Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.8%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 94 14.1%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 208 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.2%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 68 10.2%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    668
So about 8 hour-ish ago:
addressnull01.JPGaddressnull01a.JPG
addressnull02.JPG
Obviously, he's live chatting to his cult members of about 5 or 6 people so it's hard to tell what he says in there..and I don't really see how addressing it to those he already brainwashed fixes things? Far as I know they already believe he isn't a groomer.
 
please tell me he didn't say that. he can't be that fucking stupid
He didn't use the phrase "statute of limitations" but in my opinion pretty much implied the same meaning. He said something along the lines of "it was a long time ago", like multiple times. So it wasn't just a one off thing. So he's either covering for his friend because he knows it's fucked up, or he's just okay with it. Either way he's scum and anyone on his side is equally retarded.
 
More evidence the original tweet blaming "both left and right" is vito guarding
vitoguarding.JPG
He's falling into the retard trap of taking a "side" in the fight. Associating with has-beens and pedophiles is not going to totally own Josh and the Farms. He's morphing into the Ralphamale, who will side with literally anyone to own the ayylogs, including known pedophiles and his own enemies. I'm not sure what he's trying to accomplish, it's only going to create more hilarious drama for us, including Josh shitting on him repeatedly to everyone's amusement. I don't believe he's capable of thinking rationally anymore, drug and alcohol abuse has destroyed his brain.
 
Even if Nick hadn't gone degen coomer he is far from the only one in town and his lack of political knowledge is so apparent. He'll be 100% dependent on guests and if they have any brains they just stream themselves. Nick doesn't add anything to the table and even less as time goes on.

A reminder that Nick's 2022 midterm election night stream featured a disinterested trio of Nick, Lady Rackets and Branca, with Kayla and Branca flirting with each other.

The fourth straight man was Producer Tim from Drex's podcast, calling out results to a panel who couldn't care less.
 

What can he possibly teach?

How to Succeed at YouTube: The Rekieta Method

1-earn the most basic of degrees in a profession few understand
2-wait for a massive controversy to happen in a niche subsection of a fandom
3-appeal to the under served side of the controversy
4-get propped up by Kiwifarms
5-success

That’s it. He was just the only lawyer willing to take Vic’s side and talk to the farms during weeb wars. That’s the only reason he succeeded, the only reason he even had an audience for the Rittenhouse and Depp trials, and the only reason he got super chats. Nothing he could ever teach is replicable.
 
Rekeita's voice is getting fucked because he smokes cigars to act like a big man.
Sort of doubt it, you have to smoke a bunch over longer periods of time. Cigarettes sure, people put away a pack or two a day easy but cigars are harder since they're more of an investment, time wise mostly, I'm assuming he can afford it. Also you don't inhale cigar smoke unless you want to shit your entire ass.
 
So you know, if you meet someone, and she's say twenty years old, right? 20, let's say 22, 23. The person's whoever you meet them as at that point, right? You don't know their background. But when you know someone for, heh, since they were thirteen, the dynamic is different, because how you view them is different."
The way he slowly crawls her age up from 20 to 23 is interesting

Makes me think that 20 is much closer to the truth but he realize that sounded bad after saying it.

And I wouldn't be surprised if 20 is an exaggeration. Maybe she was almost 20 so he just conveniently rounded up
 
Minor PL and slight rage rant, when I found out I was having a daughter a long time ago, one thing terrified me more than anything else. It was shit like this, people like Drex and right next to him people like Nick.

The amount of people who can watch their friend do obviously horrible things. Morally wrong things. It's the number one fear you get as a dad. The only people worse than the disgusting degenerates who think this sort of thing is okay because, "Well muh rule of law, 18 is magic number", are the cowards who are around them who don't have the fucking spine to say anything to them.

The scariest option is the one that Nick isn't a massive coward. But an active collaborator getting his kicks hearing stories of things he only wishes he could do. I've gone from being disappointed in Nick's decisions to despising what he allows near his family, forgoing his only job on this planet which should be to make sure no harm ever comes to them under his watch. Truly shameful.
I'm going to Power-Level and say that I was friends with a guy who pulled something similar to what Drexel / Ethan Ralph did - Groomed a girl to run away with him the moment she turned 18. Friendship ended pretty fucking quickly. as an aside, He ended up getting arrested and went to prison for doing shit when she was 15, and to another girl when she was 12.

I 100% wouldn't be surprised if Drexel was a pedophile, especially with him talking about how 18 year old girls are "Blown out".
 
What I don't get is why he's making such a bitch fit over this whole situation. "Oh no, a few dozen internet fags are making fun of me and my friend on an obscure internet forum." If he really loves his life as much as he brags, why does he need to cry about the mean people on the internet "lying" about him?
 
I can't believe he's full on defending Vito already.
I can. I've said in this thread for a long time now he's gonna do whatever Masterson tells him to do. That includes defending Vito and taking an anti-July position. The two of which are pretty close to synonymous now that July has discovered Vito's pro-pedo stance and commented on it derisively. That's what Nick is responding to.

The sad thing is this means there might not be any reconcilation between him and Null. Recall that Null had to say his goodbyes to Masterson over Digibro. I can't imagine him being thrilled with the fact that Nick is gonna carry water for Vito.

I say "sad" only because I'm sure it sucks from Null's POV to lose what he thought was another off-site ally, but sometimes reality is a bitch and people aren't who or what you thought they were.

Hard to imagine that this isn't being coordinated behind the scenes at this point.
It is, by Masterson.
 
