Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
I have not seen the comparison made yet, but there is a much more successful Minnesota lawyer on YouTube. His name is Bruce Rivers, from the channel Criminal Lawyer Reacts. He boasts a long history of taking cases to trial, stating that prosecutors will take you more seriously if you do have a record of going to trial. He is serious enough in his practice to be considered a specialist. This heavily contrasts Nick's history of plea deals and slothful behavior.

Possibly the best comparison point, however, is that Rivers loves his child enough to have his son assist in content creation and credit him with the success of the channel. Nick instead expresses disdain well enough that we have to speculate if he regrets his children.

I bring this up because this is a lawyer who works under the same state laws, also in defense, but is wildly more successful in both continued growth and maintaining a law career. I consider this further proof of Nick being a wet noodle of a man.
Are they both in a rural area?

Just want to compare apples to apples here...

In other news, Nick is covering a Trial! The suitcase GF murder, but he is splitting coverage across the day with multiple channels.
 
While I have no doubt that Nick didn't even try to settle, there's also the question of if Montagraph would want to either.
@Balldo's Gate made the point earlier that Schneider may have been ignoring Nick's phone calls. Granted, that story comes from an unreliable narrator (Nick), and that doesn't necessary mean Nick was looking to settle, but there can't be a settlement if there is no communication.

That said, if true, it could also indeed serve as an indication Monty isn't looking to settle.

Regardless, I maintain that maybe Randazza should try his hand at talking to Schneider now. If he hasn't already. It couldn't hurt.

Are they both in a rural area?

Just want to compare apples to apples here...
No. Bruce Rivers is in Minneapolis, MN. Population 430,000. Major city. Even as a non-American, you may be familiar with the place from the George Floyd shit.

Nick is in Spicer, MN. Population 1,112. You have the squint to find it on a map.

Edit: Typo.
 
Last edited:
Regardless, I maintain that maybe Randazza should try his hand at talking to Schneider now. If he hasn't already. It couldn't hurt.
Also, presumably Schneider doesn't hate Randazza, at least not personally.

Schneider is correct not to talk to Nick directly, in fact it would be an ethics violation to do so. "In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order." Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4.2 (Communication with Person Represented by Counsel) (essentially identical to the Model Rules).

Either Nick was ignorant of this or trying to hornswoggle Schneider into an ethics violation.
 
@Balldo's Gate made the point earlier that Schneider may have been ignoring Nick's phone calls. Granted, that story comes from an unreliable narrator (Nick), and that doesn't necessary mean Nick was looking to settle, but there can't be a settlement if there is no communication.

That said, if true, it could also indeed serve as an indication Monty isn't looking to settle.

Regardless, I maintain that maybe Randazza should try his hand at talking to Schneider now. If he hasn't already. It couldn't hurt.


No. Bruce Rivers is in Minneapolis, MN. Population 430,000. Major city. Even as a non-American, you may be familiar with the place from the George Floyd shit.

Nice is in Spicer, MN. Population 1,112. You have the squint to find it on a map.
Nick is too lazy to drive into the cities to support a legal practice.

Given that, I think that this other barrister has a leg up on clients.
 
In other news, Nick is covering a Trial! The suitcase GF murder, but he is splitting coverage across the day with multiple channels.
I wonder how much of this is try to fend off criticism when he abandons it because it's 'boring' or he doesn't make enough money. If i was legalvices i'd be pissed, he put in all the leg work and Nick is just going to leech off of him.
 
Are they both in a rural area?

Just want to compare apples to apples here...

In other news, Nick is covering a Trial! The suitcase GF murder, but he is splitting coverage across the day with multiple channels.
That’s funny I was just watching the interrogation video of that the other day. They have her on video laughing and taking shit while he’s in the suitcase begging to be let out some real cold bpd shit. She couldn’t come up with a good reason why she left him in the suitcase and went upstairs to sleep either at least not during the interrogation. I imagine she will try the classic battered woman excuse but this trial probably won’t be all that interesting. She also couldn't come up with a good excuse for why she made videos during it. Here's the part where they start showing her the videos she made if you don't want to watch the whole thing.
 
Shit hadn't been able to post in the farms for some time. Anyone got a quick summary of recent Rackets happenings? Is he still getting cucked?
 
