More post-jail sightings megathread

[AnOminous]

If Chris was accessing the internet it would most likely be through a communal PC that everyone shares.

Or through his tardphone. He certainly qualifies for an Obamaphone.

 

[Blue Miaplacidus]

Or through his tardphone. He certainly qualifies for an Obamaphone.

If he is in a group home they will take the steps to secure him one as well, and they're no longer flip phones. They're galaxy A or J series, the only thing is I believe you only get 250 minutes which is 250mb of data for the month (if you make no calls or texts). I'm not sure as I'm not a nigger but I think that's what I remember the last time I looked them up for a different thread. So he would definitely be able to have access, and he could always add more minutes.

 

[AnOminous]

So he would definitely be able to have access, and he could always add more minutes.

It's definitely enough for him to tard out, which he would do if he weren't wrangled. One hopes by Heilberg, but it could be some dipshit cabal like Praetor manipulating him for their own reasons.

Hope it's Heilberg or some professional tard wranglers at his tard home.

 

[Second-Hand Boat Supplies]

It's been hashed out over and over that Chris didn't use the internet to commit his crime, and even pedophiles and hackers that do have appealed and shown that they can't be constitutionally banned from the internet. Besides, why wouldn't the courts want Chris online, so he can't further incriminate himself? They'd like that.

So bottom line, there is absolutely no reason the court would or even could ban Chris from the internet. If he isn't online, it's by his own volition, perhaps on the advice of Heilberg, or by Gateway house rules, but there is nothing legally prohibiting him!

I think you're mostly correct but, to bring up my favorite repeated point, the Autism deferral is a real wildcard. Chris has not technically been convicted of a crime and is therefore not being "punished". He and his lawyer chose the deferral path to avoid being convicted and punished. In some ways that's getting off easy, but not necessarily. Because they're not "punishing" him, they have more flexibility to require conditions.

 

[Niggerphobe]

What would happen to the case if Barb died like tomorrow or today

 

[AnOminous]

What would happen to the case if Barb died like tomorrow or today

Probably nothing, really. I always got the impression she was never intended to testify, either because she wasn't cooperating or is too demented, or they'd only need her if they were prosecuting it as a rape which they aren't. They almost certainly had him dead to rights on the one count he got, the incest, and he's already served about as much time as he probably would have gotten had he been convicted in the normal course of events.

 

[innocent jogger]

Or through his tardphone. He certainly qualifies for an Obamaphone.

You underestimate his laziness. lol The CPU Goddess will just wait for the gibs to come unto him.

 

[A Grey Cat]

It's definitely enough for him to tard out, which he would do if he weren't wrangled. One hopes by Heilberg, but it could be some dipshit cabal like Praetor manipulating him for their own reasons.

Hope it's Heilberg or some professional tard wranglers at his tard home.

Chris is a grade A attention whore even with all the shit that he's been through the last 2 years. He's gotta be itching to get back online but heilburg has told him no, not till at least he's no longer legally responsible for him and anything hecdays online won't cause the system any duress. And gateway is denying him acsess for similar reasons

 

[RodgerDodger]

People say this, but I point to John Bulla, an actual, diagnosed, in-and-out-of-the-nuthouse schizophrenic, who went to prison for sodomizing his stepdaughter. He was shanked while incarcerated, and it made such a lasting impression that after he got out even when he was posting his delusional placards and signs and ramblings online he was always VERY careful to specify that he was looking for an 18+ year woman (also no niggos, because at one point he got tricked into dating a black tranny for like 18 months, but that's another story)

Wasn't he also finally arrested for going after the neighbors underaged girls with a "Necklace of Knives"? I'm thinking he learned entirely the wrong lesson from the shanking. He also died in prison from the 'rona. Well that or his diaphram was punctured by the largely oversized penis of a black man penetrating his diaphram anally.

 

[AnOminous]

He also died in prison from the 'rona. Well that or his diaphram was punctured by the largely oversized penis of a black man penetrating his diaphram anally.

I don't know that we know it was the Kung Flu, but he was in an institution and it seems likely. I think he'd been indefinitely committed, but I don't think we know for sure.

 

[Jon Osterman]

I think you're mostly correct but, to bring up my favorite repeated point, the Autism deferral is a real wildcard. Chris has not technically been convicted of a crime and is therefore not being "punished". He and his lawyer chose the deferral path to avoid being convicted and punished. In some ways that's getting off easy, but not necessarily. Because they're not "punishing" him, they have more flexibility to require conditions.

