Cartoon Industry thread - Showcasing the Spergery of the Animation Industry

So recently an article was published on Insider.com about Pixar, and why it's recent movies aren't doing so well.
View attachment 5196321
Link: https://www.insider.com/pixar-elemental-box-office-loss-winning-back-audiences-2023-6 (Archive)

And people are calling it out because of it putting John Lasseter in a good light.
View attachment 5196350
(Archive)

View attachment 5196355
(Archive)

View attachment 5196360
(Archive)

View attachment 5196368
(Archive)

View attachment 5196411
(Archive)

View attachment 5196418
(Archive)

View attachment 5196426
(Archive)

We even got a cameo from our old friend MovieBob.
View attachment 5196442
(Archive)
The Larry the Cable Guy movie made more profit than any of these people will ever see in their lives. Lightyear made $0. Elemental, while it’s making more than Lightyear, is still on track to make $0.

Lasseter had an actual sense of whether these things would make money. You can make your passion projects all you want, yet if your last like six movies made a total $0 profit for the company because they either got forced onto streaming or just nobody liked them, then something needs to give, and it may just be you.
 
Last edited:
The Larry the Cable Guy movie made more profit than any of these people will ever see in their lives. Lightyear made $0. Elemental, while it’s making more than Lightyear, is still on track to make $0.

Lassiter had an actual sense of whether these things would make money. You can make your passion projects all you want, yet if your last like six movies made a total $0 profit for the company because they either got forced onto streaming or just nobody liked them, then something needs to give, and it may just be you.
Yea, I mean say what you want about the likes of Cars 2, but the marketing for the Cars franchise was clever and Lassetter had a better mindset of marketing the Cars movies despite the quality of each of them. Plus, the marketing for Pixar movies between the mid 90s through early 2010s were mostly a balanced between quality content and great marketing. The last few movies couldn't even manage to do any of that.
 
This shit really makes me wanna barf
I know how you feel...
Screenshot 2023-07-11 at 02-22-47 Nico Colaleo on Twitter Tons of nice and supportive comments...png

(Archive)

Screenshot 2023-07-11 at 02-27-27 Nico Colaleo on Twitter @MaxieIsATwit thanks! Yes if there w...png

(Archive)

Screenshot 2023-07-11 at 02-29-41 Nico Colaleo on Twitter @TSpicknell yes it was meant to air ...png

(Archive)

Screenshot 2023-07-11 at 02-32-20 Nico Colaleo on Twitter @Spocktacklez I can't help that we d...png

(Archive)
 
Good god, I know modern kids shows are meant for mentally ill zoomers and millennials, but do they have to be this blatant with grooming and faggotry
That’s because most of these people that watch this do not have children or raise children of their own, and in turn, they turn into the children that they want to dress up as.

Also, it says that a lot that even after a decade “The Loud House” is still only known as the cartoon that subtly managed to get away with deviancy over other cartoons that would have been outright canceled for far less. The fact that it’s getting a spin off is about as surprising as people trying to remember any funny moments of the cartoon that did not devolve into DeviantArt/rule34 sharing on the Internet.
 
Also, it says that a lot that even after a decade “The Loud House” is still only known as the cartoon that subtly managed to get away with deviancy over other cartoons that would have been outright canceled for far less. The fact that it’s getting a spin off is about as surprising as people trying to remember any funny moments of the cartoon that did not devolve into DeviantArt/rule34 sharing on the Internet.
It's just a generic Nicktoon that, like most other original Nicktoons before and after, just consist of premature toilet humor, and the only reason why it's more popular is because of (like you said) its deviant fanbase which also includes manchildren.
 
Cars wasn’t Shakespeare and I hate Anthropomorphism, but it made money on merchandise and the narrative was simple and clean.

Zootopia and shit tries to have social commentary that’s retarded. Pixar excelled mostly at character driven stories that were mostly about characters overcoming their personal problems and external threats simultaneously.
Zootopia effectively only worked because the predators and prey as stands in shit is thousands of years old.
 
That’s because most of these people that watch this do not have children or raise children of their own, and in turn, they turn into the children that they want to dress up as.

Also, it says that a lot that even after a decade “The Loud House” is still only known as the cartoon that subtly managed to get away with deviancy over other cartoons that would have been outright canceled for far less. The fact that it’s getting a spin off is about as surprising as people trying to remember any funny moments of the cartoon that did not devolve into DeviantArt/rule34 sharing on the Internet.
It's funny how The Loud House became more degenerate after they kicked out the creator with an incest fetish
 
Cars wasn’t Shakespeare and I hate Anthropomorphism, but it made money on merchandise and the narrative was simple and clean.

