Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems like the trick is directing the tax revenue from Oregon to Idaho IMO. If it's all automated, then their taxes go to Oregon anyways, which is why nothing is happening.There are chunks of eastern Oregon and Washington trying to break away and join Idaho (who has said they'll happily take them in, those parts of OR and WA are pretty damned red).
There's not a lot of precedent for it, but then again, long train of abuses and usurpations and so on.
One of the problems people (especially Euros) get confused by is that the U.S. really isn't a super-unified country like a European one. Theoretically it's fifty smaller countries all bound together. Granted, the concept of federalism has taken some serious hits, first from Lincoln (and while I am sympathetic to the issues he faced it's hard for me to not want to slap him for not seeing what was coming down the road) and then later on from FDR and the rise of the federal 'super-gov'.
But the structures are there, waiting. You don't need to cobble together a new government from scratch. The state govs will function just as well as the federal retards and I would wager with fifty percent more efficiency.
The nightmare scenario for statist WEF faggots is one where more than two states tell the feds to go fuck themselves for their latest mandate. The left has already set THAT precedent with their sanctuary city/state faggotry. Nice job fucking the llama, retards.
What's more likely to happen in the near future is the Federal Government becoming insolvent and defaulting on it's obligations once it becomes clear they can't print anymore money.Generally there are cases of that sort and of the opposite where a state's districts want to vote out another (Read: Illinois residents trying to remove Chicago/California and all kinds of districts calls to remove or be removed) but of course it never happens.
I wouldn't call that really balkanization more than wet dreams from a political perspective, generally balkanization is neither that peaceful or just solved by a vote.
I'm pretty sure when shit hits the fan and suddenly California can't live off federal welfare for it's massive deficit, they'll directly demand aid from the states they can reach nearby. Hell they already do the same thing with water rights -- sucking all the water from every state to the west of the Mississippi to fund several batshit insane ag industries that should have been left to die decades ago. (Almonds and IIRC Avocados).The real issue has ans always will be the Federal Government and when things get bad enough for it to collapse, the States would much band together than fight each other.
Which is why I'm starting to suggest that people start looking more into helping out the Republican State Leadership Committee. Instead of pozzed federal elections like the GOP they focus on winning state houses on a state by state level. And since it is not federal elections there is no cap on how much a person can donate. (Depending on State).There are chunks of eastern Oregon and Washington trying to break away and join Idaho (who has said they'll happily take them in, those parts of OR and WA are pretty damned red).
There's not a lot of precedent for it, but then again, long train of abuses and usurpations and so on.
One of the problems people (especially Euros) get confused by is that the U.S. really isn't a super-unified country like a European one. Theoretically it's fifty smaller countries all bound together. Granted, the concept of federalism has taken some serious hits, first from Lincoln (and while I am sympathetic to the issues he faced it's hard for me to not want to slap him for not seeing what was coming down the road) and then later on from FDR and the rise of the federal 'super-gov'.
But the structures are there, waiting. You don't need to cobble together a new government from scratch. The state govs will function just as well as the federal retards and I would wager with fifty percent more efficiency.
The nightmare scenario for statist WEF faggots is one where more than two states tell the feds to go fuck themselves for their latest mandate. The left has already set THAT precedent with their sanctuary city/state faggotry. Nice job fucking the llama, retards.
Lincoln did see what was coming. That's what his second inaugural speech was about. Malice towards none, charity towards all was a rebuke to the Radical Republicans who wanted to use the huge federal government wartime apparatus to crush the defeated South. Then Lincoln got domed and the Thaddeus Stevens had no effective counter to them in the party. The huge mess of Reconstruction was the result. The Party corrected itself in the 1870s and then Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson created the administrative state and cranked it up to 11, respectively. Then Silent Cal did a pretty good job reversing course, and FDR fucked it all up creating the permanent bloated overbearing federal government we've had ever sinceThere are chunks of eastern Oregon and Washington trying to break away and join Idaho (who has said they'll happily take them in, those parts of OR and WA are pretty damned red).
There's not a lot of precedent for it, but then again, long train of abuses and usurpations and so on.
One of the problems people (especially Euros) get confused by is that the U.S. really isn't a super-unified country like a European one. Theoretically it's fifty smaller countries all bound together. Granted, the concept of federalism has taken some serious hits, first from Lincoln (and while I am sympathetic to the issues he faced it's hard for me to not want to slap him for not seeing what was coming down the road) and then later on from FDR and the rise of the federal 'super-gov'.
But the structures are there, waiting. You don't need to cobble together a new government from scratch. The state govs will function just as well as the federal retards and I would wager with fifty percent more efficiency.
The nightmare scenario for statist WEF faggots is one where more than two states tell the feds to go fuck themselves for their latest mandate. The left has already set THAT precedent with their sanctuary city/state faggotry. Nice job fucking the llama, retards.
Well that's the thing big chunks of California are fine and normal it's the coastal cities that cause problems. No more Federal Welfare would mean California would have to pull itself together to survive.I'm pretty sure when shit hits the fan and suddenly California can't live off federal welfare for it's massive deficit, they'll directly demand aid from the states they can reach nearby. Hell they already do the same thing with water rights -- sucking all the water from every state to the west of the Mississippi to fund several batshit insane ag industries that should have been left to die decades ago. (Almonds and IIRC Avocados).
uhhh, I don't know, chief.Which is why I'm starting to suggest that people start looking more into helping out the Republican State Leadership Committee. Instead of pozzed federal elections like the GOP they focus on winning state houses on a state by state level.
That faggot Karl Rove is one of their advisors.Which is why I'm starting to suggest that people start looking more into helping out the Republican State Leadership Committee. Instead of pozzed federal elections like the GOP they focus on winning state houses on a state by state level. And since it is not federal elections there is no cap on how much a person can donate. (Depending on State).
The Republican Party leadership grew up with the Democrat Party leadership. They went to the same prep and Ivy League schools, they all got their starts at the same Wall Street and white shoe law firms, and many of them marry their relatives and each other. They share the same values because they’re the same people. So expecting them to be different is a fantasy. Ask Nick Fuentes how entryism worked with the Gay Old Perverts. Speaking of groypers:
Just a reminder that one of Turdblossom’s catamites was Ali Alexander, who solicited naked photos of underage groypers.That faggot Karl Rove is one of their advisors.
The "DO NOT REDEEM" jokes write themselves.
The nightmare scenario for statist WEF faggots is one where more than two states tell the feds to go fuck themselves for their latest mandate. The left has already set THAT precedent with their sanctuary city/state faggotry. Nice job fucking the llama, retards.
Imagine if a state declared it to be a sanctuary from federal bans on new automatic weapons. You'd see a very different outcome.
Well at that point the civvies are armed as well as the troops, possibly with more range time. Uncle Joe and the ATF can't have that now.Some people are actually moving to do that, declare "2nd Ammendment sanctuaries" to get around to laws. And indeed for some reason they have a much harder time doing it than the immigration faggots ave.
All we need is a second Civil War so we can get lucky like those West Virginians did.There's not a lot of precedent for it, but then again, long train of abuses and usurpations and so on.
It's looking like it unless the press and the courts miraculously cancel Trump. Vivek is catching up to DeSantis in the polls fast.I just watched the Blaze interviews. I'm calling it. The last two standing will be Trump and Ramaswamy.
Interesting. Two rich guys duking it out. Honestly glad it isn't more of the same old uniparty vs Trump. We'll actually have a somewhat solid lineup- a miracle, and no doubt a upset to the swamp ratsIt's looking like it unless the press and the courts miraculously cancel Trump. Vivek is catching up to DeSantis in the polls fast.