I question if the courts could get away with a term like that. I'm not a legal kiwi, but it would seem a bit backwards if they can get away with a no internet clause for probations but not for actual sentences. But Chris is one of the first people to be deferred by the new law, so the courts are still probably figuring out what they can and can't do with the probation clauses.

 

[AnOminous]

I question if the courts could get away with a term like that. I'm not a legal kiwi, but it would seem a bit backwards if they can get away with a no internet clause for probations but not for actual sentences.

It's not probation that he's sentenced to, it's conditions of release which are voluntary. If you don't like them you can just stay in jail. The shrinks could also probably decide that the Internet is bad for his mental health and make refraining from using it for anything but job searches part of a treatment plan.

And again, he can refuse that and go back to jail if he likes. Or possibly he wouldn't go back to jail, although I think if he got kicked out of whatever program he's in, that's probably a violation of the diversion and they go back to court and prosecute him for the original charges (or up them to rape but I really think they would have done that already if they were going to).

 

[Rukario]

I question if the courts could get away with a term like that. I'm not a legal kiwi, but it would seem a bit backwards if they can get away with a no internet clause for probations but not for actual sentences. But Chris is one of the first people to be deferred by the new law, so the courts are still probably figuring out what they can and can't do with the probation clauses.

Previously in another thread it was stated that attorneys can request communication limitations put onto their clients' probation or bail terms. This is usually when an attorney thinks it will protect the client.

In addition, note that Chris eventually stopped replying to letters and has been radio silent for over 200 days. Praetor claimed that Heilberg had told Chris to stop replying to letters, probably to stop Chris making himself look even worse. Remember that Chris doxxed the nurse at the mental hospital he was at in early 2022 via letters. Heilberg also knows that Chris is active on the internet (Chris yelled about that at the Judge in his first court appearance for the incest charge way back in 2021).

Its very possible that as part of the probation program he is under, Heilberg had a clause put in preventing Chris from having unrestricted internet access, simply to protect his client. If Chris goes back on the internet, he will start doxxing everyone who wrote to him and all the staff at the jail and hospital. Not a good look to a probation hearing board.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

Wasn't he also finally arrested for going after the neighbors underaged girls with a "Necklace of Knives"? I'm thinking he learned entirely the wrong lesson from the shanking. He also died in prison from the 'rona. Well that or his diaphram was punctured by the largely oversized penis of a black man penetrating his diaphram anally.

I don't think we ever knew what sex the kids were and from what we gathered Bulla wasn't going after the kids excatly, he got into it with their mom while they were all outside and told her he was going to kill her while swinging the knife from his knife necklace around. I think they tacked on some charges related to the kids but it was some bullshit like "menacing a child" because they were just trying to max out the time they could get him to stay in a place where he could be contained and medicate. He did die in 2021 right in the middle of 'rona times so that seems slightly more likely than black man's penis (sexually).

 

[Cuntspiracy Man]

I don't think we ever knew what sex the kids were and from what we gathered Bulla wasn't going after the kids excatly, he got into it with their mom while they were all outside and told her he was going to kill her while swinging the knife from his knife necklace around. I think they tacked on some charges related to the kids but it was some bullshit like "menacing a child" because they were just trying to max out the time they could get him to stay in a place where he could be contained and medicate. He did die in 2021 right in the middle of 'rona times so that seems slightly more likely than black man's penis (sexually).

everyone who died during the 'rona, died FROM the 'rona
the small details dont matter

>man dies from Covid-related buggery

 

[Second-Hand Boat Supplies]

I question if the courts could get away with a term like that. I'm not a legal kiwi, but it would seem a bit backwards if they can get away with a no internet clause for probations but not for actual sentences. But Chris is one of the first people to be deferred by the new law, so the courts are still probably figuring out what they can and can't do with the probation clauses.

That's a fair point. I'm reading the relevant laws in Virginia and they're very scarce on details as to the limits of the possible deferral conditions. They may be unilaterally imposed by the court, but most commonly they are agreed to by all parties, including the accused.

