Science ‘Scientist’ Neil deGrasse Tyson claims biology is ‘insufficient’ during unhinged rant defending radical trans agenda - "Suppose no matter my chromosomes today, I feel 80 percent female, 20 percent male."

6f61640ca73a669bfbb6ff3b73b0d5d9.jpg

Libby Emmons
Aug 1, 2023

Astrophysicist and noted science personality Neil deGrasse Tyson spoke out in favor of gender ideology and the ability of a person to actually change their sex. He made the remarks on the Stephen A Smith podcast "K[no]w Mercy."

"Apparenly the XX/XY chromosomes," he said with obvious derision, "are insufficient because when we wake up in the morning, we exaggerate whatever feature we want to portray the gender of our choice. Either the one you're assigned, the one you choose to be—whatever it is!"

1690981569142.png
Tweet (Archive)

"And so now," he went on as though swapping sex was the most obvious thing in the world, "just to tie a bow on this, I say to you, somewhere I read— somewhere, I think I read— that the United States was a land where we have the pursuit of happiness. Suppose no matter my chromosomes today, I feel 80 percent female, 20 percent male. Now I'm gonna, I'm gonna put on makeup. Tomorrow, I might feel 80 percent male. I'll remove the makeup and I'll wear a muscle shirt. Why do you care? What businesses is it of yours to require that I fill your inability to think of gender on a spectrum?"

Detransitioner Chloe Cole took issue with Tyson, noting that in his assessment, he conflates appearance and cosmetics with biology, as though a person's external presentation has an effect on their biological reality.

1690981587518.png
Tweet (Archive)

"How about we stop confusing basic human biology with cosmetics?" Cole said. "Like what a weird jump. I don't wear makeup most days, if I leave the house without makeup on, does that make me like 70 male?"

"If it were only truly about aesthetics," she continued, "nobody would care. It's my business. Because we're using 1950s gender stereotypes to justify an ideology that leads to the sterilization and mastectomy is of 15-year-old girls who just don't fit in— girls like me."

Cold pointed out that despite Tyson's assertions, he was not exhibiting the same stereotypes that he espoused defines males and females. "I wonder what gender he was when he recorded this," she said. "He doesn't have a muscle shirt on, right? No spray tan, no falsies. He's probably like 50 percent male," she guessed.

"Because the only thing that you've established in this video," she said, "is that men wear trousers and tank tops, but women, they wear lipstick and dresses. The idea that people can be percentages of either male or female just further reinforces the fact that biological sex is a binary. There's only two. There may only be two sexes, but there are an infinite number of personalities. I mean, it really doesn't take a degree in astrophysics to understand that."

Cole has been outspoken about her gender transition experience, which she underwent in her early teen years. Now 19, she began transition with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones before having her breasts surgically removed by doctors at the age of 15. These "cures" did not solve her problems, and she has found herself entirely dismayed at the speed with which her body was dismembered in service to a lie.

She recently testified before Congress to express her concern at the rise in this so-called treatment for minors.

Source (Archive)

Full Interview:
 
The catch is though, that criterion was chosen primarily for the purpose of excluding Pluto from the list of planets, and it isn't even properly defined by the IAU.
#MakePlutoAPlanetAgain
In at least older versions of SpaceEngine*, Pluto is considered a planet (along with Ceres), and there's 13 in the Solar System. The furthest planet out is Eris, IIRC. I guess the criteria for planet in SpaceEngine is hydrostatic equilibrium (spherical) and in orbit around sun(s)? The Kuiper Belt could get confusing if that were used IRL.

*(a mostly procedural generation universe simulator)
 
Last edited:
In at least older versions of SpaceEngine*, Pluto is considered a planet (along with Ceres), and there's 13 in the Solar System. The furthest planet out is Eris, IIRC. I guess the criteria for planet in SpaceEngine is hydrostatic equilibrium (spherical) and in orbit around sun(s)? The Kuiper Belt could get confusing if that were used IRL.

