- Joined
- Mar 16, 2023
I am mentally going through the list of the likeliest orbiters to join the Audience Caravan of Detractors heading for the border. So far, the ones further up have already been indicted for major crimes within the community. If they have yet to be, they are on some watch list, are known to be prone to retard fits or have baggage of their own.
Faran - Oops. She already committed seppuku.
LB&Hoeg - Already went there once. I suppose Hoeg could go for a round #2 during recovery as a result of medication (Get better, Hoeg).
Uncivil - He is caustic enough to draw blood with his incendiary remarks, but would likely self-immolate on impact once the audience blowback sets in
Legal Mindset - "Nick, stop flirting with used shit! Also, definitely don't be a horny sleazy lawyer who evades debt collection like me" ... I suppose he could roast him over the gay shit ...
Legal Vices - Too much of a Rekieta enabler and probably too old to deal with shit anyway.
Joe? Rob? Ian Runkle? - "Weell, I don't agree with what Nick did with this thing here buuuut... <scratches chin while desperately scanning chat for signs of potential validation>" ...
I have noticed Joe and Ian are at least more eager to piss off their own audiences over petty disagreements, but it's usually over something their chat says or does...
Branca - Most likely? Except he's too busy selling crap to other people's audiences so he can buy more expensive shit. I can see Branca railing on him for eventually killing his own channel over thirsty wine-moms, though. Also, the gay shit.
Edit:
Faran - Oops. She already committed seppuku.
LB&Hoeg - Already went there once. I suppose Hoeg could go for a round #2 during recovery as a result of medication (Get better, Hoeg).
Uncivil - He is caustic enough to draw blood with his incendiary remarks, but would likely self-immolate on impact once the audience blowback sets in
Legal Mindset - "Nick, stop flirting with used shit! Also, definitely don't be a horny sleazy lawyer who evades debt collection like me" ... I suppose he could roast him over the gay shit ...
Legal Vices - Too much of a Rekieta enabler and probably too old to deal with shit anyway.
Joe? Rob? Ian Runkle? - "Weell, I don't agree with what Nick did with this thing here buuuut... <scratches chin while desperately scanning chat for signs of potential validation>" ...
I have noticed Joe and Ian are at least more eager to piss off their own audiences over petty disagreements, but it's usually over something their chat says or does...
Branca - Most likely? Except he's too busy selling crap to other people's audiences so he can buy more expensive shit. I can see Branca railing on him for eventually killing his own channel over thirsty wine-moms, though. Also, the gay shit.
Edit:
I won't give these Creators too much credit. They're basically lizard people patting each other on the ass over clicks and bells. I will say this passively gives leads from one to the other. While the appearance on one channel is rather very small, gaining impressions (facial and voice recognition) over a swath of channels, while it won't help much with out-of-channels ubs, it leads to that user being preacquainted with their brand when it finally hits their recommends. So it does help to funnel content inbetween one and the other. After all, the point of Lawtube was really is to draw subs from a collective effort and then watching and seeing each other grow as the algorithm does whatever it does...It's possible that the orbiters think people who get turned off by Nick's antics will go to them instead.
Last edited: