Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 Changes are being made. Got a request? Shoot your shot.
    💹 I am interested in growing the non-English section of the site. Discuss.
    🖼️ Old attachments may be broken. I am rebuilding the local filesystem. They are not lost.
>D cups
Wha?…
It's because of the male ribcage. It widens from the waist up so the difference between a man's "band" size and the measurement across his nipples can easily be 4 inches. In fact, a troon claiming a large cup size could only obtain that measurement by having a more masculine frame than other men.
 
Even though it may go nowhere, it's very easy for the well needed opposition to use their negligent behavior against them.

I'd like to point out how my distinguished competitor treats your tax dollars. and how much they devalue the rule of law. You can clearly see how this revolting monster, wants to run your state. the same way every other crook gets into office and for the same goals. To take your hard earned money, and use it to attack your well established moral standing. The rules do not apply to them and their degenerate, sex pest flunkies. If you care about a safe place to raise your children, you will stay clear of this animal.
 
Tony has a bizarre habit of making testable claims that are not grounded in reality or flat out delusional.

View attachment 5257061

"Already lost and they know it" is a delusional claim for several obvious reasons.

View attachment 5257062

Bostick and Obergafell are not sounds reference points for the troons because those kind of outcomes require 5 - 4 split and Ruth Bader Ginsburg being among the living. Now we have a 6 - 3 split and RGB is unavailable for comment.

"Being queer or trans is now more accepted than ever" is laid to rest with a quick google search.
June 12, 2023

Most Americans oppose including trans athletes in sports, poll finds

May 6, 2023

Most Americans support anti-trans policies favored by GOP, poll shows

June 8, 2023

Less than half in Britain back gender-affirming care for trans teenagers

June 20, 2023

UMass Poll: 60% of adults believe gender cannot be changed

Some of Tony's stompy foot tweets suggest that he does in fact see the writing on the wall and it is not favorable to him.
"eliminationism" lmfao
 
The complaint is that Zac received donations to his 2024 campaign account without having closed his 2022 campaign account, which to be honest does not strike me as particularly explosive. I did laugh when I saw the bit about Zac owing $278.93 to the Billings Times since April 2022, though. Pay up deadbeat!

I'll upload the PDF later when I figure out how to make it smaller and keep it readable; it's a scan of a printed document so each page is an image and it's huge.

Not to mention that we can conduct RCTs for all sorts of treatments with obvious effects! Observation of the effects is in large part the rationale for the RCT in the first place, because it facilitates controlling for the placebo effect.
On the claim that "RCTs would be unethical", the proposals I've seen for RCTs for gender dysphoria are typically psychotherapy plus puberty blockers/cross-sex hormones for the treatment group, and psychotherapy alone (perhaps plus placebo) for the control group. Obviously this is unacceptable to Tony because he considers psychotherapy to be "conversion therapy".

It seems he continues to believe that RCTs are necessarily blinded (whether single or double), which is not the case.

He's published a new blog post about evidence quality, which I hope to have time to go through later today. The Myth Of "Low Quality Evidence" Around Transgender Care (archive)

Edit: I've been through his blog post now. It's garbage. I can't tell whether Tony is deliberately trying to mislead people, or he's trying to convince himself. Here's a list of the "greatest hits" that appear:
Another day, another load of nonsense from Tony. Only one treatment approach to gender dysphoria is acceptable to him: puberty blockers for children followed by cross-sex hormones for adolescents and adults. Anything else is "conversion therapy" or "unethical". Tony says that "there is no level of evidence that will ever be acceptable to those seeking to ban gender affirming care" — "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

Ultimately Tony will never abandon this position (unless he detransitions or, er, joins the detransition of the 41%) because he believes (or at least professes to believe!) that trans-identified people are "born in the wrong body". He is like a lobotomy dead-ender who is convinced beyond reason that the mentally ill have a malignant extra connection in the brain that must be surgically severed.
 