*(a mostly procedural generation universe simulator)
Plugging Space Engine here because its made by mainly a single Russian dude who quit his job as an astronomer to develop it full time. Last major update added 4 dimensional raytracing for black holes along with raymarched volumetric accretion disks and jets (and raymarched volumetric planetary rings too), so when you move in space the distance and speed of light is taken into account for the animation of the accretion disk (blue and red shift is accounted for as well).

 
I saw Neil speak and met him briefly at a symposium in Australia. He's absolutely captivating to listen when he's talking about astrophysics, because his primary skill is communicating ideas that push the limits of human conception - however, it's clear over the years he's gotten a big head and he had moments during the Q.A and when talking to the moderator when he sperged out and got surprisingly rude.

Defaulting to conflating sex and gender roles because "what the dealio?" is just one of those zero-cost concessions you make when you believe in the abstract of a non-judgmental freedom for all society. I'd like to see him talk about the science of hormones and puberty blockers before I judge him complicit in supporting troonery.
 
I forget what he said that precipitated it, but at one point he said something "controversial" and soon after there was a sexual misconduct allegation against him.

It got memory holed pretty quickly and ever since he's been fucking rabid in his support of any and every narrative point that he could be used as an appeal to authority on, even if it doesn't make sense. Because "science man" I guess.

I wonder just how deep his history of being handsy with women at conventions is for him to be so thoroughly buck broken.
 
Who has time to remember 14 planets?
Why not? I had no trouble remembering 9, what's another 5 more?

The real problem comes from trying to teach this through the modern education system where the amount of history and geography taught is only fractionally above zero in favour of "decolonizing" math and buying into kids' retarded dress up make-believe.
 
Last edited:
what the fuck does it mean to feel female or male, I have never had any of these troons explain it to me.
I imagine if you "feel" female, you have low testosterone developing in your male areas. Of course now, it's greatly exaggerated as swapping genders because you feel like it. Then again, I'm not a scientist.
 
Plugging Space Engine here because its made by mainly a single Russian dude who quit his job as an astronomer to develop it full time.
It'd be nice if he explained the algorithm(s) used for procedurally generating the universe.

(also the older free versions sans volumetric rings or jets from black holes are still good)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wright
It's not so much as a gotcha when there are plenty of actual scientists who trooned out and/or go with the death cult. It still is satisfying to laugh at magic space gay nigger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo-Nazi Rich Evans
But Pluto has to have certain requirements to be called a planet? GFY

You will never be a real planet. You have no atmosphere, no tectonics, and has not cleared your orbital path. You are a jumped-up asteroid in a highly excentric orbit, forming a crude mockery of the inner solar systems natural perfection.

All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back stargazers mock you. Astronomers are disgusted by your tiny mass and shifting albedo.

Planetologists are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed planetologists to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even dwarfplanets who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a planetologist. Your orbital excentricity and mutual tidal locking is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk planetologist to write a paper about you, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your sad apparent magnitude and four tiny planets.

You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single orbit and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the Kuiper Belt creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable emptiness. Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you will leave the solar system, and plunge into the cold abyss, of the Oort cloud. Astronomers will notice your absence, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll mark their chart with your birth name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a Trans Neptunian Object once orbited here.

This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
 
"Am nigger man science 'n say vagzinate cuz dat vag-zeen shiet be fyah as shiet iz betta than dat purple drank dawg 'n good to dress up and suck dick mean you a real ass wombman 'n shiet cuz dem whyte peepo rayciss as shiet nigguh" - Renowned astrophysicist Mike Tyson
 
Why not? I had no trouble remembering 9, what's another 5 more?

The real problem comes from trying to teach this through the modern education system where the amount of history and geography taught is only fractionally above zero in favour of "decolonizing" math and buying into kids' retarded dress up make-believe.
Only but a fraction of our excellent public education system!

TBH, the fact they don't bother with the Universe, space/time, or anything beyond the solar system should be a crime. It's one of the (many) reasons individual perspectives are so fucked. No point in explaining the cosmos or heavenly bodies when humanity is the true n' honest top dawg.
 
Back