Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[TrainWreckWatcher]

I never thought I'd see a man get bodied by a 3D turkey.
Holy shit
E: removed the weird attachfiles thing.

 

[Shig O'nella]

A lot would depend on the exact circumstances of the property and how the search was done, but I could see an argument that a search was legal if they argue they were looking for the leak and/or the water meter to shut it off for example

They're allowed to use anything that is clearly visible on entry or seen during the purposes of entry. Since they were in there for a water leak and in most flats all utilities enter the premises in the same place, the electric meter would be clearly visible.
Though the cops tend to be slightly elastic at times on what is considered to be "clearly visible" the courts aren't. Was a case about 6 years ago where a drug dealer's prosecution got thrown out of court because his stash was inside a gym bag - wasn't zipped, but there was no reason for the cop to have looked in it, so not clearly visible by definition.

 

[Ice Gun Ninja]

I can't believe this guy can't fulfill simple promises like 24hour stream or the locals gift, but Pippa fulfilled her 250k reward, eating a tarantula, on the day (or a day after) she reached 250K subs.

Edit:
Spelling

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I can't believe this guy can't fulfill simple promises like 24hour stream or the locals gift, but Pippa fulfilled her 250k reward, eating a trantulla, on the day (or a day after) she reached 250K subs.

To be fair, I’m sure Nick would guzzle bull sperm on stream instead of sending those gifts. Hell, he’d do it for nothing.

Either way, I’m sure his parents and children are very proud of Nicholas.



Imagine giving up all your dignity for online donations and then losing it all because of your own fragile ego. I guess I’d be drunk and high daily if I had to live with that. But I like to think I’d wrap the case up by settling ASAP and stopping the geyser of cash that’s enriching only lawyers.

Unless he already has wet brain, Rekieta has to wish he’d settled months ago. Now he’s just throwing more and more good money after bad. I don’t even like the guy and it’s hard to watch.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

I can't believe this guy can't fulfill simple promises like 24hour stream or the locals gift, but Pippa fulfilled her 250k reward, eating a trantulla, on the day (or a day after) she reached 250K subs.

Nick is being compared to a cartoon rabbit and has been found wanting. Again.

Nick won't eat the spider. He's too much of a chicken shit lazy faggot. EAT THE SPIDER NICK.

 

[Captain Manning]

Sean/Potentially Criminal has retracted his claim that Montagraph made a "snuff film" after being emailed by Montagraph.

That's two retractions this month now, if I'm not mistaken. Null retracted the pedo accusations last week from Monty's OP, and conceded the there's no proof. Both Sean and Null apparently had convos with Monty via E-mail.

Really makes you think Nick might be a dumb dumb, but I'm sure he'll argue he's a giga chad to keep fighting and losing ever obscene amounts of money.

 

[Lidl Drip]

I can't believe this guy can't fulfill simple promises like 24hour stream or the locals gift, but Pippa fulfilled her 250k reward, eating a tarantula, on the day (or a day after) she reached 250K subs.

Edit:
Spelling

It's easier to do that kind of stuff when you can just hide behind an anime girl avatar and just pretend while you are actually eating tasty pretzels.

 

[Kopasea]

That's two retractions this month now, if I'm not mistaken. Null retracted the pedo accusations last week from Monty's OP, and conceded the there's no proof. Both Sean and Null apparently had convos with Monty via E-mail.

What does this mean for Nick's case? I'm sure that he was relying on Kiwi Farms for his knowledge of Montegraph's pedophilia. If I remember correctly, one of the articles of defamation is that you need to know that the statement is false before uttering it as truth in an attempt to harm the target's deputation. Or does the fact that calling someone a pedophile in Minnesota is defamation per se remove that requirement.

It is interesting that 2 people somewhat affiliated with Nick immediately retracted what they had thought was a truth when approached.

 

[Maude Snew]

Imagine giving up all your dignity for online donations and then losing it all because of your own fragile ego.

 

[thhrang]

It's easier to do that kind of stuff when you can just hide behind an anime girl avatar and just pretend while you are actually eating tasty pretzels.

Believe it or not, it really wasn't pretend. She had a camera on filming her table with the spider the entire time (she brought it close to said camera on several occasions), you could hear her chewing/gagging, and she spit it out into a bowl several times, nearly vomiting into it (yes, it was as absolutely disgusting as it sounds).

 

[Lidl Drip]

Believe it or not, it really wasn't pretend. She had a camera on filming her table with the spider the entire time (she brought it close to said camera on several occasions), you could hear her chewing/gagging, and she spit it out into a bowl several times, nearly vomiting into it (yes, it was as absolutely disgusting as it sounds).