Zootopia and shit tries to have social commentary that’s retarded. Pixar excelled mostly at character driven stories that were mostly about characters overcoming their personal problems and external threats simultaneously.
Zootopia effectively only worked because the predators and prey as stands in shit is thousands of years old.
The marketing for Cars has always been creative because of its narrative story telling. No, Cars is a messed up franchise, especially for Pixar, but the merchandising for it worked, and it would not make a difference if it was a product of DreamWorks, Sony or especially Illumination due to said marketing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoReturn
The marketing for Cars has always been creative because of its narrative story telling. No, Cars is a messed up franchise, especially for Pixar, but the merchandising for it worked, and it would not make a difference if it was a product of DreamWorks, Sony or especially Illumination due to said marketing.
I always saw it as a cynical way of getting cash. Kids like race cars so they could make a toy and basically get a lot of funding fair other movies. It basically was Lassiter funding other movies via Cars because the merchandise sales would last them years.

I think Brave was basically when too many retards were allowed to sit in the writers room and pitch there shitty ideas. The woman who wrote it (even prior to the rewrites) was a dipshit. It’s an animated drama with no good set pieces. You don’t even use folklore well in the draft.
Disney made fucking Darby O’Gill and the Little People and that had more imagination than shit heap.
 
That’s because most of these people that watch this do not have children or raise children of their own, and in turn, they turn into the children that they want to dress up as.

Also, it says that a lot that even after a decade “The Loud House” is still only known as the cartoon that subtly managed to get away with deviancy over other cartoons that would have been outright canceled for far less. The fact that it’s getting a spin off is about as surprising as people trying to remember any funny moments of the cartoon that did not devolve into DeviantArt/rule34 sharing on the Internet.

I think that's why Bluely ending up getting popular and working so well. The people making it are adults that have kids (the VA of the kids on the show are literally the children of the production crew) so its less "What is my fetish I always wished I saw" and more "Hey, here is a funny story that happened with my kids/something my kids would like".
 
That’s because most of these people that watch this do not have children or raise children of their own, and in turn, they turn into the children that they want to dress up as.

Also, it says that a lot that even after a decade “The Loud House” is still only known as the cartoon that subtly managed to get away with deviancy over other cartoons that would have been outright canceled for far less. The fact that it’s getting a spin off is about as surprising as people trying to remember any funny moments of the cartoon that did not devolve into DeviantArt/rule34 sharing on the Internet.
I'm honestly surprised this show is even still popular considering all the weird fetish shit that you mentioned...

I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, that a filthy Tumblr fujoshit would have creepy gay shit in a supposed-children's cartoon.
There's also a female storyboard artist by the name of Ashley Tahilan, who has a similar creepy obsession with the Elder characters.
1689363473656.png

1689318952881.png

1689319353080.png

1689319423837.png

1689319923977.png


She even created a Zine featuring them as well...
Screenshot 2023-07-14 at 16-03-24 ash 🌝 tahilan 🐲👹🕊️ on Twitter about a year ago I jokingly sa...png


And made a "Creeksona" of herself
1689364642892.png

1689363573610.png



Who happens to be related to Elder David...
1689316317338.png

1689318035986.png


It's really, really concerning...
 
Last edited:
Is this an AGP? I saw the PFP and unprompted "I'M A LESBIANNN" shit and found that the real last name is "Vucinich" (why use a different last name on different platforms when it could confuse potential employers?), all the art is yuri shit, and I mean ALL THE ART. That's all this person in their mid-30s draws. One hundred percent of it.

Pictures:
View attachment 5211090ambervucinichdisney.jpg
madonnainnamber.pngpedoconcert.pngweird-drawing.png
That last one looks like Peter Griffin's statue of Harriet Tubman having sex with Gwyneth Paltrow.

I don't have linkedin, but here's Amber's: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ambervucinich
And IG: https://www.instagram.com/mbrleigh/

Two interviews:
Keyframe Magazine
Voyage LA
 
Is this an AGP? I saw the PFP and unprompted "I'M A LESBIANNN" shit and found that the real last name is "Vucinich" (why use a different last name on different platforms when it could confuse potential employers?), all the art is yuri shit, and I mean ALL THE ART. That's all this person in their mid-30s draws. One hundred percent of it.

Pictures:
View attachment 5211090View attachment 5211091
View attachment 5211093View attachment 5211094View attachment 5211095
That last one looks like Peter Griffin's statue of Harriet Tubman having sex with Gwyneth Paltrow.

I don't have linkedin, but here's Amber's: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ambervucinich
And IG: https://www.instagram.com/mbrleigh/

Two interviews:
Keyframe Magazine
Voyage LA
1689374678434.png1689374700651.png
that theory is certainly plausible considering the proportions and jawline
not to mention the name (at this point I'm convinced there are nearly as many troons named Amber as there are actual women)
 
Back