Last edited:
Why does he think it's not ethical to double blind HRT but it is ethical to double blind anti-depressants, anti-schizo drugs, anti-seizure drugs, etc.? Is it because the latter actually have a theory behind them that can be tested?
Depressed people and schizos don't kill themselves or do permanent harm to themselves if they don't have treatment you fucking scum, trans people see through placebos because their hurt is so deep that if they don't they fucking kill themselves instantly.

And no one's ever suffered harm or inhabilitation from a seizure, duuuuuh. They'll be out for what? A minute? Then they're super normal and happy the rest of the day because they're cis. God, can't believe your medical knowledge is so lacking.
 
Attached is a straightened, OCR'd and smaller version of the Montana Freedom Caucus campaign finance complaint against Zac, which includes some back-and-forth emails to Zac's staff about him not closing his 2022 campaign account.

I've removed the 50-odd pages at the end which are just a print out of contribution records. Instead I've attached two "CSV" files (fields separated by | ) for his 2022 and 2024 campaigns.

I've looked at Zac's 2022 contributions before, and they're pretty boring. I've not yet looked at his 2024 contributions, but there's a lot more of them: 671 reported already (June 30 cut-off), vs 189 total for his 2022 campaign. Montana's campaign finance database is here.

Text of the complaint itself (excluding the evidence):
Montana Freedom Caucus said:
  • Representative Zooey Zephyr violated Montana's campaign finance law by fund raising for and paying expenses related to a 2024 campaign for House District 95 while his 2022 campaign for House District 100 was still active. (See FOIA information attached and CERS data)
  • The 2024 campaign registration was filed but never approved due to the 2022 campaign being active. (See FOIA information attached)
  • Rep. Zephyr was informed that there could be no fund raising or expenditures for the '24 campaign until '22 was closed out. (See FOIA information attached).
  • Rep. Zephyr raised and expended funds related to the '24 campaign despite this restriction. This includes the fact that there are no in kind donations listed or valued despite traveling the country and speaking. (See FOIA information attached and CERS data)
This violates -

MCA 13-37-228(3) httpS://leg.mtgov/bills/mca/title_0130/chapter_0370/part_oo2o/section_0280/0130-0370-0020-0280.html and
Montana ARM 44.11.702(1) - because Rep. Zephyr's last C5 report for 2022 reflects all expenditures as surplus balance contributions, not campaign expenditures.

See attached documentation for further information.

Edit: I've also attached the expenditure reports for his 2022 and 2024 campaign funds.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Why does he think it's not ethical to double blind HRT but it is ethical to double blind anti-depressants, anti-schizo drugs, anti-seizure drugs, etc.? Is it because the latter actually have a theory behind them that can be tested?
Because gender is on the inside, you see. But because of his fucking insanity gEndEr oPprEsSiON he needs the other meds to keep some semblance of sanity to handle having an axe wound and looking like a bad joke.
 
It's because of the male ribcage. It widens from the waist up so the difference between a man's "band" size and the measurement across his nipples can easily be 4 inches. In fact, a troon claiming a large cup size could only obtain that measurement by having a more masculine frame than other men.

Also they have no idea about bra sizes
Generally to convert you subtract one increment from the effective cup size for each two inches the back size goes up, so 36D = 32B in effective breast size

It's always hilarious when you see some neckbeard bragging about their 40DD bra size when it's basically the equivalent of a 32A on an actual woman

It just shows how little they know about women
 
Attached is a straightened, OCR'd and smaller version of the Montana Freedom Caucus campaign finance complaint against Zac, which includes some back-and-forth emails to Zac's staff about him not closing his 2022 campaign account.
So besides criminal impersonation of a woman, he's also playing around with campaign finances? This can only end well for milk futures. What a year 2023 is turning out.
 
Here are are two tables showing Zac's campaign contributions by state, along with the total number of donations (not individual donors).

Zac's already raised more from California for his 2024 campaign than he raised from Montana for his entire 2022 campaign, and the 2022 Montana total includes $2,000 from his party.

In total he got $21,364.93 in contributions for his 2022 campaign, but has already raised $67,329 for his 2024 campaign.