Did she show it going into her mouth and swallowing it? You gullible retards are into some sick shit for real. I'd rather watch Nick Rekieta try on balldos for 10 hours than a single second of anime rabbit masturbating sick pedophiles with her fake toddler voice.

 

[Captain Manning]

What does this mean for Nick's case? I'm sure that he was relying on Kiwi Farms for his knowledge of Montegraph's pedophilia. If I remember correctly, one of the articles of defamation is that you need to know that the statement is false before uttering it as truth in an attempt to harm the target's deputation. Or does the fact that calling someone a pedophile in Minnesota is defamation per se remove that requirement.

It is interesting that 2 people somewhat affiliated with Nick immediately retracted what they had thought was a truth when approached.

I don't believe knowledge that something is untrue is an essential element of defamation per se, but I could be wrong. @AnOminous would be the guy to ask.

Moreover, Nick also said that Monty lost a previous case because he is a pedo. Which, as a lawyer, he HAD to know was B.S.. Monty lost that one on pruely procedural grounds. It never proceeded on the merits.

Kiwifarms can and has gotten some things wrong. I think maybe the moral of the story here is don't claim somebody has comitted crimes of moral turpitude, sourced from KF, on other media unless there is airtight evidence (court records, etc.). In retrospect, the evidence that Monty is a pedo appears to be virtually non-existent.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

I'd rather watch Nick Rekieta try on balldos for 10 hours

Why is this where your mind went?

 

[Lidl Drip]

Why is this where your mind went?

A balldo reference in balldo-man's thread? Truly a mystery!

 

[Maude Snew]

Which, as a lawyer, he HAD to know was B.S..

Well there are lawyers, there are "lawyers", and then there's Nick, who is as much of a lawyer as Patrick Tomlinson is a published author. It's technically true but come on. They're just not those things.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

A balldo reference in balldo-man's thread? Truly a mystery!

Gotcha. I just wanted to make sure you knew you said there was a circumstance in which you would be willing to watch Rekieta shove his wrinkly raisins into a ball cage for an extended amount of time.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Gotcha. I just wanted to make sure you knew you said there was a circumstance in which you would be willing to watch Rekieta shove his wrinkly raisins into a ball cage for an extended amount of time.

I know what I said, anime avatar.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

I know what I said, anime avatar.

You're doubling down on wanting to look at Nick's balls?

 

[AnOminous]

Really makes you think Nick might be a dumb dumb, but I'm sure he'll argue he's a giga chad to keep fighting and losing ever obscene amounts of money.

Note: of the two of them, Monty and Nick, Monty has been the one acting more sane.

I don't believe knowledge that something is untrue is an essential element of defamation per se, but I could be wrong. @AnOminous would be the guy to ask.

That's an element of actual malice, not defamation per se. Actual malice requires knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth or falsity, which requires at least subjective doubt on that issue.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Believe it or not, it really wasn't pretend. She had a camera on filming her table with the spider the entire time (she brought it close to said camera on several occasions), you could hear her chewing/gagging, and she spit it out into a bowl several times, nearly vomiting into it (yes, it was as absolutely disgusting as it sounds).

I am less disgusted by the Fear Factor type shit than I am by the fact that there are ants crawling all over her table. People are simping for this?

Both Sean and Null apparently had convos with Monty via E-mail.

Spectre said the same thing, by the way, back when he called Schneider.

Spectre retracted something he had said about Monty, saying he fell for an op, and claimed Monty had emailed him asking for said retraction. That email was the excuse he used to call Schneider and insert himself into Nick's lawsuit.

Given this seems to be a pattern with Monty, I wonder if he also emailed Nick and gave him a chance to correct the record before filing a lawsuit. Or maybe he didn't give Nick that opportunity because Nick basically dared him to try a lawsuit? Who knows?

Kiwifarms can and has gotten some things wrong. I think maybe the moral of the story here is don't claim somebody has comitted crimes of moral turpitude, sourced from KF, on other media unless there is airtight evidence (court records, etc.).

I'm not sure if I'm prepared to blame Kiwi Farms for anything Nick said. I'm pretty sure the claims in the Montagraph OP which were corrected had to do with Monty's photography business, which if I recall correctly weren't directly referenced by Rekieta.

As for the absurd "snuff film" claims, the OP definitely mentions the "Umbrella Man" video, and the fact that it creeped people out and was purged off the Internet for a while, which seems basically true, I would be surprised if it ever made a claim that the video might be a bona fide "snuff film". It currently says that "his detractors decry it as pseudo-snuff film". It also mentions a blog post that seems to think the video was real, but specifies that the blog post is "unhinged and unreliable". None of that seems out of line. It is just relaying what his detractors have claimed.