- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
My position is simple, I don't feel I have the right to dodge the draft, given I have a family military legacy and I would rather be at the front than hiding in my own piss when the nukes pound my city. Discuss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From my position, if war is going to happen, America is on a collision course, the tracks are blown, nothing can stop it... why should I sit it out? ICBM's are basically gonna wipe out the main inhabited area of Utah, so I'm dead if I stay, but at least if I fight, I might have a future, and be able to rebuild once and if I come back.Dying for the current incarnation of America isn't worth it. That is to say nothing of the concepts of "unjustified" and "justified" wars.
I understand the feeling because it was the same for my family (if you go back far enough most men in every family participated in wars anyway), but those I knew fought for things that go contrary to what I would fight for if I were to fight for the current establishment.I don't feel I have the right to dodge the draft, given I have a family military legacy and I would rather be at the front than hiding in my own piss when the nukes pound my city
Let me make it clear, I'm not for the establishment. They are evil. At the same time, I don't think they'll be in existence once the nukes start falling. I think the world will be much more Starship Troopers at that point once we've wasted our nukes. Russia and China, just as we do at their capitols, has enough firepower pointed at DC to leave it a smoking crater. And at that point, my job is to survive and rebuild. That's gonna be far easier with cargo planes and mil spec bulldozers.I understand the feeling because it was the same for my family (if you go back far enough most men in every family participated in wars anyway), but those I knew fought for things that go contrary to what I would fight for if I were to fight for the current establishment.
If you think more about it and not simply "war, no war", then you realize that the important thing is to continue their fight, not to simply participate in any random war that happens in your life time.
What did they fought for? What did they believe in? Find that out, and fight for those things. I'm pretty sure it won't manifest itself in "you should participate in a war between Whites for jews and globohomo".
That completely depends on the war. If the nukes start flying I don't know if anyone's making it. You really won't have a much higher a chance of surviving by being out on the front.From my position, if war is going to happen, America is on a collision course, the tracks are blown, nothing can stop it... why should I sit it out? ICBM's are basically gonna wipe out the main inhabited area of Utah, so I'm dead if I stay, but at least if I fight, I might have a future, and be able to rebuild once and if I come back.
Idk, from what I understand my grandfather fought because he was young and the economy was pretty bad and joining the military was a sure job. He was a good soldier and instructor who took it seriously, but I think people oversell how much troops in the past believed in the cause.What did they fought for? What did they believe in? Find that out, and fight for those things. I'm pretty sure it won't manifest itself in "you should participate in a war between Whites for jews and globohomo".
The chance they put me in a factory is high, I'll admit that much. As for warfare itself, don't kid yourself. They were planning to fight and win a nuclear war since the 50's. Why do you think even a little armored personel carrier, a box with tracks, always comes with a air scrubber?That completely depends on the war. If the nukes start flying I don't know if anyone's making it. You really won't have a much higher a chance of surviving by being out on the front.
Plus that points to an issue with the whole discussion, which is that war has changed, significantly. If heavy international armed conflict breaks out, it isn't going to be raw manpower out in trenches or storming beaches that's going to do it, war's going to be fought in large part with machines, microchips, etc.
In fact my personal belief is that war of that type (WWII style I mean) is basically obsolete. We exist in a perpetual cold war, where it's all proxy wars and soft power struggles and where if things boil over it's mutually assured destruction.
For you personally, I'm not sure if they'd even deploy you because you're a welder, they'd probably give you slight retraining and send you off to weld armor plating. You may be eager to head out to the front lines, but there's a whole lot of fodder that would be better suited. You're probably more useful in a factory than you are with a gun.
My ultimate point is that if WW3 transpired, I don't think we'd have any frame of reference for how that would play out assuming it didn't involve everyone fucking dying, so I'm not sure how much value there is in speculation.
That's not how nuclear war works. What happens it that Russia/China fires off a single nuke that absolutely incinerates Hill AFB, because Hill AFB has facilities related to nuclear weapons. That means the city of Ogden and its suburbs are annihilated. Literally nothing else is in Utah, because that is the only facility in Utah related to nuclear war. Salt Lake City or other nearby cities see a mushroom cloud and might get hit with fallout if the nuke goes off too close to the ground and the wind is blowing the wrong way, but that's a minor issue--stay indoors.From my position, if war is going to happen, America is on a collision course, the tracks are blown, nothing can stop it... why should I sit it out? ICBM's are basically gonna wipe out the main inhabited area of Utah, so I'm dead if I stay, but at least if I fight, I might have a future, and be able to rebuild once and if I come back.
You might've had more room to speak before 2022 and Russia and Ukraine having a WWI re-enactment. That's how WWIII will look unless we go full nuclear war, since neither side will be able to gain--and keep--air superiority and thus war will become a matter of keeping an industrial economy functioning so you can feed men into the meatgrinder.Plus that points to an issue with the whole discussion, which is that war has changed, significantly. If heavy international armed conflict breaks out, it isn't going to be raw manpower out in trenches or storming beaches that's going to do it, war's going to be fought in large part with machines, microchips, etc.
In fact my personal belief is that war of that type (WWII style I mean) is basically obsolete. We exist in a perpetual cold war, where it's all proxy wars and soft power struggles and where if things boil over it's mutually assured destruction.