Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Captain Manning]

Note: of the two of them, Monty and Nick, Monty has been the one acting more sane.

Agreed, and if you had said that three years ago I would have called you insane. Yet, here we are. Placed in the surreal position of siding more and more with Monty.

That's an element of actual malice, not defamation per se. Actual malice requires knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth or falsity, which requires at least subjective doubt on that issue.

I think the part where Nick said that Monty lost a previous case because he is a pedo is pretty reckless. He really should know better as somebody who was admitted to the bar and runs a (sometimes) law channel. As I understand it, if he failed to do any research, but made the claim anyways, there's your recklessness. The dude clearly knows how to source legal documents. He either didn't, or flat out lied as to why Monty's case was dismissed.

Also, I can't fully recall what Monty's OP used to say, but I don't think it ever included the claim Nick made about Monty losing a case because there was a determination by the court he is a pedo. Ergo, I'm not sure the blame for all this can be laid at KF's feet.

I mention all this because it's looking like the judge is going to assume they're both public figures. I presume Monty would still have to clear the actual malice standard at some point.

I'm not sure if I'm prepared to blame Kiwi Farms for anything Nick said. I'm pretty sure the claims in the Montagraph OP which were corrected had to do with Monty's photography business, which if I recall correctly weren't directly referenced by Rekieta.

I agree. See above. His thread OP might have insinuated he's a pedo from the photographing minors thing (since retracted), but Nick took his accusations much further. He might not have even used KF as the basis for calling Monty a pedo.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

I can't believe this guy can't fulfill simple promises like 24hour stream

I noticed the Jew was doing a 24 hour stream Sunday night.

Anyone know the reason? Subscriber milestone?

That's two retractions this month now, if I'm not mistaken. Null retracted the pedo accusations last week from Monty's OP, and conceded the there's no proof. Both Sean and Null apparently had convos with Monty via E-mail.

It could be four depending on how you count them, with Spectre's retraction mentioned by @Balldo's Gate in a subsequent post.

I'm a little fuzzy on the specific sequence of events or whom Monty contacted directly, but I believe Monty contacted the user whom made the OP of either Monty's or the Lolcow LLC thread. Monty supposedly pointed out the error re: his Umbrella Man film, leading to either the OP creator or Null himself to edit the lore and leave the editing note.

Either way, Monty has recently been surprisingly tactful, strategic and effective in using correspondence to have potential Internet sources and commentators expressly issue retractions/clarifications where offenses may have been implied but lack documented proof.

It's obvious that Nick's plight and quagmire has allowed Monty to push for corrections from adjacent sources in a presumably polite manner by using the theoretical possibility of similar legal action without even having to expressly threaten so.

 

[Confetti Meringue]

He really should know better as somebody who was admitted to the bar and runs a (sometimes) law channel. As I understand it, if he failed to do any research, but made the claim anyways, there's your recklessness. The dude clearly knows how to source legal documents. He either didn't, or flat out lied as to why Monty's case was dismissed.

I understand that this question is pure speculation, but the Ethics Board must be getting quite tired of him, right? If Nick is struck with a judgement, on top of his frequent complaints and open alcoholism/drug abuse, I'm wondering if the Ethics Board will begin applying pressure on him or escalating. They seem keenly aware of him and his bragging about skirting of ethics and professional standards.

 

[Mr Steal Your Farm]

I understand that this question is pure speculation, but the Ethics Board must be getting quite tired of him, right? If Nick is struck with a judgement, on top of his frequent complaints and open alcoholism/drug abuse, I'm wondering if the Ethics Board will begin applying pressure on him or escalating. They seem keenly aware of him and his bragging about skirting of ethics and professional standards.

It is (rightly) difficult to debar someone, so what other punitive action could we expect to see?

 

[Captain Manning]

Spectre retracted something he had said about Monty, saying he fell for an op, and claimed Monty had emailed him asking for said retraction.

Spectre claims to be a victim of more gay ops than Chris-Chan at this point.

Is it possible he actually got hoodwinked by a fake criminal record? Sure, maybe.

But it's also possible he made all of that up out of whole cloth, in order to bolster both he and Nick, and then got called out on it

It would't be the first time. He got thread-banned twice from the JMK thread for claiming he obtained FBI files that would prove JMK is a pedo (they never surfaced, naturally, because it was all made up bullshit).

@AltisticRight posted in his thread a few days back that he is still claiming to be a Marine officer on Reddit. He's even claiming to be in law school. Lol.

All of this is why I have extreme reservations as to what he's saying in regards to that alleged phone call with Schneider. Nick sure wants to believe though.

I understand that this question is pure speculation, but the Ethics Board must be getting quite tired of him, right?