Shit hadn't been able to post in the farms for some time. Anyone got a quick summary of recent Rackets happenings? Is he still getting cucked?
Read the highlights, but here's a short summary:

Post holiday, he said he had sn epiphany that he needed to be less degenerate and more focused. He did that for all of 1 week, then he started back up with Coomalot.

He has been putting slightly more effort tin with higher brow interviews (he has done 2-3), but he also had Dax and Vito on for a shit show.

Now he's focused on Anime Matsuri, holiday, and Nashville event that he put bare minimum effort into.
 
Also, presumably Schneider doesn't hate Randazza, at least not personally.

Schneider is correct not to talk to Nick directly, in fact it would be an ethics violation to do so. "In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or a court order." Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 4.2 (Communication with Person Represented by Counsel) (essentially identical to the Model Rules).

Either Nick was ignorant of this or trying to hornswoggle Schneider into an ethics violation.
Per @Balldo's Gate, he didn't talk to Nick pre-Randanza. When Nick was pro per. It's my understanding IF you are your own attorney, you CAN talk to the other side's attorney. Though maybe the LLC also being a defendant causes complications and Schneider was concerned about that. I know Nick could represent himself, but not the LLC.

Whatever the case, Randazza should give it a try. Both sides now have council. Like you say, Schineider might see Randazza as more palatable than Nick. What happened before happened, and it can't be undone. but you'd think he try to unfuck this mess now before having to shell out even more money.

Nick is too lazy to drive into the cities to support a legal practice.
To be fair, Spicer is in the middle of fucking nowhere. I don't know what in MN would constitute a big enough city to support a law practice. Minneapolis definitely would, but it's almost 100 miles (161 km) one way.

I'm pretty sure Nick barely wants to do law anymore, so this discussion is probably just academic.

I wonder how much of this is try to fend off criticism when he abandons it because it's 'boring' or he doesn't make enough money. If i was legalvices i'd be pissed, he put in all the leg work and Nick is just going to leech off of him.
That suitcase bitch is crazy. She's on like her 7th lawyer. If Nick can't make that trial watchable, he just sucks. It's probably extremely watchable without commentary.

If anybody wants a glimpse into utter sociopathic madness, I invite you to watch this Jim Can't Swim Video where the Police interrogate her. It's a cut down version of what @Lady Rackets Ass just posted.


Wait for the funny at 36:25.
 
Per @Balldo's Gate, he didn't talk to Nick pre-Randanza. When Nick was pro per. It's my understanding IF you are your own attorney, you CAN talk to the other side's attorney.
Nick was publicly claiming he had retained Randazza before he actually had. It's not Schneider's fault that Nick is a lying liar who lies.
 
In other news, Nick is covering a Trial! The suitcase GF murder, but he is splitting coverage across the day with multiple channels.
Has Nick really not had any guests for the whole day? Oof.

@Balldo's Gate made the point earlier that Schneider may have been ignoring Nick's phone calls. Granted, that story comes from an unreliable narrator (Nick), and that doesn't necessary mean Nick was looking to settle, but there can't be a settlement if there is no communication.

That said, if true, it could also indeed serve as an indication Monty isn't looking to settle.

Regardless, I maintain that maybe Randazza should try his hand at talking to Schneider now. If he hasn't already. It couldn't hurt.
According to Nick, Schneider had no problems talking with Randazza and did so as soon as the latter formally joined the case. It was only Rekieta that he didn't want to talk to, for whatever reason.

Nick has made very clear that he has no desire to settle. He claims that if he settles it will encourage more people to come out of the woodwork to sue him to get a settlement.

Per @Balldo's Gate, he didn't talk to Nick pre-Randanza. When Nick was pro per. It's my understanding IF you are your own attorney, you CAN talk to the other side's attorney. Though maybe the LLC also being a defendant causes complications and Schneider was concerned about that. I know Nick could represent himself, but not the LLC.
LLCs cannot represent themselves. Rekieta's LLC is distinct from the person of Nick Rekieta. That's literally the entire point of an LLC. Thus, he was not really representing just himself. I don't think it really mattered with respect to Schneider refusing to talk to Nick, but I imagine it could matter with respect to Schneider's ethics complaint.

