Now that I think of it, many of the girl IPs I know (not that there are many) I could think of were already fucked over by shit adaptations.
they already did back when the toy-movie craze beganI don't think they'll make a Bratz movie will they?
P.S addendum since I can't edit anymore: Another good message for the movie that's a little more universal could just be "It's okay to experiment when you don't know what to do" or something like that. Feels like everyone I know is of the mindset "you decide what you want to do and then you do that for 40 years with some side gigs and hobbies if you want", and I'm not sure how universal that is, but I know there's a lot of people who feel pressured to do things like go to university or specialize in STEM because their parents told them to or because it's "the right thing to do" instead of because they like the concept or would be willing to buckle down and learn about it.
Noooooooooo, fuuuuck. "Good luck review that," first of all if it did happen that guy gets a golden banana sticker. I was hoping for an overwhelming dump of creativity. If it is just another preachy preach film with no substance, well, let's just say I traded a ticket for another Oppenheimer viewing. I wanted my fantasy version of cocaine bear (insanity), but in barbie form. Heck, if Barbie was directed by Wes Anderson I wouldn't care about the script or writing or even the message.
Expecting fun and creativity? In Current Year+8? Perish the thought. What's more imporant is to make you dirty MEN feel like the scummiest piece of dogshit ever crapped onto a pristine lawn for the rest of your life because you were so miserable as to be born with a penis.
>his counter-argument to "this system provides us with the highest standard of living ever enjoyed in human history" is honestly, unironically, 100% seriously, "yeah but climate change will kill us in 30 years"
Yeah, I was wondering too, cuz I was going to see it in IMAX this weekend. Is it too preachy about the NOOK BAD sentiment?
Summary:
Her entire motivation just seems to fall on distancing herself from Wolf of Wall Street. I believe she spoke about it for Harley Quinn that she didn't want to be the expensive sex toy anymore. She has her own movie studio with her husband that she used to try to escape the roles, but none of her art films ever made money, including Birds of Prey, which she produced on her own.
It's going to be fun to watch (unlike the movie). Am not sure that the target demographic sees anything other than traditional media / RT but the pure word of mouth between individuals could be devastating. Aside of the wine box blue hairs whose future consists of dying in solitude and being eaten by their cats; even the female audience is likely to recoil at this level of anti male malice, the superficiality and the motherhood bashing.
She’s the millennial Sharon Stone: a vapid whore who doesn’t want to be known as a vapid whore but doesn’t have the talent to be known as anything other than a vapid whore.