Last edited:
this whole incident, with rekieta calling null at midnight and asking null, in an indirect and roundabout way, to sweep up this thread, reminds me about the coach red pill asking null to get rid of his thread because it would look bad for his future "business" prospects. null said no and crp hated null ever since.

the fact that the conartist and pow in the ukraine crp has more integrity by directly asking null to do sweep up than the "christian" family man lawyer rekieta, speaks volumes.
 
It is now 5AM in Minnesota and he's on twitter defending the pedo.
View attachment 5307642
Vito:
-hangs out with other pedos like Mr Girl
-has defended Cuties basically nonstop for years now
-repeatedly refers to himself as a pedophile and defends pedophilia
At what point does it stop being "just a joke" and become part of a troubling pattern? For me it's point one, because he just orbits so goddamn many of them.
 
I just got around to listening that 22-minute-long clip, his speech was so slow it's either deliberate or exacerbated by his alcoholism. Typing as I'm listening.

He starts by stating we're believed to be a range of things which he thinks were not entirely true. He talks about the forum being perceived as some evil harassing platform and a slew of tranny lies. It might not be obvious but he's trying to set a condition here. The condition is "I'm with you guys!" This is highly manipulative. I might be wrong.

This is similar to a manager and boss situation. The boss wants you to argue you value, you suggest a 20% increase in salary and the boss shuts it down with 5%, your manager then explains to the boss how good you've been and that you deserve more. Your boss nods his head and turns back to you, you now want 15%. Your boss insists on 10% but your manager then intervenes and suggests 12%. You think your manager was still on your side, the boss agrees. Everyone is happy.

Really? You've accepted a 12% increase in salary for double the work. Congratulations, you just got played and fucked lubeless by two higher ups.

Nick Rekieta spends some time crying about being doxed and then screwed with, ignoring that fact that @Sprate Header was able to reveal the person behind all the swatting calls.

Nick Rekieta accuses some of us of "having a deficiency in analysing people", especially regarding Drexel.
Full disclosure, I think Drexel is gross and a degenerate, he's a creep, his retarded ideology creates the women he's constantly crying about but I don't find him funny beyond cheap Blacked.com jokes about Our Wife. And no, it has nothing to do with him being a nigger.

He tries to emphasise on stories being in the past, not present, as if that matters. Notice how he fails to bring up examples?

At 8:44, he reveals his intentions. He just wanted Josh to know that what many of us have been saying about Drexel was false. Why? Accuracy matters? It's so obvious -- he wants some form of corrections to be made. When Josh identifies Nick Rekieta's intentions, he simply went with "itz nawt trooo".

At 9:30, we get the most delusion statement yet. To paraphrase "when an associate of Josh is accused of something, he feels the need to address it because he wants to appear neutral, which makes him easily manipulated." This is so dumb. The thread was moved out of Multimedia by one of the moderators (@5t3n0g0ph3r), not Josh himself. When Nick Rekieta's lolcow status was officiated as we've simply had enough, cowtipping faggots like @Twitter Is Cancer started to cry about Josh not disavowing the lolyer. He was then banned and proceeded to cry on other avenues.

For the longest time, Josh ignored all the drama surrounding the Rekieta family. If Ethan Ralph's shart or a ResetEra janny caught playing Hogwarts Legacy was worth featuring, The post by @Balldo's Gate showing Nick Rekieta and his wife following Hedonism II award-winning bulls certainly deserved something.

This is just incredibly stupid. The fact is, most people (admins included) only follow particular types of lolcows. We simply cannot know what's going on with all the idiots online. I've messed up and passed wrong information, it has happened to Josh and I'm sure it's happened to everyone at some point.

The rest just sounds like gibberish not worth talking about.
1. I have no motives man, you're crazy!
Sure, texting someone at midnight, no motives whatsoever. Who was supposed to be autistic again?
2. Talk about with regularity.
Like that's anyone's fault but Nick Rekieta's own. Was the bottle shown on MATI? Yet another falsehood. Stop lying.
3. I've never asked him to mop for me.
Who cares?
4. Forum members breaking rules.
Show proof or fuck yourself.
5. Impression I got was he thought I wanted him to remove something...
Nick Rekieta texts someone at midnight and wonders why the receiving end thinks there's motives.
6. He does not remove stuff unless there's a court order.
Another lie.
7. Don't you text in the shower?
????????????????????????????????????
Are you 12?

At 16:04, Nick Rekieta claims Josh is terrified of his own audience which must be a lolcow trait at this point. I swear I've heard Ethan and other lolcows claiming similar things.

Nick Rekieta decides to end this all with some dumb death penalty thing regarding paedophiles. He claims that Josh is okay with some innocent people being murdered by the state if it means the guilty ones are punished. I'm not sure how true this is. I personally think nonces should be locked up forever and their victims should receive state-paid counseling until they turn 18 and put in some database because most nonces were also victims.

So my feelings were right. Here's the entire setting.
1. I'm with you guys! Kiwifarms is targeted and wrongfully accused of things!
2. You've been told lies about my friend Drexel, I don't want a correction or anything no, I'm just texting at midnight from my shower.
3. You and I have a relationship, that's why you feel the need to bash me to appear neutral.
4. You are afraid of the mob you created (and you shouldn't be).
5. People want you to talk about me and if you don't they get mad, it's not your fault. (It's the users around you.)
6. People break the rules, I won't tell you who because I don't wish any trouble but yeah trust me bro.
7. You think some innocent people caught up and punished by the law is okay if the overwhelming number of nonces are shot, I don't. We have a fundamental difference, that's why you act the way you act.

The opening was stating a position and the closing statement was "I'm innocent, you want me dead anyway because most people discussed on the forum aren't. Just like your stance of state-nonce-murder."

Nice try Balldo. C- for effort. Now put "The Art of Sedition" away. It's just a stupid book.

Christ it was like listening to some Karen.
 
Back