Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[PHILLIP BANKS]

https://youtu.be/hUj5K7ComC0?si=ehLqWHIfiyVwj5SS

 

[TV's Adam West]

The court is pissed about his recording with Google's attorney.

I'm fairly certain this retard lives in what a legal minded person would call a two party consent state. Put simply, it's a law that protects people from confessions made under the assumption you aren't being recorded. Basically I can tell you in a phone call I murdered a woman, but because I didn't know I was being recorded, it's inadmissible in court.

This also is a breach of attorney and client privilege if I believe.

This retard made an enemy out of himself by disrespecting his attorney, the legal system and the courts, all for our amusement.

 

[pikachudidnothingwrong]

It would have been better, and funnier, if it was against a more sympathetic target but still a good day. lol

This guy is hilarious and depressing either way.

 

[Seafarer]

Of course it took this faggot fucking with a mega corporation like Google for him to be declared a vexatious litigant lol

 

[AnOminous]

Acerthorn asked Judge to change her mind. Best part:

I'm sure the judge will appreciate being childed by capitalization and putting his erroneous argument in a huge font with hyphens between every letter. Whatever the difference between criticism and harassment may be (and Mr. Stabby has been criticized and not harassed), "unclean hands" is completely irrelevant.

It's a defense to claims for equitable relief by the other party, and Google has brought no such claims. They're just trying to get rid of a turkey-gobbling retard filing vexatious shit against them.

I've never been so pleased to see a gigantic evil megacorporation curb-stomping an impoverished pro se litigant.

You have to provide contact details when making a takedown request, I'm guessing they just filter for his name/email and flag it for manual review.

At least when I did these, while you could do them on paper, if you wanted to do them in an efficient way, you got a content owner account, and provided details one time. Then when you logged in to that account, you could manually flag things on sight, either from search results or just any video you could see.

You could easily flag hundreds of videos within a few minutes.

Incidentally, at least at the time, it wasn't a literal DMCA request, it was their own self-devised flagging method, and I do not remember a warning about the penalties of perjury (generally required for an actual DMCA takedown). YouTube, so far as I know, provides considerably less protection for their users than the DMCA does.

There's also a ContentID algorithm where you can submit specific content you claim copyright on and it automatically does it, either flagging it, demonetizing it, or monetizing it but on behalf of the IP owner. I never did that so I don't know the mechanics of it.

I'm not sure if there's a lesser form of notification that non-commercial flaggots can use.

 

[Smithfield Ham]

It's about fucking time. Jesus, the legal system moves slower than your mom's bowels after taco tuesday.

 

[Goofy Logic]

He's just going to do his vexatious bullshit in another district.

He could, but this will have a knock-down effect that puts him in a seriously bad legal position. Any defending lawyer just has to bring up the VL declaration in this case, and they have a pretty decent argument that their case is also vexatious.

 

[EmpGulcasa]

Can't wait to see how he squirms out of this one thanks to some other court/official treating him with kid gloves again, like they always do.

 

[LikeAStone 2.0]

Fatty can’t stab his way out of this one.

Sneed.

 

[Dogechu_Prime]

He is so absolutely fucking pissed right now that the hotdogs are scared what might happen to them.

Get fucked Acercuck

 

[Instant_Pot_User]

You mean to tell me that screeching like a retard and sending
U-N-C-L-E-A-N H-A-N-D-S!
to a judge didn't work?

 

[Comandante Marcos]

El Comandante has not followed this autist for what must be a year by now. But I still remember him, and when I saw that he had been declared a vexatious litigant my first reaction was WHAT THE FLYING FUCK TOOK THE COURT SO FUCKING LONG???????? Then I saw that he pissed off Alphabet (contains Google, Youtube, and a few others) which is pretty close to the giant omnicorp depicted in cartoons like WALL-E and the old "Dinosaurs" cartoon that ran on TV like 30 years ago. Alphabet is in many ways literally THE internet, they run a lot of backbone services in addition to search and stupid cat vidyas and whatnot (although Amazon/US military provides server space). Alphabet lawyers coming to a dinky little Deep Southern town will be given the WE'RE NOT WORTHY! treatment a la Wayne's World. Acerthorn getting literally b& from the internet by the backbone operator would be the hilarious to the extreme coda to this shitshow, especially since he tried to kill his own father over his MMORPG games being too slow.

