Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 73 10.8%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.1%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.0%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 70 10.4%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    673
Clipped the full segment where he bitches about @Null, it's about what you would expect. He goes on about how Drexel is misunderstood and how Josh is being manipulated by some group of people and again claims people in this thread break the rules without saying who even though they should be reported if they actually are breaking the rules. He also keeps bringing up how "funny" all of this is and claims Josh is afraid of his own site for some reason


View attachment 5305586
Sad, pathetic, entitled alcoholic.
Wasted and raging, body language uptight, trying to portray the platonic ideal of reasonable, and deluded enough to think no one sees through him.
I liked Nick, at first, but what a fucking fall from grace for the "lawpope".
I wonder if he shakes when he wakes up yet?
If he has to watch the clock, trying to rationalize his drinking starting earlier and earlier each day?
I've seen alkies like him, he'll tell you it's under control, while it's blatantly not, he's turned pooner pink, fgs, in under a year.
He's not fooling anyone.
He needs to stop thinking he has the intellectual wherewithal to manipulate anybody, and learn that he's not the smartest person in the room.
I wonder if his bullshit works on Kayla, and how long it'll take before his incipient, barely concealed rage becomes physical. He's obviously very used to getting what he wants, without dissent.
 
he will most likely say that Null missrepresented him and in a very condecendent way say that Null is tied to the farms and its negative views on Juju, drexel, vito, etc. Somehow making it look like he is right and Null is just "keeping us happy"
We are reaching and exceeding Ron Soye levels of passive-aggressive cuckoldry.
He's genuinely leaning into Null, a fairly sober man, having autism as a condition.

Oh, and now he's "highly manipulatable and... has an inability to rationally discern."
"He sees through my drunken gay bullshit! He must be autistic!"
 
Why doesn't Nick just invite Null onto a stream to talk this out? He's always doing pussy shit like messaging Josh off hours and then changing the narrative the next day about what he said. It's such an abusive thing to do to someone. Have it out on a stream where everyone can hear everything that is said and there's no misconception. Then again NPD personalities like Nick need plausible deniability so I guess that answers my question. I just feel like he would be doing himself a favor by just inviting Josh on and talking this out in a public way where there can be no confusion by any fanbase as to what is going on.
 
EDIT: apparently Null is terrified of us... oh no. Now after this victorious speech, Rekieta will go back to suck off Vito the pedo.
Yet for the past few months, people have been trying unsuccessfully to get him to talk about Nick more and he's basically told them to go fuck themselves. Who managed to get him to talk about Nick this time? Oh yeah, that dumb dickhole himself.
He's not exactly being subtle about it. That's why he's calling you an autist. He couldn't tell you what he wants any more directly without spelling it all out for you syllable by syllable.
But yet he still wants to sleaze out of what he did by being able to deny he ever said it.
 
Clipped the full segment where he bitches about @Null, it's about what you would expect. He goes on about how Drexel is misunderstood and how Josh is being manipulated by some group of people and again claims people in this thread break the rules without saying who even though they should be reported if they actually are breaking the rules. He also keeps bringing up how "funny" all of this is and claims Josh is afraid of his own site for some reason


View attachment 5305586

"You should know what I want Josh, I shouldn't have to tell you! Do you know how many signals I've dropped?!"
"No I'm not mad, go do your little internet show or whatever... I said I'm fine!"
"Was having a shower and thought of you..."

What are you his Ex-girlfriend? Or has he hung around the locals leather-squad for so long he's forgotten how to communicate like a man?
 
Nick probably means 'all the facts' but the misspeak on the words he used was funny.
He's pretty much mastered all the cow logical fallacies and pathetic copes at this point. Nothing he said here isn't a sad cope other than the stuff that is pure incoherent seething.
 
Nick’s coverage of rittenhouse was great but it seems the fame has gotten to his head. The need for “content” pushes these streamers to create a stream-of-consciousness programming schedule where they force themselves to have daily talking points to keep the dollars flowing, instead of sticking with what put them on the map in the first place. You know, legal analysis, as opposed to drunken discussions of dicking down your ex-girlfriend’s daughter or shoving whiskey bottles up your ass.
 
I wonder if Rackets tried some of this mean girl shit on Legal Bytes? Would explain the rift a bit more than just multistream butthurt.
Wouldn't put it past him that he got weird and sexual like he does with his wine moms. No evidence of course but he also got Megan Fox to show more tiddy on stream. It's plausible.
 
