US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
With each passing day I feel more vindicated of adopting Dear Feeder's no voting policy. Imagine thinking these fucking neocons will totally not back stab you like they've been doing since before most of us were born. Even in LE BASED TEXAS greg faggot is more worried about nigger hair than doing something beneficial to his constituency. Cause you know none of those nogs voted for him.

Side note, between this talk of FDRs cornslop act and the nigger hair bill I've been convinced we should actively discriminate against these wheelchair bound cripples.
 
Sugars directly convert to alcohol. Corn starch has to be converted to sugar first, then fermented into alcohol. The end product is more or less the same, but using corn requires extra steps, materials, and time.
Fermented into alcohol and then distilled to be useful for this kind of shit, never mind whatever adulterants they need to add for ICEs.

Edit: Does corn need any other shit done to it compared to grains or does it have enough natural yeasts on their surface combined with its naturally high sugar content like fruit alcohols? That's something I never even thought about with this graft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
DeSantis's strategy is completely and utterly baffling. The "compassionate Conservative" archetype was considered extremely outdated and cringe in like 2012 and that's still what he's going for.

Who is advising this man?
Jeb Bush.
With each passing day I feel more vindicated of adopting Dear Feeder's no voting policy.
Imagine you're in a room with eight other people.

They hold a vote for whether you get fucked in the ass, or the mouth.

It's a split vote.

Not voting at all just lets the eight men who are about to fuck you think that you just like it.

It's the same with politics. At the very least you could pipe up and tell them that you're not into being plugged oral or otherwise. Which is the point of a protest vote, not voting at all just lets your vote be counted for you by both sides (that similarly are going to fuck you).
 
Jeb Bush.

Imagine you're in a room with eight other people.

They hold a vote for whether you get fucked in the ass, or the mouth.

It's a split vote.

Not voting at all just lets the eight men who are about to fuck you think that you just like it.

It's the same with politics. At the very least you could pipe up and tell them that you're not into being plugged oral or otherwise. Which is the point of a protest vote, not voting at all just lets your vote be counted for you by both sides (that similarly are going to fuck you).
Extend the metaphor to make it more accurate: two of them have guns, both want to fuck me in the ass and are holding a vote to decide who gets to fuck me in the ass. There is no "don't fuck me in the ass" vote in america anymore.

No third party doesn't count either.
 
Last edited:
Edit: Does corn need any other shit done to it compared to grains or does it have enough natural yeasts on their surface combined with its naturally high sugar content like fruit alcohols? That's something I never even thought about with this graft.
I know the liquor making process but I'm sure there's some variations when they're making fuel on an industrial scale. If your base is a starch, you have to add amylase enzymes which are naturally present in malted grains. Usually traditional whiskeys are made by converting starch (corn) into sugar (potential alcohol) by cooking it with amylase enzymes (malted grain). You can also buy powdered enzymes which are just as effective and a lot easier, they just don't add to the flavor profile like grain would. Yeast is added later and left to ferment, which is basically the yeast eating the sugar a shitting out alcohol and CO2. If your base is sugar instead of starch, you can skip most of the process and just add the yeast.


Back to politics. I bought a new hard drive and was going through my old meme folders and this gem popped up. This was way before the Bud Light scandal so it's even funnier in retrospect.
 
DeSantis's strategy is completely and utterly baffling. The "compassionate Conservative" archetype was considered extremely outdated and cringe in like 2012 and that's still what he's going for.

Who is advising this man?
The same hucksters and grifters that have been "advising" the GOP since the Bush era and are mad that Trump and the populists won't kiss the ring.
 
What happened to Ron

He is so low energy the last several weeks

Barely an afterthought

That more than anything is why he's lost support since announcing his candidacy

Trump gave him a couple brushback pitches and he found out he wasn't ready for the big time I guess

Has happened to a lot of guys who tried to go from being the big fish in a state pond to being a big fish among big fish in the national pond
 
What happened to Ron

He is so low energy the last several weeks

Barely an afterthought

That more than anything is why he's lost support since announcing his candidacy

Trump gave him a couple brushback pitches and he found out he wasn't ready for the big time I guess

Has happened to a lot of guys who tried to go from being the big fish in a state pond to being a big fish among big fish in the national pond
Lil nigga should’ve known his place and waited til 2028, but he wanted it NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW and made a fool of himself.
 
