By the way this is entire offensive is why losing your mine clearing equipment is a really bad idea in modern warfare. Inching forward with sappers in the age of drones is such a retarded idea
To be fair to the UAF, mineclearing these days hasn't changed much. It's still inch forward, identify and disarm (blow up/move) mines. Mostly because electronic fuzes designed to be blast wave tolerant (So explosive line charges don't work as well) and non-metallic mines.
Reminds me of a video of a bunch of RFAF guys at the beginning of the SMO clearing AT mines with feet shoving them aside lol. I guess the sappers forgot to set anti-handling devices on those.
You have very short, short, medium, long and very long range defences (strela/pantsir/buk/S300/S400) all interlaced and working together fighting diffefent kinds of targets. Add to that incoming S500 supposed to target very high altitude ballistic missiles.
Compare that to NATO, which has Patriot...
The actual IADS of the RFAF is this:
Descending from individual to theatre based weapons
- Strela/Igla series (Infantry MANPADS)
- Strela-10 (Vehicle based lowlevel ADS, relatively mobile)
- Tunguska/Panstir/Shosna (SPAAG, low-mid level, short range relatively mobile)
- Osa-AKM (Mid level, short range radar/guided SAM, mobile "all in one" with it's FCS/Search radar and missile launcher all integrated, very unique piece like NASAMS)
- Tor (Mid level, short range SAM, Anti-missile platform)
- S-300/S-400 (Mid-High level, SAM/ABM)
- S-500 (High level SAM/ABM).
- A-135 (Stationary ABM role, only in Moscow I think)
Compared to the US which has (in same order)
- Stinger, Javelin (MANPADS)
- Humvee Avenger (More mobile than strela-10, not amphibious, less range as it is just base manpad and not improved)
- LAV-AD (SPAAG, no radar compared to Shosna or Tunguska)
- Centurion C-RAM (Stationary Point defense, Radar)
- Enduring Shield (Repurposed MRL with 18 x Sidewinders... LRIP and only like 4 in existence)
- PATRIOT or MIM-104 (ABM, high level SAM)
- THAAD (ABM role)
Suppressing Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD a.k.a Wild Weasel.....or Iron Hand if you want to go old school) is really fucking technical. Killing SAMs requires dedicated units that only train on that issue.
Yes, a normal F-16 pilot knows how a HARM works and knows how to evade a SAM. It's not an easy job.
Yeah but if you're fighting the Russian IADS system, you're gonna end up hitting a Tunguska, Osa or Tor versus an S-300/400 most of the time. Whereas in the US system, only the CRAM (can be safely avoided) or the Patriot have active radars on them so you just lost a really expensive piece versus a not so expensive piece.
Leave the jamming to the two seaters (EA-18G or the retired F-111A) though, it's hard enough flying a plane without screwing the math for it. The US has the advantage vs the RFAF here with DRFM jamming especially against the newer ASEA radars. No doubt the Chinese are giving some of their ASEA radars to test against that though.
I'm going to remind everyone in the 90s the Soviets tested some "eletro-optical complexes" (Directed Energy Weapon) SAM systems. 1K11 Sanguine or it's successor, the 11K7 Compression. The later mounted on a Mista-S chassis,having 30kg of rubies to fire a 12 beam laser to down missiles/helos. Also could be used in a direct fire role to fry your eye sockets in a tank at 20km. Unfortunately, they only built 2 and more or less gave up after the collapse on these. Pretty sure we'll see a return of the 1K11 laser mounted on old Shilkas sometime...
