Brianna Wu / John Flynt - DEAGLE NATION STILL LIVES

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How long will Revolution 60 come to Steam?


  • Total voters
    610
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't, no. He's nattering on about working on peripheral, meaningless bits of the game that should have been done months (years) ago. Or don't need to be done at all, really. He's kicking the can down the road.

It's fascinating. I don't know why he can't release the game now, but it's obvious he can't. How long can he get away with this game? Short answer: two years and counting, so far.
Which will force him to release the game. Of course, he can claim he has other promotional material to take care of or he can completely make something different up, but his substantial excuses (oh no trailer! on no Steam art!) are no longer valid when they're done.
 
I don't, no. He's nattering on about working on peripheral, meaningless bits of the game that should have been done months (years) ago. Or don't need to be done at all, really. He's kicking the can down the road.

It's fascinating. I don't know why he can't release the game now, but it's obvious he can't. How long can he get away with this game? Short answer: two years and counting, so far.
The game is probably botched and doesn't work and Wu can't fix it and is too scared/proud to get outside help.
"Glass of ice water in hell."

So just leave "hell" you fucking dummy
But it's cold outside of hell and not hugboxy warm!
 
* There's been dozens of accounts sanctioned for posting this one image:
Brianna_and_John.jpg

Call me Tweet Naive but I can't honestly find the thoughtcrime in this.

If Twitter's policy is those are two different people, it'd be like posting an image of two celebrities with the "separated at birth?" tag. Or heck, the guy on the left isn't a celebrity so really, "celebrity looks like someone else who isn't famous"? A certain widemouthed actor who is going to play a certain Shinigami springs to mind, offtopic.

Anyway. If Twitter's policy is "top sekrit those are the same people" well... congrats on violently policing a way old secret that's common knowledge? Does Twitter have a policy about censoring people who posts things Twitter itself knows are factual? "Yeah, *we* know she used to be him, but you're not allowed to say it because it isn't.. verified, by... us and/or her, yeah". Wait until Lance Corporal Gamergate hires a lawyer and finds out *who* at Twitter knew *who* Brianna was and when, and cross references that against when accounts got censored, and at whose jurisdiction. "Don't worry investors, it probably ties in with unexpected profits. Policing social justice and maintaining high click-throughs are maybe the exact same thing?".

Normally I'd punt this ball far into the "Twitter pays the grounds maintenance fee, they get to be referee" private enterprise realm but they made so much handwringing about banning Milo: "Hey, there's a shitposter who's made our enterprise misery for years who we can probably get rid of - who wants to act like it's difficult and well-reasoned act for sending him to the Gulag?". The reality is like every other media organisation they want the clicks and retweets, and no one's business plan is making their network smaller. "The SJW's will continue to click, but they'll click *harder*, Sir".

Either be the tyrannical shitlord who says anyone who wears Crocs can't use your pool or admit you're a populist tool who's just trying to make the most (right type of) friends at that moment in time. If you think Twitter has become the playground for the above and you want to put an end to it, the answer isn't signal boosting its networks via using it to criticise, it's going cold turkey and cutting it out. The droves quitting MySpace didn't post "ok guys im out" posts on it, they walked away from their accounts and started Facebooking, leaving MySpace to wither and die on the vine. Though.. not on the Vine, that 6 second death was something else.

If it's genuinely difficult to go cold turkey, make a policy of not shit posting. You can still enjoy the stuff you like it itself ("hey buddy, glad to see you got a Meowth outside your apartment"), but you're not wasting your time and boosting Twitter's numbers by attempting to extract enjoyment out of trying to make a (probably random) Twitter user feel useless. If you think Twitter is a great thing because you're served a constant sushi train of assholes who say stupid shit without realising they're about to get their shit kicked in, congratulations, that's exactly how Dobson feels when he doesn't see a sad woman Tweeting. You're almost a Dobson, focus on that. You're that close to becoming a Dobson. Yeah.

I'm sorry, that's the meanest thing I've said in a while, but I know you deserve better. <3
 
porn sites invented the verified mark btw. specifically porn tube sites where you can upload your own video.

tbh i think twitter have marketed the tick pretty well i.e. associating it with celebs... but if they had an ounce of sense they'd charge a nominal fee for verification.
 
wu living in the 90s.png


Oh fuck off, Wu. You've never been to Ibiza. Hell, you never even left the US until gamergate gave you your 15 minutes of fame.

Wu talks like it's the 90s when people were organising raves, popping E and throwing shapes like they were being electrocuted. EDM is pop music now, every fucker under 20 listens to it. It's all the radio plays. Hell, it's been that way since at least 2003. It's hard to find a music station that plays anything else. Most of the clubs have closed down, and Ibiza is ENTIRELY commercial trash catering to shitheels who paid 10 quid to fly there, and who are too pissed to give a shit what music you're playing.

You can't be an EDM hipster in 2016. Stop trying.
 
Call me Tweet Naive but I can't honestly find the thoughtcrime in this.