Nick was told about this back in the Vic case when he sent in an amicus brief on behalf of Rekieta Media, ironically by Randazza's colleague Jay Wolman.

To be fair, Spicer is in the middle of fucking nowhere. I don't know what in MN would constitute a big enough city to support a law practice. Minneapolis definitely would, but it's almost 100 miles (161 km) one way.
I mean, Willmar is very close and it's not that small.

Schneider appears to have built a successful business.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Captain Manning
Nick was publicly claiming he had retained Randazza before he actually had. It's not Schneider's fault that Nick is a lying liar who lies.
That's actually a damn good point! I had forgotten all about that!

That would mean that Nick might have cucked himself because Schneider followed the rules based on the facts as Schneider understood them at the time. That maybe it's not so much that Schneider wouldn't talk to Nick, but that he felt he couldn't.

Nick has made very clear that he has no desire to settle. He claims that if he settles it will encourage more people to come out of the woodwork to sue him to get a settlement.
Maybe Nick wouldn't have that concern if he didn't do stupid shit like get drunk off his ass and tell somebody that they are a pedo and they should sue him?

Theoretically, most people are susceptible to civil litigation. E-celebrities probably carry a higher risk. But not everyone goes out of there way to make that happen. Maybe tone it down some of that shit, and there would be less of a concern. Nick has made plenty of enemies online, but I think this is the first time he's been hit with a lawsuit since he became an online figure.
 
I hope something sets off the hollerin hog and he goes apeshit on Nick right then and there and disses his whore of a wife and his retarded kids.
I can’t wrap my head around how Nick can reconcile with Ralph and maintain any dignity. Then again, that hasn’t stopped him from any of his other recent debacles either.

The fact that he’s still got Randazza on board is genuinely retarded. Maybe Randazza put Jay Wollman or another less expensive option on the day-to-day, but they’re not much cheaper than Randazza. Nick is one dumb son of a bitch.
 
That's actually a damn good point! I had forgotten all about that!

That would mean that Nick might have cucked himself because Schneider followed the rules based on the facts as Schneider understood them at the time. That maybe it's not so much that Schneider wouldn't talk to Nick, but that he felt he couldn't.
The detractor channel, Pepsi Man, specifically called him out on this and he responded on stream. Only to then point right back to his own words at the time that he was claiming to be represented by Randazza.

 
I suppose it's possible Vic might have seen Rekieta's true darker side before a lot of other people did. After all, he was pretty close to Rekieta, and they talked in person. However, it's also true you're not supposed to talk about litigation when you're in litigation. You're supposed to lie low and keep your mouth shut. Vic's discourse during that court case seemed to largely consist of him thanking his fans. Not going on ANY livestream... even one hosted by a paragon of sanity... is a rational decision to make under the circumstances.

Nick getting pissy about Vic not coming on his show was silly in general. A lot of people point back to that as proof that he treated Vic more as a grift than somebody he wanted to genuinely help. I recall even a lot of Weebwarriors at the time thought Rekieta was out of line for being critical of Vic there.
Didn't Nick get an interview with Vic though I don't follow

 
Nick is too lazy to drive into the cities to support a legal practice.

Given that, I think that this other barrister has a leg up on clients.
It's not just that. They are miles apart in every way. One is a serious lawyer, and the other is not. Interestingly, they both attended William Mitchell, underscoring once again that the problem with Nick is not the education made available to him. I also see that Rivers has done adjunct work at a law school, which William Mitchell has used quite a lot - just another one of those loser instructors Nick complained about, maybe?
I'm pretty sure Nick barely wants to do law anymore
Nick has never done much law.
 
That's the crazy thing about this case, as Nick didn't qualify it with a "probably" or "sources tell me" but said it as a matter of fact. More importantly, the insult he chose wasn't something like "retard" where you can argue there's a common usage of it which means "fool" so it's an insult of opinion, or even something like "rapist" which you can argue has a meaning outside of sexual assault, in the person has an ear raping voice. Nope, Nick chose "pedo" which has no other meaning besides a person who assaults or wants to assault children, and then added to it that the person actively assaults young boys.

Just seems like if he chose any other option to attack Monty on, he'd have a much easier time now.
That's usually doesn't cut it when you allege people are committing crimes.
 
Back