2022 Contributions​

StateTotal $Donations #
MT13094128
WA285010
IL14507
DC8005
TX5002
NY4505
WI4001
CA3003
NV2501
CO2503
MO17011
MA1502
WV1001
MN1001
GA1001
DE1001
TN501
PA501
NC501
IA501
HI501
AZ501

2024 Contributions​

StateTotal $Donations #
CA13725138
MT745066
NY588554
WA495050
MA312532
TX260025
MD245025
OR220020
VA180020
FL180018
IL178617
MI177517
CO170017
PA142320
MN141014
NJ135012
WI13009
NC9009
OH80010
DC7508
UT7005
ID7008
CT7005
AZ7009
NM5504
GA5506
NH5006
MO4005
KY4005
DE4001
WY3505
NE3002
KS2504
VT2003
TN2003
RI1503
NV1502
MS1502
SD1001
SC1001
IN1001
HI1001
Canada1001
WV501
ME501
LA501
IA501
AK501
AE (military?)501

I've attached the SQL dump for those that want to play along at home; I did some tidying up on the contributions spreadsheets before loading it into SQLite.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Also they have no idea about bra sizes
Generally to convert you subtract one increment from the effective cup size for each two inches the back size goes up, so 36D = 32B in effective breast size

It's always hilarious when you see some neckbeard bragging about their 40DD bra size when it's basically the equivalent of a 32A on an actual woman

It just shows how little they know about women

No, it's as you go up in cup size, you go down in band size. A 36D is the same as a 40B. The terminology is "sister sizes"
bust_ratio_1024x1365_57093bc5-dddc-498e-a6ce-431579b3dff3_600x600.jpg
If a guy says he has 40DDs he's probably buying the 40DD bra, but the cup must fit horribly. Since male chests are incredibly wide, the band size 40 is what fits him but 40A and 40Bs are rarely ever made. The minimum cup size that is manufactured in 40 band for most brands is C and I remember those being hard to find when I was a child. I bet if he took proper measurements it'll be a 40B but since women's breasts are fuller than manboobs it still probably wouldn't fit.
 
I had a quick look at the employers of the people donating to Zac's campaigns.

Big tech is especially well represented, with (among others) donations from employees of Amazon, Apple, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Nvidia and Oracle.

As is the media, with donations from people at CBS, Cox, Disney, HBO, NPR and Warner Brothers.

And, naturally, because Zac is so ✨progressive✨, donations from employees of arms manufacturers BAE Systems, L3Harris, and Raytheon.
3676763195_78f4e482f3_b.jpg

