FB 8/10 - Chris comments on a news article about incest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can we start calling the house Navy Gardens?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    62.7 KB · Views: 545
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Gunslinger, BOLDYSPICY!, Gav01 and 24 others
The American Hedgehog said:
Plus, this offers a chance for better teaching the child how to better satisfy their eventual partner(s). The schools can only teach from books; not so much practice. And Nobody wants to end up being a 20 or 30-plus year old Virgin. I know; That is a Huge, Enduring Pain.
Click to expand...

This is so gross. It reveals another one of his weird views on sex and how much importance he places on his near-virginity:

For Chris, the pain of being a 20+ year old virgin somehow outweighs the shame of losing your virginity to a parent.

Edit: Looks like Kim Wilson said something similar about how crazy it is.

To put it another way, it's like Chris going to a 20 year old's birthday party and saying 'You're still upset about being a virgin at 20? Better have sex with your mom before it gets any worse'.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: TrippinKahlua, Gunslinger, breadandcircuses and 26 others
Alec Benson Leary said:
When I said facebook comments to Chris would best serve at three words or less, I didn't think "don't fuck Mom" would be a necessary candidate.
Click to expand...
I don't even know if three words or less would get through to him. How many times has someone told him "Quit being retarded!" only for him to do something stupid like posting about his desire to fuck his mom or mutilating himself?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Vault Boy, Ray Streip, Super Collie and 5 others
MMX said:
Maybe he read the wallflowers thread and heard her kink was incest and tried to impress here maybe even add some advice ?

Seriously can any psychology kiwi explain this
I thought humans had some developmental thing that stops us being attracted to parents, siblings and even childhood friends ?
To my knowledge this was even the case with autistics and its absence was only noted in severely damage humans and those you had abusive upbringings
Click to expand...

Yes, there is a phenomenon. It is called the Westermarck effect. If you're raised with people (usually ends up being parents, siblings, though it also affects your friends you made at that age), there's an evolutionary trigger where you won't see them in any sort of sexual way.

In an unrelated tangent, that's why I'm baffled at so many authors using childhood friends becoming romantically entangled as a story thread.

King Kong... with wings? said:
if I recall, the Oedipus complex was a stage in the now disproven psychoanalysis field/theory (not a psychology major to be honest, but I do sometimes look into psychology out of morbid curiosity)
Click to expand...

You are correct. Most Freudian psychology, including the Oedipus complex, are now considered discredited by most of the psychological community, barring a few of the older therapists/teachers who still teach parts of the theory (usually defense mechanisms like projection and reaction formation) and some fringe elements. It's usually people who are outside of psychology who try to act as if it is a theory that psychology still holds. For example, I had a Criminology professor with a sociology background act as if the Oedipus complex was still legitimately a thing in psychology.

Freudian psychology itself is usually considered bad science now because core aspects are unfalsifiable. The unconscious is by definition outside of awareness, so how do therapists know about it? Any attempts to disprove the Oedipus complex were seen as being proof that you find it so damn shameful that you overreact the opposite way in an attempt to hide it.

Especially amusing with the Oedipus complex is that Freud had a sample size of one- himself, and he based it off of memories that were from when he was a small child . Though most who try to argue his viewpoint go "Your extreme reaction of disgust is clearly reaction formation and you secretly want to fuck your parent" (reaction formation), you could turn such arguments on Freud himself. That he was trying to claim everyone had the fucked up mindset he had, a form of projection. Assuming he wasn't instead projecting an adult mindset and his batshit theories on his fuzzy memories of the time, especially since memory fades and childhood memory especially so.

However, getting back to Chris, he's just fucked up. I have no idea of if there is a bottom to all of this, but I'll be surprised if there is, at this point.
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Donatien Argez, Gunslinger, 8008135 and 40 others
The Dude said:
And I can't say that Chris fantasizing about plowing Barb's geriatric cooch shocks me. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if they actually did it. Chris has always been kind of pervy and has been far to obsessed with sex to be considered healthy. And since the only woman around who will spend time with him without being paid by Chris to do so is Barb (and even she mooches off Chris' TardBux), and since her mental faculties are going down hill fast, a sexual scenario involving the two of them doesn't seem to be too much of a stretch. Especially when you take into account that they're both mentally ill shut-ins.
Click to expand...
To say nothing of the fact that Barb has spent 34 years pulling that "I'm the only person who'll ever care about you" manipulative shit on him.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!, Vault Boy, Ti-99/4A and 36 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back