If Twitter's policy is those are two different people, it'd be like posting an image of two celebrities with the "separated at birth?" tag. Or heck, the guy on the left isn't a celebrity so really, "celebrity looks like someone else who isn't famous"? A certain widemouthed actor who is going to play a certain Shinigami springs to mind, offtopic.

Anyway. If Twitter's policy is "top sekrit those are the same people" well... congrats on violently policing a way old secret that's common knowledge? Does Twitter have a policy about censoring people who posts things Twitter itself knows are factual? "Yeah, *we* know she used to be him, but you're not allowed to say it because it isn't.. verified, by... us and/or her, yeah". Wait until Lance Corporal Gamergate hires a lawyer and finds out *who* at Twitter knew *who* Brianna was and when, and cross references that against when accounts got censored, and at whose jurisdiction. "Don't worry investors, it probably ties in with unexpected profits. Policing social justice and maintaining high click-throughs are maybe the exact same thing?".

Normally I'd punt this ball far into the "Twitter pays the grounds maintenance fee, they get to be referee" private enterprise realm but they made so much handwringing about banning Milo: "Hey, there's a shitposter who's made our enterprise misery for years who we can probably get rid of - who wants to act like it's difficult and well-reasoned act for sending him to the Gulag?". The reality is like every other media organisation they want the clicks and retweets, and no one's business plan is making their network smaller. "The SJW's will continue to click, but they'll click *harder*, Sir".

Either be the tyrannical shitlord who says anyone who wears Crocs can't use your pool or admit you're a populist tool who's just trying to make the most (right type of) friends at that moment in time. If you think Twitter has become the playground for the above and you want to put an end to it, the answer isn't signal boosting its networks via using it to criticise, it's going cold turkey and cutting it out. The droves quitting MySpace didn't post "ok guys im out" posts on it, they walked away from their accounts and started Facebooking, leaving MySpace to wither and die on the vine. Though.. not on the Vine, that 6 second death was something else.

If it's genuinely difficult to go cold turkey, make a policy of not shit posting. You can still enjoy the stuff you like it itself ("hey buddy, glad to see you got a Meowth outside your apartment"), but you're not wasting your time and boosting Twitter's numbers by attempting to extract enjoyment out of trying to make a (probably random) Twitter user feel useless. If you think Twitter is a great thing because you're served a constant sushi train of assholes who say stupid shit without realising they're about to get their shit kicked in, congratulations, that's exactly how Dobson feels when he doesn't see a sad woman Tweeting. You're almost a Dobson, focus on that. You're that close to becoming a Dobson. Yeah.

I'm sorry, that's the meanest thing I've said in a while, but I know you deserve better. <3
I've seen people get banned for posting just a regular picture of someone they don't like. Nora Reeeee has had people banned for this
 
I've seen people get banned for posting just a regular picture of someone they don't like. Nora Reeeee has had people banned for this

Twitter is completely in the pocket of a certain ideology right now. Even if it wasn't, Brianna Wu is essentially directly connected to Twitter's @Support via her IRL friend Glenn Fleischmann, who is an IRL friend of Del Harvey, who he's been buds with since college. It basically exists to further the needs of the cult at this point.
 
Call me Tweet Naive but I can't honestly find the thoughtcrime in this.

If Twitter's policy is those are two different people, it'd be like posting an image of two celebrities with the "separated at birth?" tag. Or heck, the guy on the left isn't a celebrity so really, "celebrity looks like someone else who isn't famous"? A certain widemouthed actor who is going to play a certain Shinigami springs to mind, offtopic.

Anyway. If Twitter's policy is "top sekrit those are the same people" well... congrats on violently policing a way old secret that's common knowledge? Does Twitter have a policy about censoring people who posts things Twitter itself knows are factual? "Yeah, *we* know she used to be him, but you're not allowed to say it because it isn't.. verified, by... us and/or her, yeah". Wait until Lance Corporal Gamergate hires a lawyer and finds out *who* at Twitter knew *who* Brianna was and when, and cross references that against when accounts got censored, and at whose jurisdiction. "Don't worry investors, it probably ties in with unexpected profits. Policing social justice and maintaining high click-throughs are maybe the exact same thing?".

Normally I'd punt this ball far into the "Twitter pays the grounds maintenance fee, they get to be referee" private enterprise realm but they made so much handwringing about banning Milo: "Hey, there's a shitposter who's made our enterprise misery for years who we can probably get rid of - who wants to act like it's difficult and well-reasoned act for sending him to the Gulag?". The reality is like every other media organisation they want the clicks and retweets, and no one's business plan is making their network smaller. "The SJW's will continue to click, but they'll click *harder*, Sir".

Either be the tyrannical shitlord who says anyone who wears Crocs can't use your pool or admit you're a populist tool who's just trying to make the most (right type of) friends at that moment in time. If you think Twitter has become the playground for the above and you want to put an end to it, the answer isn't signal boosting its networks via using it to criticise, it's going cold turkey and cutting it out. The droves quitting MySpace didn't post "ok guys im out" posts on it, they walked away from their accounts and started Facebooking, leaving MySpace to wither and die on the vine. Though.. not on the Vine, that 6 second death was something else.