One interesting detail from the general text about any deferral is that once you agree to it, you waive your right to appeal a conviction if you're deemed guilty for violating the terms. That strikes me as relevant because it seems like a pretty significant right to give up if you "agree" to it. Fascinating legal question, honestly. I want to learn more

Adding more: agreeing to search without probable cause or notice seems to be a very common probation condition, which is fairly blatantly unconstitutional in general, but it flies for probation because you would technically consent to it because it's preferable to the 'punishment'. No way to be certain, but I feel strongly that internet restrictions are at least possible

Editing once more: We all know at this point about Packingham v North Carolina, which establishes that a North Carolina law banning sex offenders from the internet was unconstitutional. But the argument primarily rests on the breadth of the law, saying essentially, in my reading, that the uses of the internet are far too varied for a ban to legitimately serve the state's interests to protect the public or rehabilitate the criminal.
However, Illinois still explicitly lists social media bans as acceptable conditions of parole. https://codes.findlaw.com/il/chapter-730-corrections/il-st-sect-730-5-5-6-3.html This has been challenged following the lead of Packingham but has failed to go anywhere repeatedly. Virginia law is not Illinois law, but this shows that severely restricting Chris's internet activity is absolutely possible

 

[Homer Jay]

I wonder if the group home got a briefing on this beforehand
Someone had to tell them
"Hey we are sending you over this person he's known as Chris chan online so just expect hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of phone calls."

I'm just saying if they threw him there and did not warn the staff at all that's just screwed up.

im just now catching up on this thread but i can almost guarantee that no one gave anyone any kind of warning. the only way they would have is if the person handling his transfer to the home was a Christorian, casually or otherwise. also as Terrorist mentioned earlier:

"This doesn't make sense. Why doesn't he have a wrangler with him at all times?"
Chris roaming relatively free is understandable when you consider that the staff of tard homes are some mixture of:

1. Overworked, underfunded angels who have to deal with toddlers in 300 lb gorilla bodies punching holes in walls all day
2. Lazy incompetent niggers trying to scam the most tax dollars possible in exchange for the absolute bare minimum of care

Should Chris have a minder when he's out and about? Probably. But if the staff can get the docile ones out of their hair for a couple hours, risking most likely nothing but the mild annoyance of the general public, they will.

both examples 1 and 2 of the type of workers in this field would be unable or unwilling to protect the general public (or chris himself) from our nasty little motherfucker.


and as someone whos been in this field for coming up on a decade now, i'm going to assume Chris is a non-24 hour client, meaning he's allowed, and required to have if he so choses, alone time for such things.

when you come across that in this field you take it. that being said when you work in a home such as the one he's most likely in, his staff probably DEFINITLEY have at the bare minimum three other tards to wrangle.


again i apologize if im repeating anything obvious or that's already been said ive been away for awhile and im just now getting caught up.


missed you faggots.

 

[Homer Jay]

If they're a normie, they won't know who Chris is.

ive had quite a few normies talk about him on facebook since this whole thing happened. people FAR outside this circle. its because of that tucker carlson spot and all the other coverage the motherfucker-ing garnered.

 

[Homer Jay]

Goddammit it Chris, I legit have to ask why the fuck is Gateway allowing him to do this bullshit? Like I get they will never try to convince him to drop the troonery cause that would be seen as "conversion therapy." But are you seriously telling me the system is just going to let him sign things under the name Jesus sonichu Hedgehog cpu goddess blue heart?"


Edit: just read up this incident on the cwcki, apparently two years in jail have done nothing to Chris's love for new age magic crap mumbo jumbo. He was buying a new set of magical healing crystals and stones and they're letting him dye his hair cotton candy blue? I miss when people like Chris where zapped in the skull and treated with an ice pick up the nose to end that kind of thinking.

dude gateway or whomever the fuck is wrangling him have not been granted the ability to take away any of his rights. I'm trying not to be an asshole but like...are you fucking high? these programs, group homes, halfway houses and reentry programs are NOT internment camps that are granted carte blanche over the lives of the mentally or criminally deranged. it's not secret knowledge either you can easily look into how these places work. I legit have to ask why so many people here are confused about how these programs work. they aren't clandestine organizations fucking google it homie. no matter how badly you think he should be tied to a chair in a sanatorium with diodes on his temples for the rest of eternity that shit doesn't happen to people guilty of what CWC is guilty of, or worse even for that matter

 

[Gunter Hatherer]

ive had quite a few normies talk about him on facebook since this whole thing happened. people FAR outside this circle. its because of that tucker carlson spot and all the other coverage the motherfucker-ing garnered.

Nothing quite like mainstream media attention.
Or is Tucker Carlson no longer "mainstream"?