Yet for the past few months, people have been trying unsuccessfully to get him to talk about Nick more and he's basically told them to go fuck themselves. Who managed to get him to talk about Nick this time? Oh yeah, that dumb dickhole himself.
I'm glad Null actually addressed Rekieta's comments, Nick is quickly to forget that despite the farms screaming about it Null didn't talk about it a single bit, there's even a term for it "noseguarding", is not even an excuse for him, there was a little bit of guntguarding, and even Null a couple of MATIs ago said he avoided talking about Masterson for the longest time.

Nick seems to believe his thread is the only thread on the farms, theres houndreds if not thousands of happenings and people posting stuff that could eventually end up on a MATI show, and Null ignores most of them (because of being irrelevant, not funny enough, not corroborated, etc).

The whole "Nick is afraid of the power of the farms and what they could do to him" is such a fucking bitch response, specially when Null can do whatever he wants here and has showed it, and if he was really scared of the people using the site he had multiple opportunities to leave the site to die, the biggest one being probably the whole Christchurch stuff, and more recently the multiple coordinated attacks by trannies, making the site work mostly on tor (and every non-tor link being pretty much a time bomb), yet Null out of principle has worked to keep the site alive, just to not let those faggots win.
 
Look at that smuggy faggy smille.
Nick is happy the farms are struggling to say up ,he sees it as divine retribution for his thread turning hostile.
It seems like every stream now has multiple expressions that would make smug soyjacks, feral soyjacks, and every other kind. He has become a soy-filled twitching bitch.
 
It seems like every stream now has multiple expressions that would make smug soyjacks, feral soyjacks, and every other kind. He has become a soy-filled twitching bitch.
err.jpg
 
Nick’s coverage of rittenhouse was great but it seems the fame has gotten to his head. The need for “content” pushes these streamers to create a stream-of-consciousness programming schedule where they force themselves to have daily talking points to keep the dollars flowing, instead of sticking with what put them on the map in the first place. You know, legal analysis, as opposed to drunken discussions of dicking down your ex-girlfriend’s daughter or shoving whiskey bottles up your ass.
He’s not “pushed to it,” he’s lazy.

Other everyday spam streamers at least try to expand on incremental details of some subject.

Nick’s huge disappointment is that continuing to talk about legal subjects would require thinking about them and exposing himself when he doesn’t bother to, so he wanted to change his format to “lifestyle, degenerate edition” and the majority of his audience didn’t like it.

He doesn’t understand his own brand from a value proposition. The value comes from having an insight into a case that a lay person wouldn’t have thought of themselves, not from being “wacky” and “being me” which all just sounds like a midlife crisis.

Fuck it, my new go-to Minnesota based legal analysis is Bruce Rivers: criminal lawyer
 
Last edited:
He's pretty much mastered all the cow logical fallacies and pathetic copes at this point. Nothing he said here isn't a sad cope other than the stuff that is pure incoherent seething.
Idk, calling someone in the middle of the night from the shower (that you’re totally not mad at) is a new move for me. The Lolcows are evolving their tactics.
 
oh I didn't even see this

Nick's messages to me are incredibly dismissive and belittling. He repeatedly called me autistic for not understanding what the fuck he wants from me in these bizarre conversations. When he messaged me immediately after my stream this time I just told him flat out that our conversations are not productive and I don't like his fucking attitude so there was nothing to be discussed.

He's definitely trying to get me to cross some bridge but refuses to say what it is. Chances are it's not something I can think of on my own because it would literally even occur to me to do it without someone explicitly suggesting it.
Is he trying to get you to say "fuck you were not 'friends' anymore?" I feel like that's the point he's trying to get to, but he wants to stick to his principle of "I don't disavow people, they disavow me." Of all the things he could still stick to, that's hilarious.

He's dumping gasoline on the bridge and throwing you the lighter. He can't do it himself because even his hardcore fans would look at that and call him a hypocrite.
 
Is he trying to get you to say "fuck you were not 'friends' anymore?" I feel like that's the point he's trying to get to, but he wants to stick to his principle of "I don't disavow people, they disavow me." Of all the things he could still stick to, that's hilarious.
Yeah, it feels like it. I don't serve a purpose to him anymore but he wants to basically demean me in public and private while saying "BUT I LOVE NULL AND KIWI FARMS" so that if I say anything back it's my fault.
 
Last edited:
Back