1686803925481.png
3 for 3 cyberpunk boys
Giving his due.
1686804076996.png
Human embryos made without eggs or sperm have been created in a scientific breakthrough which is bound to raise serious ethical and legal questions.
They were produced in a joint project between Cambridge University and the California Institute of Technology and resemble embryos in the earliest stages of human development.
They do not have the beginnings of a brain or a beating heart, but do include cells which would go on to form the placenta and yolk sac.
Scientists believe that their finding could provide significant insight and aid research into rare genetic disorders and the biological causes of miscarriage.
But the synthetic embryos are not covered by laws in the UK or in most countries around the world, meaning that they come with serious ethical and legal issues regarding the use of human embryos in a lab.
Human embryos made without eggs or sperm have been created in a scientific breakthrough which is bound to raise serious ethical and legal questions
Human embryos made without eggs or sperm have been created in a scientific breakthrough which is bound to raise serious ethical and legal questions (file image)
The embroyos do not have the beginnings of a brain or a beating heart, but do include cells which would go on to form the placenta and yolk sac
The embroyos do not have the beginnings of a brain or a beating heart, but do include cells which would go on to form the placenta and yolk sa
Until this breakthrough, scientists had to adhere to the 14-day rule which meant they were limited to allowing embryos to develop in a lab for a maximum of two weeks.
After this point researchers would have to wait until further along its development to pick up their study, relying on pregnancy scans and embryos donated to research.
The desire to understand this period of an embryo's development – which starts at day 14 and ends around day 28 – was the main motivation behind the work to create synthetic human embryos.
Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz, a fellow at the University of Cambridge, described the work yesterday at the International Society for Stem Cell Research's annual meeting in Boston: 'We can create human embryo-like models by the reprogramming of [embryonic stem] cells.'
Before the talk, she told The Guardian: 'It's beautiful and created entirely from embryonic stem cells.'
While it is not yet clear if the synthetic embryos could continue developing beyond their early stages, implanting them into a patient's womb would be illegal and there is no near-term prospect of them being used for medical purposes.
Until this breakthrough, scientists had to adhere to the 14-day rule which meant they were limited to allowing embryos to develop in a lab for a maximum of two weeks
Until this breakthrough, scientists had to adhere to the 14-day rule which meant they were limited to allowing embryos to develop in a lab for a maximum of two weeks
Robin Lovell-Badge, the head of stem cell biology and developmental genetics at the Francis Crick Institute in London, told The Guardian: 'The idea is that if you really model normal human embryonic development using stem cells you can gain an awful lot of information about how we begin development, what can go wrong, without having to use early embryos for research.'
Discussing the ethical issues surrounding the findings, he added: 'If the whole intention is that these models are very much like normal embryos, then, in a way, they should be treated the same.
'Currently in legislation they're not. People are worried about this.'
 
Lil nigga should’ve known his place and waited til 2028, but he wanted it NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW and made a fool of himself.
He thought that he would never be as relevant as he is now, due to covid and fighting off groomers. He's right. Also he's irrelevant.
 
Lil nigga should’ve known his place and waited til 2028, but he wanted it NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW and made a fool of himself.
You're acting like he wasn't an established crony from the start. He was only allowed to be based as a way to build up a profile to attack Trump. He's been fluffed up by the media with attacks that make him look favorable to Conservatives("We hate that DeDantis is doing this thing(that you want)" or "DeSantis wins horrible victory that goes against all of our values(that you think are evil"). He gets big press on passing this or that based law, and little coverage on mediocre to no follow through.

There was no "waiting his turn", they'll probably keep trying to prop him up(if he isn't completely Jebed) to try and controlled opposition 2028 at well, but his entire political clout comes from the plan to try and spoiler Trump's 2024 run.
 

RFK Jr. is growing more in popularity and favorability, as Trump and Biden come in close to second:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is running as a Democrat in the 2024 presidential election, is currently ranking the highest in favorability among both his fellow Democrat and Republican challengers, recent polls show.
According to the Economist and YouGov poll released on Wednesday, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. received a 49 percent favorability rating from respondents, resulting in a net favorability rating of 19 points. 30 percent of respondents voted him unfavorable, The Hill reports.
 
I don't mind RFK Jr. as a spoiler for the left because he's very attractive to your urban, city-guy union mook. He's not Trump, who union guys do not like, but he's saying shit that kinda sounds like Trump, and the union guys do like that.

Biden is not well-liked by anyone. Trump is polarizing, sure, but largely captures the hearts of most of the voting Right already. RFK Jr. has pull over non-Gender Studies democrats/bluedogs and Never Trumpers. Very unlikely to win the nomination but it would be utterly insane to have 2024 be vaccine-denier Democrat versus Trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back