It's possible but, in theory, they shouldn't take action against him unless he screws up as an officer of the court. They would likely ignore anything he does on his show as a private citizen. Just like they did during the Vic saga. Many crazy people tried to go after him just because he was supporting Vic's case. He wasn't serving in a legal capacity there.

That said, I thought I read a while back that there might be some complaint working it's way though the system that he might be legit worried over. Am I misremembering?

 

[sneedem&feedem]

https://twitter.com/RekietaLaw/status/1686152927419805696

What the fuck is this retard on about? This is the only time he gets to use his useless degree to get into semantic faggotry. The point being made is, "hey, maybe don't be so dismissive of people who actively listen/support you." You don't make content for content's sake, Nick, you do it to make money which you get from your audience. Pretending like you're so above it all is so transparent. Nick doesn't have an ounce of integrity to act so holier than thou.

Not to mention for "people who don't have anyone listen to them" both Nick and Dick sure love to respond to farmers all the fucking time. Maybe if Nick actually tried understanding was posted on here instead of sperging out then he wouldn't be 75k+ in the hole over a lawsuit from fucking Montegraph.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

https://twitter.com/RekietaLaw/status/1686152927419805696

What the fuck is this retard on about? This is the only time he gets to use his useless degree to get into semantic faggotry. The point being made is, "hey, maybe don't be so dismissive of people who actively listen/support you." You don't make content for content's sake, Nick, you do it to make money which you get from your audience. Pretending like you're so above it all is so transparent. Nick doesn't have an ounce of integrity to act so holier than thou.

Not to mention for "people who don't have anyone listen to them" both Nick and Dick sure love to respond to farmers all the fucking time. Maybe if Nick actually tried understanding was posted on here instead of sperging out then he wouldn't be 75k+ in the hole over a lawsuit from fucking Montegraph.

Ah you didn't post Ian Runkle replying to it. He's part of the lawtuber circles too. Canadian like vivafrei but is super pro gun and generally does his own thing and is normally not a drama magnet, unlike Nick and so probably not aware what he's saying here applies to Nick LOL.

 

[AnOminous]

It is (rightly) difficult to debar someone, so what other punitive action could we expect to see?

Unless it's something serious like stealing client money or even commingling client retainer money with personal money, they generally start out small, with something like a private reprimand that doesn't show up in a public record of discipline, reprimand with no actual penalty but on the record, a fine, a temporary suspension, an indefinite suspension (until some corrective action specified by the Bar happens), and disbarment, sometimes theoretically reversible after some period of time but often effectively permanent.

Sometimes this is accompanied by a requirement the lawyer get psychological counseling or attend rehab for substance abuse issues. Imagine the sheer raging FUCK YOU DAD levels of tard rage that would cause Nick.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

Ah you didn't post Ian Runkle replying to it. He's part of the lawtuber circles too. Canadian like vivafrei but is super pro gun and generally does his own thing and is normally not a drama magnet, unlike Nick and so probably not aware what he's saying here applies to Nick LOL.

View attachment 5244125View attachment 5244124

Any creator who thinks they're entitled to "their audience's" attention, affection, or money is probably going to experience a hard correction at some point.

What's the hard correction? A drop in subs?

Big sub drops, finding their fan base has become hostile, etc.

Mildly interesting from Runkle.

Harkening back to Depp, Runkle stayed loyal to LegalBytes during the mean girls saga with DUI Guy, despite the fact that he was physically hanging in line and in the courtroom with Larry and Rob from Law&Lumber.

Runkle is definitely just a quirky normie though and tries to stay neutral like Kurt.

He seems to practice criminal defense law in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, which is commie central and similar Austin, Texas as a socialist hub in a sea of cowboy basedness otherwise.

If you watch his video, he also has tons of Patreon type supporters in his scroll from presumably the Canadian sports shooting community despite only doing YT part time.

He also does sport shoot himself. I saw a videolog he posted a year or two back where he traveled to the Southwest to try out some sort of Desert Madness trick shooting competition.

 

[Swole McPole]

Ah you didn't post Ian Runkle replying to it. He's part of the lawtuber circles too. Canadian like vivafrei but is super pro gun and generally does his own thing and is normally not a drama magnet, unlike Nick and so probably not aware what he's saying here applies to Nick LOL.

Not convinced. I'm absolutely certain that Runkle is making commentary on the consequences that Nick is facing as a result of the direction his channel has taken.

Back in the days of Depp and Rittenhouse, Runkle would appear fairly regularly on Nick's channel. While I very much doubt that any of those lawyers are watching Nick's content today, I'd be really surprised if they weren't keeping tabs on what's going on with Nick via the clips channels.