Edit: here's a table with the donations from people at companies whose names stood out to me:
NameStateEmployerOccupationAmountDate
Joe CarlinCAAccentureCONSULTANT502023-04-27
Gurinderpal BahlPAAmazonWorker1002023-04-27
Tejaswi BayyaWAAmazonSoftware Developer1002023-04-27
David BlumNYAmazonEditor1002023-04-27
Anne HansenWAAmazonRESEARCH MANAGER1002023-04-27
Derek ArtetaCAAppleATTORNEY752023-04-27
Deborah GoldsmithCAApple Inc.Software Engineer502023-04-27
Robin Diane GoldsteinCAApple Inc.ATTORNEY1002023-04-27
Abby DorseyCAAVIDMARKETING502023-04-27
Laura ThachinNJBAE SYSTEMSENGINEER2002023-04-27
Lindsay FjeranWABoeingEngineer1002021-10-01
Lindsay FjeranWABoeingEngineer1002022-01-01
Beth BaniszewskiMABOSTON DYNAMICSENGINEER502023-04-27
Taylor SanchezCABROADCOMSoftware Engineer502023-04-27
Barbara FriendCACBSTV WRITER1002023-04-27
Edward Van BrusselenTXCOGENT COMMUNICATIONSMANAGER1002023-04-27
Christopher MorterGACox Communications IncCorporate Counsel1002022-01-01
Christopher RaylKSCOX COMMUNICATIONS INC.Software Engineer502023-04-27
Benjamin LeonardNYDisney Streaming ServicesMedia Operations Manager1002023-04-27
Howard PulchinNYEdelmanMarketing Specialist2002022-04-16
Brian MaloneyDCGenentechExternal Affairs1002022-01-01
Josh HoakWAGoogleSoftware Engineer4002021-10-01
Rachel FennCAGoogleMANAGER1002023-04-27
Tracy FerrellCAGoogleENGINEER502023-04-27
Justine HahnNJGoogleSoftware Engineering Manager4002023-04-27
Scott MilesCAGoogleProgrammer502023-04-27
Scott MilesCAGoogleProgrammer502023-04-27
terry MoranAZGoogleSoftware Engineer1002023-04-27
Gabriel PumariegaNYGoogleTech502023-04-27
Paul RaccugliaMAGoogleSoftware Engineer1002023-04-27
Jeffrey WarshawCAGooglePRIVACY ENGINEER502023-04-27
Lila ByockCAHBOTV WRITER502023-04-27
Kevin AdlerMNIBMSoftware Engineer1002023-04-27
Eoghan Conlon O’NeillCOIBMSoftware Engineer1002023-04-27
Justin HackerWAL3HarrisTest Technician1002023-04-27
Patrick McElroyWAMicrosoftSoftware Developer4002022-01-01
Josh SmithrudWAMicrosoftSoftware Engineer1502022-01-01
Stefanie HansenWAMicrosoftSoftware Engineer502023-04-27
Danny MassaMOMicrosoftSoftware Engineer502023-04-27
Allison SanbongiNYMSFTSALES1002023-04-27
Hannah GluvnaOHNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIOAudio Engineer502023-04-27
Robert SchuttenCANVIDIAENGINEER502023-04-27
Valerie DeweyMTOracleTech Writer502023-04-27
Niko PfundNYOxford University PressPublisher1002022-10-16
Niko PfundNYOxford University PressPublisher1002023-04-27
Sheryl GarfioCORaytheonSoftware Engineer502023-04-27
River JaffeCARiot GamesNARRATIVE WRITER4002023-04-27
Nick CecilWASALESFORCESoftware Engineering Manager4002022-01-01
Robin Bruns WoronaORSALESFORCECopywriter502023-04-27
Cynsa BonorrisCASYMANTEC CORP.Programmer1002023-04-27
Ian KennedyWAThe Walt Disney CompanyENGINEER1002023-04-27
DeMane DavisMAWarner BrothersDIRECTOR1002023-04-27
DeMane DavisMAWarner BrothersDIRECTOR1002023-04-27
 
Last edited:
So what’s the worst that can come to Zac from this controversy?
Legally? A fine. Which the Democrats will pay for him.

Campaign finance violations are news fodder and legal harassment. Basically what they're alleging is probably correct and Zach stupidly never closed the 2022 campaign because of that outstanding debt. Everything else is mostly just suggesting there's smoke since they can't outright allege that Zach is using campaign funds improperly as it's too hard to prove. I wouldn't entirely be surprised if Zach was doing this because he's pretty stupid but I would have figured someone backing his trips might have wanted to make sure the funds were separated for these. National groups tend to be better about this because FEC penalties have the potential of being harsher. If he did it and there's proof, he'll have to reimburse his campaign. I don't know Montana law specifics and haven't looked them up but this is the case for most state laws. If he's even stupider and spent a shit load of the campaign funds already that might actually potentially boost it up to a criminal level.

Politically, it only matters if somebody's running against him. It's quite early for that in a minor state race, it might convince someone to run though if this is the start of Zach's problems.

I would assume the Republicans normally bulk grab all the Democrats every quarter and someone noticed Zach rather than them looking at him specifically. Though the amount of money he's brought in for an uncompetitive race would draw attention even if he hadn't had his little worldwide famous protest.
 
Last edited:
Just for the fun of it I thought I would look up Justine from Google who had $400 dollars of disposable income to waste on Zach.
IMG_5300.jpeg
LMAO! A fucking avatar on LinkedIn! Let’s be honest we all knew Justine was a troon, but in case you need further confirmation. Here is an old recommendation post that calls him Justin.
IMG_5301.jpeg

For those of you keeping genocide score at home that’s 2x deadname and 5x pronoun violations.
 
Back
Top Bottom