Bearmumrik
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2023
Not planning on doing anything, faggot, just thought it would be a good and fun saga to happen.
Chris's incest charge is dismissed
- Thread starter themarchivist2
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
I disagree with the idea that Chris's morality is literally immature. Chris is a relativist in my opinion. Plenty of adults have relativist ethics in stark contrast to the archetypal/absolute morality of the West, and many who insist on the very much absolute morality of the Bible will almost intuitively view relativist morality as immature. But that doesn't mean they are.
The main difference between absolutism and relativism is that an absolutist has a strong belief in moral correctness – that actions are either right or wrong, and which is which isn't up for debate. Relativists believe right/wrong to be a matter of opinion – this doesn't mean they all desire a free-for-all, but that their morality is more open to accommodating:
- benign, consensual, or minor deviations from social conventions (i.e., casual cursing)
- separation of legality from morality (i.e., believing an action is wrong, but also believing that it shouldn't be illegal, or that the punishment doesn't fit the crime)
- analysis of the actual consequences of taboos, enabling a case-by-case view of morality (i.e., yes, gay people are statistically more likely to catch HIV, but it's neither inevitable nor exclusive to gay men – but safe sex is a must)
- epistemological relativism (i.e., words can mean different things in different contexts, and every word is a human invention)
- utilitarianism (i.e., a white lie can have positive social benefits, unlike a serious lie)
- boundary manners (i.e., being polite is a manner of respecting the comfort of those individuals in your setting, not following a collectivist ideal of etiquette)
For some, relativism can appear self-serving, warped, or inconsistent, but I believe it's just a different kind of integrity. I actually think many people become more relativist as they get older.
The main difference between absolutism and relativism is that an absolutist has a strong belief in moral correctness – that actions are either right or wrong, and which is which isn't up for debate. Relativists believe right/wrong to be a matter of opinion – this doesn't mean they all desire a free-for-all, but that their morality is more open to accommodating:
- benign, consensual, or minor deviations from social conventions (i.e., casual cursing)
- separation of legality from morality (i.e., believing an action is wrong, but also believing that it shouldn't be illegal, or that the punishment doesn't fit the crime)
- analysis of the actual consequences of taboos, enabling a case-by-case view of morality (i.e., yes, gay people are statistically more likely to catch HIV, but it's neither inevitable nor exclusive to gay men – but safe sex is a must)
- epistemological relativism (i.e., words can mean different things in different contexts, and every word is a human invention)
- utilitarianism (i.e., a white lie can have positive social benefits, unlike a serious lie)
- boundary manners (i.e., being polite is a manner of respecting the comfort of those individuals in your setting, not following a collectivist ideal of etiquette)
For some, relativism can appear self-serving, warped, or inconsistent, but I believe it's just a different kind of integrity. I actually think many people become more relativist as they get older.
I question that dichotomy a bit . Qualifying it that way would essentially make everyone a relativist as regardless of time period you will have people doing actions they would agree are immoral for either a greater good or because the immorality is negligible
Like the most devout god fearing catholic might still tell his wife that she looks wonderful in that old dress even though it’s clear she has gained a few pounds. Or perhaps another white lie because they think that is what the person needs to hear in that moment. If the moral dichotomy is set in such a way that it becomes entirely theoretical on one end ( the absolutist). It starts to have less actual meaning outside of fictional comic book hero’s.
Regardless I think closest thing you might be keying into with Chris is that he self justifies his actions . Such as claiming his sexual action is healing his mum. This also ties into his inability to accept responsibility.
Now part of this isn’t a surprise. A prime trait of autism is difficulty accepting criticism , seemingly through a general sensitivity to rejection. Just like you can be rejected socially your actions can be rejected . If you actually add up the events in the life of chris it starts to make a hell of a lot of sense . His mum had similar sensitivities and constantly pampered him worsening his own behaviours and in ways shielding him from a world which largely didn’t tolerate his antics .
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Chris's sins though red as scarlet have been made white as snow
Maybe he is the Saviour!
Maybe he is the Saviour!
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2022
Chris has half-heartedly trooned for a decade because society treats him better, some people will defend him no matter what, and it's an effective way to get closer to women.
He knows what is generally considered morally acceptable by society, but many autists think it's bullshit. I think that defines many actions in Chris's life where he's hid what is considered conventionally wrong.