 

[Meat Target]

Hopefully the SidAlpha lolsuit will follow.

I imagine Acerthorn looks and acts like the vandal peep from Rollercoaster Tycoon all the time, but especially right now.

 

[Glowie]

Stebbins v. Google is DISMISSED
Stebbins declared a vexatious litigant
Entry #71 (Attached)



His future copyright claims will be pre-screened by a Judge.

What kind of idiot sues a mega corporation representing himself pro-se and appeal to poverty.

 

[Mind Goblins]

I'm fairly certain this retard lives in what a legal minded person would call a two party consent state. Put simply, it's a law that protects people from confessions made under the assumption you aren't being recorded. Basically I can tell you in a phone call I murdered a woman, but because I didn't know I was being recorded, it's inadmissible in court.

This also is a breach of attorney and client privilege if I believe.

This retard made an enemy out of himself by disrespecting his attorney, the legal system and the courts, all for our amusement.

Fatty actually lives in Arkansas, which is a one party consent state, and to his dubious credit he does make that argument in his response to the court's order. It won't do him any good though, since the court never said the recording was illegal, just highly improper.

I also highly doubt there is any breach of attorney-client privilege here, though I'm willing to be corrected by Useful_Mistake or An0minous on this. Pretending for a moment that Acerthorn could pass as competent council for David Anthony Stebbins, this is a conversation between the legal representation for both parties. Any privileged information either of them brings up to the other is already a breach of attorney-client privilege and you can't really put that genie back in the bottle once it's out. If lawyer A tells opposing council B, "look, my guy will go on the stand but you'll never get out of him that the bodies are buried under the woodshed" council B is absolutely allowed to use the information they got however they want and it's on attorney A's head for letting it get out there.

Again, not an illegal move, but one that would get any practicing attorney in a lot of trouble and likely added fuel to Google's argument for vex-lit status.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Well we all knew Google would slap Stabbins shit in, his case was terrible even before he started all the stupid unclean hands shit.

Sadly this will only slow down his lawlfare against his "haters" as he's got nothing else to do with his life and he keeps the dream alive of that one big case that will set him onto easy street.

While labeling anyone a vexatious litigant isn't something to be done lightly, taking away someones legal rights should never be done lightly, this stupid fuck deserves to be locked out of the justice system unless ALL his cases are per-screened by a judge simply to save his victims the cost of defending themselves.

Stabbins gets to abuse the free filing, like so many of Null's admirers do, to freely abuse and victimize anyone who criticizes him. And there is no legal recourse for his victims as Stabbins owns nothing, lives in a pit of hell and only get welfare payments so counter suing for fee's is pointless.

Quickie Edit: For those saying to fight the DCMA strikes that requires you to give Stabbins your personal information and you ask Sid Alpha how well that goes. Sure you might get the strike removed but then your fighting stupid frivolous lawlsuits the rest of your life from this sack of shit.

Hopefully Google takes steps to ensure that Stabbins can't keep DMCA striking accounts that he dislikes.

 

[Lake Cresva Diver]

this turkey brain logic lmao

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Come on now, Your Honor, who would really sit down and listen to 45 minutes of two lawyers a laywer and a turkey goblin talking on the phone? Surely nobody here would be so uncultured...

Please tell me this was archived. I want to hear this so badly.

 

[Meat Target]

And there is no legal recourse for his victims as Stabbins owns nothing, lives in a pit of hell and only get welfare payments so counter suing for fee's is pointless.

They can't garnish his tard tugboats?

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 5308242
this turkey brain logic lmao

"Muh Latin" means I can break the law according to this turkey gobbling dementia patient.