A quick glance at the comments section will tell you everything you need to know about what Nick's audience currently thinks of him.

 

[Chibitzen]

I can't believe this guy can't fulfill simple promises like 24hour stream or the locals gift, but Pippa fulfilled her 250k reward, eating a tarantula, on the day (or a day after) she reached 250K subs.

Nick can eat a Balldo. It would be the better 5K reward over anything he's possibly thought of and he could review it at the same time!


Seriously though, THIS is the kind of person Rekieta was courting to get on his show?? Christ. Other than the the incredibly off-putting description, real or fake, it just screams desperation. I guess that must be something she and he do have in common. Gross.

Though I see an increasing trend where he seeks out emotionally damaged women out to vamp off of and suit his whims. It began with soliciting lewds from in his community, but perhaps he could at least her get involved in his Coomstream. He seems to favor unwell women whom he can attract using his Youtuber clout whose main trait is attention-seeking, sexual commentary, occasional photo swaps. They're likelier to be the exhibitionist type even if it's just commentary, so easier to work with. He can then use them as pawns to build up his desired image and "get their story". If they don't give it to him, he can easily make things up on a whim based off a few interactions, just like in the case of Pippa.

Perhaps Pippa is not as deep into the Coom as his Coomunity, but maybe she could still be used. He seems to think that getting women to say and do inappropriate things on stream or in chat at his behest somehow gets him off the hook for his own extramarital degeneracy. It's his usual way to bypass social norms. "I'm a Comedian! I'm being funny!"

These are also traits he could've easily have taken from Drex. Both collect relationships like fuel to build their individual towers of personal authority and ego. "Parasocial relationships are completely neutral!" We know how he feels about those people being guilt free marks for his "personal interest" into their "life story".

Of course any connections he's made, their stories are Fair Use from the point they're told for the same reason relationship[s are clout. Piggy backing off people's issues and emotions to get what one wants is how Drex manages his personal business. Nick clearly wanted to enter into or cater to that demographic.

Where Pippa fits in with all that makes her more interesting, not less. My commentary on that POI relative to Nick is meant to be speculative. What did she say behind the scenes to get the interest of this fool? Did she come off as an easy mark? Did he ask her to tell him her most private Youtuber feelings after some exchange. "Oh! Youtubing is so hard sometimes, Pippa! I spend all my time on my knees pleasing everyone! What do you think about that, Pippa? Tell me all about your intense feelings as a Youtuber, Pippa, because I definitely won't talk about any of that on any future streams!"... would be my guess.

 

[Captain Manning]

He also does sport shoot himself. I saw a videolog he posted a year or two back where he traveled to the Southwest to try out some sort of Desert Madness trick shooting competition.

It wouldn't happen to have been Karl Kasarda's Desert Brutality out of Tucson, would it?

I only ask cuz Karl apparently went full lolcow this year. He has a thread on the Farms.

Not convinced. I'm absolutely certain that Runkle is making commentary on the consequences that Nick is facing as a result of the direction his channel has taken.

That was my read too.

It seemed like he was purposing criticizing Rekieta there.

Seriously though, THIS is the kind of person Rekieta was courting to get on his show??

In Pippa's defense, the fact she made fun of the Balldo, and gave that "bullet dodged" quip, is a point in her favor. If only a small one.

Normally I can't stand vtubers, but Nick getting btfo'd by an anime rabbit is pretty funny.

 

[AnOminous]

Perhaps Pippa is not as deep into the Coom as his Coomunity, but maybe she could still be used.

That ship has sailed. Nick is the one who is seething impotently while Pippa is the one saying she dodged a bullet. That's how far Nick's star has sunk.

 

[fluxeon]

Believe it or not, it really wasn't pretend. She had a camera on filming her table with the spider the entire time (she brought it close to said camera on several occasions), you could hear her chewing/gagging, and she spit it out into a bowl several times, nearly vomiting into it (yes, it was as absolutely disgusting as it sounds).

Doesn't she normally vomit into her cabinet drawers?

 

[feral cat #6385]

I understand that this question is pure speculation, but the Ethics Board must be getting quite tired of him, right? If Nick is struck with a judgement, on top of his frequent complaints and open alcoholism/drug abuse, I'm wondering if the Ethics Board will begin applying pressure on him or escalating. They seem keenly aware of him and his bragging about skirting of ethics and professional standards.

Sadly I doubt anything will come out of the ethics board. However, Nick's vices have the potential to land him with criminal charges sooner or later.

Not convinced. I'm absolutely certain that Runkle is making commentary on the consequences that Nick is facing as a result of the direction his channel has taken.