I’m pretty sure Chris was cross dressing since the 2000s . It’s funny watching troons try to claim that Chris isn’t a troon and just pointing to it being a sexual thing… as if it isn’t very clearly sexual for vast majority of troons .
Chris is a headcase though and seems to think that to be a woman is to be
1: virtuous and kind
2: be served upon by your partner. Which suits his ideal of being a house wife .
The oddity being that he wants to be a house wife… to an actual woman . A woman who he wants to be womanly, not autistic , in shape, but also make tons of money and deeply into his retarded ass .
I think my point is that it’s very in line with his general character and doesn’t seem to be simply a calculated manifestation . It’s definitely fed by the troon community largely being unwilling to hold those within it to any moral standards .
Chris can sit in corner in a dress drinking his own cum and it’ll just receive a chorus of hell yaaa sissterrr
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2014
Chris is a turbo autists.
Thing Chris wants is good. Thinks Chris doesn't want are bad.
Anybody who says he is wrong is a jerk and hates him for no reason.
Thing Chris wants is good. Thinks Chris doesn't want are bad.
Anybody who says he is wrong is a jerk and hates him for no reason.
I was betting on him getting sent to a home to make macaroni paintings or on the streets for the rest of his life, boy was I wrong.
I doubt that they would let him visit or God forbid stay with dear ol mom after all of this. I hope the caretakers or wranglers as they call them, do
their job and not let him loose. Then again a literal MOTHERFUCKER Sonic autist, got away from fucking his mother and didn't even end up on the Registry. Im still in bewilderment as to how he did it.
Chris won, we lost.
I doubt that they would let him visit or God forbid stay with dear ol mom after all of this. I hope the caretakers or wranglers as they call them, do
their job and not let him loose. Then again a literal MOTHERFUCKER Sonic autist, got away from fucking his mother and didn't even end up on the Registry. Im still in bewilderment as to how he did it.
Chris won, we lost.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2019
Been away from this site and most of the internet due to tending to my sick mother that ended up passing away and I return to see Chris is a free man. Holy shit.
Raccoonboy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
This has gotta be te start to some funny saga's i wonder how he'll fuck things up for himself even more
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2021
It could really go either way on this one. Either Chris has finally chilled out in his older age, and he just plays Vidya and occasionally conversates with some ween on the street, or he goes back to tarding on the Internet for attention.
Since Chris obviously has access to social media again, you'd think that he would have already going on about the Merge and shit for days by now, but he's still kept a fairly low profile lately. Granted, he did this as well in the early 2010s as well, so it could just be a matter of time, but isn't it a bit unusual that he hasn't gone full ham yet?
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2021
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
Wonder if he'll become an on-the-go poster like the tiktok spergs (Daniel Larson and Worldoftshirts)
Homeless arc would bring endless content.
Homeless arc would bring endless content.
Bearmumrik
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2023
I think he's honestly just afraid of the potential backlash and hate he'll get at first from people angry at him due to the incest. He still believes in the merge, still into vidya, and is liking pony and sonic shit on twitter, as well as liking posts of people welcoming him back with fanart. It's only a matter of time, he hasn't changed a bit.
We haven’t considered possibility he might actually be Jesus
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
I read that he has a rather bestial* view of sex, where "love" and sex itself are synonymous to him. Also according to those "exceptional" requirements on that "Attraction Sign", he wanted "Lovely Weather" to be "an expert in sex" -- "experienced", that is. And of course the freak also claimed in jail that adultery is "okay, well, and good".
*(he's also turned on by Sonic style anthropomorphic hedgehogs and pretended he's "married" to Mewtwo in a "polyamorous marriage")
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Why didn't you just heal her?
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
The IP2 bus is fucking gay but an arc where Chris pepper sprays Andy Dick would be the best thing to happen to Christory since the house fire.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
They're public by default but crimes involving children and sex crimes are generally not fully public. The records aren't available on the online site available to the public. It's possible if someone physically went to the clerk's office that at least something more would be available, as is sometimes the case in divorces.
This is generally a crime involving a parent and a minor child, so they probably applied the default rule for such cases, even though technically it doesn't qualify.
FOIA type laws generally don't apply to courts but to executive agencies. Courts have their own laws and regulations about what gets released and the limited exceptions to the general rule of public availability.
- Status