Chris's incest charge is dismissed

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMG_1757.jpeg
 
A-logs just maldin that Chris-Chad got;
  • His dick wet 3 times a week
  • Thousands of fans
  • 2 years of back paid SSDI
  • 3 square meals a day for free
  • Live by himself for 2 years, got to meditate, work on his OC fan fics and jack it to memories of Barbussy.
  • Comes back to more thousands of fans.
  • No criminal record, no lists, back on the internet.
  • Fiona will still probably try to fuck Chris.
Stay mad a-logs.

Jokes side, this shit is infuriating and anyone enabling Chris deserved total ween death
 
I have nothing against Chris, his mom should bare as much blame as he does and besides that years of involuntary celibacy does things to the mind. I just see him as a victim of circumstances. That of course doesn't mean I won't laugh at the degradation of his life though. I'm glad this has come to pass so he can continue to provide content for years to come.
 
Here's my crackpot theory of what happened with Chris' case.
I believe it's what's called a deferred disposition in his state.

§ 19.2-298.02. Deferred disposition in a criminal case.​

A. A trial court presiding in a criminal case may, with the agreement of the defendant and the Commonwealth, after any plea or trial, with or without a determination, finding, or pronouncement of guilt, and notwithstanding the entry of a conviction order, upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, including (i) mitigating factors relating to the defendant or the offense, (ii) the request of the victim, or (iii) any other appropriate factors, defer proceedings, defer entry of a conviction order, if none, or defer entry of a final order, and continue the case for final disposition, on such reasonable terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the parties and placed on the record, or if there is no agreement, as may be imposed by the court. Final disposition may include (a) conviction of the original charge, (b) conviction of an alternative charge, or (c) dismissal of the proceedings.

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title19.2/chapter18/section19.2-298.02/

But remember, this is just a wild postulation, because we don't know what happened yet.
 
Here's my crackpot theory of what happened with Chris' case.
I believe it's what's called a deferred disposition in his state.

§ 19.2-298.02. Deferred disposition in a criminal case.​

A. A trial court presiding in a criminal case may, with the agreement of the defendant and the Commonwealth, after any plea or trial, with or without a determination, finding, or pronouncement of guilt, and notwithstanding the entry of a conviction order, upon consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, including (i) mitigating factors relating to the defendant or the offense, (ii) the request of the victim, or (iii) any other appropriate factors, defer proceedings, defer entry of a conviction order, if none, or defer entry of a final order, and continue the case for final disposition, on such reasonable terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the parties and placed on the record, or if there is no agreement, as may be imposed by the court. Final disposition may include (a) conviction of the original charge, (b) conviction of an alternative charge, or (c) dismissal of the proceedings.

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title19.2/chapter18/section19.2-298.02/

But remember, this is just a wild postulation, because we don't know what happened yet.
I'm 99% sure he got off because of the law Virginia passed a few months before his arrest that gives autists and tards a literal get out of jail free card:

§ 19.2-303.6. Deferred disposition in a criminal case; persons with autism or intellectual disabilities.​

A. In any criminal case, except a violation of § 18.2-31, an act of violence as defined in § 19.2-297.1, or any crime for which a deferred disposition is provided for by statute, upon a plea of guilty, or after a plea of not guilty, and the facts found by the court would justify a finding of guilt, the court may, if the defendant has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist with (i) an autism spectrum disorder as defined in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association or (ii) an intellectual disability as defined in § 37.2-100 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the criminal conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the person's disorder or disability, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the accused, after giving due consideration to the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth and the views of the victim, defer further proceedings and place the accused on probation subject to terms and conditions set by the court. Upon violation of a term or condition, the court may enter an adjudication of guilt; or upon fulfillment of the terms and conditions, the court may discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against him without an adjudication of guilt. This section shall not limit the authority of any juvenile and domestic relations court granted to it in Title 16.1.
B. Deferred disposition shall be available to the defendant even though he has previously been convicted of a criminal offense, been adjudicated delinquent as a juvenile, or had proceedings deferred and dismissed under this section or under any other provision of law, unless, after having considered the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth, the views of the victims, and any evidence offered by the defendant, the court finds that deferred disposition is inconsistent with the interests of justice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back