starborn427614
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
To be fair, most protagonists are merely there to move the plot along. Secondary and other side characters get a lot more freedom in terms of writing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be fair, most protagonists are merely there to move the plot along. Secondary and other side characters get a lot more freedom in terms of writing.
That's called bad writing.To be fair, most protagonists are merely there to move the plot along. Secondary and other side characters get a lot more freedom in terms of writing.
I don't like Critical Drinker but outside nerves which are understandable he did a good job here.Well, CD somehow is interviewing Russell Crowe on his YouTube channel.
So apparently Drinker saw & reviewed the film which Russell Crowe was promoting at CD's interview.Well, CD somehow is interviewing Russell Crowe on his YouTube channel.
Oh I'm sure critical drinker is sad that DOGFUCKER doesn't like him.
Of all human beings existing in the world, the goddamn, fatso, leftoid, ultra-procrastinating, Mufasa-obsessed, degenerate gooner & pro-beastiality furfag, who gets his pasty ass buck broken by a limp-dick nigger (he posts about it on his Twitter, you can see it on his own thread, it's fucking nightmare fuel), has no right to criticize him, specially not without any self-reflecting of his own.
Of all human beings existing in the world, the goddamn, leftoid, ultra-procrastinating, Mufasa-obsessed, degenerate gooner & pro-beastiality furfag has no right to criticize him, specially not without any self-reflecting of his own. TCD is an objectively better human being, even just talking from a professional standard alone. Hell, not being a lolcow alone is a good thing in comparison to YMS.
I can tell before even watching it that this is the usual "le Scottish based man bad", combined with the fact that TCD is essentially the absolute opposite of literally everything YMS
Shit, did anyone archive this?
I think once you willingly upload pics of yourself in drag with your dick out and the aftermath of getting butt-fucked by your gay nigger boyfriend then I think it is 100% official that you lose the right to criticize anyone. Not just movies. But any and everyone. It's not just being a degenerate on the internet but it shows that you make really bad judgement calls.Of all human beings existing in the world, the goddamn, fatso, leftoid, ultra-procrastinating, Mufasa-obsessed, degenerate gooner & pro-beastiality furfag, who gets his pasty ass buck broken by a limp-dick nigger (he posts about it on his Twitter, you can see it on his own thread, it's fucking nightmare fuel), has no right to criticize him, specially not without any self-reflecting of his own.
TCD is an objectively better human being, even just talking from a professional standard alone. Hell, not being a lolcow alone is a good thing in comparison to YMS.
I can tell before even watching it that this is the usual "le Scottish based man bad", but this time it's combined with the fact that it's seething from jealousy that TCD is essentially the absolute opposite of literally everything YMS is.
Shit, did anyone archive this?
Mauler is just using the same exact formula that YMS helped popularized but even longer so... What? It's just a gigantic break down of every logical inconsistency in a film or unrealistic thing. That was Adum's ENTIRE gimmick.Adum briefly talks about MauLer and dismissing the idea that MauLer represents everything wrong with modern day film criticism.
I mean, I knew he was a gay furry into bestiality already so I shouldn't be surprised, but its still dissapointing. Does he actually say it on those words or is he more subtle?Adum also argues that politics are nothing new, but he says politics had previously celebrated the 'straight white male' culture, so was "less noticeable" to straight white males.
This is a very telling comment. It's Adum letting his film snobbery come out. In essence it's "I don't watch movies, I appreciate films." The Drinker, love him or hate him, is a reviewer of "guy" movies. High and low concept action movies, war movies, horror that kind of stuff. Not what is considered film, by the more snobbish. His audience will not enjoy a review about a touching drama about 2 gay black drug dealers trying to buy a house in Vermont while eating pudding.Adum says it's weird that Drinker's channel is a "movie review" channel for people who aren't very interested in films, and are more interested in the identity politics surrounding them.