simply be naive to believe they don't at least have one foot in some form of that culture.
 
It still reads like a bad smutty manga plot.
It's interesting to me that in most of these stories Nick is the only witness. Not even Lady R is there to see all these women who are just fawning over him. I think the stories are made up for her benefit as much as his audience. It reeks of insecurity trying to both impress his viewers and also tell his wife that he's desirable and she shouldn't go wandering or he might be snatched away.

It's the adult version of "You wouldn't know her, she goes to another school".
 
He also invoked the Sermon on the Mount last night as part of pushing his argument. The way I interpreted what he said was that the Sermon on the Mount was really about us being in the situation of judging ourselves and determining for ourselves when we have done wrong. That it was ok to lust openly after other women even in public and even to your partner while married. He left the final line that actually cheating might be wrong if you did it. But nothing else was. Push them right up to the line of cheating and then if they do cheat, its their fault.

I would point Nose to I Thessalonians 5: 22- 24

AMP:

22 Abstain from evil [shrink from it and keep aloof from it] in whatever form or whatever kind it may be.

23 And may the God of peace Himself sanctify you through and through [separate you from profane things, make you pure and wholly consecrated to God]; and may your spirit and soul and body be preserved sound and complete [and found] blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah).

24 Faithful is He Who is calling you [to Himself] and utterly trustworthy, and He will also do it [fulfill His call by hallowing and keeping you].

KJV:

22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

24 Faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it.
 
Last edited:
He also invoked the Sermon on the Mount last night as part of pushing his argument. The way I interpreted what he said was that the Sermon on the Mount was really about us being in the situation of judging ourselves and determining for ourselves when we have done wrong.
To go a little autistic on Jesus' teachings and Paul's teachings, cause I've been thinking about this a lot recently.

In my understanding, and I do not claim to be a great theologian, there are things that are objectively wrong. Steer FAR away from those things. Breaking covenants (like the covenant of marriage) by cheating would be a clear example of a sin.

It gets a little murkier when we look at some of Paul's writings. The section about "Don't stumble the weaker brother", or "All things are lawful, not all things are profitable" is what I've been thinking about a lot. My personal opinion is that the further you walk with God and develop a personal relationship with Him, He will guide your conscience to abhor things that you shouldn't be doing, but aren't objectively wrong. For example, it's not a sin for me to enjoy alcohol, but someone else may be convicted of that by the Holy Spirit and thus it WOULD be a sin for him to enjoy alcohol.
 
He also invoked the Sermon on the Mount last night as part of pushing his argument. The way I interpreted what he said was that the Sermon on the Mount was really about us being in the situation of judging ourselves and determining for ourselves when we have done wrong. That it was ok to lust openly after other women even in public and even to your partner while married. He left the final line that actually cheating might be wrong if you did it. But nothing else was. Push them right up to the line of cheating and then if they do cheat, its their fault.
I hate when Christians, even nominal ones try and do the real obvious spins that can't hold up to even the slightest scrutiny. Christianity considers lust a sin, and a serious one at that. The Sermon on the Mount is incredibly harsh about how to deal with lust, Christ even suggesting that you'd be better to tear out your fucking eyes than to let them lead you to hell. Or later on in Paul's first letter to the Corinthians, pointing out why lust is especially bad.

1 Corinthians 6:18 "Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body.

Nick seems to be trying to prove the Bishop Sheen's adage "If you do not worship God, you worship something, and nine times out of ten it will be yourself." The Bible agrees with Nick's oversexed view of the world because Nick wants it to, and for no other reason. At least if he was honest and didn't try and use religion to try and justify himself, it would be less embarrassing.

Spoiled some additional Bible lines about lust and the quotes from the Sermon on the Mount below for brevity.
Acts 15:20 "Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood."

Colossians 3:5 "Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry."

17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell. 30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. For it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.
 
I said it briefly before: Even irreligious people see value and respect good religious morality. They, however, have an even lower tolerance for BS hypocrisy than other people of faith.

IMO, THAT it why the warnings by Paul are so strict about even the hint of impropriety and consideration for others. Is it fair? No, but if you are trying to win over a sceptic,, you have a hurdle to overcome and your job is to save people from hellfire, so stuff it.

See below reference by the man himself:

Acts 26:

28Then Agrippa said to Paul, “Can you persuade me in such a short time to become a Christian?”

29“Short time or long,” Paul replied, “I wish to God that not only you but all who hear me this day may become what I am, except for these chains.”

Nick seems to be taking the tackle of 'I am not a teacher. I stopped teaching for a reason',, but that does not absolve you of influence.

Matthew 12:

36 But I tell you that everyone will have to give account on the day of judgment for every empty word they have spoken.
 
Other than that, Nick won't realize anything because to do that would require him to agree with the people in this thread, which he's called "bottom of the kiwi barrel" many times.
Just as a reminder, according to Nick we are autistic, incel, conservative prudes who want Nick to be our daddy. But at the same time (according to Nick), we want to tear him down because he is a great man just like Tiger Woods was before Tiger was torn down by a jealous society. We can't be Nick so we want to destroy Nick.
 
A bunch of that crowd migrated to Sean's discord to continue bitching about Nick. Why Sean's? No idea. Because it was free? Is it free? Sean didn't care bc he flies under the radar. It seems he found it amusing. Meanwhile there are a bunch of active anime/gamer/comic/horror something Discord hub channels on Discord - I was on one briefly (not my crowd) - that have some Nick detractors sub-channels (or whatever it's called on Discord). Apparently Sean sometimes interacts there (tho he never says anything negative about Nick).
You left the fugee discord because you sperged out and got mocked until you left though. The fugee discord it self was made long before nick locked down his own discord...because nick's admin soter couldn't stop being a retard and fucking up so someone made an alternate server to not deal with soter's retardation. There's more to expound there but nick's discord turned on him because they did notice the "no law talk, cooming only" early and the bottle in ass locals pics was just the confirmation.

Anyway, the fugee discord was talking about the photos nick took of lady ours during their trip to miami (the ones where she look nothing like before). This convo somehow led to cynthia saying that single white women are the happiest.
cynthiamooing01.JPG
Everyone dismissed her and this led to her talking about how many people she slept with and what she did today and then she questioned back "what did you do today? what have you done for the world?"
cynthiamooing02.JPG
Person she's arguing with said that it has nothing to do with with anything but cynthia doubled down and claimed she had dinner with a CEO and repeated her question.
cynthiamooing03.JPG
This argument went on for a lot longer and the above mentioned already skipped parts. Including talking about cynthia claiming she'll sue nick for doxxing her kids. Which she then posted pics of herself again (because she's already doxxed so it's fine...seems to be a repeating thing for her.
cynthiamooing04.JPG
She repeated the "what have you done for the world today?" question again. The mocking continues.
cynthiamooing05.JPG
Back to the suing nick and someone pointed out her retarded logic. The arguments kept going after this but she left the server on her own about 40 minutes later and everyone had a laugh. Total spergout from start to finish from 8:45 to 11:30. This is where she started posting more on KF again, it seems.
cynthiamooing06.JPG
 
Back