I rewatched the videos without skipping to better understand it all since it seems so fucking stupid and incomprehensible.
Although the public database is going to be discontinued, I think it's still worth talking about because it shows their true intentions. It wasn't just collecting info such as demos, but it was logging your past names and even friends then marked you as suspicious if you were friends with at least 2 people they considered cheaters. Basically a surveillance for the greater good. He mentions being so generous that when it went public, he took off 810 people who were no longer friends with cheaters off the list as it wasn't fair. Spying on you is fair only if you're still friends with the suspects.
Example of the database:
Note the amount of white dots. That's just people marked as being spied on.
Red nodes are players we think are definite cheaters; humans and bots.
Yellow nodes are players we deemed suspicious. We don't know if these players cheat or not. We encourage users to presume innocence.
White nodes are not suspicious, but are being watched. The database will automatically watch certain users, for instance if they're friends with too many cheaters.
Of course it would be foolish to think that they would just stop all this surveillance and accusations and rely on hard proof all of sudden. It will 100% be going behind the closed doors with trannies deciding your fate.
This is from the first video (where he also virtue signals about muh racism quite a bit):
How is "abusive chat" relevant at all? Isn't this about cheating? Or was he already planning the "toxicity" kicks from the beginning?
Additionally, the australian faggot
falsely marked a guy as a cheater who then reached out to be removed from this list. What was the response? He asked the victim to prove his innocence. Apparently if you get marked by one of his faggot clique as a cheater, the burden of proof is on YOU. How to prove this? Don't ask me. He claims the guy was downgraded to suspicious, followed up by the contradicting claim that you have to presume innocence... "Sorry dude you're not a cheater we will just slander you as a potential one
"
Talking of "suspicious" status, here's the freudian slip I caught:
"...they could be innocent, frankly they should be treated as such until proven otherwise. If you guys start harassing innocent people on here and they're not marked as a cheater that is a 100% your fault not mine"
So harassment is ok against those you disagree with, huh?
The last thing I want to mention is this disclaimer from his site:
Basically all the usual disclaimers about innocence and "no harassment" to wash his hands of any responsibility. Probably after being told it's a bad look to publicly incite it even towards cheaters. But look at the highlighted part. He's going to log all IPs on his server. While not a big deal, it again exposes his intentions. Why does he need this info? If he could do so, he would probably IP grab people in casual, too. For anti-cheat purposes, of course.
The funniest shit about this is they think their open source tranny AI is going to do anything LOL
Dude they have
22 DEVS.
I cant tell if its because hes retarded or if hes straight up ignoring the fact you can just create a new steam account making the whole autistic fbi thing worthless
He thinks that he's going to run an AI to analyze the demos and automatically mark obvious cheaters in the database. Which is then downloaded by the anti-cheat program resulting in an automatic, synchronized votekicks just by having the program open in background. It seems he intends to make the demo grabbing automatic while the program is running, too. I doubt people will be bothered to download it, let alone start it up everytime they play. The whole idea runs on the belief that there's going to be enough active users to pass the votes. Very wishful thinking.