Back in the days of Depp and Rittenhouse, Runkle would appear fairly regularly on Nick's channel. While I very much doubt that any of those lawyers are watching Nick's content today, I'd be really surprised if they weren't keeping tabs on what's going on with Nick via the clips channels.

A quick glance at the comments section will tell you everything you need to know about what Nick's audience currently thinks of him.

Methinks the serious LawTubers are sick of Nick's audience in particular and by extension Nick.

Doesn't she normally vomit into her cabinet drawers?

Doesn't sound too abnormal. I used to have piss jugs. And I bet I'm not the only one in the thread. We all have our quirks.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

Back in the days of Depp and Rittenhouse, Runkle would appear fairly regularly on Nick's channel. While I very much doubt that any of those lawyers are watching Nick's content today, I'd be really surprised if they weren't keeping tabs on what's going on with Nick via the clips channels.

I watched a few of Runkle's post-Depp live sit-in jury analysis livestreams after the LegalBytes/DUI Guy dustup when his channel was blowing up with his 15 minutes of e-fame.

He had no interest in addressing any of the drama when chat brought it up and it was one of the few times I've seen him get cantankerous.

It wouldn't happen to have been Karl Kasarda's Desert Brutality out of Tucson, would it?

I only ask cuz Karl apparently went full lolcow this year. He has a thread on the Farms.

Thanks for reminding me of the proper name, it was definitely Desert Brutality back in 2021.

I think he talked about doing a second Brutality comp on the East Coast as well afterwards, but don't know if it ever came to fruition.

I personally have never heard of Karl Kasarda.

I just recall from the 2021 video that Runkle was his usual humble and adorable self. He also felt awkward IIRC because he had to borrow unfamiliar guns because it was too complicated to import his south for the comp.

 

[feral cat #6385]

Nick's work ethic never ceases to amaze me.

 

[Not Who You Think]

Where Pippa fits in with all that makes her more interesting, not less. My commentary on that POI relative to Nick is meant to be speculative. What did she say behind the scenes to get the interest of this fool? Did she come off as an easy mark? Did he ask her to tell him her most private Youtuber feelings after some exchange. "Oh! Youtubing is so hard sometimes, Pippa! I spend all my time on my knees pleasing everyone! What do you think about that, Pippa? Tell me all about your intense feelings as a Youtuber, Pippa, because I definitely won't talk about any of that on any future streams!"... would be my guess.

Pippa is the one that got away (thankfully), and that seems to be what is bothering Nick the most. This, combined with how Nick handled the Phase/Camelot331 mess, makes it unlikely that Nick got too far with Pippa (even behind the scenes with his brand of "sympathy").

Here is some information for those interested. Keep in mind that Pippa's debut was on June 20th 2021, so this was somewhat early in her career as the character "Pippa".

Initial interest in a collaboration seems to have come from a $200 superchat from Lupu during Nick's stream on December 07, 2021. Pippa was quickly made aware of the suggestion and plans for a collaboration happened soon after:



December 14, 2021 has a post in this thread alleging that Pippa's management reached out to Nick about the collaboration, but Nick never got back to them. It is mentioned in the post below that Nick is terrible at responding to others.

February 04, 2022 has Pippa's take on Ethan Ralph in Portugal (first visit).

February 05, 2022 features a post that has Nick reaching out to Pippa and her management and not getting a response.

February 21, 2022 features a post that says Pippa's management have given Nick the okay to collaborate with her.

May 26, 2022 features a post saying that Pippa's management would let her talk with Branca as long as there was no discussion of politics and such.

...and the rest is history. Phase ultimately decides there will be no collaboration with Nick, Pippa instead collaborates with Camelot331 in 2023, and then Pippa summarily regrets interacting with both Nick and Camelot331.

TLDR: So, it seems like the potential collaboration came about initially because of a crossover already existing within Nick's fan-base (even here on his thread), followed by interest from Pippa and Nick, and then an overall failure to communicate helped drag things out until it was run into the ground. There were other factors as well, like what they were even going to talk about, who the collaboration was supposed to appeal to, and whether the collaboration would be a step forward/backward (though Nick certainly helped clarify that as time went on).

 

[AltisticRight]

Ah you didn't post Ian Runkle replying to it. He's part of the lawtuber circles too. Canadian like vivafrei but is super pro gun and generally does his own thing and is normally not a drama magnet, unlike Nick and so probably not aware what he's saying here applies to Nick LOL.

View attachment 5244125View attachment 5244124

>If I crop the screenshot to not include the bottom ribbon, it'll totally show these pesky Karens that I don't actually read my own thread.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

>If I crop the screenshot to not include the bottom ribbon, it'll totally show these pesky Karens that I don't actually read my own thread.

Wait are you accusing me of being actually Nick Rekieta? LOL