If it's genuinely difficult to go cold turkey, make a policy of not shit posting. You can still enjoy the stuff you like it itself ("hey buddy, glad to see you got a Meowth outside your apartment"), but you're not wasting your time and boosting Twitter's numbers by attempting to extract enjoyment out of trying to make a (probably random) Twitter user feel useless. If you think Twitter is a great thing because you're served a constant sushi train of assholes who say stupid shit without realising they're about to get their shit kicked in, congratulations, that's exactly how Dobson feels when he doesn't see a sad woman Tweeting. You're almost a Dobson, focus on that. You're that close to becoming a Dobson. Yeah.

I'm sorry, that's the meanest thing I've said in a while, but I know you deserve better. <3
Twitter, like Reddit, keeps its disciplinary rules and actions vague intentionally. They don't want to be backed into a corner or proven to be hypocritical by exposing themselves to the sorts of philosophical delimmas you describe.

Logic and fairness are not the goal. Convenience, profitability, and the perception of fairness are.
 
Twitter, like Reddit, keeps its disciplinary rules and actions vague intentionally. They don't want to be backed into a corner or proven to be hypocritical by exposing themselves to the sorts of philosophical delimmas you describe.

Logic and fairness are not the goal. Convenience, profitability, and the perception of fairness are.

The opening of "Verified" status to nobodies like John Walker Flynt probably corresponds with devoting less human resources to catering to tards like him.

He can stop any bullshit "harassment" now himself just by setting some blocks.

He doesn't want that, though. He wants them thrown off Twitter so they can't contradict his narrative and expose his crimes and frauds. Sucks to be John.
 
Anyway. If Twitter's policy is "top sekrit those are the same people" well... congrats on violently policing a way old secret that's common knowledge? Does Twitter have a policy about censoring people who posts things Twitter itself knows are factual?
Like most San Fran startups the head of Twitter trust and safety is a tranny so dead-naming is a biiiiiiig no no
 
I'd be more impressed with "@Spacekatgal has officially released a game on Steam". Only took Wu ages to get that so incredibly important badge, but whatever. Suum cuique and all that.

View attachment 121637
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/761398659779035136
He finally got that pointless, well-deserved check mark next to his name that he wanted so bitterly! That means he's important now!

Now it's going to be fun seeing Wu talk about it for the next few days as if something remarkable has happened.

I'm pretty sure almost anyone can get that badge if they try hard enough. @KiwiNull should try.

Edit: Already the grandstanding begins. "Gotta talk 'bout it on Rocket! Also Milo sucks ololol #gamergate"

View attachment 121652
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/761407611711451136

View attachment 121653
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/761407700324454400

Edit the second:

View attachment 121662
http://tweetsave.com/spacekatgal/status/761410012283543553
Nice smugness, John. Now where's the fucking game? Hosk is waiting.

Grade-A John Walker Flynt-brand Narcissism at its best.
He must have worked so hard for it, too! It's not like Twitter gives out Verified statuses to people who tell Twitter where they live or anything!
 
The opening of "Verified" status to nobodies like John Walker Flynt probably corresponds with devoting less human resources to catering to tards like him.

He can stop any bullshit "harassment" now himself just by setting some blocks.

He doesn't want that, though. He wants them thrown off Twitter so they can't contradict his narrative and expose his crimes and frauds. Sucks to be John.
That makes a lot of sense, he has been bitching that he's not getting responses to his emails lately.

And the slow tank of money at twitter likely means that cant afford too many people in non essential departments.
 
View attachment 121821

Oh fuck off, Wu. You've never been to Ibiza. Hell, you never even left the US until gamergate gave you your 15 minutes of fame.

Wu talks like it's the 90s when people were organising raves, popping E and throwing shapes like they were being electrocuted. EDM is pop music now, every fucker under 20 listens to it. It's all the radio plays. Hell, it's been that way since at least 2003. It's hard to find a music station that plays anything else. Most of the clubs have closed down, and Ibiza is ENTIRELY commercial trash catering to shitheels who paid 10 quid to fly there, and who are too pissed to give a shit what music you're playing.

You can't be an EDM hipster in 2016. Stop trying.

As i said before, 99.9% of EDM is fucking trash. I especially like her "iTunes is for normies guise, beatport is where its at". All he does is buttfuck Skrillex, Deadmau5 and cheap remixes using NI massive patches you can download from torrent sites.

Beatports top EDM tracks were lead by spinnin records, the same spinnin records that pay for purchases and reviews. The producer scene fucking hate spinnin records.

I bet he doesn't even know the god of SJW faggots, Jack Conte aka co-founder of patreon, produced EDM before maxing out his loans and credit cards to finance patreon and his music biz.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back