The Caroline Farrow, Adrian Harrop, and Anthony George Halliday / Stephanie Hayden Megathread

Imagine having to get Fat Tony's permission before you could post anything on social media.

Twitter archive

Mumsnet thread



View attachment 5153168View attachment 5153169View attachment 5153170View attachment 5153171

Oh, and to the Surrey police... I AM NOT MOTHER FARROW!
This is why American Colonials one day just started murdering British naval officers. The British mind is that of a busybody, incapable of leaving well enough alone. Freedom is an anathema to the British condition and considered a blight to their very soil. Every British child's first word is "loicense," and it is hardly surprising considering their parents saw fit to copulate on the clay of God's most hated island. I feel an immense sympathy for Farrow, for she has been given this cursed existence through no fault of her own and must now navigate the hellscape of Britain's mockery of a justice system using her addled Anglo mind.
 
Insurgencies don't need to and don't want to occupy territory.

And let's just take Wyoming as an example. 100,000 square miles. 575,000 people. Population density of less than 6 people a mile, take out the few cities and it's much less.

Your cruise missile can go fuck itself. You got one for every isolated Unabomber shack?
insurgencies are not made up of individualists
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
And they are also not made up of idiots who helpfully gather into one place so you can drop a daisy cutter on it.
Oh? Is the executive committee of the National Liberation Front of America going to be meeting on Discord instead?

You can't build a guerilla force out of individualists. Individualists are incapable of building a movement made up of sparsely connected cells with strategic direction from a cadre of political officers that will remain ideologically committed enough to maintain a long-term campaign of resistance against the American regime.
 
You can't build a guerilla force out of individualists. Individualists are incapable of building a movement made up of sparsely connected cells with strategic direction from a cadre of political officers that will remain ideologically committed enough to maintain a long-term campaign of resistance against the American regime.
Tell that to the IRA and then let them explain how a terrorist "cell" works.
 
Tell that to the IRA and then let them explain how a terrorist "cell" works.
Do you really think that the heroic IRA (any iteration) was just made up of random schizo guys (American-type folks) who just happened to shoot at the British from time to time? That they didn't have a political wing which directed operations, and a chain of command going down to the cell level?

Of course you do, you're an American.
 
Do you really think that the heroic IRA (any iteration) was just made up of random schizo guys (American-type folks) who just happened to shoot at the British from time to time?
No,I never said that anywhere. You seem to be only seeing things in black or white ("It's all just random schizo, or all the brave men marching in one block together as an army!"). This is because you are autistic. If you aren't already diagnosed, consider Canadian healthcare.
 
Pentagon wargame reports indicate that the US military would be unable to hold any strategic positions in the event of civil war.
This certainly seems likely, though I'm not sure they would want to admit it; anyone know where to find any primary source on this? Would be useful when people start to sneer about "what is your AR-15 going to do against an F-16??"
 
insurgencies are not made up of individualists
Assassinations and home invasions are.

But this is getting way off-topic. Britbongs don't have a history of guerilla warfare or resistance, instead a bunch of major countries have such a history against the Brits.

They aren't going to dig themselves out of authoritarianism by appealing to an old tradition of individualism, rebellion, or even regular old liberty. They arrive at governing paradigms either through consensus, or elite-led civil war. And all their elites right now are on the authoritarian side.

Farrow would have to start a localized, physical rebellion against a weak police force that basically challenges their ability to enforce their edicts. And that turns into a 24/7 job, because they would just wait until the energy dies down to try and raid her house with whatever guns are still left in that hellhole of a country. They couldn't get away with that in the US, where similar strategies worked even over the long term; but they can in the UK.
 
Assassinations and home invasions are.
Home invasions- sometimes (although most of those are, uh, thugs in a robbery crew). Assassinations? I guess if you believe that Gavrilo Princip wasn't actually part of any organisation, and that Lee Harvey Oswald was a random nut and Jacob Rubinstein was a real true red white and blue patriot who just loved the shit out of Jack Kennedy.
But this is getting way off-topic. Britbongs don't have a history of guerilla warfare or resistance, instead a bunch of major countries have such a history against the Brits.
Well, not really. Individualism doesn't overthrow tyrannical governments anywhere. Just look at what happened to the Confederates when they fought the first real American revolution.
 
The UK system is deeply unsettling to me. The culture of compliance is eerie.

I visit the UK regularly (personal life reasons) and I'm always very cognizant that I'm leaving freedom behind.

Sorry that's a little dramatic but it sums up my feelings.

I run a private VPN at my home in the US so I can still pretend like I'm at work and access US only stuff.

I worry about what's on my laptop or my phone.

There's tshirts that I don't bring to the UK because they're too spicy.

I don't mean to mischaracterize the UK, I'm sure brits are way less uptight than I am but I just don't feel free there. I'd feel freer in Canada or Mexico.

Anyway to bring this all around to the topic at hand: I distinguish people bucking the British boot for personal advancement reasons and those bucking for liberty reasons. The boot is wrong in all cases but some people are genuine victims while others are opportunists. Count Dankula was absolutely a victim of the boot.
Its freedom as long as you dont upset your betters...
 
Would be useful when people start to sneer about "what is your AR-15 going to do against an F-16??"
Thats your F16 going to do when me and my talibros blow up your pilots legs with a IED made from Catfoodcontainers and Goatpiss?

That they didn't have a political wing which directed operations, and a chain of command going down to the cell level?
They also had alot of Nato help... the biggest IRA attacks just scream GLADIO....
 
dumb gay shit
You will never be a woman
You will never be a revolutionary
You will never be in the nomenklatura
You will never be in the intelligentsia

You will always be a simp
You will always be a faggot
You will always be a subject
You will always be a moron

SNEED

I’m fine with LGB too as long as they shut up. Nobody needs to hear about how you cum. Grow up, attention seeking coomers.
To get back on track discussing faggotry like polite posters, and piss off a few people, I have something to add to this:

The problem with the LGBBQ is that they don't know their place anymore, and neither does the rest of society. I'm quite serious.

Homosexuals are supposed to be on the periphery of society. The core of society is always going to be people who reproduce and do all the fucking work and can't spend their time chasing fun. Faggots, who are chasing fun, it turns out, does not a good basis of society make.

If homosexuals and hedonists were on the periphery and seen as such, and normies weren't encouraged to imitate them, and we were honest about who does what and who contributes what, that would be fine, as long as it's managed correctly. Not everyone is cut out to have a family. Not everyone is cut out to parent. People who do sometimes need an outlet to fuck around and get it out of their system. Plenty of long lasting societies had prostitution and other outlets.

There are arguments to make that faggots actually have a lot to offer artistically or whatever, so how about we let them do that while not letting their degeneracy fuck everything else up? Imagine that compared to the current shit show where children and heterosexual people are encouraged to construct a "queer" identity to fit in instead of accept themselves as they are. Imagine not putting faggots on a fucking pedestal for spending their lives partying.

Thanks for coming to my ted talk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back