Is Nitter borked for good with the recent changes?
Even without Twitter policy changes, it seems Nitter was already vulnerable. While trying different instances at random to see if one worked, I stumbled upon this one :
nitter.pussthecat.org. It now redirects to this message :
View attachment 5282629
tl;dr : the Nitter instance was shutdown (through mostly automated processes) for having
displayed illegal content (CSAM)
hosted by Twitter. Of course Twitter stays online without issue in the meantime.
This made me tick because Josh recently talked about the use of CP to shutdown websites and/or force everyone to go through 3rd parties to scan content. Seems here that there's already a huge double standard in the treatment of Big Tech versus small website, even when the content is literally the same.
Here's the list of IWF members (donators) :
https://www.iwf.org.uk/membership/our-members/ (a) . Pretty much all of Big Tech, including Twitter.