100%, the guy who posted semi-publicly his ass clapping cheeks on a bottle, has dick pics on his phone. Probably not just his own but at least Coomalot's too. In spite of his admonitions to the fans to not take nude pics, doing what he says is not Balldoman's strength.
It was Chuck Huber. Not hard to figure out.
INB4 there is a motion for a mutual NDA from Nick's side.
There's no way his phone ISN'T LOADED with dick pics!
At least the homo stuff would be legal. With any luck the Rekieta kids might get placed in a more stable home.
I don't forsee Monty getting Nick's phone mirrored.....and even if that happened, Monty doesn't just get to blast everything out in the open. That could open him up to tort liability of his own
But if he was discussing Monty while high on molly and shrooms at Hedonism 2...
Ah, yikes, slander much? We know from the Plaintiff that Nick was “commission[ing] Hate Crimes”. Clearly Nick was in Hedonism 2 to see which FAGS and NIGGERS he should pay his people to lynch
RICO has no relevancy to the case, and is not the only way to get Nick’s communications via discovery. I also wanted to raise issue with qualifying RICO as a tort, but I was wrong, in civil cases it is considered a tort (for example, In re EpiPen Direct Purchaser Litig., 20-CV-827 (ECT/JFD) (D. Minn. Mar. 29, 2023))
Forgive me if I’m wrong, but conspiracy is not one of the causes of action in this case.
Both parties agreed to the discovery plan, that is to say, these deadlines are what both parties want.
If Nick has harmed Montagraph as he did, one would expect the wishes for trial would be ASAP. As the Judge noted, “Both Quest and Rekieta have submitted flurries of evidence, almost all of which indicate that they were engaged in a vulgar, online shouting match. Both called each other abhorrent names and made rude jokes at the other’s expense. However, very little of the evidence on the record relates to an actionable claim of defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, or negligent infliction of emotional distress”. There is no complex issues as I remember it. It’s taking long because both parties want to get the last word in and pretend that they’re on Twitter. Rittenhouse case, full of complex issues, was resolved in a year (and they had to deal with the Prosecution committing fraud practically left and right). In comparison this is rather simple defamation per se case wherein the most complex part is whether Montagraph has had the same kind of reputation Nick jokingly (allegedly by Nick) accused him of.
That was a criminal trial, where the state and courts are obligated to go extremely fast if the defendant doesn't waive their right to a speedy trial. This is a civil case, so no such constraints apply, and the judge is free to push out the timeline as far as she wants.
He might have been able to get discovery on an alleged RICO tort, if a RICO tort had been one of the claims made in his complaint (and if the RICO claim wasn't dismissed at the motion to dismiss stage, which seems rather likely since it's purely speculative - he has literally no evidence to support it). He's asking for discovery on matters that are unrelated to the claims for which he's actually suing, and anything he's wanting that is outside of the scope of the claims in the complaint should be denied.
You missed my point. This is not a complex case, and it can get resolved much sooner. Even in the notoriously slow district courts, 90% of civil cases in Minnesota get resolved in a single year. 97% in 18 months. There is no reason this has to take this long.
My assumption is Randazza's schedule is pretty full; meanwhile, Schneider and Monte see allowing a longer timeline means more rope given to Balldoman to hang himself with. And from Racket's side, more time equals more money, and they're hoping to bring Monte to his knees, at least financially. Hence the agreed timeline, even if it is stupid long.
Pretty much any defamation case is a complex case. Particularly when ideas about public figures are involved. On top of that, there will probably be expert witnesses over the idea of emotional distress, which makes discovery a lot less simple.
So what you are saying is this case is going to be really expensive for Nick?
But if you put it in a court filing...
Nick is burning cash ar a higher rate. This conflict is Parthian in nature, and I wager Nick's dwindling pool of resourced does not offset his higher hourly rate.
Now, would dear feeder give Nick those communications, or would he require Nick to have a subpoena? And if a subpoena is required, what are the odds that Nick bitches about it as if Josh hates him?
Technically, unless I am grossly mistaken, the Court could compell it from Monty's side.
I don't know that Rackets has it in him to settle. If he did, he would have already done it. Maybe the financial pressure could get to him? But it's clear he has outside support that frees him up to make stupid financial decisions. And muh ego. I think he'd take a pyrrhic victory over eating humble pie.
I get the Impression that Nool reflexively refuses to comply with any sort of information production without a court order.
